Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Its the same rules for everyone. People will complain about anything. Nothing wrong with this.
comment by Fourzah (U22366)
posted 11 minutes ago
"This may have been mentioned, but I'm yet to see it on here."
a whole 3 articals below
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeh
where has no relegation been confirmed in England's pro leagues
Should help with fatigue and injuries. Hopefully they’ll increase the amount of players allowed on the bench in England - something that should be done anyway - which could be a good opportunity for some youth players at all clubs, bar City.
so much for keeping integrity in the game.
-------------------------
Yeah. I wish they would just be honest and admit they don't give a furrrk about this and this is all just for money.
comment by Fourzah (U22366)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
"This may have been mentioned, but I'm yet to see it on here."
a whole 3 articals below
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My guess is that Busby only goes on the United Board where there isn’t an article on this subject 3 below.
It’s a bit of a random rule to me. Reducing it by two players just seems arbitrary. You can have 7 players on the bench and still social distance. Why not have 3 players and not 5, if it will make such a difference lol
You can have 7 players on the bench and still social distance.
....
Was this meant to be funny because you can’t be serious.
In an empty stadium, and you think you can’t have 7 substitute players inside the stadium and social distance, but suddenly can with 5. I think you can’t be serious if you’re struggling to understand.
You can have 7 players on the bench and still social distance.
+++
A 14 yard bench. At least ?
Or an empty stadium, at least.
It isn’t about social distancing you idiot. The sub issue has nothing to do with it.
How the eff do you think players will social distance during games?
The article is about subs not distancing during games. Let's not add new criteria to make this less of a sharticle.
It is all becoming nonsensical now, changing rules halfway through a season, just to try to finish it, meanwhile hundreds are still catching and not recovering from the virus.
Our leaders and football authority bods should hang their heads in shame, that they are even thinking of restarting football. The Football Authorities are gutless and incapable of making a decision. The season should have been scrapped a month or so back.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
New Rule: 5 Subs
Page 1 of 1
posted on 8/5/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/5/20
Its the same rules for everyone. People will complain about anything. Nothing wrong with this.
posted on 8/5/20
comment by Fourzah (U22366)
posted 11 minutes ago
"This may have been mentioned, but I'm yet to see it on here."
a whole 3 articals below
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yeh
posted on 8/5/20
where has no relegation been confirmed in England's pro leagues
posted on 8/5/20
Should help with fatigue and injuries. Hopefully they’ll increase the amount of players allowed on the bench in England - something that should be done anyway - which could be a good opportunity for some youth players at all clubs, bar City.
posted on 8/5/20
so much for keeping integrity in the game.
-------------------------
Yeah. I wish they would just be honest and admit they don't give a furrrk about this and this is all just for money.
posted on 8/5/20
comment by Fourzah (U22366)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
"This may have been mentioned, but I'm yet to see it on here."
a whole 3 articals below
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My guess is that Busby only goes on the United Board where there isn’t an article on this subject 3 below.
posted on 8/5/20
It’s a bit of a random rule to me. Reducing it by two players just seems arbitrary. You can have 7 players on the bench and still social distance. Why not have 3 players and not 5, if it will make such a difference lol
posted on 8/5/20
You can have 7 players on the bench and still social distance.
....
Was this meant to be funny because you can’t be serious.
posted on 8/5/20
In an empty stadium, and you think you can’t have 7 substitute players inside the stadium and social distance, but suddenly can with 5. I think you can’t be serious if you’re struggling to understand.
posted on 8/5/20
You can have 7 players on the bench and still social distance.
+++
A 14 yard bench. At least ?
posted on 8/5/20
Or an empty stadium, at least.
posted on 9/5/20
It isn’t about social distancing you idiot. The sub issue has nothing to do with it.
How the eff do you think players will social distance during games?
posted on 9/5/20
The article is about subs not distancing during games. Let's not add new criteria to make this less of a sharticle.
posted on 9/5/20
It is all becoming nonsensical now, changing rules halfway through a season, just to try to finish it, meanwhile hundreds are still catching and not recovering from the virus.
Our leaders and football authority bods should hang their heads in shame, that they are even thinking of restarting football. The Football Authorities are gutless and incapable of making a decision. The season should have been scrapped a month or so back.
posted on 9/5/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 1 of 1