Just look.at their second goal. I the k fabinho tackled it to Suarez who hit the post and it falls straight to GOAT ffs.
We needed to take at least one of the 3 clear chances we had today .
Now cam we do a Roma?
Roma lost the first leg 4-1 so had an away goal
Your task is tougher
Could’ve been worse if Dembele hadn’t fluffed his lines though
That's how you win big games. Gotta take the chances.
Thought a few mistakes were made tonight. I think playing Gomez and Gini in the role he did was a huge risk and didn't make much sense.
I feel Barca is a place managers egos can take over in "trying to stop them" but it was closer than the scoreline suggested.
I do think we have a concern about lack of focus after we concede. Game got away from us for a short while and we were punished.
Summer our focus has to be replacing our cross (a) and (b) finding midfielders that are reliable. Ours are too consistent and confused in which role they need to be playing.
Anyways it's done now, at 1-0 I was confident but 3-0 without an away goal. This tie is done. Let's hope I'm wrong.
comment by The Goofy One (U16087)
posted 1 minute ago
Just look.at their second goal. I the k fabinho tackled it to Suarez who hit the post and it falls straight to GOAT ffs.
We needed to take at least one of the 3 clear chances we had today .
Now cam we do a Roma?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You never know in football. However I have no hope.
That game should never have been 3 0.
Daylight robbery
We played well and created enough chances to actually win the game
---------------------------------------------
Err....no you didn't. That's nonsense. For that to be true, you'd have to ignore all Barca's goals and the chances they missed too.
comment by (kash) I'm the Mané (U1108)
posted 3 minutes ago
That's how you win big games. Gotta take the chances.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jose wins big games. You should dump the trophy Dodger and get a winner in charge
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} π½ π #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Goofy One (U16087)
posted 1 minute ago
Just look.at their second goal. I the k fabinho tackled it to Suarez who hit the post and it falls straight to GOAT ffs.
We needed to take at least one of the 3 clear chances we had today .
Now cam we do a Roma?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You never know in football. However I have no hope.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One of the most overrated scored I’ve seen. Not many teams out play Barca at home. Chances should of been taken. Messi is unreal.
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 2 minutes ago
We played well and created enough chances to actually win the game
---------------------------------------------
Err....no you didn't. That's nonsense. For that to be true, you'd have to ignore all Barca's goals and the chances they missed too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Before we pushed everyone forward and started leaving spaces behind, we were well on top and created more chances. At the end Barca obviously had more chances through counter attacks.
We outplayed them and had the chances to score.
Daylight robbery.
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} π½ π #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 2 minutes ago
We played well and created enough chances to actually win the game
---------------------------------------------
Err....no you didn't. That's nonsense. For that to be true, you'd have to ignore all Barca's goals and the chances they missed too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Before we pushed everyone forward and started leaving spaces behind, we were well on top and created more chances. At the end Barca obviously had more chances through counter attacks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I'd argue that had Barca not been leading 1-0, they would have played more on the front foot. Of course goals change matches. But to say you created enough matches to win the game goes too far when you just facking lost 3-0.
comment by The Mane Man ( life at this age is rubbish with no money #needajob) (U19731)
posted 18 seconds ago
We outplayed them and had the chances to score.
Daylight robbery.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wont day it was robbery. They scored a good goal.and a parker of a goal.
Mane though am.afraid in the real big game missed his big chance. Remeber city at Etihad. Now here.
We didn’t deserve to be beaten as far as I’m concerned.
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} π½ π #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 2 minutes ago
We played well and created enough chances to actually win the game
---------------------------------------------
Err....no you didn't. That's nonsense. For that to be true, you'd have to ignore all Barca's goals and the chances they missed too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Before we pushed everyone forward and started leaving spaces behind, we were well on top and created more chances. At the end Barca obviously had more chances through counter attacks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I'd argue that had Barca not been leading 1-0, they would have played more on the front foot. Of course goals change matches. But to say you created enough matches to win the game goes too far when you just facking lost 3-0.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you saying that Barce sat back once they went 1 nil up? Fact is that we were playing well and forced them to change their tactics. Unfortunately you can get punished for being wasteful. We dominated possession and created more chances (even with their counter attacks included).
