Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 2 minutes ago
Yeah everyone but Winston, dry your eyes. Remain as calm, concise and on point as him and this thread will get back on track.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve calmly ruined the guy making a stupid point and calmly ruined you.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hence me giving advice to others. It's been text book from you on this thread. Great stuff.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty textbook from the guy obsessed with me I’d say.
Still going as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 22 seconds ago
“ Why would you check back?
Oh I don’t know... maybe to see if it’s likely I was talking about you?”
You expect people to trawl through a weeks worth of posts just to check who you’re rambling about now.
Mental
No it wasn’t. You have barely mentioned the topic on this thread. Maybe time to stop crying about off topic comments. It makes you look like you’re round the twist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I expect you to check the conversation before assuming a comment that doesn’t name you is about you.
Let me know which part of that you’re struggling with.
And yes it was. It was about the topic and I gave it the respect it deserved. I then went onto pull it apart properly.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe you should make it clear who you’re talking about. Then you wouldn’t make yourself look silly.
No, you’re first comment was ridiculing his comment. Nothing to do with the OP at all. You made one comment after that was on topic but your aim was to come on here and mock Pailsey’s. Something else you constantly whinge about others doing.
This hasn’t gone well for you at all. Just give up.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 22 seconds ago
“ Why would you check back?
Oh I don’t know... maybe to see if it’s likely I was talking about you?”
You expect people to trawl through a weeks worth of posts just to check who you’re rambling about now.
Mental
No it wasn’t. You have barely mentioned the topic on this thread. Maybe time to stop crying about off topic comments. It makes you look like you’re round the twist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I expect you to check the conversation before assuming a comment that doesn’t name you is about you.
Let me know which part of that you’re struggling with.
And yes it was. It was about the topic and I gave it the respect it deserved. I then went onto pull it apart properly.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe you should make it clear who you’re talking about. Then you wouldn’t make yourself look silly.
No, you’re first comment was ridiculing his comment. Nothing to do with the OP at all. You made one comment after that was on topic but your aim was to come on here and mock Pailsey’s. Something else you constantly whinge about others doing.
This hasn’t gone well for you at all. Just give up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I should make it clear who I’m talking about in every post of the same conversation?
As expected, it’s all my fault. Not yours.
Why is that muppets like you can’t just admit they’ve made a mistake?
My comment was ridiculing the comment yes. Still on topic though.
Let me know when you catch up.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 22 seconds ago
“ Why would you check back?
Oh I don’t know... maybe to see if it’s likely I was talking about you?”
You expect people to trawl through a weeks worth of posts just to check who you’re rambling about now.
Mental
No it wasn’t. You have barely mentioned the topic on this thread. Maybe time to stop crying about off topic comments. It makes you look like you’re round the twist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I expect you to check the conversation before assuming a comment that doesn’t name you is about you.
Let me know which part of that you’re struggling with.
And yes it was. It was about the topic and I gave it the respect it deserved. I then went onto pull it apart properly.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe you should make it clear who you’re talking about. Then you wouldn’t make yourself look silly.
No, you’re first comment was ridiculing his comment. Nothing to do with the OP at all. You made one comment after that was on topic but your aim was to come on here and mock Pailsey’s. Something else you constantly whinge about others doing.
This hasn’t gone well for you at all. Just give up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I should make it clear who I’m talking about in every post of the same conversation?
As expected, it’s all my fault. Not yours.
Why is that muppets like you can’t just admit they’ve made a mistake?
My comment was ridiculing the comment yes. Still on topic though.
Let me know when you catch up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah you’re right. You should be as vague as possible or everyone should cross reference your comment woth past comments, doa quick Google search and check Wiki, you know just to be sure.
Again no it wasn’t. Your first comment was about Paisleys opinion and not the alleged foul on DDG, or Souness’ comments after.
One comment on topic out of how many? Yet keeps crying about others making off topic comments
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 22 seconds ago
“ Why would you check back?
