Don’t like the look of it or the sponsor to be honest however they are apparently paying very decent money for it

No idea who the sponsor is
Years ago I'd have said plain blue only
But we see so many kits every season it doesn't overly bother me
Resent offerings of black and maroon have been well received
I think the away kit is more important so they play all away games in the same colours not have 3 or 4 kits

I like the kit a lot. In line with the 80s trend that’s big at the minute.

The pattern is a nod to the Bukta kit which I loved as a kid as it coincided with the start of our turn in fortunes.

9/10 for me 👌

Back to white shorts too by the looks of it which is always better than all blue.

comment by Hamilton Fox (U22508)
posted 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
Don’t like the look of it or the sponsor to be honest however they are apparently paying very decent money for it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any idea what sort of money it costs

comment by dublin fox optimistically pessimistic, (now a Cambridge fox)(still can not spell fox) (U1131)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Hamilton Fox (U22508)
posted 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
Don’t like the look of it or the sponsor to be honest however they are apparently paying very decent money for it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any idea what sort of money it costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The kit or the sponsorship??

comment by Hamilton Fox (U22508)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by dublin fox optimistically pessimistic, (now a Cambridge fox)(still can not spell fox) (U1131)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Hamilton Fox (U22508)
posted 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
Don’t like the look of it or the sponsor to be honest however they are apparently paying very decent money for it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any idea what sort of money it costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The kit or the sponsorship??
----------------------------------------------------------------------

About £40m for both in the modern era I think!

A bit torn. There are aspects that I like. I like the background but would prefer it a little darker. Also would like some gold on it. I think my biggest issue in the sponsor though. The logo doesn’t look like it fits well with the rest of the kit; it looks like a lazy photoshop on an otherwise carefully prepared shirt. Plus it reads like the kind of business that could be revealed as a scandal in a few years’ time.

comment by The_Dungeon_Master (U4830)
posted 12 minutes ago
A bit torn. There are aspects that I like. I like the background but would prefer it a little darker. Also would like some gold on it. I think my biggest issue in the sponsor though. The logo doesn’t look like it fits well with the rest of the kit; it looks like a lazy photoshop on an otherwise carefully prepared shirt. Plus it reads like the kind of business that could be revealed as a scandal in a few years’ time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think it is photshopped on some pics! There is a little gold on the sleeves and collar too.

I like the return of white shorts.

Hopefully the sponsor looks a bit better in real life, but obscure foreign betting companies are pretty standard in this age. Long gone are the days of JVC, Sharp, Holsten Pils and Walkers Crisps!

Don't like the blue kit, it's crrrap. The mint away offering is much nicer in my opinion.