or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 338 comments are related to an article called:

Lurker?

Page 5 of 14

posted on 19/11/19

comment by Zachsda(Not a predictor cheat, dignity intact) (U1850)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ elite.... the wolf wan (U16936)
posted 23 seconds ago
Fvck celtic..... dirty Ε›hite smelling baxtards
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At last a bit of honesty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Needed to get this chat back into football.... hate those cvnts

posted on 19/11/19

Couldn’t finish the OP
—-
You didn’t leave him at the tickly bit, did you?

comment by Sjb1888 (U5188)

posted on 19/11/19

Eddy looking to score his 11 goal in his 6th game tonight for France u21.

Playing on a dodgy looking artificial pitch so hopefully he gets a goal and then gets a rest.

posted on 19/11/19

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 39 seconds ago
if it was getting to me like this I'd be thinking seriously about it.
------------------------------------------------------------

And I might leave.

And not because it 'gets to me'. I take it for what it is - posts an anonymous internet forum by folk who don't know me from adam and who in that case were completely wrong with their assertions about what I had done.

I knew exactly what I did and was honest about it.

The problem wasn't with me it was with the people calling me a liar for no real reason other than as far as I could see I was a Rangers fan posting a negative story about a celtic player.

I can rationalise that fairly easily. And I don't take it personally - but it does disappoint me that when you try and talk about football it descends into something like that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You weren’t talking about football though, you were talking about Fraser Forster’s ex girlfriend.

Let’s not rewrite history here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

And by the way POV - just so we are clear. It is exactly this sort of nonsense that you post about people that has repeatedly caused an issue between us.

You are completely wrong in your assertion that I am trying to rewrite history with the Fraser Forster post yet you post it as if it were a fact.

I find your judgement of people and situations frequently to be pretty poor yet you seem happy to hang your hat on inaccurate accusations and then stick by them even when proven wrong.

You have tried this type of thing with me several times in the past.

And yes I stand my ground with it.

For you to try and paint that as me bullying you - well - no chance I am afraid.

But its no great loss - as I said I am happy to stay out of your way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just so we’re clear, you told us that you googled to see if Forster was still with his girlfriend. Incredibly, despite the answer being there for you at the time, you decided you wanted to talk about the fourth article on the second page which was a story about how bad Forster was-that’s what you got slagged about.

And there’s standing your ground, and then teaming up with others and slagging them.

Stop being such a snowflake. That whole incident clearly got to you, the way you went about trying to prove your ‘innocence’ at the time and the fact you brought it up again today (and still won’t let it go!!) makes it look like it affected you more than you’ll want to admit. Why, I don’t know. Every time someone moved on, you wanted to stand your ground. Good for you!

I used your barometer for what was bullying. Not mine. I’ve had what you got that day a fair bit worse on a few occasions, and I’ve had you and your pal Fash give it a go as well. Never thought of it as bullying, but then again, I’ve not used your barometer before.

I did say just to move on-but wasn’t enough for you. I’ve never seen you defend any of my comments, yet despite the fact of what you think about me I’ve done that for you.

Mixed forums where folk can’t take a bit of joking sometimes aren’t for everyone.

I’m out later this evening, so you can have the last word tonight.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Again - this isn’t the full story about what happened but hey ho that’s you all over.

I honestly can’t believe after all this you are stupid enough to still be calling me a liar.

Oh no - wait .....I can. It is actually you all over.

Utterly ridiculous and why I believe you to be the biggest clown on here.

I guess it must just be coincidence that I saw you named at least twice yesterday as on of the main culprits on this site 😳

comment by Sjb1888 (U5188)

posted on 19/11/19

French Eddy, 1 nil.

Goal machine.

comment by NNH (U10730)

posted on 19/11/19

comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 39 seconds ago
if it was getting to me like this I'd be thinking seriously about it.
------------------------------------------------------------

And I might leave.

And not because it 'gets to me'. I take it for what it is - posts an anonymous internet forum by folk who don't know me from adam and who in that case were completely wrong with their assertions about what I had done.