Oh I don’t know... maybe to see if it’s likely I was talking about you?”
You expect people to trawl through a weeks worth of posts just to check who you’re rambling about now.
Mental
No it wasn’t. You have barely mentioned the topic on this thread. Maybe time to stop crying about off topic comments. It makes you look like you’re round the twist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I expect you to check the conversation before assuming a comment that doesn’t name you is about you.
Let me know which part of that you’re struggling with.
And yes it was. It was about the topic and I gave it the respect it deserved. I then went onto pull it apart properly.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe you should make it clear who you’re talking about. Then you wouldn’t make yourself look silly.
No, you’re first comment was ridiculing his comment. Nothing to do with the OP at all. You made one comment after that was on topic but your aim was to come on here and mock Pailsey’s. Something else you constantly whinge about others doing.
This hasn’t gone well for you at all. Just give up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I should make it clear who I’m talking about in every post of the same conversation?
As expected, it’s all my fault. Not yours.
Why is that muppets like you can’t just admit they’ve made a mistake?
My comment was ridiculing the comment yes. Still on topic though.
Let me know when you catch up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah you’re right. You should be as vague as possible or everyone should cross reference your comment woth past comments, doa quick Google search and check Wiki, you know just to be sure.
Again no it wasn’t. Your first comment was about Paisleys opinion and not the alleged foul on DDG, or Souness’ comments after.
One comment on topic out of how many? Yet keeps crying about others making off topic comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You butted into an existing conversation and didn’t think to check who I was talking about.
Face it, you messed up and now you want to blame me rather than just admit it - you’re a pathetic mess.
What is it about this place? People lose their sheite over someone they’ve never met.
It’s facking embarrassing.
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 22 seconds ago
“ Why would you check back?
Oh I don’t know... maybe to see if it’s likely I was talking about you?”
You expect people to trawl through a weeks worth of posts just to check who you’re rambling about now.
Mental
No it wasn’t. You have barely mentioned the topic on this thread. Maybe time to stop crying about off topic comments. It makes you look like you’re round the twist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I expect you to check the conversation before assuming a comment that doesn’t name you is about you.
Let me know which part of that you’re struggling with.
And yes it was. It was about the topic and I gave it the respect it deserved. I then went onto pull it apart properly.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe you should make it clear who you’re talking about. Then you wouldn’t make yourself look silly.
No, you’re first comment was ridiculing his comment. Nothing to do with the OP at all. You made one comment after that was on topic but your aim was to come on here and mock Pailsey’s. Something else you constantly whinge about others doing.
This hasn’t gone well for you at all. Just give up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I should make it clear who I’m talking about in every post of the same conversation?
As expected, it’s all my fault. Not yours.
Why is that muppets like you can’t just admit they’ve made a mistake?
My comment was ridiculing the comment yes. Still on topic though.
Let me know when you catch up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, catch up Fields. Winston is all over you here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed I am.
Oh and fields, paisleys comment was about the incident. So of course my reply was on topic.
You absolute muppet.
Geez, is this still rumbling on? Mind you, it's less than 300 comments so there is still a bit to go. As you were. 👍
comment by Going Loco Like Sissoko - SUPER EUROPEAN WORLD CHAMPIONS (U10893)
posted 14 seconds ago
Geez, is this still rumbling on? Mind you, it's less than 300 comments so there is still a bit to go. As you were. 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve GT to thank this time.
Of course, it’ll all be Winston’s fault.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 22 seconds ago
“ Why would you check back?
Oh I don’t know... maybe to see if it’s likely I was talking about you?”
You expect people to trawl through a weeks worth of posts just to check who you’re rambling about now.
Mental
No it wasn’t. You have barely mentioned the topic on this thread. Maybe time to stop crying about off topic comments. It makes you look like you’re round the twist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I expect you to check the conversation before assuming a comment that doesn’t name you is about you.
Let me know which part of that you’re struggling with.
