I'm not a tory.....but, I am against the idea. But how about we strike a balance on a case by case basis. If the family is found to be genuinely in need then fine you can get a free meal for them.
However if the family is found to have an iphone, then we get to kill the kid.
That way both sides are happy as it is done on a case by case basis, you get to save some kids and we get to kill some. That solves it all.
comment by Boom SakaLaca (U3664)
posted 5 minutes ago
Just so we're clear no one is happy for kids to go hungry.
I have no answer to Robbing's conundrum, sounds an unlikely/fabricated scenario to me but if it's not a system change is needed for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I guarantee you it takes six weeks for universal credit to come through so if you've lost your job due to Government policy then what?
They offer a loan off £800 to bridge you. So let's say you use that you then have £50 to feed two kids.
In an age where MP's spend £8m on food and drink per year and get to claim far more in expenses voting down a £20m spend for kids to eat us absurd.
comment by Boom SakaLaca (U3664)
posted 14 minutes ago
Just so we're clear no one is happy for kids to go hungry.
I have no answer to Robbing's conundrum, sounds an unlikely/fabricated scenario to me but if it's not a system change is needed for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its not. When my wife lost her job at the beginning of the year we had to wait over a month to get anything.
Seems the system is the issue then.
Just to be clear am no fan of the expenses lavished on all sides of the house.
comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 26 minutes ago
I'm not a tory.....but, I am against the idea. But how about we strike a balance on a case by case basis. If the family is found to be genuinely in need then fine you can get a free meal for them.
However if the family is found to have an iphone, then we get to kill the kid.
That way both sides are happy as it is done on a case by case basis, you get to save some kids and we get to kill some. That solves it all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah God forbid parents on low income have a f*cking phone or a telly.
Thin gruel for everyone and bed by 5:30pm when it gets dark.
comment by Boom SakaLaca (U3664)
posted 2 hours, 40 minutes ago
Seeing as everyone is writing poetry...
Tony Blair, with stupid hair
Took us into an illegal war
His fatal flaw.
Gordon Brown, such a clown
There was no elation
When he bankrupted the nation.
Corbyn the terror sympathiser
Are Labour voters any wiser?
Anti-semitism is rife,
Startd by Red Ken.
Anyone voting Labour then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course they are, I and millions of others.
Labour is made of people, so fallible.
But we are for fairness, a net for people who fall. The fact that capitalism works is indisputable, but also that the success only benefits a faw, not most. But the helpless, children, invalids and others should not suffer and.
comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
I'm not a tory.....but, I am against the idea. But how about we strike a balance on a case by case basis. If the family is found to be genuinely in need then fine you can get a free meal for them.
However if the family is found to have an iphone, then we get to kill the kid.
That way both sides are happy as it is done on a case by case basis, you get to save some kids and we get to kill some. That solves it all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The way I see it the problem solves itself. If the kids with poor parents die from starvation we remove the poor genes from the gene pool. Given a hard enough winter the only poors left will be immigrants picking veg and driving the kids to school. If they don't starve we can work them to death and bury them in the garden seeing as they're not real people anyway.
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 13 minutes ago
The way I see it the problem solves itself. If the kids with poor parents die from starvation we remove the poor genes from the gene pool. Given a hard enough winter the only poors left will be immigrants picking veg and driving the kids to school. If they don't starve we can work them to death and bury them in the garden seeing as they're not real people anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could use the poor kids as fertiliser to grow quality vegetables for waitrose, for real people to buy and eat.
comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 13 minutes ago
The way I see it the problem solves itself. If the kids with poor parents die from starvation we remove the poor genes from the gene pool. Given a hard enough winter the only poors left will be immigrants picking veg and driving the kids to school. If they don't starve we can work them to death and bury them in the garden seeing as they're not real people anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could use the poor kids as fertiliser to grow quality vegetables for waitrose, for real people to buy and eat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only problem with that is poor kids lack nutrients. We could take all the food from food banks and plow that into the ground to make sure we don't run out of M&S ready meals. Their potato dauphinoise is to die for.