I knew exactly what I did and was honest about it.

The problem wasn't with me it was with the people calling me a liar for no real reason other than as far as I could see I was a Rangers fan posting a negative story about a celtic player.

I can rationalise that fairly easily. And I don't take it personally - but it does disappoint me that when you try and talk about football it descends into something like that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You weren’t talking about football though, you were talking about Fraser Forster’s ex girlfriend.

Let’s not rewrite history here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

And by the way POV - just so we are clear. It is exactly this sort of nonsense that you post about people that has repeatedly caused an issue between us.

You are completely wrong in your assertion that I am trying to rewrite history with the Fraser Forster post yet you post it as if it were a fact.

I find your judgement of people and situations frequently to be pretty poor yet you seem happy to hang your hat on inaccurate accusations and then stick by them even when proven wrong.

You have tried this type of thing with me several times in the past.

And yes I stand my ground with it.

For you to try and paint that as me bullying you - well - no chance I am afraid.

But its no great loss - as I said I am happy to stay out of your way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just so we’re clear, you told us that you googled to see if Forster was still with his girlfriend. Incredibly, despite the answer being there for you at the time, you decided you wanted to talk about the fourth article on the second page which was a story about how bad Forster was-that’s what you got slagged about.

And there’s standing your ground, and then teaming up with others and slagging them.

Stop being such a snowflake. That whole incident clearly got to you, the way you went about trying to prove your ‘innocence’ at the time and the fact you brought it up again today (and still won’t let it go!!) makes it look like it affected you more than you’ll want to admit. Why, I don’t know. Every time someone moved on, you wanted to stand your ground. Good for you!

I used your barometer for what was bullying. Not mine. I’ve had what you got that day a fair bit worse on a few occasions, and I’ve had you and your pal Fash give it a go as well. Never thought of it as bullying, but then again, I’ve not used your barometer before.

I did say just to move on-but wasn’t enough for you. I’ve never seen you defend any of my comments, yet despite the fact of what you think about me I’ve done that for you.

Mixed forums where folk can’t take a bit of joking sometimes aren’t for everyone.

I’m out later this evening, so you can have the last word tonight.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Again - this isn’t the full story about what happened but hey ho that’s you all over.

I honestly can’t believe after all this you are stupid enough to still be calling me a liar.

Oh no - wait .....I can. It is actually you all over.

Utterly ridiculous and why I believe you to be the biggest clown on here.

I guess it must just be coincidence that I saw you named at least twice yesterday as on of the main culprits on this site 😳
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Talks about bullying and calls someone a clown

Couldn’t mark your neck with a blowtorch Hamish. That day over Forster obviously got to you but if you still can’t accept what was said that day, majority by me, then that’s your decision.

Let’s not pretend I bullied you though, if I bullied you, you’d know all about it.

posted on 19/11/19

comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 39 seconds ago
if it was getting to me like this I'd be thinking seriously about it.
------------------------------------------------------------

And I might leave.

And not because it 'gets to me'. I take it for what it is - posts an anonymous internet forum by folk who don't know me from adam and who in that case were completely wrong with their assertions about what I had done.

I knew exactly what I did and was honest about it.

The problem wasn't with me it was with the people calling me a liar for no real reason other than as far as I could see I was a Rangers fan posting a negative story about a celtic player.

I can rationalise that fairly easily. And I don't take it personally - but it does disappoint me that when you try and talk about football it descends into something like that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You weren’t talking about football though, you were talking about Fraser Forster’s ex girlfriend.

Let’s not rewrite history here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

And by the way POV - just so we are clear. It is exactly this sort of nonsense that you post about people that has repeatedly caused an issue between us.

You are completely wrong in your assertion that I am trying to rewrite history with the Fraser Forster post yet you post it as if it were a fact.

I find your judgement of people and situations frequently to be pretty poor yet you seem happy to hang your hat on inaccurate accusations and then stick by them even when proven wrong.