And yes it was. It was about the topic and I gave it the respect it deserved. I then went onto pull it apart properly.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe you should make it clear who you’re talking about. Then you wouldn’t make yourself look silly.
No, you’re first comment was ridiculing his comment. Nothing to do with the OP at all. You made one comment after that was on topic but your aim was to come on here and mock Pailsey’s. Something else you constantly whinge about others doing.
This hasn’t gone well for you at all. Just give up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I should make it clear who I’m talking about in every post of the same conversation?
As expected, it’s all my fault. Not yours.
Why is that muppets like you can’t just admit they’ve made a mistake?
My comment was ridiculing the comment yes. Still on topic though.
Let me know when you catch up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah you’re right. You should be as vague as possible or everyone should cross reference your comment woth past comments, doa quick Google search and check Wiki, you know just to be sure.
Again no it wasn’t. Your first comment was about Paisleys opinion and not the alleged foul on DDG, or Souness’ comments after.
One comment on topic out of how many? Yet keeps crying about others making off topic comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You butted into an existing conversation and didn’t think to check who I was talking about.
Face it, you messed up and now you want to blame me rather than just admit it - you’re a pathetic mess.
What is it about this place? People lose their sheite over someone they’ve never met.
It’s facking embarrassing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Butted in, you mean like you did in your response to Paisleys.
Erm no soft lad. I posted a comment to you, One post later you responded but didn’t make it clear who to. Of course I’d assume you were replying me and not someone you last spoke to over a week ago. Mental gymnastics from Winston
What did your first comment have to do with the DDG foul or Souness’ subsequent comments?
I laid no blame at anyone's door, it was merely an observation. I'm taking no sides.
Yes fields, exactly like that.
Only I didn’t make the mistake of reading a comment and assuming it was aimed at me because I don’t have a weird complex.
There was no logical reason to assume what I’d posted was aimed at you as it followed on from the conversation I’d been having.
This is your fault - you’re just too immature to admit it.
And of course it’s on topic. It’s a reply about a reply on the subject. The fact that it was a short reply just laughing at the comment doesn’t mean it wasn’t about the subject.
Keep up.
comment by Going Loco Like Sissoko - SUPER EUROPEAN WORLD CHAMPIONS (U10893)
posted 9 minutes ago
I laid no blame at anyone's door, it was merely an observation. I'm taking no sides.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I know, I was just making it clear as the likes of fields and GT will soon be crying about me - whether it’s on this thread or another.
“ There was no logical reason to assume what I’d posted was aimed at you as it followed on from the conversation I’d been having.”
If it was aimed at Paisleys last time you spoke to him?
No it was mocking Paisleys comment and didn’t contribute to the thread at all. It was off topic. Like the rest of your comments since.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 19 minutes ago
“ There was no logical reason to assume what I’d posted was aimed at you as it followed on from the conversation I’d been having.”
If it was aimed at Paisleys last time you spoke to him?
No it was mocking Paisleys comment and didn’t contribute to the thread at all. It was off topic. Like the rest of your comments since.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was aimed at GT as part of a conversation that had been going on for ages.
That would have been obvious to anyone with half a brain.
You made a mistake. Get over it.
And of course it’s on topic. If someone makes a comment about the article and I call it ridiculous, how is it of topic? By all means criticise the lack of content, but calling it off topic just makes you sound like a moron.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 19 minutes ago
“ There was no logical reason to assume what I’d posted was aimed at you as it followed on from the conversation I’d been having.”
If it was aimed at Paisleys last time you spoke to him?
No it was mocking Paisleys comment and didn’t contribute to the thread at all. It was off topic. Like the rest of your comments since.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was aimed at GT as part of a conversation that had been going on for ages.
That would have been obvious to anyone with half a brain.
You made a mistake. Get over it.
And of course it’s on topic. If someone makes a comment about the article and I call it ridiculous, how is it of topic? By all means criticise the lack of content, but calling it off topic just makes you sound like a moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hang on. So we're ok to criticise the content you put out?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If I say something as stupid as paisley’s did, then yes.