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 13 minutes ago
The way I see it the problem solves itself. If the kids with poor parents die from starvation we remove the poor genes from the gene pool. Given a hard enough winter the only poors left will be immigrants picking veg and driving the kids to school. If they don't starve we can work them to death and bury them in the garden seeing as they're not real people anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could use the poor kids as fertiliser to grow quality vegetables for waitrose, for real people to buy and eat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only problem with that is poor kids lack nutrients. We could take all the food from food banks and plow that into the ground to make sure we don't run out of M&S ready meals. Their potato dauphinoise is to die for.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know good point. Was going to say. Poor people can only afford expensive food like Chinese takeaways so they end up unstarving to death via obesity. But they do lack the nutrients to help grow more food. Although you could use the fat to cook with.
comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 13 minutes ago
The way I see it the problem solves itself. If the kids with poor parents die from starvation we remove the poor genes from the gene pool. Given a hard enough winter the only poors left will be immigrants picking veg and driving the kids to school. If they don't starve we can work them to death and bury them in the garden seeing as they're not real people anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could use the poor kids as fertiliser to grow quality vegetables for waitrose, for real people to buy and eat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only problem with that is poor kids lack nutrients. We could take all the food from food banks and plow that into the ground to make sure we don't run out of M&S ready meals. Their potato dauphinoise is to die for.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know good point. Was going to say. Poor people can only afford expensive food like Chinese takeaways so they end up unstarving to death via obesity. But they do lack the nutrients to help grow more food. Although you could use the fat to cook with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd never thought of it like that to be fair. Now you say it, the Chinese clearly have been planning it all along. Killing all our rich poor fat starving people to destabilise the economy. I say we only give them chopsticks and bowls of miso to eat. See how clever they are then with their satellite dishes and Nike shoes.
comment by *Robbing Hoody - Clandestine Boat Pleb (U6374)
posted 7 hours, 32 minutes ago
comment by Boom SakaLaca(U3664)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 10 minutes ago
It’s an emotive issue, but not a complicated one, feed the f*cking kids.
------------------------------
Couldn't agree more AFTP.
Exactly what parents should be doing with their benefits.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're obviously pretty clueless about the benefits system, I system I used to work on.
I notice you didn't answer my question before.
I'll add more to it because this is happening everyday.
So if you've been made redundant from a 0 hours contract job due to policy in a gig economy that this Government has purposely nurtured and it takes six weeks for your universal credit to come through.
Your universal credit finally comes through, it's £1100 for everything including your kids but you've already missed one months rent which is £600 and housing benefit only goes to £450 anyway. Your entire £1100 doesnt cover the two months rent and now you can face eviction and no one has even eaten and no bills have been paid.
But yeah, it's the parents fault. You come across as a complete moron tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whats the answer?
Instead of awarding literally billions to companies like Serco who have a track record of failing they spend a mere £20m on free school meals until February.
Just to put that into perspective that's less than half of what they spent on advertising for Brexit... which hasn't happened.
It's not hard.
Who would win in a fight to the death between a 13 year old homeless kid and a 58 year old Tory adult male?
Well it's certainly something I'd like to see.
If the kid had eaten, gotten a decent night's sleep and been abused by said Tory, the 13 year old by a fox hunting country mile I reckon.
I went to the toilet and in that time I decided that I would genuinely watch homeless people vs Tories on PPV, winner takes all in the "Social Mobility Octagon".
I dunno, I wouldn't bet against Johnson, he has form against kids: http://gph.is/1hIDQ1G
Weird. He plays football and rugby exactly the same
https://images.app.goo.gl/D4cRjtRQRvSBwJq39
Give the homeless kid steel toecaps and 9/10 times he'll kick his face off.
Ok I'll get something set up. Will have to split the pay per view money accordingly so 99.9% to the Tory and 0.01% to the homeless person.
That's very generous. Could you also fix it for me, if the homeless wins, that the Daily Mail publish a story about his grandparents coming from Eastern Europe possibly? And if you could, find a picture where one of his parents' siblings has slightly browner skin than the others and use a caption that infers something about a 'shady background' while not being overtly racist. Thx.
Don't worry there will be loads of money put into the promotion of the fight from the Tory guy's side. We will have the daily mail etc all over it in the weeks before the fight. Stories about him being a Romanian Pickpocketer. And the Tory just "Taking back whats are's"
I shall contact some Tory MPs to see if they are interested in participating. It may not actually be that bad of an idea if the money is going to homeless charities and the Tories could be made to look like good sports. Everyone's a winner.
Sign in if you want to comment
Free School Meals Disgrace
Page 13 of 13
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13
posted on 26/10/20
I'm not a tory.....but, I am against the idea. But how about we strike a balance on a case by case basis. If the family is found to be genuinely in need then fine you can get a free meal for them.
However if the family is found to have an iphone, then we get to kill the kid.
