Magnum and puyol

Sounds like a 70s cop show

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Women of that age should be having teen lassies lick their huge baggy pies for my viewing pleasure.

comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 9 minutes ago
Women of that age should be having teen lassies lick their huge baggy pies for my viewing pleasure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I can vaugely remember her pie afore having a kid.
Those halcyon days when my cauk n' baws didnae get a chill from the draft.

Like driving a micra round the Nürburgring

I'm back look at me look at me

I can’t even be angry with you, simon.

I think you’re like an internet Sam Beckett quantum-leaping from site to site just to say ‘fvck Rangers’ to the world.

I object to that. This is the only forum I frequent.

I love the quantum leap reference though. Tuesday evenings at 8pm (I think - might have been 7 might have been 9). Couldn't miss it.

Also, I really really like you

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Puyol was brand new.

Even Mugabe was awrite at times.

Magnum,well he`s something else!

Pair of ejits,put your difference`s aside and get your erses back on ja606.

Simples!

Puyol,the diabeticloyal loves ya.

comment by simon_bhoy - the happiest tim in the world (U16215)
posted 2 hours, 41 minutes ago
I'm back look at me look at me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh look! Its simon

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZjmwRV2GPs

comment by Zico♡ (U21900)
posted 12 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 9 minutes ago
Women of that age should be having teen lassies lick their huge baggy pies for my viewing pleasure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I can vaugely remember her pie afore having a kid.
Those halcyon days when my cauk n' baws didnae get a chill from the draft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Holy smoke....that was a read first thing this morning.🤗🤗

comment by Bluebell (U7064)
posted 8 hours, 45 minutes ago
Puyol was brand new.

Even Mugabe was awrite at times.

Magnum,well he`s something else!

Pair of ejits,put your difference`s aside and get your erses back on ja606.

Simples!

Puyol,the diabeticloyal loves ya.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Puyol is sound and mags could be a prickly bhoy, who liked to wum, as do I, but the more the merrier.

Come back soon dudes.

Good luck Scotland against fc Putin, and I have a ticket for NI v Germany.

Green n white army.







Still conflicted with that.....used to wear Linfield gear to NI games being a young staunchie

comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 1 day ago
Both good posters and Mags is a sound guy. He realised that he had gone too Robocop or Dixon of Dock Green with a few posters and reflected upon this. As a result he decided to have a cool off from JA and pop back on now and then. We’ll see him soon I’d expect. Puyol is a good bear and likes a wum or three. Hopefully he’ll be back once Rangers beat Celtic again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well....if it was possible to completely misunderstand a situation, you've certainly done it here.

1 I didnt realise that I had gone 'too Robocop or Dixon of Dock Green' with any posters. To be more accurate, I may have realised it but I cant be sure as i don't really know what that means. I suspect from your law enforcement analogy that you share Subs' view that I think I'm the 'Sheriff ' around here with a 'badge'.

I don't and he's wrong. Even big tough guys who can make comedians scared just by looking at them in the street and who regularly boast about their successful life and considerable wealth can be wrong from time to time m8.

2 as for driving other posters off the site as suggested elsewhere...to be clear I accept no responsibility for that. Certain posters have claimed that but its their decision. I tend to stay away from the big subjects on here that get people riled up. Dont really get into the politucs or religion stuff in a serious way so if anyone is upset about anything I've posted (and it seems that few are) it says more about them than me. I'll leave it at that.

3 Having said that, I think this is a great site and it has been very beneficial for me over the years. I've had some great laughs and met some fantastic people. The admins do a great job in difficult circumstances.

4 As for claims of attention seeking. Thanks to subs for nailing that one. That was certainly not my intent. My view has always been that if a poster is leaving the site or taking a break, its sensible to let other posters know. For example, when Curly left I was concerned that something had happened to him. That's just a matter of opinion...no rights or wrongs unless SJB is actually the sheriff around here and has made a decree that I missed.

So for anyone who may be interested, I will still be a regular visitor to the site unless admin decides otherwise. I recognise that my posting on here seems to upset quite a number of people and that a number of people claim to have left because of it.

So for the good of the site, I'll post a bit less and hopefully they will feel that it's safe for them to come back and will enable a few other posters who find my posting objectionable to enjoy the high standard of debate.

So in summary, mon the good guys and get it right up the rest of you.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 2 hours, 24 minutes ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 1 day ago
Both good posters and Mags is a sound guy. He realised that he had gone too Robocop or Dixon of Dock Green with a few posters and reflected upon this. As a result he decided to have a cool off from JA and pop back on now and then. We’ll see him soon I’d expect. Puyol is a good bear and likes a wum or three. Hopefully he’ll be back once Rangers beat Celtic again 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well....if it was possible to completely misunderstand a situation, you've certainly done it here.

1 I didnt realise that I had gone 'too Robocop or Dixon of Dock Green' with any posters. To be more accurate, I may have realised it but I cant be sure as i don't really know what that means. I suspect from your law enforcement analogy that you share Subs' view that I think I'm the 'Sheriff ' around here with a 'badge'.