I don’t recall ever doing that.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 19 minutes ago
“ There was no logical reason to assume what I’d posted was aimed at you as it followed on from the conversation I’d been having.”
If it was aimed at Paisleys last time you spoke to him?
No it was mocking Paisleys comment and didn’t contribute to the thread at all. It was off topic. Like the rest of your comments since.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was aimed at GT as part of a conversation that had been going on for ages.
That would have been obvious to anyone with half a brain.
You made a mistake. Get over it.
And of course it’s on topic. If someone makes a comment about the article and I call it ridiculous, how is it of topic? By all means criticise the lack of content, but calling it off topic just makes you sound like a moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Conversation, you talking shiite and GT replying ok to everything
Na it wasn’t. I’ll ask again. What did your comment have to do woth the alleged foul on DDG or Souness’ subsequent comments?
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by Going Loco Like Sissoko - SUPER EUROPEAN WORLD CHAMPIONS (U10893)
posted 9 minutes ago
I laid no blame at anyone's door, it was merely an observation. I'm taking no sides.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I know, I was just making it clear as the likes of fields and GT will soon be crying about me - whether it’s on this thread or another.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From an outsider looking in, you seem to be the fuel to the fire. Not saying who's right or who is wrong in any scenario as that is not my point, but you seem to be on the end of these types of altercations, either with the same people or others. I think at some point we have to step back and evaluate why we end up in certain situations. There's absolutely no shame in walking away you. 👍
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 19 minutes ago
“ There was no logical reason to assume what I’d posted was aimed at you as it followed on from the conversation I’d been having.”
If it was aimed at Paisleys last time you spoke to him?
No it was mocking Paisleys comment and didn’t contribute to the thread at all. It was off topic. Like the rest of your comments since.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was aimed at GT as part of a conversation that had been going on for ages.
That would have been obvious to anyone with half a brain.
You made a mistake. Get over it.
And of course it’s on topic. If someone makes a comment about the article and I call it ridiculous, how is it of topic? By all means criticise the lack of content, but calling it off topic just makes you sound like a moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Conversation, you talking shiite and GT replying ok to everything
Na it wasn’t. I’ll ask again. What did your comment have to do woth the alleged foul on DDG or Souness’ subsequent comments?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh it’s a sheite conversation but a conversation nonetheless. Absolutely nothing to imply I was talking about you - your mistake.
Paisley commented on the incident. I called his opinion on said incident ridiculous. Therefore it’s on topic.
Let me know which part you’re struggling with and I’ll do my best to help.
Of course, we know from the first part of this exchange that you can’t admit when you’ve made an error so of course this isn’t going end in any other way than you crying your eyes out and blaming me.
comment by Going Loco Like Sissoko - SUPER EUROPEAN WORLD CHAMPIONS (U10893)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by Going Loco Like Sissoko - SUPER EUROPEAN WORLD CHAMPIONS (U10893)
posted 9 minutes ago
I laid no blame at anyone's door, it was merely an observation. I'm taking no sides.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I know, I was just making it clear as the likes of fields and GT will soon be crying about me - whether it’s on this thread or another.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From an outsider looking in, you seem to be the fuel to the fire. Not saying who's right or who is wrong in any scenario as that is not my point, but you seem to be on the end of these types of altercations, either with the same people or others. I think at some point we have to step back and evaluate why we end up in certain situations. There's absolutely no shame in walking away you. 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A short evaluation will show you that paisley started spamming the thread when challenged and GT joined the thread purely to spam it as I’m here.
I can walk away but am not going to as I’m enjoying the fact that he’s boxed himself into a corner and can’t get our.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Graeme...are you ok ?
Page 12 of 68
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17
posted on 28/1/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/1/20
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 2 minutes ago
Yeah everyone but Winston, dry your eyes. Remain as calm, concise and on point as him and this thread will get back on track.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ve calmly ruined the guy making a stupid point and calmly ruined you.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hence me giving advice to others. It's been text book from you on this thread. Great stuff.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty textbook from the guy obsessed with me I’d say.