After their 1st goal they barely created anything until the 2nd (which was very fortunate) and their 3rd (admittedly a world class goal).
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} π½ π #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} π½ π #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 2 minutes ago
We played well and created enough chances to actually win the game
---------------------------------------------
Err....no you didn't. That's nonsense. For that to be true, you'd have to ignore all Barca's goals and the chances they missed too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Before we pushed everyone forward and started leaving spaces behind, we were well on top and created more chances. At the end Barca obviously had more chances through counter attacks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I'd argue that had Barca not been leading 1-0, they would have played more on the front foot. Of course goals change matches. But to say you created enough matches to win the game goes too far when you just facking lost 3-0.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you saying that Barce sat back once they went 1 nil up? Fact is that we were playing well and forced them to change their tactics. Unfortunately you can get punished for being wasteful. We dominated possession and created more chances (even with their counter attacks included).
After their 1st goal they barely created anything until the 2nd (which was very fortunate) and their 3rd (admittedly a world class goal).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool had 3 clear chances basically. Mane in the first, Milner early in the second (or was that Henderson), and the Salah miss immediately after Barca went 3-0 up. By your standards of ruling out Barca's two late 3-on-1 situations, we might as well rule out the Salah chance, leaving you with 2 clear chances. Oh, and Vidal missed just as good a position as Milner when he chose to square the ball for some reason when the clear shot was on.
I'm not denying that you had chances and the scoreline flattered Barca. But to say you had enough chances to win is ridiculous. You didn't. Plain and simple.
Milners chance changes the game if he scores
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} π½ π #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} π½ π #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 2 minutes ago
We played well and created enough chances to actually win the game
---------------------------------------------
Err....no you didn't. That's nonsense. For that to be true, you'd have to ignore all Barca's goals and the chances they missed too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Before we pushed everyone forward and started leaving spaces behind, we were well on top and created more chances. At the end Barca obviously had more chances through counter attacks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I'd argue that had Barca not been leading 1-0, they would have played more on the front foot. Of course goals change matches. But to say you created enough matches to win the game goes too far when you just facking lost 3-0.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you saying that Barce sat back once they went 1 nil up? Fact is that we were playing well and forced them to change their tactics. Unfortunately you can get punished for being wasteful. We dominated possession and created more chances (even with their counter attacks included).
After their 1st goal they barely created anything until the 2nd (which was very fortunate) and their 3rd (admittedly a world class goal).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool had 3 clear chances basically. Mane in the first, Milner early in the second (or was that Henderson), and the Salah miss immediately after Barca went 3-0 up. By your standards of ruling out Barca's two late 3-on-1 situations, we might as well rule out the Salah chance, leaving you with 2 clear chances. Oh, and Vidal missed just as good a position as Milner when he chose to square the ball for some reason when the clear shot was on.
I'm not denying that you had chances and the scoreline flattered Barca. But to say you had enough chances to win is ridiculous. You didn't. Plain and simple.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rakitic did the exact same thing from an even better position in the first ten minutes.
Liverpool were the better side for a lot of the game and had good chances, but Barca had more chances in the match.
comment by Ed The King Woodward (U10026)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} π½ π #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} π½ π #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 2 minutes ago
We played well and created enough chances to actually win the game
---------------------------------------------
Err....no you didn't. That's nonsense. For that to be true, you'd have to ignore all Barca's goals and the chances they missed too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Before we pushed everyone forward and started leaving spaces behind, we were well on top and created more chances. At the end Barca obviously had more chances through counter attacks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I'd argue that had Barca not been leading 1-0, they would have played more on the front foot. Of course goals change matches. But to say you created enough matches to win the game goes too far when you just facking lost 3-0.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you saying that Barce sat back once they went 1 nil up? Fact is that we were playing well and forced them to change their tactics. Unfortunately you can get punished for being wasteful. We dominated possession and created more chances (even with their counter attacks included).
After their 1st goal they barely created anything until the 2nd (which was very fortunate) and their 3rd (admittedly a world class goal).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool had 3 clear chances basically. Mane in the first, Milner early in the second (or was that Henderson), and the Salah miss immediately after Barca went 3-0 up. By your standards of ruling out Barca's two late 3-on-1 situations, we might as well rule out the Salah chance, leaving you with 2 clear chances. Oh, and Vidal missed just as good a position as Milner when he chose to square the ball for some reason when the clear shot was on.
