I hope you are as chatty on this thread as you were on the previous
UTRams đ đ đ
Swansea are a footballing team so we shouldn't have any problems with them, not to mention they have nothing to play for. I just hope we are up to it and we don't need any iffy penalties or sendings off.
It's a shame Bamford will probably be suspended for the first leg at PP or Smogsville. I was thinking he was getting his game together and then he goes and does that. What a pillock.
comment by ViewFromTheStudent (U1581)
posted 16 minutes ago
I hope you are as chatty on this thread as you were on the previous
UTRams đ đ đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No time for chit chat. This is all about steely eyed professionalism and footy stuff
Live @ https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewLiveArticle/407098
One match ban enabled
I thought you said foodie stuff for a moment............... I need my tea.
So, no Scottish contingent for us, but they have 21 goal McBurnie, who has scored an average of one Champ goal every 2 games this season. He's scored 4 in the last 3, so is due a break. Hopefully Keogh & Evans can keep him under control.
Try and use some of your influence on things N of the border, please Heb
Our playing record away from home on matches on 1st May is poor to say the least, won 0, drawn 0, lost 14, goals scored 4 goals against 36. The last one being a 1-2 defeat at Charlton in 1993. Doesn’t bode well!
I think I know what Spart's comment to that stat would be, Baz
Law of big numbers Baz. More we play more chance we have of winning. We beat them quite comfortably at PP. The 2 1 flattered them. Have a feeling we will go in to Sunday's game only needing not to lose big the qualify for the play offs.
comment by I'm not Spartacus, to be quite Frank
......... Have a feeling we will go in to Sunday's game only needing not to lose big the qualify for the play offs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That must rank as one of the most over-complicated sentences ever Spart. How about:
"Not lose by more than 'x' goals"?
It also should say "big to qualify"
How did Swansea manage to lose 4-0 away at QPR ?
comment by I'm not Spartacus, to be quite Frank (U4603)
posted 6 minutes ago
X is unknown.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah! Now that is exactly the point at which I opted out of Mrs Whitehead's class. I could do numbers but the moment they started introducing the alphabet I was lost.
X is also a binary operator
comment by HebridesRam (U2909)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by I'm not Spartacus, to be quite Frank (U4603)
posted 6 minutes ago
X is unknown.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah! Now that is exactly the point at which I opted out of Mrs Whitehead's class. I could do numbers but the moment they started introducing the alphabet I was lost.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You'd be useless on Countdown then.
Millwall's not a place I'd fancy going to get a result.
comment by ViewFromTheStudent (U1581)
posted 4 minutes ago
X is also a binary operator
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In my defence, this site would not allow me to display 'x' correctly (i.e. in italics). You could have at least used the correct lower case View (you were teaching Maths today I assume)?
comment by Scouse (U9675)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by ViewFromTheStudent (U1581)
posted 4 minutes ago
X is also a binary operator
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In my defence, this site would not allow me to display 'x' correctly (i.e. in italics). You could have at least used the correct lower case View (you were teaching Maths today I assume)?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not an 'ex' in this context, it's an operator and size doesn't matter (you'll be pleased to know)
I don't need reminding of my 'ex' in any way, shape of form, thank you.
In other news, Bamford has been charged with "successful deception of a match official" and faces a two match ban if upheld.
Bad shape and worse form plus zero ex( insert as required>
Scouse what is the value of a/b if a/b = (a + b)/a. It does have a numerical answer.
Sign in if you want to comment
Swansea City 1 - 1 Derby County
Page 1 of 33
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 30/4/19
I hope you are as chatty on this thread as you were on the previous
UTRams đ đ đ
posted on 30/4/19
Swansea are a footballing team so we shouldn't have any problems with them, not to mention they have nothing to play for. I just hope we are up to it and we don't need any iffy penalties or sendings off.
It's a shame Bamford will probably be suspended for the first leg at PP or Smogsville. I was thinking he was getting his game together and then he goes and does that. What a pillock.
posted on 30/4/19
comment by ViewFromTheStudent (U1581)
posted 16 minutes ago
I hope you are as chatty on this thread as you were on the previous
UTRams đ đ đ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No time for chit chat. This is all about steely eyed professionalism and footy stuff
posted on 30/4/19
Live @ https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewLiveArticle/407098
One match ban enabled
posted on 30/4/19
5
posted on 30/4/19
I thought you said foodie stuff for a moment............... I need my tea.
posted on 30/4/19
So, no Scottish contingent for us, but they have 21 goal McBurnie, who has scored an average of one Champ goal every 2 games this season. He's scored 4 in the last 3, so is due a break. Hopefully Keogh & Evans can keep him under control.
Try and use some of your influence on things N of the border, please Heb
posted on 30/4/19
Our playing record away from home on matches on 1st May is poor to say the least, won 0, drawn 0, lost 14, goals scored 4 goals against 36. The last one being a 1-2 defeat at Charlton in 1993. Doesn’t bode well!
posted on 30/4/19
I think I know what Spart's comment to that stat would be, Baz
posted on 30/4/19
Law of big numbers Baz. More we play more chance we have of winning. We beat them quite comfortably at PP. The 2 1 flattered them. Have a feeling we will go in to Sunday's game only needing not to lose big the qualify for the play offs.
posted on 30/4/19
comment by I'm not Spartacus, to be quite Frank
......... Have a feeling we will go in to Sunday's game only needing not to lose big the qualify for the play offs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That must rank as one of the most over-complicated sentences ever Spart. How about:
"Not lose by more than 'x' goals"?
posted on 30/4/19
X is unknown.
posted on 30/4/19
It also should say "big to qualify"
posted on 30/4/19
How did Swansea manage to lose 4-0 away at QPR ?
posted on 30/4/19
comment by I'm not Spartacus, to be quite Frank (U4603)
posted 6 minutes ago
X is unknown.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah! Now that is exactly the point at which I opted out of Mrs Whitehead's class. I could do numbers but the moment they started introducing the alphabet I was lost.
posted on 30/4/19
X is also a binary operator
posted on 30/4/19
comment by HebridesRam (U2909)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by I'm not Spartacus, to be quite Frank (U4603)
posted 6 minutes ago
X is unknown.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah! Now that is exactly the point at which I opted out of Mrs Whitehead's class. I could do numbers but the moment they started introducing the alphabet I was lost.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You'd be useless on Countdown then.
posted on 30/4/19
Bristol losing
posted on 30/4/19
Millwall's not a place I'd fancy going to get a result.
posted on 30/4/19
comment by ViewFromTheStudent (U1581)
posted 4 minutes ago
X is also a binary operator
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In my defence, this site would not allow me to display 'x' correctly (i.e. in italics). You could have at least used the correct lower case View (you were teaching Maths today I assume)?
posted on 30/4/19
comment by Scouse (U9675)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by ViewFromTheStudent (U1581)
posted 4 minutes ago
X is also a binary operator
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In my defence, this site would not allow me to display 'x' correctly (i.e. in italics). You could have at least used the correct lower case View (you were teaching Maths today I assume)?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not an 'ex' in this context, it's an operator and size doesn't matter (you'll be pleased to know)
posted on 30/4/19
I don't need reminding of my 'ex' in any way, shape of form, thank you.
posted on 30/4/19
In other news, Bamford has been charged with "successful deception of a match official" and faces a two match ban if upheld.
posted on 30/4/19
Bad shape and worse form plus zero ex( insert as required>
posted on 30/4/19
Scouse what is the value of a/b if a/b = (a + b)/a. It does have a numerical answer.
Page 1 of 33
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10