You have tried this type of thing with me several times in the past.

And yes I stand my ground with it.

For you to try and paint that as me bullying you - well - no chance I am afraid.

But its no great loss - as I said I am happy to stay out of your way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just so we’re clear, you told us that you googled to see if Forster was still with his girlfriend. Incredibly, despite the answer being there for you at the time, you decided you wanted to talk about the fourth article on the second page which was a story about how bad Forster was-that’s what you got slagged about.

And there’s standing your ground, and then teaming up with others and slagging them.

Stop being such a snowflake. That whole incident clearly got to you, the way you went about trying to prove your ‘innocence’ at the time and the fact you brought it up again today (and still won’t let it go!!) makes it look like it affected you more than you’ll want to admit. Why, I don’t know. Every time someone moved on, you wanted to stand your ground. Good for you!

I used your barometer for what was bullying. Not mine. I’ve had what you got that day a fair bit worse on a few occasions, and I’ve had you and your pal Fash give it a go as well. Never thought of it as bullying, but then again, I’ve not used your barometer before.

I did say just to move on-but wasn’t enough for you. I’ve never seen you defend any of my comments, yet despite the fact of what you think about me I’ve done that for you.

Mixed forums where folk can’t take a bit of joking sometimes aren’t for everyone.

I’m out later this evening, so you can have the last word tonight.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Again - this isn’t the full story about what happened but hey ho that’s you all over.

I honestly can’t believe after all this you are stupid enough to still be calling me a liar.

Oh no - wait .....I can. It is actually you all over.

Utterly ridiculous and why I believe you to be the biggest clown on here.

I guess it must just be coincidence that I saw you named at least twice yesterday as on of the main culprits on this site 😳
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who do you think would be the main culprits if we were voting today?

posted on 19/11/19

Honestly, the bumming chat is the least gay thing on here.

comment by NNH (U10730)

posted on 19/11/19

Edouard better wrap it btw.

comment by NNH (U10730)

posted on 19/11/19

And btw, if anyone has ever been bullied on here then Heed and Weig would be right up there and majority of the so called bullying comes from flooking Tims.

Both of which have also attended nights out.

Although I believe their membership for the clique is almost up

posted on 19/11/19

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 19/11/19

comment by New Magnum. Never posted before. (U16400)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Hot Shot Hamish (U21959)
posted 39 seconds ago
if it was getting to me like this I'd be thinking seriously about it.
------------------------------------------------------------

And I might leave.

And not because it 'gets to me'. I take it for what it is - posts an anonymous internet forum by folk who don't know me from adam and who in that case were completely wrong with their assertions about what I had done.

I knew exactly what I did and was honest about it.

The problem wasn't with me it was with the people calling me a liar for no real reason other than as far as I could see I was a Rangers fan posting a negative story about a celtic player.

I can rationalise that fairly easily. And I don't take it personally - but it does disappoint me that when you try and talk about football it descends into something like that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You weren’t talking about football though, you were talking about Fraser Forster’s ex girlfriend.

Let’s not rewrite history here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

And by the way POV - just so we are clear. It is exactly this sort of nonsense that you post about people that has repeatedly caused an issue between us.

You are completely wrong in your assertion that I am trying to rewrite history with the Fraser Forster post yet you post it as if it were a fact.

I find your judgement of people and situations frequently to be pretty poor yet you seem happy to hang your hat on inaccurate accusations and then stick by them even when proven wrong.

You have tried this type of thing with me several times in the past.

And yes I stand my ground with it.

For you to try and paint that as me bullying you - well - no chance I am afraid.

But its no great loss - as I said I am happy to stay out of your way.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just so we’re clear, you told us that you googled to see if Forster was still with his girlfriend. Incredibly, despite the answer being there for you at the time, you decided you wanted to talk about the fourth article on the second page which was a story about how bad Forster was-that’s what you got slagged about.

And there’s standing your ground, and then teaming up with others and slagging them.