I'm not denying that you had chances and the scoreline flattered Barca. But to say you had enough chances to win is ridiculous. You didn't. Plain and simple.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rakitic did the exact same thing from an even better position in the first ten minutes.
Liverpool were the better side for a lot of the game and had good chances, but Barca had more chances in the match.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's how I'd put it. Liverpool controlled the flow of play, but there is no doubt Barca created easily more chances. I thought the first half was 50-50 (don't know why some are claiming Liverpool dominated it - they didn't), but Barca had a really rotten period in the first 25 or so minutes of the 2nd half. Couldn't string 3 passes together and sat deep and narrow as they were overrun. Valverde's removing Coutinho and bringing on Semedo bolstered their overrun midfield and freed up Messi to get closer to Suarez and they became more of an offensive threat.
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 1 hour, 1 minute ago
That game should never have been 3 0.
Daylight robbery
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What?
It's not like they cheated, their goals were all legitimate and they could have scored a couple more.
You should of course have scored at least two though.
You played well and the scoreline doesn't reflect the match. Nothing to do with robbery though
Sheriff, yep I’d agree with that evaluation.
Each of Milner and Salah could have scored two. The referee was on their side.
comment by LAMCAM♠ (U18537)
posted 9 minutes ago
Each of Milner and Salah could have scored two. The referee was on their side.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, and Messi could have scored 5. What the fack are you smoking on this board.
comment by LAMCAM♠ (U18537)
posted 15 minutes ago
Each of Milner and Salah could have scored two. The referee was on their side.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fack off
Did the referee stop you from scoring or something
Sign in if you want to comment
Wasteful
Page 1 of 2
posted on 1/5/19
Just look.at their second goal. I the k fabinho tackled it to Suarez who hit the post and it falls straight to GOAT ffs.
We needed to take at least one of the 3 clear chances we had today .
Now cam we do a Roma?
posted on 1/5/19
Roma lost the first leg 4-1 so had an away goal
Your task is tougher
Could’ve been worse if Dembele hadn’t fluffed his lines though
posted on 1/5/19
That's how you win big games. Gotta take the chances.
posted on 1/5/19
Thought a few mistakes were made tonight. I think playing Gomez and Gini in the role he did was a huge risk and didn't make much sense.
I feel Barca is a place managers egos can take over in "trying to stop them" but it was closer than the scoreline suggested.
I do think we have a concern about lack of focus after we concede. Game got away from us for a short while and we were punished.
Summer our focus has to be replacing our cross (a) and (b) finding midfielders that are reliable. Ours are too consistent and confused in which role they need to be playing.
Anyways it's done now, at 1-0 I was confident but 3-0 without an away goal. This tie is done. Let's hope I'm wrong.
posted on 1/5/19
comment by The Goofy One (U16087)
posted 1 minute ago
Just look.at their second goal. I the k fabinho tackled it to Suarez who hit the post and it falls straight to GOAT ffs.
We needed to take at least one of the 3 clear chances we had today .
Now cam we do a Roma?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You never know in football. However I have no hope.
posted on 1/5/19
That game should never have been 3 0.
Daylight robbery
posted on 1/5/19
We played well and created enough chances to actually win the game
---------------------------------------------
Err....no you didn't. That's nonsense. For that to be true, you'd have to ignore all Barca's goals and the chances they missed too.
posted on 1/5/19
comment by (kash) I'm the Mané (U1108)
posted 3 minutes ago
That's how you win big games. Gotta take the chances.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jose wins big games. You should dump the trophy Dodger and get a winner in charge
posted on 1/5/19
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} π½ π #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Goofy One (U16087)
posted 1 minute ago
Just look.at their second goal. I the k fabinho tackled it to Suarez who hit the post and it falls straight to GOAT ffs.
We needed to take at least one of the 3 clear chances we had today .
