Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
RAP, yeah but the jokes on then because it’ll just increase immigration from outside the EU, where more brownskin people live, and the government have literally told them this as well.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
The opposition to the war in Iraq (inside and outside parliament) came from the left, in a large part from the people who now control the Labour party. In fact, hatred of Blair as a result of that decision to go to war was one of the direct factors that led to the leftward drift of the Labour party and the election of Corbyn.
You can disagree with Corbyn's politics if you like. You can say Blair's Labour party and those who voted to re-elect him had blood on their hands. You can say you don't care about Iraq and the victims of our various foreign misadventures.
But arguing that anyone who is against unleashing mass violence abroad should vote against Corbyn's Labour because of Iraq is the weakest argument I've seen on this thread. It suggests that deciding to vote Tory comes first and looking for reasons to justify it comes second.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Phendombele (U20037)
posted 1 minute ago
weare
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This. He really is making a completely clown of himself here...
you call leave voters thick when all you do is call 52% of the nation racist
this is thick in itself
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Ffs do you ever read what you are replying to?
Weare making Maf look intelligent
comment by wearethefamous Jose-hotspurs (U19211)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 36 seconds ago
RAP, yeah but the jokes on then because it’ll just increase immigration from outside the EU, where more brownskin people live, and the government have literally told them this as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you call leave voters thick when all you do is call 52% of the nation racistits like the dumb and dumber show on here ...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not "52% of the nation" that voted leave though, which is 100% the point of my article
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by BerbaKing11 (U6256)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Sid (U1868)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by wearethefamous Jose-hotspurs (U19211)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
The thought of anyone in the north voting Tory is nauseating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the north voted to leave the EU .. you just want them to do what you do ..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a General Election. Youre a moron if you think this is 'going to get Brexit done'.
You'll just have to put up with brown people Im afraid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven't mentioned hundreds of thousands dying due to Tories yet,but it's early days yet
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True. Tory voters do have blood on their hands.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does this mean Labour voters have blood on their hands due to Blair’s warmongering?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From 2005 onwards, yes. Re-electing a war criminal is indefensible. Johnson voted for the war of aggression in Iraq, remember. You want to vote for him tomorrow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Voted because of the false evidence put to him and every other MP.
Evidence provided under the Labour government that was backed by Blair
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Iraq was 'fundamentally disarmed', according to key witness Scott Ritter, UN Chief Weapons Inspector *in Iraq* by 1998 - 5 years prior. He appeared once on the BBC at about 4am on the world news show.
The claims against Saddam were known lies. Blair knew them to be lies, as did the intelligence services. He also knew the attack to be illegal. If even the claims were true, that's not a justification for launching a war of aggression. Lots of countries have devastating weaponry, including the UK. Should we support the bombing of Whitehall by a foreign power that is threatened by the UK's global militarism?
I'm not sure of the relevance here in any case. I'm not in any way defending Blair, and to the best of my knowledge, he isn't on the ballot tomorrow. A lifelong human rights and anti-war campaigner is, however. To have such a person as PM is unprecedented in this country and an opportunity not to be missed.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 9 seconds ago
The opposition to the war in Iraq (inside and outside parliament) came from the left, in a large part from the people who now control the Labour party. In fact, hatred of Blair as a result of that decision to go to war was one of the direct factors that led to the leftward drift of the Labour party and the election of Corbyn.
You can disagree with Corbyn's politics if you like. You can say Blair's Labour party and those who voted to re-elect him had blood on their hands. You can say you don't care about Iraq and the victims of our various foreign misadventures.
But arguing that anyone who is against unleashing mass violence abroad should vote against Corbyn's Labour because of Iraq is the weakest argument I've seen on this thread. It suggests that deciding to vote Tory comes first and looking for reasons to justify it comes second.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robbing has been bleating on for weeks about the Tories having let thousands die under there watch.Hence the bringing up of Blair's Labour party outdoing them 100 fold when it comes to parties having blood on there hands.
Just putting Robbing in his place that the party he supports when last in power caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Labour really should have taken weare around the country.
Weare has funded the Brexit party and has voted for them
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 9 seconds ago
The opposition to the war in Iraq (inside and outside parliament) came from the left, in a large part from the people who now control the Labour party. In fact, hatred of Blair as a result of that decision to go to war was one of the direct factors that led to the leftward drift of the Labour party and the election of Corbyn.
You can disagree with Corbyn's politics if you like. You can say Blair's Labour party and those who voted to re-elect him had blood on their hands. You can say you don't care about Iraq and the victims of our various foreign misadventures.
But arguing that anyone who is against unleashing mass violence abroad should vote against Corbyn's Labour because of Iraq is the weakest argument I've seen on this thread. It suggests that deciding to vote Tory comes first and looking for reasons to justify it comes second.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robbing has been bleating on for weeks about the Tories having let thousands die under there watch.Hence the bringing up of Blair's Labour party outdoing them 100 fold when it comes to parties having blood on there hands.
Just putting Robbing in his place that the party he supports when last in power caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didnt vote for them though so what's your point?
Am I right in thinking you're unable differentiate between the two?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Sign in if you want to comment
Brexit Vote
Page 6 of 68
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
posted on 11/12/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/12/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/12/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/12/19
RAP, yeah but the jokes on then because it’ll just increase immigration from outside the EU, where more brownskin people live, and the government have literally told them this as well.
posted on 11/12/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/12/19
weare
posted on 11/12/19
The opposition to the war in Iraq (inside and outside parliament) came from the left, in a large part from the people who now control the Labour party. In fact, hatred of Blair as a result of that decision to go to war was one of the direct factors that led to the leftward drift of the Labour party and the election of Corbyn.