Stop being such a snowflake. That whole incident clearly got to you, the way you went about trying to prove your ‘innocence’ at the time and the fact you brought it up again today (and still won’t let it go!!) makes it look like it affected you more than you’ll want to admit. Why, I don’t know. Every time someone moved on, you wanted to stand your ground. Good for you!

I used your barometer for what was bullying. Not mine. I’ve had what you got that day a fair bit worse on a few occasions, and I’ve had you and your pal Fash give it a go as well. Never thought of it as bullying, but then again, I’ve not used your barometer before.

I did say just to move on-but wasn’t enough for you. I’ve never seen you defend any of my comments, yet despite the fact of what you think about me I’ve done that for you.

Mixed forums where folk can’t take a bit of joking sometimes aren’t for everyone.

I’m out later this evening, so you can have the last word tonight.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Again - this isn’t the full story about what happened but hey ho that’s you all over.

I honestly can’t believe after all this you are stupid enough to still be calling me a liar.

Oh no - wait .....I can. It is actually you all over.

Utterly ridiculous and why I believe you to be the biggest clown on here.

I guess it must just be coincidence that I saw you named at least twice yesterday as on of the main culprits on this site 😳
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who do you think would be the main culprits if we were voting today?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The Old Mags and the new version

comment by NNH (U10730)

posted on 19/11/19

This is all a ploy to make Magnum liked isn’t it?

posted on 19/11/19

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 19/11/19

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 19/11/19

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 19/11/19

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 19/11/19

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 19/11/19

comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 3 minutes ago
This is all a ploy to make Magnum liked isn’t it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not sure it's a ploy as such.

comment by NNH (U10730)

posted on 19/11/19

Off topic as ever but my eyes are like dugs baws, wee yin has that Novovirus (not Nacho) so hardly slept since Sunday.

She sh@t in the bath last night and I had to leave the window open to get rid of the smell. Went in for a p1wh during the night and thought I’d walked into a penguins gaff.

posted on 19/11/19

comment by DoireDevilBhoy (U10745)
posted 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
I am a lurker. Have been since the only BBC606 days. I enjoy reading the site for both the take on sports and also the banter, but I post very rarely as any time I have posted it gets little response and tbh when I do get a response I generally forget to check or reply for a few hours and the topic has normally moved on to something else.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cheers for posting. That's what I asked for.
The thread didn't quite turn out as I hoped but hopefully it wasn't too traumatic

posted on 19/11/19

Just to add a view point from south of the border, there’s a group of 6-8 spurs fans that were on the original BBC 606 who transferred to here, been mates for the best part of 10 years and meet up 2-3 times a year for beer and bollox

Quite enjoy the forum, and particularly the Celtic/Rangers boards. Plenty going on to laugh at (laugh with is more appropriate πŸ‘)

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 19/11/19

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 19/11/19

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 19/11/19

------------------------------------------
Talks about bullying and calls someone a clown

Couldn’t mark your neck with a blowtorch Hamish. That day over Forster obviously got to you but if you still can’t accept what was said that day, majority by me, then that’s your decision.

Let’s not pretend I bullied you though, if I bullied you, you’d know all about it.
————————————

I called someone a clown who has just repeatedly called me a liar, told me how I supposedly really feel etc.

I think that’s fair. If you think that’s hypocritical then fine.

Just because I remember what happened clearly wet to the Forster thread it doesn’t mean it ‘got to me’. It just means I remember the day several of you called me a liar and took the pash relentlessly when I had been 100% honest about what had happened.

It was me that brought it up today ffs. Do you think if I had genuinely made a joint of it that day I would bring it up again!?

Take a deep breath and consider just for a minute I have been telling the truth completely about that all along. How do you think the guys that all piled on calling me a liar would look then?

Well that’s how they have looked to me all along πŸ‘

And as for the ‘if I bullied you you would know all about it’ pash. I’m sorry - but if that was supposed to come across as menacing or threatening then unfortunately it had the opposite effect.

Sorry πŸ‘

Page 5 of 14

Sign in if you want to comment