comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
I'm not confused.
The sentence makes no sense.
I've nothing to apologise for. My point was that you've written something that makes no sense and I'm right.
Love the way you're clinging onto this - I've really got you to a desperate stage, haven't I?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's not what you said. You said it was not legible.
Another foot in mouth comment from you. I can't believe you just can't come out and admit it after all your preaching. What a hypocrite.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, I'm satisfied with what I said having checked.
You should concentrate on writing things that make sense instead of trying to desperately find a victory on a thread where you've been beaten multiple times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Making sense has nothing to do with legibility
You know this. Stay in denial. Caught pants down again.
Don't you get tired of me whooping your ass all the time?
It is to do with legibility.
The words you've intended to use cannot be deciphered - presumably because you were so angry at the time.
Oh dear Klopptimus. You thought you had me and you've lost again. Oh dear oh dear.
The definition of legible is known to most people
I'll just leave this here so that when you start preaching again your hypocrisy can be exposed
Yep, and I know it as well.
I thought it was reasonable use and upon checking, I'm right.
Good luck claiming I'm a hypocrite for not admitting when I'm wrong on the same thread as trying to mock me for apologising when I was wrong.
Its impossible for stuff to be illegible on this site.
Yet again you've been owned by yhe Kloppmeister.
It's not impossible - unless you're claiming that the words in your post are what you intended to write?
I'm not sure what is funnier; the desperation of abandoning conversations every time you think I've made a mistake, or the fact that each time you do it, you get it wrong.
Illegible means impossible to read.
So what I posted was impossible for you to read?
Legibility was the wrong word. I know the word you were looking for, and if you had used that word you'd have been right.
Still nice to see you squirm in the face of another blatant gaffe.
Illegible may apply in more than one scenario.
It's not possible to know what words you wrote from the sentence posted. Unless you're claiming you used the correct words?
Nice to be correct as usual, and particularly nice to see you get excited (again) only for it all to come crashing down.
Fact is it wasn't illegible. You used yhe wrong word and you know it. You are also aware that you are squirming right now rather than admit it.
Simply Lavalee to watch!
Don't let facts get in the way though, keep going. Morale, morale.
It was illegible and I've explained why.
You won't admit you're wrong because you never do, where as we know that I do.
Yet again, it's game, set and match.
Perhaps get in touch with Oxford so they can add your explanation to the dictionary. It seems they missed it.
Squirm fishy, squirm.
Maybe you should broaden your reading beyond a dictionary definition that requires interpretation.
Let me know if you need some help.
I saw on another thread that you mixed up 'you're and your', so it's fascinating to watch you give it the big one on this general subject area.
Almost as fascinating as watching you try to convince yourself that I can't admit that I'm wrong on the same thread where you mocked me for admitting I was wrong.
I saw on another thread that you mixed up 'you're and your'
-------
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 23 minutes ago.
Almost as fascinating as watching you try to convince yourself that I can't admit that I'm wrong on the same thread where you mocked me for admitting I was wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. You won't admit it because you are afraid of getting mocked, which is something you do all the time.
You don't have to admit it. Its better when you keep digging.
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
I saw on another thread that you mixed up 'you're and your'
-------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was funny, given the conversation here.
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 23 minutes ago.
Almost as fascinating as watching you try to convince yourself that I can't admit that I'm wrong on the same thread where you mocked me for admitting I was wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. You won't admit it because you are afraid of getting mocked, which is something you do all the time.
You don't have to admit it. Its better when you keep digging.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I admit when I'm wrong and you don't.
Therefore we know that in this situation, I'm confident I am right.
We don't know what you really think because we know you wouldn't admit it even if you did realise that you're wrong.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
I saw on another thread that you mixed up 'you're and your'
-------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was funny, given the conversation here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparable to a guy saying something is illegible on a written forum?
Squirm fishy, squirm.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 23 minutes ago.
Almost as fascinating as watching you try to convince yourself that I can't admit that I'm wrong on the same thread where you mocked me for admitting I was wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. You won't admit it because you are afraid of getting mocked, which is something you do all the time.
You don't have to admit it. Its better when you keep digging.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I admit when I'm wrong and you don't.
Therefore we know that in this situation, I'm confident I am right.
We don't know what you really think because we know you wouldn't admit it even if you did realise that you're wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheet can't be illegible on this site saan.
You know this. I know this. You know I know this. I know that you know that I know you know this. Another stupid gaffe. Wonder what will be next.
