or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 89 comments are related to an article called:

Furlough Decision Reversed

Page 1 of 4

posted on 6/4/20

They probably can afford to pay the non paying staff otherwise they wouldn't have back tracked. Either that or they're very wary of what this would do to their reputation long term, if they went ahead with it.

They are correct though in that their income has stopped but their outgoings are the same.

posted on 6/4/20

Seems to me that its a bit stupid of them all round.

I could have advised them that is was the worst possible decision to take and now here they are having incurred the reputation damage doing a humbling climbdown

Clearly they didn't need the few million it is in the end.

They had better cut the new stadium phase or transfer budget accordingly

posted on 6/4/20

Bit of a strange decision.

posted on 6/4/20

And they say publicly shaming people is bad practice.

posted on 6/4/20

Good decision. Rare I disagree with the Liverpool board on any ethical/moral issues but that was def one.
Credit for back peddling 👍

posted on 6/4/20

Well done reversing this in the end. Or damage still done.

posted on 6/4/20

Pr*

posted on 6/4/20

Yes fair play from them, they realised it was hurting their reputation and backtracked. Not easy to do, but it was so clearly wrong when many poorer clubs were not.

posted on 6/4/20

comment by Ole-Dirty-Baztard (U19119)
posted 15 seconds ago
Well done reversing this in the end. Or damage still done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Damage done.
Fecking idiots.

posted on 6/4/20

At least they have now done the right think

posted on 6/4/20

Fan power is being listened too. Well done to the powers to correct there mistake.

posted on 6/4/20

Good call.

Liverpool mafia clearly had a word

posted on 6/4/20

Players obviously are footing the bill.

posted on 6/4/20

comment by Ole-Dirty-Baztard (U19119)
posted 6 minutes ago
Well done reversing this in the end. Or damage still done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed.

posted on 6/4/20

Damage done but at least they have reversed it so fair play on that.

comment by Neo (U9135)

posted on 6/4/20

The club and owners are pretty good for listening to the fans on most things so we are fortunate for that.

posted on 6/4/20

Agree damaged done but at least they came to their senses.

Like I said more than happy to take a hit on the transfer budget to pay for the non playing staff.

posted on 6/4/20

Well done Liverpool fans for not accepting the clubs decision

posted on 6/4/20

If you ignore the damage to reputation and who dunnit fun and games then you could read peter Moore's statement in detailed apply it to every club.

If Liverpool see massive in bound losses coming and previously leaked that all transfers and contracts had beenb suspended already then you have to wonder about other clubs

posted on 6/4/20

Less money for next transfer window (whenever that is). The club is bleeding money but people prefer to get emotional without properly thinking of the repercussions. Oh well.

posted on 6/4/20

Some damage done because they had to be pushed into it by the fans, still the right decision in the end.

posted on 6/4/20

Comes after they discussed wage cuts with players

posted on 6/4/20

comment by {honestlivpool~five~times} 👽 🐎 #worldpeace (U1661)
posted 31 seconds ago
Less money for next transfer window (whenever that is). The club is bleeding money but people prefer to get emotional without properly thinking of the repercussions. Oh well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No people thought about it and made the board know it was wrong, which it was.

posted on 6/4/20

Are Liverpool, and their owners, really bleeding money?

posted on 6/4/20

Right decision in the end but a wrong way of going about it.

Page 1 of 4

Sign in if you want to comment