You can disagree with Corbyn's politics if you like. You can say Blair's Labour party and those who voted to re-elect him had blood on their hands. You can say you don't care about Iraq and the victims of our various foreign misadventures.
But arguing that anyone who is against unleashing mass violence abroad should vote against Corbyn's Labour because of Iraq is the weakest argument I've seen on this thread. It suggests that deciding to vote Tory comes first and looking for reasons to justify it comes second.
posted on 11/12/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/12/19
comment by Phendombele (U20037)
posted 1 minute ago
weare
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This. He really is making a completely clown of himself here...
posted on 11/12/19
you call leave voters thick when all you do is call 52% of the nation racist
this is thick in itself
posted on 11/12/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/12/19
Ffs do you ever read what you are replying to?
posted on 11/12/19
Weare making Maf look intelligent
posted on 11/12/19
comment by wearethefamous Jose-hotspurs (U19211)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Mason The King Greenwood (U10026)
posted 36 seconds ago
RAP, yeah but the jokes on then because it’ll just increase immigration from outside the EU, where more brownskin people live, and the government have literally told them this as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you call leave voters thick when all you do is call 52% of the nation racistits like the dumb and dumber show on here ...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not "52% of the nation" that voted leave though, which is 100% the point of my article
posted on 11/12/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/12/19
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by BerbaKing11 (U6256)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Sid (U1868)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by wearethefamous Jose-hotspurs (U19211)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
The thought of anyone in the north voting Tory is nauseating.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the north voted to leave the EU .. you just want them to do what you do ..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a General Election. Youre a moron if you think this is 'going to get Brexit done'.
You'll just have to put up with brown people Im afraid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven't mentioned hundreds of thousands dying due to Tories yet,but it's early days yet
----------------------------------------------------------------------
True. Tory voters do have blood on their hands.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does this mean Labour voters have blood on their hands due to Blair’s warmongering?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From 2005 onwards, yes. Re-electing a war criminal is indefensible. Johnson voted for the war of aggression in Iraq, remember. You want to vote for him tomorrow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Voted because of the false evidence put to him and every other MP.
Evidence provided under the Labour government that was backed by Blair
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Iraq was 'fundamentally disarmed', according to key witness Scott Ritter, UN Chief Weapons Inspector *in Iraq* by 1998 - 5 years prior. He appeared once on the BBC at about 4am on the world news show.
The claims against Saddam were known lies. Blair knew them to be lies, as did the intelligence services. He also knew the attack to be illegal. If even the claims were true, that's not a justification for launching a war of aggression. Lots of countries have devastating weaponry, including the UK. Should we support the bombing of Whitehall by a foreign power that is threatened by the UK's global militarism?
I'm not sure of the relevance here in any case. I'm not in any way defending Blair, and to the best of my knowledge, he isn't on the ballot tomorrow. A lifelong human rights and anti-war campaigner is, however. To have such a person as PM is unprecedented in this country and an opportunity not to be missed.
posted on 11/12/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/12/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/12/19
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 9 seconds ago
The opposition to the war in Iraq (inside and outside parliament) came from the left, in a large part from the people who now control the Labour party. In fact, hatred of Blair as a result of that decision to go to war was one of the direct factors that led to the leftward drift of the Labour party and the election of Corbyn.
You can disagree with Corbyn's politics if you like. You can say Blair's Labour party and those who voted to re-elect him had blood on their hands. You can say you don't care about Iraq and the victims of our various foreign misadventures.
But arguing that anyone who is against unleashing mass violence abroad should vote against Corbyn's Labour because of Iraq is the weakest argument I've seen on this thread. It suggests that deciding to vote Tory comes first and looking for reasons to justify it comes second.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robbing has been bleating on for weeks about the Tories having let thousands die under there watch.Hence the bringing up of Blair's Labour party outdoing them 100 fold when it comes to parties having blood on there hands.
Just putting Robbing in his place that the party he supports when last in power caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people
posted on 11/12/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/12/19
Labour really should have taken weare around the country.
posted on 11/12/19
Weare has funded the Brexit party and has voted for them
posted on 11/12/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/12/19
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 9 seconds ago
The opposition to the war in Iraq (inside and outside parliament) came from the left, in a large part from the people who now control the Labour party. In fact, hatred of Blair as a result of that decision to go to war was one of the direct factors that led to the leftward drift of the Labour party and the election of Corbyn.
You can disagree with Corbyn's politics if you like. You can say Blair's Labour party and those who voted to re-elect him had blood on their hands. You can say you don't care about Iraq and the victims of our various foreign misadventures.
But arguing that anyone who is against unleashing mass violence abroad should vote against Corbyn's Labour because of Iraq is the weakest argument I've seen on this thread. It suggests that deciding to vote Tory comes first and looking for reasons to justify it comes second.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robbing has been bleating on for weeks about the Tories having let thousands die under there watch.Hence the bringing up of Blair's Labour party outdoing them 100 fold when it comes to parties having blood on there hands.
Just putting Robbing in his place that the party he supports when last in power caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didnt vote for them though so what's your point?
Am I right in thinking you're unable differentiate between the two?
posted on 11/12/19
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 6 of 68
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11