comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 2 minutes ago
Maguire has been a succes in that he played a major part in a 3rd place finish and reaching a final
--------------------
Oh ok.

Why would you sack the manager for signing him then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gonread what I said

comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 3 minutes ago
RDD mate? When you get back...if you could just explain how it is possible that:

1)Ed hasn't done a bad job because signings a lot of signings like Maguire have been a success

And

2) Ole should be sacked for signing Maguire.

(Little tip...the easy way out of this for you would be to admit everything you write is agenda-driven nonsense)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ed is there to sign the cheques and ensure the money keeps rolling in.

It upto the manager, coaches, scouts to identify targets

I didn't say he should be sacked for signing Maguire. I said that amongst other things, prove Ole is out of his depth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That didn't really explain what I was asking you to explain now did it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It does

Well Done
by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)26 July 2020
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
Well done for securing 3rd Ole.

Lot to do over the Summer if we want to trouble the top 2 though.

Come on Ed Get the chequebook out for Koulibaily, Neves Sancho and Jimenez.

comment by Roy's Keane (U11635)
posted 2 seconds ago
Well Done
by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)26 July 2020
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
Well done for securing 3rd Ole.

Lot to do over the Summer if we want to trouble the top 2 though.

Come on Ed Get the chequebook out for Koulibaily, Neves Sancho and Jimenez.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

And your point is ?

comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 59 seconds ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 3 minutes ago
RDD mate? When you get back...if you could just explain how it is possible that:

1)Ed hasn't done a bad job because signings a lot of signings like Maguire have been a success

And

2) Ole should be sacked for signing Maguire.

(Little tip...the easy way out of this for you would be to admit everything you write is agenda-driven nonsense)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ed is there to sign the cheques and ensure the money keeps rolling in.

It upto the manager, coaches, scouts to identify targets

I didn't say he should be sacked for signing Maguire. I said that amongst other things, prove Ole is out of his depth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That didn't really explain what I was asking you to explain now did it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It does
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, it doesn't. Not in the slightest.

Dont you fed up of embarrassing yourself like this on a daily basis?

comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 59 seconds ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 3 minutes ago
RDD mate? When you get back...if you could just explain how it is possible that:

1)Ed hasn't done a bad job because signings a lot of signings like Maguire have been a success

And

2) Ole should be sacked for signing Maguire.

(Little tip...the easy way out of this for you would be to admit everything you write is agenda-driven nonsense)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ed is there to sign the cheques and ensure the money keeps rolling in.

It upto the manager, coaches, scouts to identify targets

I didn't say he should be sacked for signing Maguire. I said that amongst other things, prove Ole is out of his depth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That didn't really explain what I was asking you to explain now did it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It does
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, it doesn't. Not in the slightest.

Dont you fed up of embarrassing yourself like this on a daily basis?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not embaressed. Ole is out of his depth. Some see it quicker than others, you will see eventually kid.

comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 59 seconds ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 3 minutes ago
RDD mate? When you get back...if you could just explain how it is possible that:

1)Ed hasn't done a bad job because signings a lot of signings like Maguire have been a success

And

2) Ole should be sacked for signing Maguire.

(Little tip...the easy way out of this for you would be to admit everything you write is agenda-driven nonsense)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ed is there to sign the cheques and ensure the money keeps rolling in.

It upto the manager, coaches, scouts to identify targets

I didn't say he should be sacked for signing Maguire. I said that amongst other things, prove Ole is out of his depth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That didn't really explain what I was asking you to explain now did it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It does
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, it doesn't. Not in the slightest.

Dont you fed up of embarrassing yourself like this on a daily basis?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not embaressed. Ole is out of his depth. Some see it quicker than others, you will see eventually kid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't actually given an opinion on Ole on this thread but OK.

All I have done is provide unequivocal evidence of what an absolute idiot you are. (As if we didn't know already)

By not being able to.interpret my response to your question..

Off you pop Treacle. You are boring.

Standard RDD response when he has completely tied himself in knots. Again.

See ya.

Comment deleted by Article Creator

comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 3 minutes ago
Standard RDD response when he has completely tied himself in knots. Again.

See ya.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Iv answered your question you bore.

You think you have because you are an idiot.

You haven't though.

RDD showing his low IQ yet again.
And reverting to kid, as if he were some wise old man giving adice.
And this to someone of whose age he hasn't a clue.
And forgetting the wise part.

Bloodred

comment by Lurker - "We did it on derby day" (U21432)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Lurker - "We did it on derby day" (U21432)
posted 1 minute ago
I'm not Ole out. But fans defending him because he isn'g getting £100m players is tiresome.

Look at the tactics on the pitch. It's abysmal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think he is the best manager we could get?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'd keep him as he shows potential.

Who else is available? Poch? He's been available for so long and no ones picked him up. Says a lot.

With Ole we got stability. But Ole is making the same mistakes again. and then not fixing his mistakes.

Fans won't turn on him because they live in a fairy tale world where they will blame the board for not backing him and THAT's the reason we lost to relegation fodder today.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you will find Palace are not relegation fodder. In fact saying so shows your ignorance.

How is Ed signing Maguire a good job


His job is to deliver Oles targets. He did it.

Why should Ole be sacked for signing Maguire. Ole thinks Maguire is good enough to get United back on top. That, among other things is why Ole shouldn't be United manager

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
RDD showing his low IQ yet again.
And reverting to kid, as if he were some wise old man giving adice.
And this to someone of whose age he hasn't a clue.
And forgetting the wise part.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Try to get your spelling right when having a pop at other people's intelligence kid.

comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 3 minutes ago
RDD mate? When you get back...if you could just explain how it is possible that:

1)Ed hasn't done a bad job because signings a lot of signings like Maguire have been a success

And

2) Ole should be sacked for signing Maguire.