Still going as well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok
posted on 28/1/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 22 seconds ago
“ Why would you check back?
Oh I don’t know... maybe to see if it’s likely I was talking about you?”
You expect people to trawl through a weeks worth of posts just to check who you’re rambling about now.
Mental
No it wasn’t. You have barely mentioned the topic on this thread. Maybe time to stop crying about off topic comments. It makes you look like you’re round the twist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I expect you to check the conversation before assuming a comment that doesn’t name you is about you.
Let me know which part of that you’re struggling with.
And yes it was. It was about the topic and I gave it the respect it deserved. I then went onto pull it apart properly.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe you should make it clear who you’re talking about. Then you wouldn’t make yourself look silly.
No, you’re first comment was ridiculing his comment. Nothing to do with the OP at all. You made one comment after that was on topic but your aim was to come on here and mock Pailsey’s. Something else you constantly whinge about others doing.
This hasn’t gone well for you at all. Just give up.
posted on 28/1/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 22 seconds ago
“ Why would you check back?
Oh I don’t know... maybe to see if it’s likely I was talking about you?”
You expect people to trawl through a weeks worth of posts just to check who you’re rambling about now.
Mental
No it wasn’t. You have barely mentioned the topic on this thread. Maybe time to stop crying about off topic comments. It makes you look like you’re round the twist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I expect you to check the conversation before assuming a comment that doesn’t name you is about you.
Let me know which part of that you’re struggling with.
And yes it was. It was about the topic and I gave it the respect it deserved. I then went onto pull it apart properly.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe you should make it clear who you’re talking about. Then you wouldn’t make yourself look silly.
No, you’re first comment was ridiculing his comment. Nothing to do with the OP at all. You made one comment after that was on topic but your aim was to come on here and mock Pailsey’s. Something else you constantly whinge about others doing.
This hasn’t gone well for you at all. Just give up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I should make it clear who I’m talking about in every post of the same conversation?
As expected, it’s all my fault. Not yours.
Why is that muppets like you can’t just admit they’ve made a mistake?
My comment was ridiculing the comment yes. Still on topic though.
Let me know when you catch up.
posted on 28/1/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 22 seconds ago
“ Why would you check back?
Oh I don’t know... maybe to see if it’s likely I was talking about you?”
You expect people to trawl through a weeks worth of posts just to check who you’re rambling about now.
Mental
No it wasn’t. You have barely mentioned the topic on this thread. Maybe time to stop crying about off topic comments. It makes you look like you’re round the twist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I expect you to check the conversation before assuming a comment that doesn’t name you is about you.
Let me know which part of that you’re struggling with.
And yes it was. It was about the topic and I gave it the respect it deserved. I then went onto pull it apart properly.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe you should make it clear who you’re talking about. Then you wouldn’t make yourself look silly.
No, you’re first comment was ridiculing his comment. Nothing to do with the OP at all. You made one comment after that was on topic but your aim was to come on here and mock Pailsey’s. Something else you constantly whinge about others doing.
This hasn’t gone well for you at all. Just give up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I should make it clear who I’m talking about in every post of the same conversation?
As expected, it’s all my fault. Not yours.
Why is that muppets like you can’t just admit they’ve made a mistake?
My comment was ridiculing the comment yes. Still on topic though.
Let me know when you catch up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah you’re right. You should be as vague as possible or everyone should cross reference your comment woth past comments, doa quick Google search and check Wiki, you know just to be sure.
Again no it wasn’t. Your first comment was about Paisleys opinion and not the alleged foul on DDG, or Souness’ comments after.
One comment on topic out of how many? Yet keeps crying about others making off topic comments
posted on 28/1/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/1/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 22 seconds ago
“ Why would you check back?
Oh I don’t know... maybe to see if it’s likely I was talking about you?”
You expect people to trawl through a weeks worth of posts just to check who you’re rambling about now.
