or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 1684 comments are related to an article called:

Graeme...are you ok ?

Page 20 of 68

posted on 30/1/20

Klopptimus Prime (U1282)

I admitted nothing of the sort.

This thread went crashing downhill because Paisley started spamming it and then GT joined in.

"Why is everything and everyone happening the way it is because of you?"

Everything and everyone?

No. Most threads are fine. Most threads that go this way do so because of a handful of posters who target me.

You, GT and Fields have done it. You've come on with absolutely no intention of doing anything but argue. Then you blame me for all the arguing.

"Nothing is your fault"

I've never said this and literally said the opposite but that doesn't fit with your narrative, does it?

posted on 30/1/20

FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)

Why should he? Well ultimately it's up to him. If he wanted to debate the point then he can. But he chose to spam the thread. I think that tells it's own story.

I didn't get anything wrong.

I gave you an example sentence where the word 'you' is used without it being directed at the person you're speaking with.

For some reason you struggle interpreting context and tone.

"No way you run a business the amount of time you spend on here"

Yeh that's right. I made it up. Of course I did.

posted on 30/1/20

“ You, GT and Fields have done it. You've come on with absolutely no intention of doing anything but argue. Then you blame me for all the arguing.”

And your first comment was with the intention of?

Such a hypocrite

posted on 30/1/20

FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)

Yeh, I already admitted that.

But that isn't the reason why the thread now has nearly 500 comments of crap.

posted on 30/1/20

And actually, whilst my first comment wasn't exactly instigating debate, it was at least about the subject.

You children just come on to make things personal.

posted on 30/1/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 14 seconds ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)

Yeh, I already admitted that.

But that isn't the reason why the thread now has nearly 500 comments of crap.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven’t contributed towards the crap?

posted on 30/1/20

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 14 seconds ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)

Yeh, I already admitted that.

But that isn't the reason why the thread now has nearly 500 comments of crap.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven’t contributed towards the crap?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yeh of course I have.

And it's a bit of a game between GT and I. Pathetic, but such is life.

It still stands though that it wouldn't have happened if he and Paisely didn't start spamming the thread for no apparent reason.

posted on 30/1/20

Winston

You do know you don’t have to keep posting yeah. You can move on to one of the many other threads you ‘contribute’ to

posted on 30/1/20

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
Winston

You do know you don’t have to keep posting yeah. You can move on to one of the many other threads you ‘contribute’ to
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yep, just as you presumably know that you don't need to keep posting to me, given you clearly don't like me.

You put 'contributing' in inverted commas but take a look. You'll see perfectly reasonable posts and conversation with people.

I know you want to stick to a certain narrative but it just doesn't fit.

posted on 30/1/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
Winston

You do know you don’t have to keep posting yeah. You can move on to one of the many other threads you ‘contribute’ to
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yep, just as you presumably know that you don't need to keep posting to me, given you clearly don't like me.

You put 'contributing' in inverted commas but take a look. You'll see perfectly reasonable posts and conversation with people.

I know you want to stick to a certain narrative but it just doesn't fit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll continue to post as and when I want ta. Thing is I’m not the one crying about the state of this article but continuing to post.

We’ll go and ‘contribute’ your reasonable posts and comments elsewhere as it’s obvious you’ve failed on this thread. GT kept posting smileys because he knew you’d keep replying. Point proven.

posted on 30/1/20

FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)

Yeh I know you will, just as I will.

I'm not crying about anything. You're trying to have a pop at me and I'm explaining what has happened.

"GT kept posting smileys because he knew you’d keep replying. Point proven."

And I knew exactly what he was doing, so chose to tie him into the thread - which was my point when I was mocking him yesterday morning.

Ultimately, no one comes out of this looking anything other than a little bit pathetic.

But for me it's really about proving a point that most threads that are derailed happen because of this and not because of things I've done.

Quite why you felt the need to get involved, I've no idea.

posted on 30/1/20

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 30/1/20

GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)

Just like you think I have to reply to you.

You seem to have completely missed the many times where you've tried this 'ok' stuff and I've ignored you.

Do I really believe it? Well, no, you could walk away anytime. So could I. Of course we could.

Do I think I affected your behaviour? Maybe a little, yes.