I don't and he's wrong. Even big tough guys who can make comedians scared just by looking at them in the street and who regularly boast about their successful life and considerable wealth can be wrong from time to time m8.

2 as for driving other posters off the site as suggested elsewhere...to be clear I accept no responsibility for that. Certain posters have claimed that but its their decision. I tend to stay away from the big subjects on here that get people riled up. Dont really get into the politucs or religion stuff in a serious way so if anyone is upset about anything I've posted (and it seems that few are) it says more about them than me. I'll leave it at that.

3 Having said that, I think this is a great site and it has been very beneficial for me over the years. I've had some great laughs and met some fantastic people. The admins do a great job in difficult circumstances.

4 As for claims of attention seeking. Thanks to subs for nailing that one. That was certainly not my intent. My view has always been that if a poster is leaving the site or taking a break, its sensible to let other posters know. For example, when Curly left I was concerned that something had happened to him. That's just a matter of opinion...no rights or wrongs unless SJB is actually the sheriff around here and has made a decree that I missed.

So for anyone who may be interested, I will still be a regular visitor to the site unless admin decides otherwise. I recognise that my posting on here seems to upset quite a number of people and that a number of people claim to have left because of it.

So for the good of the site, I'll post a bit less and hopefully they will feel that it's safe for them to come back and will enable a few other posters who find my posting objectionable to enjoy the high standard of debate.

So in summary, mon the good guys and get it right up the rest of you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who are the good guys in this?

Why do you think you wind folk up?

Mags

I think you should post and stay btw.

You have pulled me up about my life experience in NI, while others like to hear about how things develop here, so perhaps it is how you pull people up, or who you pull up, but you hsve been fair and called out Celts and bears, orange and green.

If you do not want to hear about the loyalist side or protestant side, that is cool, but as Catholics and unionists and prods and nationalists, it Helps to talk here as we live separate lives at times, and do not communicate.

Me talking to Celtic guys enhanced my journey even more away from a narrow minded view.

But I found you wanted to shut down such chat...and that was cool, but you did so in a combative manner, which I use too...and it winds folk up.

Who are the good guys in this?
—-
I assume he means me.

comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)
posted 25 minutes ago
Mags

I think you should post and stay btw.

You have pulled me up about my life experience in NI, while others like to hear about how things develop here, so perhaps it is how you pull people up, or who you pull up, but you hsve been fair and called out Celts and bears, orange and green.

If you do not want to hear about the loyalist side or protestant side, that is cool, but as Catholics and unionists and prods and nationalists, it Helps to talk here as we live separate lives at times, and do not communicate.

Me talking to Celtic guys enhanced my journey even more away from a narrow minded view.

But I found you wanted to shut down such chat...and that was cool, but you did so in a combative manner, which I use too...and it winds folk up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be honest...I don't think its great that you shoehorn your pet topics into almost every discussion....as you've just done yet again.

Just my opinion of course..and you're just as entitled to it.
As for winding people up..seems to me that it mainly happens when I simply repeat stuff to people that they themselves have said. Some folk seem not to like that.

I've been called the biggest hypocrite on the site, the most poisonous poster on the site and similar epithets.

I've been described as a WUM..I'm not. I mean every word I've ever typed on here...apart from when I've been pashed. Occasionally I've been wrong..not often...and not about Kieran Tierney or Brendan Rodgers or Neil Lennon or Roy Keane. A few folk got annoyed that I knew about these things before they did.

One other thing...my default position on here is not to believe anything that anyone says about themselves unless it's one of the guys I've met. I think that's a sensible strategy. That might cause some issues too.

I'm mainly just on for a laugh though.

comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by thebluebellsarablue (U9292)
posted 25 minutes ago
Mags

I think you should post and stay btw.

You have pulled me up about my life experience in NI, while others like to hear about how things develop here, so perhaps it is how you pull people up, or who you pull up, but you hsve been fair and called out Celts and bears, orange and green.

If you do not want to hear about the loyalist side or protestant side, that is cool, but as Catholics and unionists and prods and nationalists, it Helps to talk here as we live separate lives at times, and do not communicate.

Me talking to Celtic guys enhanced my journey even more away from a narrow minded view.

But I found you wanted to shut down such chat...and that was cool, but you did so in a combative manner, which I use too...and it winds folk up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be honest...I don't think its great that you shoehorn your pet topics into almost every discussion....as you've just done yet again.

Just my opinion of course..and you're just as entitled to it.
As for winding people up..seems to me that it mainly happens when I simply repeat stuff to people that they themselves have said. Some folk seem not to like that.

I've been called the biggest hypocrite on the site, the most poisonous poster on the site and similar epithets.

I've been described as a WUM..I'm not. I mean every word I've ever typed on here...apart from when I've been pashed. Occasionally I've been wrong..not often...and not about Kieran Tierney or Brendan Rodgers or Neil Lennon or Roy Keane. A few folk got annoyed that I knew about these things before they did.

One other thing...my default position on here is not to believe anything that anyone says about themselves unless it's one of the guys I've met. I think that's a sensible strategy. That might cause some issues too.

I'm mainly just on for a laugh though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These pet topics were what you pulled up!

Otherwise it would not be relevant!

This is what you pulled up!