That way both sides are happy as it is done on a case by case basis, you get to save some kids and we get to kill some. That solves it all.
posted on 26/10/20
comment by Boom SakaLaca (U3664)
posted 5 minutes ago
Just so we're clear no one is happy for kids to go hungry.
I have no answer to Robbing's conundrum, sounds an unlikely/fabricated scenario to me but if it's not a system change is needed for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I guarantee you it takes six weeks for universal credit to come through so if you've lost your job due to Government policy then what?
They offer a loan off £800 to bridge you. So let's say you use that you then have £50 to feed two kids.
In an age where MP's spend £8m on food and drink per year and get to claim far more in expenses voting down a £20m spend for kids to eat us absurd.
posted on 26/10/20
comment by Boom SakaLaca (U3664)
posted 14 minutes ago
Just so we're clear no one is happy for kids to go hungry.
I have no answer to Robbing's conundrum, sounds an unlikely/fabricated scenario to me but if it's not a system change is needed for sure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its not. When my wife lost her job at the beginning of the year we had to wait over a month to get anything.
posted on 26/10/20
Seems the system is the issue then.
Just to be clear am no fan of the expenses lavished on all sides of the house.
posted on 26/10/20
comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 26 minutes ago
I'm not a tory.....but, I am against the idea. But how about we strike a balance on a case by case basis. If the family is found to be genuinely in need then fine you can get a free meal for them.
However if the family is found to have an iphone, then we get to kill the kid.
That way both sides are happy as it is done on a case by case basis, you get to save some kids and we get to kill some. That solves it all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah God forbid parents on low income have a f*cking phone or a telly.
Thin gruel for everyone and bed by 5:30pm when it gets dark.
posted on 26/10/20
comment by Boom SakaLaca (U3664)
posted 2 hours, 40 minutes ago
Seeing as everyone is writing poetry...
Tony Blair, with stupid hair
Took us into an illegal war
His fatal flaw.
Gordon Brown, such a clown
There was no elation
When he bankrupted the nation.
Corbyn the terror sympathiser
Are Labour voters any wiser?
Anti-semitism is rife,
Startd by Red Ken.
Anyone voting Labour then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course they are, I and millions of others.
Labour is made of people, so fallible.
But we are for fairness, a net for people who fall. The fact that capitalism works is indisputable, but also that the success only benefits a faw, not most. But the helpless, children, invalids and others should not suffer and.
posted on 26/10/20
comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 1 hour, 58 minutes ago
I'm not a tory.....but, I am against the idea. But how about we strike a balance on a case by case basis. If the family is found to be genuinely in need then fine you can get a free meal for them.
However if the family is found to have an iphone, then we get to kill the kid.
That way both sides are happy as it is done on a case by case basis, you get to save some kids and we get to kill some. That solves it all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 26/10/20
The way I see it the problem solves itself. If the kids with poor parents die from starvation we remove the poor genes from the gene pool. Given a hard enough winter the only poors left will be immigrants picking veg and driving the kids to school. If they don't starve we can work them to death and bury them in the garden seeing as they're not real people anyway.
posted on 26/10/20
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 13 minutes ago
The way I see it the problem solves itself. If the kids with poor parents die from starvation we remove the poor genes from the gene pool. Given a hard enough winter the only poors left will be immigrants picking veg and driving the kids to school. If they don't starve we can work them to death and bury them in the garden seeing as they're not real people anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could use the poor kids as fertiliser to grow quality vegetables for waitrose, for real people to buy and eat.
posted on 26/10/20
comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 13 minutes ago
The way I see it the problem solves itself. If the kids with poor parents die from starvation we remove the poor genes from the gene pool. Given a hard enough winter the only poors left will be immigrants picking veg and driving the kids to school. If they don't starve we can work them to death and bury them in the garden seeing as they're not real people anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could use the poor kids as fertiliser to grow quality vegetables for waitrose, for real people to buy and eat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only problem with that is poor kids lack nutrients. We could take all the food from food banks and plow that into the ground to make sure we don't run out of M&S ready meals. Their potato dauphinoise is to die for.
posted on 26/10/20
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 13 minutes ago
The way I see it the problem solves itself. If the kids with poor parents die from starvation we remove the poor genes from the gene pool. Given a hard enough winter the only poors left will be immigrants picking veg and driving the kids to school. If they don't starve we can work them to death and bury them in the garden seeing as they're not real people anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could use the poor kids as fertiliser to grow quality vegetables for waitrose, for real people to buy and eat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only problem with that is poor kids lack nutrients. We could take all the food from food banks and plow that into the ground to make sure we don't run out of M&S ready meals. Their potato dauphinoise is to die for.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know good point. Was going to say. Poor people can only afford expensive food like Chinese takeaways so they end up unstarving to death via obesity. But they do lack the nutrients to help grow more food. Although you could use the fat to cook with.