(Little tip...the easy way out of this for you would be to admit everything you write is agenda-driven nonsense)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ed is there to sign the cheques and ensure the money keeps rolling in.

It upto the manager, coaches, scouts to identify targets

I didn't say he should be sacked for signing Maguire. I said that amongst other things, prove Ole is out of his depth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That didn't really explain what I was asking you to explain now did it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It does
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I've read it, and it doesn't. So you can keep saying it, and it keeps being wrong

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 3 minutes ago
RDD mate? When you get back...if you could just explain how it is possible that:

1)Ed hasn't done a bad job because signings a lot of signings like Maguire have been a success

And

2) Ole should be sacked for signing Maguire.

(Little tip...the easy way out of this for you would be to admit everything you write is agenda-driven nonsense)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ed is there to sign the cheques and ensure the money keeps rolling in.

It upto the manager, coaches, scouts to identify targets

I didn't say he should be sacked for signing Maguire. I said that amongst other things, prove Ole is out of his depth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That didn't really explain what I was asking you to explain now did it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It does
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I've read it, and it doesn't. So you can keep saying it, and it keeps being wrong
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you tell me specifically what aspect of the quesrion hasnt been answered and il tell you how it has

comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
RDD showing his low IQ yet again.
And reverting to kid, as if he were some wise old man giving adice.
And this to someone of whose age he hasn't a clue.
And forgetting the wise part.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Try to get your spelling right when having a pop at other people's intelligence kid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm older than you, know more, so I don't have to ask a question every post.
There you go babes;

comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 3 minutes ago
RDD mate? When you get back...if you could just explain how it is possible that:

1)Ed hasn't done a bad job because signings a lot of signings like Maguire have been a success

And

2) Ole should be sacked for signing Maguire.

(Little tip...the easy way out of this for you would be to admit everything you write is agenda-driven nonsense)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ed is there to sign the cheques and ensure the money keeps rolling in.

It upto the manager, coaches, scouts to identify targets

I didn't say he should be sacked for signing Maguire. I said that amongst other things, prove Ole is out of his depth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That didn't really explain what I was asking you to explain now did it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It does
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I've read it, and it doesn't. So you can keep saying it, and it keeps being wrong
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you tell me specifically what aspect of the quesrion hasnt been answered and il tell you how it has

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Better if you rell me without the question isn't it. It was pointed out where you were wrong, so respond without a question.
Oh hang on, you can't, your RDD

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
RDD showing his low IQ yet again.
And reverting to kid, as if he were some wise old man giving adice.
And this to someone of whose age he hasn't a clue.
And forgetting the wise part.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Try to get your spelling right when having a pop at other people's intelligence kid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm older than you, know more, so I don't have to ask a question every post.
There you go babes;
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no idea what you are on about

comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
RDD showing his low IQ yet again.
And reverting to kid, as if he were some wise old man giving adice.
And this to someone of whose age he hasn't a clue.
And forgetting the wise part.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Try to get your spelling right when having a pop at other people's intelligence kid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm older than you, know more, so I don't have to ask a question every post.
There you go babes;
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no idea what you are on about
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 3 minutes ago
RDD mate? When you get back...if you could just explain how it is possible that:

1)Ed hasn't done a bad job because signings a lot of signings like Maguire have been a success

And

2) Ole should be sacked for signing Maguire.

(Little tip...the easy way out of this for you would be to admit everything you write is agenda-driven nonsense)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ed is there to sign the cheques and ensure the money keeps rolling in.

It upto the manager, coaches, scouts to identify targets

I didn't say he should be sacked for signing Maguire. I said that amongst other things, prove Ole is out of his depth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That didn't really explain what I was asking you to explain now did it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It does
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I've read it, and it doesn't. So you can keep saying it, and it keeps being wrong
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you tell me specifically what aspect of the quesrion hasnt been answered and il tell you how it has

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Better if you rell me without the question isn't it. It was pointed out where you were wrong, so respond without a question.
Oh hang on, you can't, your RDD
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You want me to tell you what part of somebody else's question you don't think iv answered?

Iv better things to do.

comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Reddevilsdouble II (U22313)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 3 minutes ago
RDD mate? When you get back...if you could just explain how it is possible that:

1)Ed hasn't done a bad job because signings a lot of signings like Maguire have been a success

And

2) Ole should be sacked for signing Maguire.

(Little tip...the easy way out of this for you would be to admit everything you write is agenda-driven nonsense)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ed is there to sign the cheques and ensure the money keeps rolling in.

It upto the manager, coaches, scouts to identify targets

I didn't say he should be sacked for signing Maguire. I said that amongst other things, prove Ole is out of his depth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That didn't really explain what I was asking you to explain now did it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It does
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well I've read it, and it doesn't. So you can keep saying it, and it keeps being wrong
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you tell me specifically what aspect of the quesrion hasnt been answered and il tell you how it has

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Better if you rell me without the question isn't it. It was pointed out where you were wrong, so respond without a question.
Oh hang on, you can't, your RDD
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You want me to tell you what part of somebody else's question you don't think iv answered?

Iv better things to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No you haven't. Except perhaps chat to Matth about existentialism.

Whenever you lose an argument you always say you have better things to do.
Such as think up more questions for next week