or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 10 comments are related to an article called:

India v England, new rules apply.

Page 1 of 1

posted on 27/9/11

So from potentially losing out there, we're now going to get hammered, and then have a list of great excuses with all these changes!
Exactly what we didnt need!

posted on 27/9/11

probably the most sensible on here, i appreciate that,
i still dont understand how could all the sub continent teams have agrred on this , it takes out reverse swing and spin off the game , what a bloody way to cheat asian block.

i think this makes 400 a gettable target on indian pitches and bhajji and ashwin can bowl with new ball as they r used to it , but i feel for fast bowlers on indian pitches . i dis agree with these changes

posted on 27/9/11

How do you mean Phil?

"A new ball at each end."

What? So you are using two balls per side?

posted on 27/9/11

people say anderson is rested but i would say he is more like dropped or horses for courses given his terrible oneday record in india, he always got hammered in india

posted on 27/9/11

Crazy4Cricket (U2836)

we have our best bowler missing, we dont have a good record out there as it is, so i can see the excuses already lined up.

posted on 27/9/11

England ODI squad
Alastair Cook (captain, Essex)
Jonathan Bairstow (Yorkshire)
Ian Bell (Warwickshire)
Ravi Bopara (Essex)
Scott Borthwick (Durham)
Tim Bresnan (Yorkshire)
Jade Dernbach (Surrey)
Steven Finn (Middlesex)
Craig Kieswetter (Somerset)
Stuart Meaker (Surrey)
Samit Patel (Nottinghamshire)
Kevin Pietersen (Surrey)
Graeme Swann (Nottinghamshire)
Jonathan Trott (Warwickshire)
Chris Woakes (Warwickshire)

Jos Buttler (Somerset) For T20 fixture only
Alex Hales (Nottinghamshire) For T20 fixture only

posted on 27/9/11

people say anderson is rested but i would say he is more like dropped or horses for courses given his terrible oneday record in india, he always got hammered in india
india r unhappy that anderson is not included , he would go for 8 per over, @ phil read it

posted on 27/9/11

Finally found the correct OP.

Gentlemen, this OP is about what difference if any these rule changes will have on this series, not who will win.
There are other articles going for that nonsense.

posted on 27/9/11

yes

posted on 27/9/11

I wonder who will be the first sneaky bowler to run out a non striking batsman?
Will this become a skill that all bowlers will practice?

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment