Comment by BrummieBlue
Mommy the bad men won't take me seriously!
=====
In that case I don't know how calling out your mummy is gonna help you.
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Even the livErpool captain said how tired and how hard it was. Your players went down with cramp lol
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's because it's the start of the season which means they're not fit, below par and not at their best don't you know Nick!
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
Liverpool weren’t at their best, that much was obvious, but I don’t think it can be denied that the way Chelsea played had an impact on that - it wasn’t an either or situation.
=====
That's what I said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it wasn't, I think you need to look back at your opening gambits before trying to deceive people!
You've been tolerated and humoured so far because you're some what of a proven clown, with mild amusement value - don't push the pantomime act too far!
What the fack are you talking about?
Its about the same thing I said here
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
You were not allowed to be at your best because of the other team
=====
Not entirely accurate, if at all.
You can fail to be at your best for other reasons other than your opponents. Basic stuff.
From which events have unfolded to you now looking like you want to start crying and escalate and make out like I'm wumming or something.
Its a valid point, then we had some jokes. I don't see the problem.
Yes it is accurate, in reply to Darrens comment in which he said:
"I don’t think it can be denied that the way Chelsea played had an impact on that - it wasn’t an either or situation".
To which you replied:
"That's what I said".
Well that wasn't true was it because you excused Liverpools performance by them being below par, with no credit to Chelsea for imposing themselves on you.
The brutal truth is you were made to look ordinary because Chelsea didn't let you play to your strengths.
When Bournmouth beat us 4 nil it wasn't because we didn't play to our best it was because Bournmouth were better than us and dominated us!
The basic truth is you play as well as the opposition allow you to!
Darren
"I don’t think it can be denied that the way Chelsea played had an impact on that - it wasn’t an either or situation".
Me
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
You were not allowed to be at your best because of the other team
=====
Not entirely accurate, if at all.
You can fail to be at your best for other reasons other than your opponents. Basic stuff.
=====
Its basically making the same point.
The basic truth is you play as well as the opposition allow you to!
-------
This is not entirely accurate, as already stated. Other factors can play a role in determining how well a team plays.
Well that wasn't true was it because you excused Liverpools performance by them being below par, with no credit to Chelsea for imposing themselves on you.
=====
You're delusional and seeing things as I haven't done any of this.
What.The.Fack.
Who was this klopptimus? That dodgy Norwegian horgan guy? mamba?
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 6 minutes ago
Who was this klopptimus? That dodgy Norwegian horgan guy?mamba?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah Nick, the squirming, mamba, aka, Thorgan Klopp blah, blah, blah, aka Klopptimus - still trying to make excuses for his under performing team!
Look Chelsea were better than us last night which might have been a surprise to some but ultimately, the result itself was not a surprise to anyone.
We haven't been on song so far this season except for a half here or 20 minutes there but we've seen this before under Klopp so it's a matter of hoping we can continue to win or pick up three points without playing the best game you've ever seen.
We did that quite a bit beginning of last season, remains to be seen if we've regressed or just early season polishing still needed this season.
That's all.
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
...The basic truth is you play as well as the opposition allow you to!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
.... still trying to make excuses for his under performing team!
Errr - which is it? Did we under perform or did the opposition dictate how we played?!
I think for large portions of the game Chelsea played a very pressing style which made life hard for us - does that mean that every team that do that beat Liverpool? No.
Chelsea had a great game against Liverpool, we had a good game too - but we can play a lot better, as proven by last season (same team). I imagine Chelsea can play better too, but we'll have to see if that's true as you have a new manager and different players so its not a given!
I also think that Chelsea played well against United, but were sloppy at times, as were United - neither team can blame the opposition for that, and United too advantage more clinically than you.
In short, Liverpool won the penalty lottery, just as City did in the CS, and need to get up to full playing speed. Chelsea played very well and have gone a long way to proving that they have a team and manager that can complete with the best.
Sign in if you want to comment
Well
Page 3 of 3
posted on 15/8/19
Comment by BrummieBlue
Mommy the bad men won't take me seriously!
=====
In that case I don't know how calling out your mummy is gonna help you.
posted on 15/8/19
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 minute ago
Even the livErpool captain said how tired and how hard it was. Your players went down with cramp lol
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's because it's the start of the season which means they're not fit, below par and not at their best don't you know Nick!
posted on 15/8/19
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
Liverpool weren’t at their best, that much was obvious, but I don’t think it can be denied that the way Chelsea played had an impact on that - it wasn’t an either or situation.
=====
That's what I said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No it wasn't, I think you need to look back at your opening gambits before trying to deceive people!
You've been tolerated and humoured so far because you're some what of a proven clown, with mild amusement value - don't push the pantomime act too far!
posted on 15/8/19
What the fack are you talking about?
Its about the same thing I said here
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
You were not allowed to be at your best because of the other team
=====
Not entirely accurate, if at all.
You can fail to be at your best for other reasons other than your opponents. Basic stuff.
From which events have unfolded to you now looking like you want to start crying and escalate and make out like I'm wumming or something.
Its a valid point, then we had some jokes. I don't see the problem.
posted on 15/8/19
Yes it is accurate, in reply to Darrens comment in which he said:
"I don’t think it can be denied that the way Chelsea played had an impact on that - it wasn’t an either or situation".
To which you replied:
"That's what I said".
Well that wasn't true was it because you excused Liverpools performance by them being below par, with no credit to Chelsea for imposing themselves on you.
The brutal truth is you were made to look ordinary because Chelsea didn't let you play to your strengths.
When Bournmouth beat us 4 nil it wasn't because we didn't play to our best it was because Bournmouth were better than us and dominated us!
The basic truth is you play as well as the opposition allow you to!
posted on 15/8/19
Darren
"I don’t think it can be denied that the way Chelsea played had an impact on that - it wasn’t an either or situation".
Me
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
You were not allowed to be at your best because of the other team
=====
Not entirely accurate, if at all.
You can fail to be at your best for other reasons other than your opponents. Basic stuff.
=====
Its basically making the same point.
The basic truth is you play as well as the opposition allow you to!
-------
This is not entirely accurate, as already stated. Other factors can play a role in determining how well a team plays.
Well that wasn't true was it because you excused Liverpools performance by them being below par, with no credit to Chelsea for imposing themselves on you.
=====
You're delusional and seeing things as I haven't done any of this.
What.The.Fack.
posted on 15/8/19
Who was this klopptimus? That dodgy Norwegian horgan guy? mamba?
posted on 15/8/19
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 6 minutes ago
Who was this klopptimus? That dodgy Norwegian horgan guy?mamba?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah Nick, the squirming, mamba, aka, Thorgan Klopp blah, blah, blah, aka Klopptimus - still trying to make excuses for his under performing team!
posted on 15/8/19
Look Chelsea were better than us last night which might have been a surprise to some but ultimately, the result itself was not a surprise to anyone.
We haven't been on song so far this season except for a half here or 20 minutes there but we've seen this before under Klopp so it's a matter of hoping we can continue to win or pick up three points without playing the best game you've ever seen.
We did that quite a bit beginning of last season, remains to be seen if we've regressed or just early season polishing still needed this season.
That's all.
posted on 16/8/19
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
...The basic truth is you play as well as the opposition allow you to!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by BrummieBlue! (U3487)
.... still trying to make excuses for his under performing team!
Errr - which is it? Did we under perform or did the opposition dictate how we played?!
I think for large portions of the game Chelsea played a very pressing style which made life hard for us - does that mean that every team that do that beat Liverpool? No.
Chelsea had a great game against Liverpool, we had a good game too - but we can play a lot better, as proven by last season (same team). I imagine Chelsea can play better too, but we'll have to see if that's true as you have a new manager and different players so its not a given!
I also think that Chelsea played well against United, but were sloppy at times, as were United - neither team can blame the opposition for that, and United too advantage more clinically than you.
In short, Liverpool won the penalty lottery, just as City did in the CS, and need to get up to full playing speed. Chelsea played very well and have gone a long way to proving that they have a team and manager that can complete with the best.
Page 3 of 3