Maybe because it's a better league?
Gerrard?? Over 10yrs he has been better than Xavi, Iniesa and Kaka.
its only the lasy 4yrs that Xavi Iniesta have proved it, plus Kaka was awesome for about 6yrs...not 10!!
Gerrard?? Over 10yrs he has been better than Xavi, Iniesa and Kaka.
-------------------------
You should be a comedian
Doesn't have to be for the whole 10 years. That is just silly sausageable.
No defenders?
Cannavaro??
5. Henry (PL, La Liga)
6. Xavi (La Liga)
7. Iniesta (La Liga)
One of the best players, but certainly not the best...
Unless I read your article wrong.
Xavi has been the heart of the Barcelona team since '99, Gerrard has probably had around 2-3 seasons at the very top, and started declining ever since the 09/10 season. And Xavi's still going strong
Cannavaro only won player of the year cos Italy won the world cup. He wasn't even that good. I don't like defenders cos they try and hurt me.
comment by The Blue Kenyan ¡Viva Sturridge! (U1641)
posted 52 seconds ago
Gerrard?? Over 10yrs he has been better than Xavi, Iniesa and Kaka.
-------------------------
You should be a comedian
=========================================
May sound comedian to you but Gerrard was one of the best 6 in the world for a long time.
He was once the BEST club player in Europe.
Do some research.
No one saying Rivaldo? He was awesome but guess he only had a couple of years at his best in the last 10 years.
comment by The Blue Kenyan ¡Viva Sturridge! (U1641)
posted 1 minute ago
Xavi has been the heart of the Barcelona team since '99, Gerrard has probably had around 2-3 seasons at the very top, and started declining ever since the 09/10 season. And Xavi's still going strong
=======================================
Xavi wasn't even a regular when Deco was there.
The level he's at right now isn't the level he was at 4 seasons ago. He started playing this good after the former manager left.
Do you think Zidane was a better player than Messi?
But he was never upto the level of Kaka. Iniesta or Xavi. Why? Because even at his best he wouldn't get into the current Barcelona team and when Kaka was at his best he wouldn't displace him. Having said that, comparing him to Kaka is more reasonable. Unless you want to go down the same route and compare him with Lampard...
The Blue Kenyan ¡Viva Sturridge!
=======================
Take those cfc glasses of for a minute, Gerarrd has been awesome. Xavi and Iniesta cant do what gerrard does, Tackle, score screamers...pick the game by the scruff of the neck and drag his team to victory.
He played left back, left wing centre mid of striker won Liverpool the champs league and fa cup and destroyed Madrid.
Mourinho wanted him, Madrid, Ferguson too and the italian heavyweights....xavi, inesta...great players but they cant do what gerrard does!!
If you offerd me a midfield general between gerrard, iniesta, xavi and kaka...its gerrard evertime no question!!
Think a Chelsea fan could tell you that Iniesta can score some decent goals.
Not doubting in his prime he was a great player...I just think Iniesta and Xavi at their best are better, which isn't something to be ashamed of.
Yes Barry Smith i do, the things he could.with a football just blew people away. Dont get me wrong, in five to ten years, i have no doubt messi will be one of if not the best player off all time, but for now, its zidane all the way.
Yes Zidane had amazing skill and great tricks, but at the end of the day was just not as effective as Messi is now at 23. They could both play attacking midfield but Messi would be even 5x as effective as Zidane when it comes to Goals, assists and overall input.
ramsey the one, why are you debating with Barry Smith? everybody knows by now that he is a master debator
But when is Barry Smith's opinion serious? Mostly never pretty much actually.
Zidane was the founder of modern football. He makes the difficult look easy, the impossible effortless. He was consistently the best player on the planet for a decade
Preferred Ronaldinho to be honest. The things he did were ridiculous, and did it with a goofy seahorse face on. Zidane's face was too serious for me.
Ronaldinho's face made anything more interesting.
Sign in if you want to comment
Best Players in Last 10 years. La Liga v PL
Page 1 of 3
posted on 10/6/11
Maybe because it's a better league?
posted on 10/6/11
How very dare you?
posted on 10/6/11
Gerrard?? Over 10yrs he has been better than Xavi, Iniesa and Kaka.
its only the lasy 4yrs that Xavi Iniesta have proved it, plus Kaka was awesome for about 6yrs...not 10!!
posted on 10/6/11
Gerrard?? Over 10yrs he has been better than Xavi, Iniesa and Kaka.