Mental
No it wasn’t. You have barely mentioned the topic on this thread. Maybe time to stop crying about off topic comments. It makes you look like you’re round the twist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I expect you to check the conversation before assuming a comment that doesn’t name you is about you.
Let me know which part of that you’re struggling with.
And yes it was. It was about the topic and I gave it the respect it deserved. I then went onto pull it apart properly.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe you should make it clear who you’re talking about. Then you wouldn’t make yourself look silly.
No, you’re first comment was ridiculing his comment. Nothing to do with the OP at all. You made one comment after that was on topic but your aim was to come on here and mock Pailsey’s. Something else you constantly whinge about others doing.
This hasn’t gone well for you at all. Just give up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I should make it clear who I’m talking about in every post of the same conversation?
As expected, it’s all my fault. Not yours.
Why is that muppets like you can’t just admit they’ve made a mistake?
My comment was ridiculing the comment yes. Still on topic though.
Let me know when you catch up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah you’re right. You should be as vague as possible or everyone should cross reference your comment woth past comments, doa quick Google search and check Wiki, you know just to be sure.
Again no it wasn’t. Your first comment was about Paisleys opinion and not the alleged foul on DDG, or Souness’ comments after.
One comment on topic out of how many? Yet keeps crying about others making off topic comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You butted into an existing conversation and didn’t think to check who I was talking about.
Face it, you messed up and now you want to blame me rather than just admit it - you’re a pathetic mess.
What is it about this place? People lose their sheite over someone they’ve never met.
It’s facking embarrassing.
posted on 28/1/20
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 22 seconds ago
“ Why would you check back?
Oh I don’t know... maybe to see if it’s likely I was talking about you?”
You expect people to trawl through a weeks worth of posts just to check who you’re rambling about now.
Mental
No it wasn’t. You have barely mentioned the topic on this thread. Maybe time to stop crying about off topic comments. It makes you look like you’re round the twist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I expect you to check the conversation before assuming a comment that doesn’t name you is about you.
Let me know which part of that you’re struggling with.
And yes it was. It was about the topic and I gave it the respect it deserved. I then went onto pull it apart properly.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe you should make it clear who you’re talking about. Then you wouldn’t make yourself look silly.
No, you’re first comment was ridiculing his comment. Nothing to do with the OP at all. You made one comment after that was on topic but your aim was to come on here and mock Pailsey’s. Something else you constantly whinge about others doing.
This hasn’t gone well for you at all. Just give up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I should make it clear who I’m talking about in every post of the same conversation?
As expected, it’s all my fault. Not yours.
Why is that muppets like you can’t just admit they’ve made a mistake?
My comment was ridiculing the comment yes. Still on topic though.
Let me know when you catch up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, catch up Fields. Winston is all over you here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed I am.
posted on 28/1/20
Oh and fields, paisleys comment was about the incident. So of course my reply was on topic.
You absolute muppet.
posted on 28/1/20
Geez, is this still rumbling on? Mind you, it's less than 300 comments so there is still a bit to go. As you were. 👍
posted on 28/1/20
comment by Going Loco Like Sissoko - SUPER EUROPEAN WORLD CHAMPIONS (U10893)
posted 14 seconds ago
Geez, is this still rumbling on? Mind you, it's less than 300 comments so there is still a bit to go. As you were. 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve GT to thank this time.
Of course, it’ll all be Winston’s fault.
posted on 28/1/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 22 seconds ago
“ Why would you check back?
Oh I don’t know... maybe to see if it’s likely I was talking about you?”
You expect people to trawl through a weeks worth of posts just to check who you’re rambling about now.
Mental
No it wasn’t. You have barely mentioned the topic on this thread. Maybe time to stop crying about off topic comments. It makes you look like you’re round the twist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I expect you to check the conversation before assuming a comment that doesn’t name you is about you.
Let me know which part of that you’re struggling with.
And yes it was. It was about the topic and I gave it the respect it deserved. I then went onto pull it apart properly.