Now cam we do a Roma?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You never know in football. However I have no hope.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 1/5/19
One of the most overrated scored I’ve seen. Not many teams out play Barca at home. Chances should of been taken. Messi is unreal.
posted on 1/5/19
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 2 minutes ago
We played well and created enough chances to actually win the game
---------------------------------------------
Err....no you didn't. That's nonsense. For that to be true, you'd have to ignore all Barca's goals and the chances they missed too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Before we pushed everyone forward and started leaving spaces behind, we were well on top and created more chances. At the end Barca obviously had more chances through counter attacks.
posted on 1/5/19
We outplayed them and had the chances to score.
Daylight robbery.
posted on 1/5/19
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} π½ π #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 2 minutes ago
We played well and created enough chances to actually win the game
---------------------------------------------
Err....no you didn't. That's nonsense. For that to be true, you'd have to ignore all Barca's goals and the chances they missed too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Before we pushed everyone forward and started leaving spaces behind, we were well on top and created more chances. At the end Barca obviously had more chances through counter attacks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I'd argue that had Barca not been leading 1-0, they would have played more on the front foot. Of course goals change matches. But to say you created enough matches to win the game goes too far when you just facking lost 3-0.
posted on 1/5/19
comment by The Mane Man ( life at this age is rubbish with no money #needajob) (U19731)
posted 18 seconds ago
We outplayed them and had the chances to score.
Daylight robbery.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wont day it was robbery. They scored a good goal.and a parker of a goal.
Mane though am.afraid in the real big game missed his big chance. Remeber city at Etihad. Now here.
posted on 1/5/19
We didn’t deserve to be beaten as far as I’m concerned.
posted on 1/5/19
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} π½ π #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 2 minutes ago
We played well and created enough chances to actually win the game
---------------------------------------------
Err....no you didn't. That's nonsense. For that to be true, you'd have to ignore all Barca's goals and the chances they missed too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Before we pushed everyone forward and started leaving spaces behind, we were well on top and created more chances. At the end Barca obviously had more chances through counter attacks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I'd argue that had Barca not been leading 1-0, they would have played more on the front foot. Of course goals change matches. But to say you created enough matches to win the game goes too far when you just facking lost 3-0.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you saying that Barce sat back once they went 1 nil up? Fact is that we were playing well and forced them to change their tactics. Unfortunately you can get punished for being wasteful. We dominated possession and created more chances (even with their counter attacks included).
After their 1st goal they barely created anything until the 2nd (which was very fortunate) and their 3rd (admittedly a world class goal).
posted on 1/5/19
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} π½ π #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} π½ π #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 2 minutes ago
We played well and created enough chances to actually win the game
---------------------------------------------
Err....no you didn't. That's nonsense. For that to be true, you'd have to ignore all Barca's goals and the chances they missed too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Before we pushed everyone forward and started leaving spaces behind, we were well on top and created more chances. At the end Barca obviously had more chances through counter attacks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I'd argue that had Barca not been leading 1-0, they would have played more on the front foot. Of course goals change matches. But to say you created enough matches to win the game goes too far when you just facking lost 3-0.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you saying that Barce sat back once they went 1 nil up? Fact is that we were playing well and forced them to change their tactics. Unfortunately you can get punished for being wasteful. We dominated possession and created more chances (even with their counter attacks included).
After their 1st goal they barely created anything until the 2nd (which was very fortunate) and their 3rd (admittedly a world class goal).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool had 3 clear chances basically. Mane in the first, Milner early in the second (or was that Henderson), and the Salah miss immediately after Barca went 3-0 up. By your standards of ruling out Barca's two late 3-on-1 situations, we might as well rule out the Salah chance, leaving you with 2 clear chances. Oh, and Vidal missed just as good a position as Milner when he chose to square the ball for some reason when the clear shot was on.
I'm not denying that you had chances and the scoreline flattered Barca. But to say you had enough chances to win is ridiculous. You didn't. Plain and simple.
posted on 1/5/19
Milners chance changes the game if he scores
posted on 1/5/19
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} π½ π #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} π½ π #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 2 minutes ago
We played well and created enough chances to actually win the game
---------------------------------------------
Err....no you didn't. That's nonsense. For that to be true, you'd have to ignore all Barca's goals and the chances they missed too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Before we pushed everyone forward and started leaving spaces behind, we were well on top and created more chances. At the end Barca obviously had more chances through counter attacks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I'd argue that had Barca not been leading 1-0, they would have played more on the front foot. Of course goals change matches. But to say you created enough matches to win the game goes too far when you just facking lost 3-0.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you saying that Barce sat back once they went 1 nil up? Fact is that we were playing well and forced them to change their tactics. Unfortunately you can get punished for being wasteful. We dominated possession and created more chances (even with their counter attacks included).