posted on 26/10/20
comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Bales (U22081)
posted 13 minutes ago
The way I see it the problem solves itself. If the kids with poor parents die from starvation we remove the poor genes from the gene pool. Given a hard enough winter the only poors left will be immigrants picking veg and driving the kids to school. If they don't starve we can work them to death and bury them in the garden seeing as they're not real people anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could use the poor kids as fertiliser to grow quality vegetables for waitrose, for real people to buy and eat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The only problem with that is poor kids lack nutrients. We could take all the food from food banks and plow that into the ground to make sure we don't run out of M&S ready meals. Their potato dauphinoise is to die for.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know good point. Was going to say. Poor people can only afford expensive food like Chinese takeaways so they end up unstarving to death via obesity. But they do lack the nutrients to help grow more food. Although you could use the fat to cook with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd never thought of it like that to be fair. Now you say it, the Chinese clearly have been planning it all along. Killing all our rich poor fat starving people to destabilise the economy. I say we only give them chopsticks and bowls of miso to eat. See how clever they are then with their satellite dishes and Nike shoes.
posted on 27/10/20
comment by *Robbing Hoody - Clandestine Boat Pleb (U6374)
posted 7 hours, 32 minutes ago
comment by Boom SakaLaca(U3664)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Automatic For The People (U21889)
posted 10 minutes ago
It’s an emotive issue, but not a complicated one, feed the f*cking kids.
------------------------------
Couldn't agree more AFTP.
Exactly what parents should be doing with their benefits.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're obviously pretty clueless about the benefits system, I system I used to work on.
I notice you didn't answer my question before.
I'll add more to it because this is happening everyday.
So if you've been made redundant from a 0 hours contract job due to policy in a gig economy that this Government has purposely nurtured and it takes six weeks for your universal credit to come through.
Your universal credit finally comes through, it's £1100 for everything including your kids but you've already missed one months rent which is £600 and housing benefit only goes to £450 anyway. Your entire £1100 doesnt cover the two months rent and now you can face eviction and no one has even eaten and no bills have been paid.
But yeah, it's the parents fault. You come across as a complete moron tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whats the answer?
posted on 27/10/20
Instead of awarding literally billions to companies like Serco who have a track record of failing they spend a mere £20m on free school meals until February.
Just to put that into perspective that's less than half of what they spent on advertising for Brexit... which hasn't happened.
It's not hard.
posted on 27/10/20
Who would win in a fight to the death between a 13 year old homeless kid and a 58 year old Tory adult male?
posted on 27/10/20
Well it's certainly something I'd like to see.
If the kid had eaten, gotten a decent night's sleep and been abused by said Tory, the 13 year old by a fox hunting country mile I reckon.
posted on 27/10/20
I went to the toilet and in that time I decided that I would genuinely watch homeless people vs Tories on PPV, winner takes all in the "Social Mobility Octagon".
posted on 27/10/20
I dunno, I wouldn't bet against Johnson, he has form against kids: http://gph.is/1hIDQ1G
posted on 27/10/20
Weird. He plays football and rugby exactly the same
https://images.app.goo.gl/D4cRjtRQRvSBwJq39
Give the homeless kid steel toecaps and 9/10 times he'll kick his face off.
posted on 27/10/20
Ok I'll get something set up. Will have to split the pay per view money accordingly so 99.9% to the Tory and 0.01% to the homeless person.
posted on 27/10/20
That's very generous. Could you also fix it for me, if the homeless wins, that the Daily Mail publish a story about his grandparents coming from Eastern Europe possibly? And if you could, find a picture where one of his parents' siblings has slightly browner skin than the others and use a caption that infers something about a 'shady background' while not being overtly racist. Thx.
posted on 27/10/20
Don't worry there will be loads of money put into the promotion of the fight from the Tory guy's side. We will have the daily mail etc all over it in the weeks before the fight. Stories about him being a Romanian Pickpocketer. And the Tory just "Taking back whats are's"
I shall contact some Tory MPs to see if they are interested in participating. It may not actually be that bad of an idea if the money is going to homeless charities and the Tories could be made to look like good sports. Everyone's a winner.
Page 13 of 13
9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13