Hope this helps.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe you should make it clear who you’re talking about. Then you wouldn’t make yourself look silly.
No, you’re first comment was ridiculing his comment. Nothing to do with the OP at all. You made one comment after that was on topic but your aim was to come on here and mock Pailsey’s. Something else you constantly whinge about others doing.
This hasn’t gone well for you at all. Just give up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I should make it clear who I’m talking about in every post of the same conversation?
As expected, it’s all my fault. Not yours.
Why is that muppets like you can’t just admit they’ve made a mistake?
My comment was ridiculing the comment yes. Still on topic though.
Let me know when you catch up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah you’re right. You should be as vague as possible or everyone should cross reference your comment woth past comments, doa quick Google search and check Wiki, you know just to be sure.
Again no it wasn’t. Your first comment was about Paisleys opinion and not the alleged foul on DDG, or Souness’ comments after.
One comment on topic out of how many? Yet keeps crying about others making off topic comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You butted into an existing conversation and didn’t think to check who I was talking about.
Face it, you messed up and now you want to blame me rather than just admit it - you’re a pathetic mess.
What is it about this place? People lose their sheite over someone they’ve never met.
It’s facking embarrassing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Butted in, you mean like you did in your response to Paisleys.
Erm no soft lad. I posted a comment to you, One post later you responded but didn’t make it clear who to. Of course I’d assume you were replying me and not someone you last spoke to over a week ago. Mental gymnastics from Winston
What did your first comment have to do with the DDG foul or Souness’ subsequent comments?
posted on 28/1/20
I laid no blame at anyone's door, it was merely an observation. I'm taking no sides.
posted on 28/1/20
Yes fields, exactly like that.
Only I didn’t make the mistake of reading a comment and assuming it was aimed at me because I don’t have a weird complex.
There was no logical reason to assume what I’d posted was aimed at you as it followed on from the conversation I’d been having.
This is your fault - you’re just too immature to admit it.
And of course it’s on topic. It’s a reply about a reply on the subject. The fact that it was a short reply just laughing at the comment doesn’t mean it wasn’t about the subject.
Keep up.
posted on 28/1/20
comment by Going Loco Like Sissoko - SUPER EUROPEAN WORLD CHAMPIONS (U10893)
posted 9 minutes ago
I laid no blame at anyone's door, it was merely an observation. I'm taking no sides.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I know, I was just making it clear as the likes of fields and GT will soon be crying about me - whether it’s on this thread or another.
posted on 28/1/20
“ There was no logical reason to assume what I’d posted was aimed at you as it followed on from the conversation I’d been having.”
If it was aimed at Paisleys last time you spoke to him?
No it was mocking Paisleys comment and didn’t contribute to the thread at all. It was off topic. Like the rest of your comments since.
posted on 28/1/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 19 minutes ago
“ There was no logical reason to assume what I’d posted was aimed at you as it followed on from the conversation I’d been having.”
If it was aimed at Paisleys last time you spoke to him?
No it was mocking Paisleys comment and didn’t contribute to the thread at all. It was off topic. Like the rest of your comments since.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was aimed at GT as part of a conversation that had been going on for ages.
That would have been obvious to anyone with half a brain.
You made a mistake. Get over it.
And of course it’s on topic. If someone makes a comment about the article and I call it ridiculous, how is it of topic? By all means criticise the lack of content, but calling it off topic just makes you sound like a moron.
posted on 28/1/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/1/20
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 19 minutes ago
“ There was no logical reason to assume what I’d posted was aimed at you as it followed on from the conversation I’d been having.”
If it was aimed at Paisleys last time you spoke to him?
No it was mocking Paisleys comment and didn’t contribute to the thread at all. It was off topic. Like the rest of your comments since.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was aimed at GT as part of a conversation that had been going on for ages.
That would have been obvious to anyone with half a brain.
You made a mistake. Get over it.
