or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 116 comments are related to an article called:

Olivier Ntcham

Page 5 of 5

posted on 16/10/20

Fwxakes.

Just as I type there she is.

Banging on that anyone flouting the rules to watch Celtic v Rangers will cost people their lives.

Honest to Christ.

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 16/10/20

I don’t think either should have been cleared, makes a mockery of the track and trace.
—————————
On the contrary, to nota.low it would make a mockery of the tests we’re being asked to do twice a week.

posted on 16/10/20

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
I don’t think either should have been cleared, makes a mockery of the track and trace.
—————————
On the contrary, to nota.low it would make a mockery of the tests we’re being asked to do twice a week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Agreed.

What’s the point if you ignore what they tell you?

comment by NNH (U10730)

posted on 16/10/20

She's spoke about the game for 4 days straight yet she only spoke about Ferrier once.

She's a flucking clown!

posted on 16/10/20

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
I don’t think either should have been cleared, makes a mockery of the track and trace.
—————————
On the contrary, to nota.low it would make a mockery of the tests we’re being asked to do twice a week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Agreed.

What’s the point if you ignore what they tell you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The incubation period, you could catch it on Saturday and test negative all week then be positive the next Saturday.

comment by NNH (U10730)

posted on 16/10/20

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
I don’t think either should have been cleared, makes a mockery of the track and trace.
—————————
On the contrary, to nota.low it would make a mockery of the tests we’re being asked to do twice a week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Agreed.

What’s the point if you ignore what they tell you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The incubation period, you could catch it on Saturday and test negative all week then be positive the next Saturday.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was only up to 5 days that can be the case?

I think it's now 10 days for Christie and he returned 2 negative tests in that time.

posted on 16/10/20

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
I don’t think either should have been cleared, makes a mockery of the track and trace.
—————————
On the contrary, to nota.low it would make a mockery of the tests we’re being asked to do twice a week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Agreed.

What’s the point if you ignore what they tell you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The incubation period, you could catch it on Saturday and test negative all week then be positive the next Saturday.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well first of all the average incubation period is for 5 days and secondly it was 10 days ago.

Try again

posted on 16/10/20

comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
I don’t think either should have been cleared, makes a mockery of the track and trace.
—————————
On the contrary, to nota.low it would make a mockery of the tests we’re being asked to do twice a week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Agreed.

What’s the point if you ignore what they tell you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The incubation period, you could catch it on Saturday and test negative all week then be positive the next Saturday.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was only up to 5 days that can be the case?

I think it's now 10 days for Christie and he returned 2 negative tests in that time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
5 days is the standard but their are examples of it lasting longer.

14 days isolation for close contacts and 10 days if you tested positive.

posted on 16/10/20

It’s nice to see bears getting wound up about it already, not that I think there’s a chance in hell he’ll be allowed to play.

posted on 16/10/20

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
I don’t think either should have been cleared, makes a mockery of the track and trace.
—————————
On the contrary, to nota.low it would make a mockery of the tests we’re being asked to do twice a week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Agreed.

What’s the point if you ignore what they tell you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The incubation period, you could catch it on Saturday and test negative all week then be positive the next Saturday.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was only up to 5 days that can be the case?

I think it's now 10 days for Christie and he returned 2 negative tests in that time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
5 days is the standard but their are examples of it lasting longer.

14 days isolation for close contacts and 10 days if you tested positive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Are the rules.

But yet again. Incubation is between 1-11 days with 5 being the average.

I think you should write into the FA and point this out to their experts

posted on 16/10/20

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
It’s nice to see bears getting wound up about it already, not that I think there’s a chance in hell he’ll be allowed to play.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd rather he played than Ntcham, good player but wasteful.

posted on 16/10/20

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
I don’t think either should have been cleared, makes a mockery of the track and trace.
—————————
On the contrary, to nota.low it would make a mockery of the tests we’re being asked to do twice a week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Agreed.

What’s the point if you ignore what they tell you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The incubation period, you could catch it on Saturday and test negative all week then be positive the next Saturday.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was only up to 5 days that can be the case?

I think it's now 10 days for Christie and he returned 2 negative tests in that time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
5 days is the standard but their are examples of it lasting longer.

14 days isolation for close contacts and 10 days if you tested positive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Are the rules.

But yet again. Incubation is between 1-11 days with 5 being the average.

I think you should write into the FA and point this out to their experts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah funnier if Tierney is allowed and Christie isn't

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 16/10/20

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
It’s nice to see bears getting wound up about it already, not that I think there’s a chance in hell he’ll be allowed to play.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter will have his digit hovering over the speed dial hoping the opus dei cabal will come through for him and he doesn't have to use up 5mins talking to Nic.

posted on 16/10/20

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 1 second ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
I don’t think either should have been cleared, makes a mockery of the track and trace.
—————————
On the contrary, to nota.low it would make a mockery of the tests we’re being asked to do twice a week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Agreed.

What’s the point if you ignore what they tell you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The incubation period, you could catch it on Saturday and test negative all week then be positive the next Saturday.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought it was only up to 5 days that can be the case?

I think it's now 10 days for Christie and he returned 2 negative tests in that time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
5 days is the standard but their are examples of it lasting longer.

14 days isolation for close contacts and 10 days if you tested positive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Are the rules.

But yet again. Incubation is between 1-11 days with 5 being the average.

I think you should write into the FA and point this out to their experts
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah funnier if Tierney is allowed and Christie isn't
----------------------------------------------------------------------

😂

posted on 16/10/20

Right now I couldn't give two fvcks about the match tomorrow, back down to one wage in this house for the next four weeks, hopefully thats all it will be ☹

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 16/10/20

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 29 minutes ago
Fwxakes.

Just as I type there she is.

Banging on that anyone flouting the rules to watch Celtic v Rangers will cost people their lives.

Honest to Christ.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
'This is controversial but watching football is not essential'

True, and context important, but relative to what, Nic?

All she is doing is demonstrating that she really doesn't get it which maybe explains her utter contempt?

Shopping in person, exercising, going to work, using public transport - all non-essential but permitted for various reasons.

If she was in any way interested in the game or advised better she would realise that there are many people out there for whom the game is more important than their wife, job, kids, family and drives holidays, house purchases, employment, discretionary spend, culture, relationships and much more.

I'm not saying it is right but it's true!

Page 5 of 5

Sign in if you want to comment