Squirm fishy.
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
I saw on another thread that you mixed up 'you're and your'
-------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was funny, given the conversation here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparable to a guy saying something is illegible on a written forum?
Squirm fishy, squirm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say it was comparable, did I?
Please read things more carefully.
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 23 minutes ago.
Almost as fascinating as watching you try to convince yourself that I can't admit that I'm wrong on the same thread where you mocked me for admitting I was wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. You won't admit it because you are afraid of getting mocked, which is something you do all the time.
You don't have to admit it. Its better when you keep digging.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I admit when I'm wrong and you don't.
Therefore we know that in this situation, I'm confident I am right.
We don't know what you really think because we know you wouldn't admit it even if you did realise that you're wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheet can't be illegible on this site saan.
You know this. I know this. You know I know this. I know that you know that I know you know this. Another stupid gaffe. Wonder what will be next.
Squirm fishy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it can. If it's not clear what word has been written, it's illegible.
I'm right and you're wrong.
Time for the Klopptimus tantrum.
Always makes me chuckle when people with a poor grasp of the English language read a dictionary entry and believe they have a full understanding.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
I saw on another thread that you mixed up 'you're and your'
-------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was funny, given the conversation here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparable to a guy saying something is illegible on a written forum?
Squirm fishy, squirm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say it was comparable, did I?
Please read things more carefully.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say you said it was comparable, did I?
Here's the next one.
Please read things more carefully.
"Comparable to a guy saying something is illegible on a written forum?"
Why ask me that then?
Seriously Dimston are you Ok with being destroyed like this? Why don't you just quit and beg for mercy?
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 12 seconds ago
Seriously Dimston are you Ok with being destroyed like this? Why don't you just quit and beg for mercy?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here it is.
Here's Klopptimus moving away from the actual debate to just post soundbites, because he's lost the debate.
Graeme...are you ok ?
Page 46 of 68
47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51
posted on 11/2/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
I'm not confused.
The sentence makes no sense.
I've nothing to apologise for. My point was that you've written something that makes no sense and I'm right.
Love the way you're clinging onto this - I've really got you to a desperate stage, haven't I?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's not what you said. You said it was not legible.
Another foot in mouth comment from you. I can't believe you just can't come out and admit it after all your preaching. What a hypocrite.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, I'm satisfied with what I said having checked.
You should concentrate on writing things that make sense instead of trying to desperately find a victory on a thread where you've been beaten multiple times.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Making sense has nothing to do with legibility
You know this. Stay in denial. Caught pants down again.
Don't you get tired of me whooping your ass all the time?
posted on 11/2/20
It is to do with legibility.
The words you've intended to use cannot be deciphered - presumably because you were so angry at the time.
Oh dear Klopptimus. You thought you had me and you've lost again. Oh dear oh dear.
posted on 11/2/20
The definition of legible is known to most people
I'll just leave this here so that when you start preaching again your hypocrisy can be exposed
posted on 11/2/20
Yep, and I know it as well.
I thought it was reasonable use and upon checking, I'm right.
Good luck claiming I'm a hypocrite for not admitting when I'm wrong on the same thread as trying to mock me for apologising when I was wrong.
posted on 11/2/20
Its impossible for stuff to be illegible on this site.
Yet again you've been owned by yhe Kloppmeister.
posted on 11/2/20
It's not impossible - unless you're claiming that the words in your post are what you intended to write?
I'm not sure what is funnier; the desperation of abandoning conversations every time you think I've made a mistake, or the fact that each time you do it, you get it wrong.
posted on 11/2/20
Illegible means impossible to read.
So what I posted was impossible for you to read?
Legibility was the wrong word. I know the word you were looking for, and if you had used that word you'd have been right.
Still nice to see you squirm in the face of another blatant gaffe.
posted on 11/2/20
Illegible may apply in more than one scenario.
It's not possible to know what words you wrote from the sentence posted. Unless you're claiming you used the correct words?
Nice to be correct as usual, and particularly nice to see you get excited (again) only for it all to come crashing down.
posted on 11/2/20
Fact is it wasn't illegible. You used yhe wrong word and you know it. You are also aware that you are squirming right now rather than admit it.
Simply Lavalee to watch!
Don't let facts get in the way though, keep going. Morale, morale.
posted on 11/2/20
It was illegible and I've explained why.
You won't admit you're wrong because you never do, where as we know that I do.
