What a question! Lol. I can see headlines: Man U rejected Neymar because they already have Lingard.
Behave harle - we have Pedro!
Nah, he seems like hard work to manage.
Nah I'd stick with Callum Hudson-Odoi
Have got to admit that he is a very good player,maybe not as good as he thinks he is,certainly not in Messi or Ronaldos class, but all the same a quality player ...............
but it's the baggage he carries with him !
so I would say no .
Lets be honest hes probably the 3rd best player in the world. Anyone who says they wouldnt take him is lying.
£270m+ out of pocket for Neymar or Sancho for less than half that price...8 years his junior, which one would you rather?
I know which one I'm picking.
If the option was Mbappe or Sancho...now that's a tough one.
Neymar is a ridiculously good footballer.
Neymar Jr is the best footballer in the world.
He has 133m insta followers.
Apart from Mbappe, he’s literally the player any ball club would most want to sign.
Sancho looks quality but he could be another Kagawa, Gotze, Mikhi ect who excel in the dortmund system.
Neymar is World class.
Mbappe is also World class but he's more of a striker.
Depends what your team needs. In PSG case they have both the lucky bstards
Couldn't do it on a blustery Sunday in Burnley.
No thanks now for all his baggage but 5 years ago I would have taken him in a heartbeat.
Seems to get underrated now days because he's such a caaant and plays in France.
Ridiculously good and the closest to Messi/Ronaldo there is.
Wouldn't take him now purely because of how expensive he'd be. Would like to see him in the PL though, for the same reasons I've always wanted to see Messi here, just to watch them every week.
Would take Mbappe over him though currently, probably Sancho too as a 'cheaper' option.
Not sure chelsea could afford him unless we went onto immediate success, his wages are ridiculous and it would cost £200m to get him.
Great player, but (this year aside) i would have preferred to pay £100m to keep hazard rather than buy neymar for 2
No meaning to offend anyone here, but I don't think he's lived up to the hype/expectation.
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 41 seconds ago
No meaning to offend anyone here, but I don't think he's lived up to the hype/expectation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think hes a bit of a show pony and when the going gets tough he shrinks(like ozil).
But 247 games club and international and 159 goals and 91 assists?
Bit harsh to say he hasn't lived up to the hype lol.
250 goal contributions in 247 games.
I could do some of that in that league with PSG
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 40 seconds ago
I could do some of that in that league with PSG
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but thats also internationals and barca
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 8 minutes ago
No meaning to offend anyone here, but I don't think he's lived up to the hype/expectation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s about 10x as good as Eden hazard easily so you must not have rated hazard
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 8 minutes ago
No meaning to offend anyone here, but I don't think he's lived up to the hype/expectation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s about 10x as good as Eden hazard easily so you must not have rated hazard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, I'd take peak Hazard in our league every time.
Hazard over Neymar?
Don’t think many would agree with that
Sign in if you want to comment
Neymar...........
Page 1 of 3
posted on 4/2/20
What a question! Lol. I can see headlines: Man U rejected Neymar because they already have Lingard.
posted on 4/2/20
Behave harle - we have Pedro!
posted on 4/2/20
Nah, he seems like hard work to manage.
posted on 4/2/20
Nah I'd stick with Callum Hudson-Odoi
posted on 4/2/20
Have got to admit that he is a very good player,maybe not as good as he thinks he is,certainly not in Messi or Ronaldos class, but all the same a quality player ...............
but it's the baggage he carries with him !
so I would say no .
posted on 4/2/20
Nah
posted on 4/2/20
Lets be honest hes probably the 3rd best player in the world. Anyone who says they wouldnt take him is lying.
posted on 4/2/20
£270m+ out of pocket for Neymar or Sancho for less than half that price...8 years his junior, which one would you rather?
I know which one I'm picking.
posted on 4/2/20
If the option was Mbappe or Sancho...now that's a tough one.
posted on 4/2/20
Why wouldn’t you?
posted on 4/2/20
No.
posted on 4/2/20
Neymar is a ridiculously good footballer.
posted on 4/2/20
Neymar Jr is the best footballer in the world.
He has 133m insta followers.
Apart from Mbappe, he’s literally the player any ball club would most want to sign.
posted on 4/2/20
Sancho looks quality but he could be another Kagawa, Gotze, Mikhi ect who excel in the dortmund system.
Neymar is World class.
Mbappe is also World class but he's more of a striker.
Depends what your team needs. In PSG case they have both the lucky bstards
posted on 5/2/20
Couldn't do it on a blustery Sunday in Burnley.
posted on 5/2/20
No thanks now for all his baggage but 5 years ago I would have taken him in a heartbeat.
posted on 5/2/20
Seems to get underrated now days because he's such a caaant and plays in France.
Ridiculously good and the closest to Messi/Ronaldo there is.
Wouldn't take him now purely because of how expensive he'd be. Would like to see him in the PL though, for the same reasons I've always wanted to see Messi here, just to watch them every week.
Would take Mbappe over him though currently, probably Sancho too as a 'cheaper' option.
posted on 5/2/20
Not sure chelsea could afford him unless we went onto immediate success, his wages are ridiculous and it would cost £200m to get him.
Great player, but (this year aside) i would have preferred to pay £100m to keep hazard rather than buy neymar for 2
posted on 5/2/20
No meaning to offend anyone here, but I don't think he's lived up to the hype/expectation.
posted on 5/2/20
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 41 seconds ago
No meaning to offend anyone here, but I don't think he's lived up to the hype/expectation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think hes a bit of a show pony and when the going gets tough he shrinks(like ozil).
But 247 games club and international and 159 goals and 91 assists?
Bit harsh to say he hasn't lived up to the hype lol.
250 goal contributions in 247 games.
posted on 5/2/20
I could do some of that in that league with PSG
posted on 5/2/20
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 40 seconds ago
I could do some of that in that league with PSG
----------------------------------------------------------------------
true but thats also internationals and barca
posted on 5/2/20
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 8 minutes ago
No meaning to offend anyone here, but I don't think he's lived up to the hype/expectation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s about 10x as good as Eden hazard easily so you must not have rated hazard
posted on 5/2/20
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 8 minutes ago
No meaning to offend anyone here, but I don't think he's lived up to the hype/expectation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s about 10x as good as Eden hazard easily so you must not have rated hazard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, I'd take peak Hazard in our league every time.
posted on 5/2/20
Hazard over Neymar?
Don’t think many would agree with that
Page 1 of 3