And of course it’s on topic. If someone makes a comment about the article and I call it ridiculous, how is it of topic? By all means criticise the lack of content, but calling it off topic just makes you sound like a moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hang on. So we're ok to criticise the content you put out?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If I say something as stupid as paisley’s did, then yes.
I don’t recall ever doing that.
posted on 28/1/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 19 minutes ago
“ There was no logical reason to assume what I’d posted was aimed at you as it followed on from the conversation I’d been having.”
If it was aimed at Paisleys last time you spoke to him?
No it was mocking Paisleys comment and didn’t contribute to the thread at all. It was off topic. Like the rest of your comments since.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was aimed at GT as part of a conversation that had been going on for ages.
That would have been obvious to anyone with half a brain.
You made a mistake. Get over it.
And of course it’s on topic. If someone makes a comment about the article and I call it ridiculous, how is it of topic? By all means criticise the lack of content, but calling it off topic just makes you sound like a moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Conversation, you talking shiite and GT replying ok to everything
Na it wasn’t. I’ll ask again. What did your comment have to do woth the alleged foul on DDG or Souness’ subsequent comments?
posted on 28/1/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by Going Loco Like Sissoko - SUPER EUROPEAN WORLD CHAMPIONS (U10893)
posted 9 minutes ago
I laid no blame at anyone's door, it was merely an observation. I'm taking no sides.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I know, I was just making it clear as the likes of fields and GT will soon be crying about me - whether it’s on this thread or another.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From an outsider looking in, you seem to be the fuel to the fire. Not saying who's right or who is wrong in any scenario as that is not my point, but you seem to be on the end of these types of altercations, either with the same people or others. I think at some point we have to step back and evaluate why we end up in certain situations. There's absolutely no shame in walking away you. 👍
posted on 28/1/20
You know#
posted on 28/1/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 19 minutes ago
“ There was no logical reason to assume what I’d posted was aimed at you as it followed on from the conversation I’d been having.”
If it was aimed at Paisleys last time you spoke to him?
No it was mocking Paisleys comment and didn’t contribute to the thread at all. It was off topic. Like the rest of your comments since.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was aimed at GT as part of a conversation that had been going on for ages.
That would have been obvious to anyone with half a brain.
You made a mistake. Get over it.
And of course it’s on topic. If someone makes a comment about the article and I call it ridiculous, how is it of topic? By all means criticise the lack of content, but calling it off topic just makes you sound like a moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Conversation, you talking shiite and GT replying ok to everything
Na it wasn’t. I’ll ask again. What did your comment have to do woth the alleged foul on DDG or Souness’ subsequent comments?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh it’s a sheite conversation but a conversation nonetheless. Absolutely nothing to imply I was talking about you - your mistake.
Paisley commented on the incident. I called his opinion on said incident ridiculous. Therefore it’s on topic.
Let me know which part you’re struggling with and I’ll do my best to help.
Of course, we know from the first part of this exchange that you can’t admit when you’ve made an error so of course this isn’t going end in any other way than you crying your eyes out and blaming me.
posted on 28/1/20
comment by Going Loco Like Sissoko - SUPER EUROPEAN WORLD CHAMPIONS (U10893)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by Going Loco Like Sissoko - SUPER EUROPEAN WORLD CHAMPIONS (U10893)
posted 9 minutes ago
I laid no blame at anyone's door, it was merely an observation. I'm taking no sides.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I know, I was just making it clear as the likes of fields and GT will soon be crying about me - whether it’s on this thread or another.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From an outsider looking in, you seem to be the fuel to the fire. Not saying who's right or who is wrong in any scenario as that is not my point, but you seem to be on the end of these types of altercations, either with the same people or others. I think at some point we have to step back and evaluate why we end up in certain situations. There's absolutely no shame in walking away you. 👍
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A short evaluation will show you that paisley started spamming the thread when challenged and GT joined the thread purely to spam it as I’m here.
I can walk away but am not going to as I’m enjoying the fact that he’s boxed himself into a corner and can’t get our.
posted on 28/1/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 12 of 68
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17