comment by Bãles left boot (U22081)
posted 20 minutes ago
God it's really gaining traction this one. 160m is a heck of a lot. We've got no business turning that down or stopping him from going and winning stuff, really.
If we can get Son to sign a new deal I'd actually be ok with it. We rebuild the defence with this cash, put plenty of creative players around him, (and a backup like Ings) and we go again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not bothered about Kane deserving to win stuff...he's played 3 major finals and lost them with poor performances but I will wish him well but not Silver well.
Would be hilarious if he went to City and they don’t win anything in his time there, fingers crossed
Hope he gets a load of abuse when he returns in City colours
comment by The Hybrid Doos (U10416)
posted 39 minutes ago
Hope he gets a load of abuse when he returns in City colours
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would he get abused? I for one won’t boo him. Or cheer him. Once a player leaves I am largely indifferent to them. Unless it’s an absolute caaant like sol
The sun , so the other week Nuno does a conference saying we are keeping him and they break this story.
It's the sun ffs does anyone actually believe this because I don't.?
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
The sun, so the other week Nuno does a conference saying we are keeping him and they break this story.
It's the sun ffs does anyone actually believe this because I don't.?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully it’s a crap source. Nowhere near as happy and optimistic as a lot of Spurs fans on here about selling Kane. I don’t care how much money we get. When do Spurs invest the money well enough ? Now, if we were selling Kane and say buying Haaland as a replacement ( I know impossible ) but I’m trying to make a point, then I’d be content with selling Kane. Selling our only world class player with our track record of signing players = recipe for disaster. We need to be building, not taking 2 steps back.
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
The sun, so the other week Nuno does a conference saying we are keeping him and they break this story.
It's the sun ffs does anyone actually believe this because I don't.?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully it’s a crap source. Nowhere near as happy and optimistic as a lot of Spurs fans on here about selling Kane. I don’t care how much money we get. When do Spurs invest the money well enough ? Now, if we were selling Kane and say buying Haaland as a replacement ( I know impossible ) but I’m trying to make a point, then I’d be content with selling Kane. Selling our only world class player with our track record of signing players = recipe for disaster. We need to be building, not taking 2 steps back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly Don, sell Kane and what kind of message does that give? I love the way the story says Levy told him last Friday and yet its breaking news, they have also said the wages and contract length. If this story had any credibility SSN would have been the first to break this.
We've been linked with Dusan Vlahovic, 21 year old serbian at Fiorentina. 21 league goals in 32 last season. Lukaku scored 24in a much stronger team. This is the sort of player that fits the Levy mould .
I'd be very excited is we start to add these sorts of players to the team, with Romero (23) Gil (21). If we combined with a bit of experience like Ings. Just a decent right back needed.
As painful as it will be to see Kane leave, and as much as it will set us back years, using our last opportunity to get top money for him makes sense. People will be even angrier if we allow him to run down his contract and leave for a low fee, or even for free. Kane won't sign a new contract so this is our best option sadly. Not looking forward to seeing Kane play for City though!
I think you have to look at the examples of Ronaldo, Suarez, Countinho. These players left and the clubs were able to restructure their teams and gain or maintain success.
It is imperative that the replacements are quality and this remains to be seen but at least we have a very experienced DoF leading the line we are being linked with quality.
If Kane's going, lets get it done asap. and lets get a clause in that he doesnt play against us in game week 1.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
The sun, so the other week Nuno does a conference saying we are keeping him and they break this story.
It's the sun ffs does anyone actually believe this because I don't.?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully it’s a crap source. Nowhere near as happy and optimistic as a lot of Spurs fans on here about selling Kane. I don’t care how much money we get. When do Spurs invest the money well enough ? Now, if we were selling Kane and say buying Haaland as a replacement ( I know impossible ) but I’m trying to make a point, then I’d be content with selling Kane. Selling our only world class player with our track record of signing players = recipe for disaster. We need to be building, not taking 2 steps back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly Don, sell Kane and what kind of message does that give? I love the way the story says Levy told him last Friday and yet its breaking news, they have also said the wages and contract length. If this story had any credibility SSN would have been the first to break this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The message it sends is fine. It’s 160m ffs. The general view is that you cannot really turn that amount down. If we had just accepted 100m plus Gabriel Jesus or some joker like that then you would have a point.
Now that this story has broken , it looks bad if we now sell for anything less. So if it’s garbage then at least the sun probably just hiked the price up for us.
I personally can see us not signing a striker and using Son as a replacement. Just a complete disaster this will be just watch.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Just the thought of Kane in a City shirt next season and potentially scoring against us sickens me. Why are Spurs fans content with this ? 160 mil does nothing for you or me. As far as I’m concerned, it’s there to keep the balance healthy as per usual. No chance are investing that money on his replacement.
comment by Ace (U22467)
posted 1 minute ago
Sheite if he goes. We get money that I don’t particularly trust us to reinvest. City, who are already the best team in the league, get the best player in the league. We lose our talisman, a world class striker who came through our ranks because we are too much of an average club and can’t keep pace with the leagues big guns. No different to us losing Berbatov, Modric or Bale, nothing has changed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly Ace and the same thing will happen in 6 years with Scarlett. Rinse and repeat.
comment by Tottenham Chronic (U3423)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
The sun, so the other week Nuno does a conference saying we are keeping him and they break this story.