It's all just posturing and we're both being a bit pathetic, aren't we. The only difference is, I don't seek you out for these exchanges. Never have and never will.

posted on 30/1/20

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 30/1/20

GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)

You can justify it all you like - but you create situations where a thread goes from being fairly normal albeit possibly a bit of an argument into this tedious back and forth, completely derailing the thread.

If you genuinely have issues with how I post on here then fine, but that isn't justification for doing that.

"all the things you deny being in terms of how you behave on this site and communicating with someone in a way that is going to cause issues"

I do take issue with this, though.

Time and time again I have openly admitted my faults and apologised when I feel I've behaved poorly.

I also find it bemusing that you sit there in judgement of my posting style.

Have a look around the site. Have a look at some of your fellow Liverpool fans. Why are you not appraising them and derailing threads where their behaviour is poor?

I have no idea why your focus is on me - but it's been that way for so long it really has become quite tedious.

posted on 30/1/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 37 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 14 seconds ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)

Yeh, I already admitted that.

But that isn't the reason why the thread now has nearly 500 comments of crap.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You haven’t contributed towards the crap?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yeh of course I have.

And it's a bit of a game between GT and I. Pathetic, but such is life.

It still stands though that it wouldn't have happened if he and Paisely didn't start spamming the thread for no apparent reason.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Its not your job to police thread spamming. You waded in to have an argument with a tatgetted individual, face the facts.

You can't fix it while lying to yourself. Identifying the problem correctly is crucial in problem solving.

A lot of threads on JA606 are spammed but this 20 page pile of sheet only ever happens when you're involved. Stop blaming others.

If people are spamming a thread then leave it to admin as its not your job, stop using it as an excuse to do this time and again. Take this advice.

posted on 30/1/20

Klopptimus Prime (U1282)

I didn't say or imply it is my job to police spamming.

"this 20 page pile of sheet only ever happens when you're involved"

Yep. Because the usual culprits don't target others as they do with me.

I do find it funny that you're telling me that it's not my job to police the site yet here you are, telling me what to do.

There's no advice to be taken from you - unlike GT, who I think is a decent poster, you add nothing of value to this site. You're only capable of discussing subjects if you agree with the other person - you're incapable of debating a subject like an adult.

posted on 30/1/20

Actually, I take that back.

There are loads of sheite threads on here that go on for ages and don't involve me - so that's absolute ballacks!

posted on 30/1/20

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 30/1/20

GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)

Come on, you've not targeted anyone like you have me, have you?

Calling someone out for a crap post is fine - go ahead and do it with me if you like. But don't pretend that's the same as what you've done here.

Regardless of whether you are right or wrong about me, you have a choice about how to behave yourself and over the past year you've chosen to behave appallingly in many cases.

I will give you some credit though - you often do discuss things properly and don't seem to hold grudges into all conversations.

The same can't be said for other people on this forum, certainly.

posted on 30/1/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 10 minutes ago

Klopptimus Prime (U1282)

I didn't say or imply it is my job to police spamming.

"this 20 page pile of sheet only ever happens when you're involved"

Yep. Because the usual culprits don't target others as they do with me.
------
And I'm telling you it's the other way around, iys you targeting them and when you start to accept that then we will see some progress.

posted on 30/1/20

Klopptimus Prime (U1282)

Well maybe you can show me where I've targeted you, GT and Fields on this thread then.

Good luck with that.

posted on 30/1/20

I don't need to show you because I know you know its true.

How many times have I made you apologise for commenting before thinking?

comment by Phenom (U20037)

posted on 30/1/20

499

posted on 30/1/20

comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
I don't need to show you because I know you know its true.

How many times have I made you apologise for commenting before thinking?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well it isn't true, that's why I asked.

On this thread, you, GT and Fields have all decided to post at me with no provocation whatsoever. You targeted me, not the other way around?

"How many times have I made you apologise for commenting before thinking?"

This always makes me chuckle - trying to use the fact that I apologise when I've made a mistake against me.

Fact is you've made many mistakes. The difference is, you don't hold your hands up, admit it and move on. You try to argue your way out of it.

I apologised once, when I'd completely misread the original post. You should have apologised multiple times, but you never will of course... which really just enhances my point.

I don't know why people like you use forums.

Page 20 of 68