Comment deleted by Site Moderator
So let's get this straight. This is the dictionary example:
"Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him."
You think this means 'don't start a conversation with him'?
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/engage
to become involved, or have contact, with someone or something
"Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him"
Fields is done. Ruined.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only using the word engage and not the full term. Typical mental Winston shifting the goal posts to suit his weak argument.
What a headcase
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because it's the definition of the word you muppet.
Oh my god.
You don't understand the English language at all, do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Engage with is two words you autistic knobhead
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was referring to the word 'engage' you muppet. That's how dictionaries work - they give you a definition of a single word.
You are so stupid it's unbelievable.
Great to see you sink to new levels with your insults though. Me destroying you has really wound you up, hasn't it?
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/engage
to become involved, or have contact, with someone or something
"Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him"
Fields is done. Ruined.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only using the word engage and not the full term. Typical mental Winston shifting the goal posts to suit his weak argument.
What a headcase
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because it's the definition of the word you muppet.
Oh my god.
You don't understand the English language at all, do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Engage with is two words you autistic knobhead
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was referring to the word 'engage' you muppet. That's how dictionaries work - they give you a definition of a single word.
You are so stupid it's unbelievable.
Great to see you sink to new levels with your insults though. Me destroying you has really wound you up, hasn't it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.macmillandictionary.com/amp/dictionary/british/engage-with
Definition of engage with.
Look at the hypocrite going on about being wound up. You unfiltered Ripley’s yet you coward?
Biggest hypocrite on the site, and one of the biggest caants as well. Cries about other people’s contributions like your the site police yet is fine to dish out insults and filter himself.
Just calling you out for what you are. Hope this helps.
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
So which one of those 'definitions' do you think applies here?
And answer this:
"Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him."
Are you saying that you think this means 'don't start a conversation with him'?
Fields is approaching Robbing levels of rage here.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
So which one of those 'definitions' do you think applies here?
And answer this:
"Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him."
Are you saying that you think this means 'don't start a conversation with him'?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes of course it does you thick caaant
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
So which one of those 'definitions' do you think applies here?
And answer this:
"Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him."
Are you saying that you think this means 'don't start a conversation with him'?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes of course it does you thick caaant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It really doesn't.
Have you got an English teacher who can help you with this?
He actually doesn't know what 'engage' means.
I am staggered.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
Fields is approaching Robbing levels of rage here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not yet reached Winston levels yet. Haven’t reached for the filter button, gone to admins or threatened to go the police
‘Officer someone said something mean to me on the internet’
I’ll never be able to beat you on that front rain man.
Fields, it's really quite clear how fuming you are now.
You'll deny it, of course. But seriously, you look a total mess.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
So which one of those 'definitions' do you think applies here?
And answer this:
"Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him."
Are you saying that you think this means 'don't start a conversation with him'?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes of course it does you thick caaant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It really doesn't.
Have you got an English teacher who can help you with this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you can start a conversation with someone but not engage them. Ok then
"So you can start a conversation with someone but not engage them."
What the actual feck?
No. The point is that if someone starts a conversation with you and you respond, you're engaging with them.
That is just a fact, no matter how desperately you try to argue otherwise.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 second ago
Fields, it's really quite clear how fuming you are now.
You'll deny it, of course. But seriously, you look a total mess.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like you denied fuming over Ripley’s comments last night. Have I reached the same level as you last night? Nope.
How long before you filter/complain to Admins/threaten to go the bizzies?
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 seconds ago
"So you can start a conversation with someone but not engage them."
What the actual feck?
No. The point is that if someone starts a conversation with you and you respond, you're engaging with them.
That is just a fact, no matter how desperately you try to argue otherwise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No mention of the other person starting the conversation here;
“Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him."
More shifting the goal posts from the thick caaant. Money stuff
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 seconds ago
"So you can start a conversation with someone but not engage them."
What the actual feck?
No. The point is that if someone starts a conversation with you and you respond, you're engaging with them.
That is just a fact, no matter how desperately you try to argue otherwise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No mention of the other person starting the conversation here;
“Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him."
More shifting the goal posts from the thick caaant. Money stuff
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would there need to be a mention of who starts the conversation? It's simply saying don't engage with him i.e. don't speak to him, don't look at him etc.
There's no mention of starting the conversation because 'engage with' doesn't mean start the conversation, you donut.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 second ago
Fields, it's really quite clear how fuming you are now.
