Called it.

comment by Benched (U7195)

posted 1 day, 23 hours ago

I think we'll see a 3-5-2 with wingbacks

---------------------------DDG--------------------------------
--------Bailly--------Smalling---------Lindelof-----------
Young--------Fred------McT---------Pereira---------Shaw
-----------------Lukaku-------------Rashford---------------

Harsh on Dalot

Apparently Bailly may line up in midfield

5 defenders when you need goals. Smeagol has lost the plot.

As expected. We’ll probably lose tonight but if the squad players can learn something from the night and become better players it’s not a complete fail. Hopefully though we can shock the world. If we did not only would Ole get the job, he’d also be given the keys to Manchester

Would prefer Dalot to Young with 3 at the back tbh.

Didn't have many options unless we throw the kids to the lions.

comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 16 seconds ago
Apparently Bailly may line up in midfield
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would rather Lindelof if that's where he is going with it.

Good luck






Said no one ever
Hope you get humiliated

When Arsenal needed to win by two at Anfield in 1989 George Graham played a back five...

Would have preferred Dalot at RWB buy I guess he wants Young's experience in there.

Damage limitation tonight, move on to the FA Cup and getting top 4.

comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 46 seconds ago
5 defenders when you need goals. Smeagol has lost the plot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Moron alert. We've got about 10 players missing. We've got very little chance anyway. 5 of the front 6 missing.

comment by Paulpowerburnleyfan (U1037)
posted 1 second ago
Good luck






Said no one ever
Hope you get humiliated
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Will you quit with the name changes? Ever since you started down that we started missing chances and drawing games.

comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 42 seconds ago
5 defenders when you need goals. Smeagol has lost the plot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You seem to be lost. Liverpool fans page is here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zToZeBpL590

comment by Diafol Coch 77 (U2462)
posted 28 seconds ago
When Arsenal needed to win by two at Anfield in 1989 George Graham played a back five...
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Is it 3 at the back? Or is Bailly playing RB?

There's a few ways that team could be lined up.

If it is 3-5-2, I'd have liked to have seen Dalot over Young.

comment by Eric_the_king (SE85) (U21241)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 46 seconds ago
5 defenders when you need goals. Smeagol has lost the plot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Moron alert. We've got about 10 players missing. We've got very little chance anyway. 5 of the front 6 missing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Smeagol shouldn't have sold Fellaini then should he?

comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 minutes ago
5 defenders when you need goals. Smeagol has lost the plot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Go on then, give us your line up.

comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Paulpowerburnleyfan (U1037)
posted 1 second ago
Good luck






Said no one ever
Hope you get humiliated
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Will you quit with the name changes? Ever since you started down that we started missing chances and drawing games.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you can feck off 🤬

Great bench. Hopefully see some of them on the pitch making an impact

comment by BerbaKing11 (U6256)
posted 20 seconds ago
Is it 3 at the back? Or is Bailly playing RB?

There's a few ways that team could be lined up.

If it is 3-5-2, I'd have liked to have seen Dalot over Young.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe even a 4-2-3-1 with Pereira at #10, Young on right, Rash on left and Bailly at RB.
McT holding and Fred as B2B beside him.

comment by Paulpowerburnleyfan (U1037)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Paulpowerburnleyfan (U1037)
posted 1 second ago
Good luck






Said no one ever
Hope you get humiliated
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Will you quit with the name changes? Ever since you started down that we started missing chances and drawing games.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you can feck off 🤬
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fine.

comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 3 minutes ago
Damage limitation tonight, move on to the FA Cup and getting top 4.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yup, I can’t see us getting anything, but never underestimate psg’s Ability to self destruct.

comment by Benched (U7195)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by BerbaKing11 (U6256)
posted 20 seconds ago
Is it 3 at the back? Or is Bailly playing RB?

There's a few ways that team could be lined up.

If it is 3-5-2, I'd have liked to have seen Dalot over Young.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe even a 4-2-3-1 with Pereira at #10, Young on right, Rash on left and Bailly at RB.
McT holding and Fred as B2B beside him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually I like this. Seems more potent than Lukaku and Rash up top by themselves

comment by baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 3 minutes ago
Damage limitation tonight, move on to the FA Cup and getting top 4.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yup, I can’t see us getting anything, but never underestimate psg’s Ability to self destruct.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, not at home.