After their 1st goal they barely created anything until the 2nd (which was very fortunate) and their 3rd (admittedly a world class goal).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool had 3 clear chances basically. Mane in the first, Milner early in the second (or was that Henderson), and the Salah miss immediately after Barca went 3-0 up. By your standards of ruling out Barca's two late 3-on-1 situations, we might as well rule out the Salah chance, leaving you with 2 clear chances. Oh, and Vidal missed just as good a position as Milner when he chose to square the ball for some reason when the clear shot was on.
I'm not denying that you had chances and the scoreline flattered Barca. But to say you had enough chances to win is ridiculous. You didn't. Plain and simple.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rakitic did the exact same thing from an even better position in the first ten minutes.
Liverpool were the better side for a lot of the game and had good chances, but Barca had more chances in the match.
posted on 1/5/19
comment by Ed The King Woodward (U10026)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} π½ π #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} π½ π #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Wenger Till I Die (U7482)
posted 2 minutes ago
We played well and created enough chances to actually win the game
---------------------------------------------
Err....no you didn't. That's nonsense. For that to be true, you'd have to ignore all Barca's goals and the chances they missed too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Before we pushed everyone forward and started leaving spaces behind, we were well on top and created more chances. At the end Barca obviously had more chances through counter attacks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I'd argue that had Barca not been leading 1-0, they would have played more on the front foot. Of course goals change matches. But to say you created enough matches to win the game goes too far when you just facking lost 3-0.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you saying that Barce sat back once they went 1 nil up? Fact is that we were playing well and forced them to change their tactics. Unfortunately you can get punished for being wasteful. We dominated possession and created more chances (even with their counter attacks included).
After their 1st goal they barely created anything until the 2nd (which was very fortunate) and their 3rd (admittedly a world class goal).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool had 3 clear chances basically. Mane in the first, Milner early in the second (or was that Henderson), and the Salah miss immediately after Barca went 3-0 up. By your standards of ruling out Barca's two late 3-on-1 situations, we might as well rule out the Salah chance, leaving you with 2 clear chances. Oh, and Vidal missed just as good a position as Milner when he chose to square the ball for some reason when the clear shot was on.
I'm not denying that you had chances and the scoreline flattered Barca. But to say you had enough chances to win is ridiculous. You didn't. Plain and simple.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rakitic did the exact same thing from an even better position in the first ten minutes.
Liverpool were the better side for a lot of the game and had good chances, but Barca had more chances in the match.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's how I'd put it. Liverpool controlled the flow of play, but there is no doubt Barca created easily more chances. I thought the first half was 50-50 (don't know why some are claiming Liverpool dominated it - they didn't), but Barca had a really rotten period in the first 25 or so minutes of the 2nd half. Couldn't string 3 passes together and sat deep and narrow as they were overrun. Valverde's removing Coutinho and bringing on Semedo bolstered their overrun midfield and freed up Messi to get closer to Suarez and they became more of an offensive threat.
posted on 1/5/19
comment by Sporty and Portly - LFC (U8531)
posted 1 hour, 1 minute ago
That game should never have been 3 0.
Daylight robbery
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What?
It's not like they cheated, their goals were all legitimate and they could have scored a couple more.
You should of course have scored at least two though.
You played well and the scoreline doesn't reflect the match. Nothing to do with robbery though
posted on 1/5/19
Sheriff, yep I’d agree with that evaluation.
posted on 1/5/19
Each of Milner and Salah could have scored two. The referee was on their side.
posted on 1/5/19
comment by LAMCAM♠ (U18537)
posted 9 minutes ago
Each of Milner and Salah could have scored two. The referee was on their side.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, and Messi could have scored 5. What the fack are you smoking on this board.
posted on 1/5/19
comment by LAMCAM♠ (U18537)
posted 15 minutes ago
Each of Milner and Salah could have scored two. The referee was on their side.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fack off
Did the referee stop you from scoring or something
Page 1 of 2