Yet again, it's game, set and match.
posted on 11/2/20
Perhaps get in touch with Oxford so they can add your explanation to the dictionary. It seems they missed it.
Squirm fishy, squirm.
posted on 11/2/20
Maybe you should broaden your reading beyond a dictionary definition that requires interpretation.
Let me know if you need some help.
I saw on another thread that you mixed up 'you're and your', so it's fascinating to watch you give it the big one on this general subject area.
Almost as fascinating as watching you try to convince yourself that I can't admit that I'm wrong on the same thread where you mocked me for admitting I was wrong.
posted on 11/2/20
I saw on another thread that you mixed up 'you're and your'
-------
posted on 11/2/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 23 minutes ago.
Almost as fascinating as watching you try to convince yourself that I can't admit that I'm wrong on the same thread where you mocked me for admitting I was wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. You won't admit it because you are afraid of getting mocked, which is something you do all the time.
You don't have to admit it. Its better when you keep digging.
posted on 11/2/20
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
I saw on another thread that you mixed up 'you're and your'
-------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was funny, given the conversation here.
posted on 11/2/20
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 23 minutes ago.
Almost as fascinating as watching you try to convince yourself that I can't admit that I'm wrong on the same thread where you mocked me for admitting I was wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. You won't admit it because you are afraid of getting mocked, which is something you do all the time.
You don't have to admit it. Its better when you keep digging.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I admit when I'm wrong and you don't.
Therefore we know that in this situation, I'm confident I am right.
We don't know what you really think because we know you wouldn't admit it even if you did realise that you're wrong.
posted on 11/2/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
I saw on another thread that you mixed up 'you're and your'
-------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was funny, given the conversation here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparable to a guy saying something is illegible on a written forum?
Squirm fishy, squirm.
posted on 11/2/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 23 minutes ago.
Almost as fascinating as watching you try to convince yourself that I can't admit that I'm wrong on the same thread where you mocked me for admitting I was wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. You won't admit it because you are afraid of getting mocked, which is something you do all the time.
You don't have to admit it. Its better when you keep digging.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I admit when I'm wrong and you don't.
Therefore we know that in this situation, I'm confident I am right.
We don't know what you really think because we know you wouldn't admit it even if you did realise that you're wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheet can't be illegible on this site saan.
You know this. I know this. You know I know this. I know that you know that I know you know this. Another stupid gaffe. Wonder what will be next.
Squirm fishy.
posted on 11/2/20
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
I saw on another thread that you mixed up 'you're and your'
-------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was funny, given the conversation here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparable to a guy saying something is illegible on a written forum?
Squirm fishy, squirm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say it was comparable, did I?
Please read things more carefully.
posted on 11/2/20
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 23 minutes ago.
Almost as fascinating as watching you try to convince yourself that I can't admit that I'm wrong on the same thread where you mocked me for admitting I was wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. You won't admit it because you are afraid of getting mocked, which is something you do all the time.
You don't have to admit it. Its better when you keep digging.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I admit when I'm wrong and you don't.
Therefore we know that in this situation, I'm confident I am right.
We don't know what you really think because we know you wouldn't admit it even if you did realise that you're wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheet can't be illegible on this site saan.
You know this. I know this. You know I know this. I know that you know that I know you know this. Another stupid gaffe. Wonder what will be next.
Squirm fishy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it can. If it's not clear what word has been written, it's illegible.
I'm right and you're wrong.
Time for the Klopptimus tantrum.
posted on 11/2/20
Always makes me chuckle when people with a poor grasp of the English language read a dictionary entry and believe they have a full understanding.
posted on 11/2/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
I saw on another thread that you mixed up 'you're and your'
-------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was funny, given the conversation here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparable to a guy saying something is illegible on a written forum?
Squirm fishy, squirm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say it was comparable, did I?
Please read things more carefully.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't say you said it was comparable, did I?
Here's the next one.
Please read things more carefully.
posted on 11/2/20
"Comparable to a guy saying something is illegible on a written forum?"
Why ask me that then?
posted on 11/2/20
Seriously Dimston are you Ok with being destroyed like this? Why don't you just quit and beg for mercy?
posted on 11/2/20
comment by Klopptimus Prime (U1282)
posted 12 seconds ago
Seriously Dimston are you Ok with being destroyed like this? Why don't you just quit and beg for mercy?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here it is.
Here's Klopptimus moving away from the actual debate to just post soundbites, because he's lost the debate.
Page 46 of 68
47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51