-------------------------
You should be a comedian
posted on 10/6/11
Doesn't have to be for the whole 10 years. That is just silly sausageable.
posted on 10/6/11
No defenders?
Cannavaro??
5. Henry (PL, La Liga)
6. Xavi (La Liga)
7. Iniesta (La Liga)
One of the best players, but certainly not the best...
Unless I read your article wrong.
posted on 10/6/11
Xavi has been the heart of the Barcelona team since '99, Gerrard has probably had around 2-3 seasons at the very top, and started declining ever since the 09/10 season. And Xavi's still going strong
posted on 10/6/11
Cannavaro only won player of the year cos Italy won the world cup. He wasn't even that good. I don't like defenders cos they try and hurt me.
posted on 10/6/11
comment by The Blue Kenyan ¡Viva Sturridge! (U1641)
posted 52 seconds ago
Gerrard?? Over 10yrs he has been better than Xavi, Iniesa and Kaka.
-------------------------
You should be a comedian
=========================================
May sound comedian to you but Gerrard was one of the best 6 in the world for a long time.
He was once the BEST club player in Europe.
Do some research.
posted on 10/6/11
No one saying Rivaldo? He was awesome but guess he only had a couple of years at his best in the last 10 years.
posted on 10/6/11
Zidane over messi.
posted on 10/6/11
comment by The Blue Kenyan ¡Viva Sturridge! (U1641)
posted 1 minute ago
Xavi has been the heart of the Barcelona team since '99, Gerrard has probably had around 2-3 seasons at the very top, and started declining ever since the 09/10 season. And Xavi's still going strong
=======================================
Xavi wasn't even a regular when Deco was there.
The level he's at right now isn't the level he was at 4 seasons ago. He started playing this good after the former manager left.
posted on 10/6/11
Do you think Zidane was a better player than Messi?
posted on 10/6/11
But he was never upto the level of Kaka. Iniesta or Xavi. Why? Because even at his best he wouldn't get into the current Barcelona team and when Kaka was at his best he wouldn't displace him. Having said that, comparing him to Kaka is more reasonable. Unless you want to go down the same route and compare him with Lampard...
posted on 10/6/11
The Blue Kenyan ¡Viva Sturridge!
=======================
Take those cfc glasses of for a minute, Gerarrd has been awesome. Xavi and Iniesta cant do what gerrard does, Tackle, score screamers...pick the game by the scruff of the neck and drag his team to victory.
He played left back, left wing centre mid of striker won Liverpool the champs league and fa cup and destroyed Madrid.
Mourinho wanted him, Madrid, Ferguson too and the italian heavyweights....xavi, inesta...great players but they cant do what gerrard does!!
If you offerd me a midfield general between gerrard, iniesta, xavi and kaka...its gerrard evertime no question!!
posted on 10/6/11
Think a Chelsea fan could tell you that Iniesta can score some decent goals.
posted on 10/6/11
sausageable
posted on 10/6/11
Not doubting in his prime he was a great player...I just think Iniesta and Xavi at their best are better, which isn't something to be ashamed of.
posted on 10/6/11
Yes Barry Smith i do, the things he could.with a football just blew people away. Dont get me wrong, in five to ten years, i have no doubt messi will be one of if not the best player off all time, but for now, its zidane all the way.
posted on 10/6/11
Yes Zidane had amazing skill and great tricks, but at the end of the day was just not as effective as Messi is now at 23. They could both play attacking midfield but Messi would be even 5x as effective as Zidane when it comes to Goals, assists and overall input.
posted on 10/6/11
ramsey the one, why are you debating with Barry Smith? everybody knows by now that he is a master debator
posted on 10/6/11
But when is Barry Smith's opinion serious? Mostly never pretty much actually.
posted on 10/6/11
Zidane was the founder of modern football. He makes the difficult look easy, the impossible effortless. He was consistently the best player on the planet for a decade
posted on 10/6/11
Preferred Ronaldinho to be honest. The things he did were ridiculous, and did it with a goofy seahorse face on. Zidane's face was too serious for me.
posted on 10/6/11
Ronaldinho's face made anything more interesting.
Page 1 of 3