You'll deny it, of course. But seriously, you look a total mess.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like you denied fuming over Ripley’s comments last night. Have I reached the same level as you last night? Nope.
How long before you filter/complain to Admins/threaten to go the bizzies?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just by writing this post, it shows what a mess you're in.
Scrapping around for any insult that you can find - bring mental health into it.. you're angry and it really shows.
so...just to clarify
are you two engaged now...
Winston have you told Robbing & Kloptimus...it's only fair I think
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 1 minute ago
so...just to clarify
are you two engaged now...
Winston have you told Robbing & Kloptimus...it's only fair I think
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We are engaging with each other
Oh...and Winston...filtering....really...
This shows weakness, & is unacceptable
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 0 seconds ago
Oh...and Winston...filtering....really...
This shows weakness, & is unacceptable
----------------------------------------------------------------------
do the right thing
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 47 seconds ago
Oh...and Winston...filtering....really...
This shows weakness, & is unacceptable
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I use filtering to prevent people from derailing my threads.
That's for the likes of Sandy & sizzle
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 seconds ago
"So you can start a conversation with someone but not engage them."
What the actual feck?
No. The point is that if someone starts a conversation with you and you respond, you're engaging with them.
That is just a fact, no matter how desperately you try to argue otherwise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No mention of the other person starting the conversation here;
“Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him."
More shifting the goal posts from the thick caaant. Money stuff
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would there need to be a mention of who starts the conversation? It's simply saying don't engage with him i.e. don't speak to him, don't look at him etc.
There's no mention of starting the conversation because 'engage with' doesn't mean start the conversation, you donut.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You brought up starting the conversation with your example;
“Are you saying that you think this means 'don't start a conversation with him'?”
In that initial example there was no mention of who started the conversation.
Desperately backtracking again
Graeme...are you ok ?
Page 63 of 68
64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68
posted on 18/2/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 18/2/20
So let's get this straight. This is the dictionary example:
"Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him."
You think this means 'don't start a conversation with him'?
posted on 18/2/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/engage
to become involved, or have contact, with someone or something
"Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him"
Fields is done. Ruined.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only using the word engage and not the full term. Typical mental Winston shifting the goal posts to suit his weak argument.
What a headcase
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because it's the definition of the word you muppet.
Oh my god.
You don't understand the English language at all, do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Engage with is two words you autistic knobhead
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was referring to the word 'engage' you muppet. That's how dictionaries work - they give you a definition of a single word.
You are so stupid it's unbelievable.
Great to see you sink to new levels with your insults though. Me destroying you has really wound you up, hasn't it?
posted on 18/2/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 56 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/engage
to become involved, or have contact, with someone or something
"Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him"
Fields is done. Ruined.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only using the word engage and not the full term. Typical mental Winston shifting the goal posts to suit his weak argument.
What a headcase
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's because it's the definition of the word you muppet.
Oh my god.
You don't understand the English language at all, do you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Engage with is two words you autistic knobhead
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was referring to the word 'engage' you muppet. That's how dictionaries work - they give you a definition of a single word.
You are so stupid it's unbelievable.
Great to see you sink to new levels with your insults though. Me destroying you has really wound you up, hasn't it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.macmillandictionary.com/amp/dictionary/british/engage-with
Definition of engage with.
Look at the hypocrite going on about being wound up. You unfiltered Ripley’s yet you coward?
Biggest hypocrite on the site, and one of the biggest caants as well. Cries about other people’s contributions like your the site police yet is fine to dish out insults and filter himself.
Just calling you out for what you are. Hope this helps.
posted on 18/2/20
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
So which one of those 'definitions' do you think applies here?
And answer this:
"Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him."
Are you saying that you think this means 'don't start a conversation with him'?
posted on 18/2/20
Fields is approaching Robbing levels of rage here.
posted on 18/2/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
So which one of those 'definitions' do you think applies here?
And answer this:
"Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him."
Are you saying that you think this means 'don't start a conversation with him'?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes of course it does you thick caaant
posted on 18/2/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
So which one of those 'definitions' do you think applies here?
And answer this:
"Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him."
Are you saying that you think this means 'don't start a conversation with him'?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes of course it does you thick caaant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It really doesn't.
Have you got an English teacher who can help you with this?
posted on 18/2/20
He actually doesn't know what 'engage' means.
I am staggered.
posted on 18/2/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
Fields is approaching Robbing levels of rage here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not yet reached Winston levels yet. Haven’t reached for the filter button, gone to admins or threatened to go the police
‘Officer someone said something mean to me on the internet’
I’ll never be able to beat you on that front rain man.
posted on 18/2/20
Fields, it's really quite clear how fuming you are now.
You'll deny it, of course. But seriously, you look a total mess.
posted on 18/2/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
So which one of those 'definitions' do you think applies here?
And answer this:
"Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him."
Are you saying that you think this means 'don't start a conversation with him'?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes of course it does you thick caaant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It really doesn't.
Have you got an English teacher who can help you with this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you can start a conversation with someone but not engage them. Ok then
posted on 18/2/20
"So you can start a conversation with someone but not engage them."
What the actual feck?
No. The point is that if someone starts a conversation with you and you respond, you're engaging with them.
That is just a fact, no matter how desperately you try to argue otherwise.
posted on 18/2/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 second ago
Fields, it's really quite clear how fuming you are now.
You'll deny it, of course. But seriously, you look a total mess.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like you denied fuming over Ripley’s comments last night. Have I reached the same level as you last night? Nope.
How long before you filter/complain to Admins/threaten to go the bizzies?
posted on 18/2/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 seconds ago
"So you can start a conversation with someone but not engage them."
What the actual feck?
No. The point is that if someone starts a conversation with you and you respond, you're engaging with them.
That is just a fact, no matter how desperately you try to argue otherwise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No mention of the other person starting the conversation here;
“Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him."
More shifting the goal posts from the thick caaant. Money stuff
posted on 18/2/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 seconds ago
"So you can start a conversation with someone but not engage them."
What the actual feck?
No. The point is that if someone starts a conversation with you and you respond, you're engaging with them.
That is just a fact, no matter how desperately you try to argue otherwise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No mention of the other person starting the conversation here;
“Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him."
More shifting the goal posts from the thick caaant. Money stuff
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would there need to be a mention of who starts the conversation? It's simply saying don't engage with him i.e. don't speak to him, don't look at him etc.
There's no mention of starting the conversation because 'engage with' doesn't mean start the conversation, you donut.
posted on 18/2/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 second ago
Fields, it's really quite clear how fuming you are now.
You'll deny it, of course. But seriously, you look a total mess.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like you denied fuming over Ripley’s comments last night. Have I reached the same level as you last night? Nope.
How long before you filter/complain to Admins/threaten to go the bizzies?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just by writing this post, it shows what a mess you're in.
Scrapping around for any insult that you can find - bring mental health into it.. you're angry and it really shows.
posted on 18/2/20
so...just to clarify
are you two engaged now...
Winston have you told Robbing & Kloptimus...it's only fair I think
posted on 18/2/20
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 1 minute ago
so...just to clarify
are you two engaged now...
Winston have you told Robbing & Kloptimus...it's only fair I think
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We are engaging with each other
posted on 18/2/20
Oh...and Winston...filtering....really...
This shows weakness, & is unacceptable
posted on 18/2/20
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 0 seconds ago
Oh...and Winston...filtering....really...
This shows weakness, & is unacceptable
----------------------------------------------------------------------
do the right thing
posted on 18/2/20
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 47 seconds ago
Oh...and Winston...filtering....really...
This shows weakness, & is unacceptable
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I use filtering to prevent people from derailing my threads.
posted on 18/2/20
That's for the likes of Sandy & sizzle
posted on 18/2/20
Each to their own
posted on 18/2/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 28 seconds ago
"So you can start a conversation with someone but not engage them."
What the actual feck?
No. The point is that if someone starts a conversation with you and you respond, you're engaging with them.
That is just a fact, no matter how desperately you try to argue otherwise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No mention of the other person starting the conversation here;
“Just stay out of his way as much as possible, and don't engage with him."
More shifting the goal posts from the thick caaant. Money stuff
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would there need to be a mention of who starts the conversation? It's simply saying don't engage with him i.e. don't speak to him, don't look at him etc.
There's no mention of starting the conversation because 'engage with' doesn't mean start the conversation, you donut.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You brought up starting the conversation with your example;
“Are you saying that you think this means 'don't start a conversation with him'?”
In that initial example there was no mention of who started the conversation.
Desperately backtracking again
Page 63 of 68
64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68