It's the sun ffs does anyone actually believe this because I don't.?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully it’s a crap source. Nowhere near as happy and optimistic as a lot of Spurs fans on here about selling Kane. I don’t care how much money we get. When do Spurs invest the money well enough ? Now, if we were selling Kane and say buying Haaland as a replacement ( I know impossible ) but I’m trying to make a point, then I’d be content with selling Kane. Selling our only world class player with our track record of signing players = recipe for disaster. We need to be building, not taking 2 steps back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly Don, sell Kane and what kind of message does that give? I love the way the story says Levy told him last Friday and yet its breaking news, they have also said the wages and contract length. If this story had any credibility SSN would have been the first to break this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The message it sends is fine. It’s 160m ffs. The general view is that you cannot really turn that amount down. If we had just accepted 100m plus Gabriel Jesus or some joker like that then you would have a point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember what happened last time we sold a world class player and reinvested. We signed Vlad Chiriches.
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tottenham Chronic (U3423)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
The sun, so the other week Nuno does a conference saying we are keeping him and they break this story.
It's the sun ffs does anyone actually believe this because I don't.?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully it’s a crap source. Nowhere near as happy and optimistic as a lot of Spurs fans on here about selling Kane. I don’t care how much money we get. When do Spurs invest the money well enough ? Now, if we were selling Kane and say buying Haaland as a replacement ( I know impossible ) but I’m trying to make a point, then I’d be content with selling Kane. Selling our only world class player with our track record of signing players = recipe for disaster. We need to be building, not taking 2 steps back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly Don, sell Kane and what kind of message does that give? I love the way the story says Levy told him last Friday and yet its breaking news, they have also said the wages and contract length. If this story had any credibility SSN would have been the first to break this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The message it sends is fine. It’s 160m ffs. The general view is that you cannot really turn that amount down. If we had just accepted 100m plus Gabriel Jesus or some joker like that then you would have a point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember what happened last time we sold a world class player and reinvested. We signed Vlad Chiriches.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, we signed the s** seven. Well, Eriksen being the only true success story and to a smaller extent Lamela, but all the other 5 utter s**. Same old story. Spurs bending over and giving our best players to the likes of City etc. City are like the old United with berbatov
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tottenham Chronic (U3423)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
The sun, so the other week Nuno does a conference saying we are keeping him and they break this story.
It's the sun ffs does anyone actually believe this because I don't.?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully it’s a crap source. Nowhere near as happy and optimistic as a lot of Spurs fans on here about selling Kane. I don’t care how much money we get. When do Spurs invest the money well enough ? Now, if we were selling Kane and say buying Haaland as a replacement ( I know impossible ) but I’m trying to make a point, then I’d be content with selling Kane. Selling our only world class player with our track record of signing players = recipe for disaster. We need to be building, not taking 2 steps back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly Don, sell Kane and what kind of message does that give? I love the way the story says Levy told him last Friday and yet its breaking news, they have also said the wages and contract length. If this story had any credibility SSN would have been the first to break this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The message it sends is fine. It’s 160m ffs. The general view is that you cannot really turn that amount down. If we had just accepted 100m plus Gabriel Jesus or some joker like that then you would have a point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember what happened last time we sold a world class player and reinvested. We signed Vlad Chiriches.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, we signed the s** seven. Well, Eriksen being the only true success story and to a smaller extent Lamela, but all the other 5 utter s**. Same old story. Spurs bending over and giving our best players to the likes of City etc. City are like the old United with berbatov
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What was it Don sold Elvis and baught the Beatles, more like facking Blazing Squad.
Would be a good deal all round. That's a huge amount of money for a 28 year old.
We need a rebuild and ENIC will not be dipping into their pockets so I think our best chance of becoming a top 4 team again is to sell Kane and reinvest wisely. Hopefully the new DoF knows what he's doing.
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tottenham Chronic (U3423)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
The sun, so the other week Nuno does a conference saying we are keeping him and they break this story.
It's the sun ffs does anyone actually believe this because I don't.?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully it’s a crap source. Nowhere near as happy and optimistic as a lot of Spurs fans on here about selling Kane. I don’t care how much money we get. When do Spurs invest the money well enough ? Now, if we were selling Kane and say buying Haaland as a replacement ( I know impossible ) but I’m trying to make a point, then I’d be content with selling Kane. Selling our only world class player with our track record of signing players = recipe for disaster. We need to be building, not taking 2 steps back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly Don, sell Kane and what kind of message does that give? I love the way the story says Levy told him last Friday and yet its breaking news, they have also said the wages and contract length. If this story had any credibility SSN would have been the first to break this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The message it sends is fine. It’s 160m ffs. The general view is that you cannot really turn that amount down. If we had just accepted 100m plus Gabriel Jesus or some joker like that then you would have a point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember what happened last time we sold a world class player and reinvested. We signed Vlad Chiriches.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, we signed the s** seven. Well, Eriksen being the only true success story and to a smaller extent Lamela, but all the other 5 utter s**. Same old story. Spurs bending over and giving our best players to the likes of City etc. City are like the old United with berbatov
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What was it Don sold Elvis and baught the Beatles, more like facking Blazing Squad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
at least blazing Squad had some relative success unlike our sorry mob
Only way I’m happy and others should be is if we replace him with an elite forward. Kane goes? You shove 130 mil on the table to try and get Haaland or someone of that ilk otherwise you keep Kane. Selling Harry and signing Danny Ings and the vampire name Vlahovic or who ever the f*+ he’s called, doesn’t cut it for me. Keeping Harry and buying Ings? Awesome. Different story altogether. Selling Harry is a disaster I’m sorry. Will set us back years.
Sign in if you want to comment
Kane off to City for £160m
Page 2 of 5
posted on 23/7/21
comment by Bãles left boot (U22081)
posted 20 minutes ago
God it's really gaining traction this one. 160m is a heck of a lot. We've got no business turning that down or stopping him from going and winning stuff, really.
If we can get Son to sign a new deal I'd actually be ok with it. We rebuild the defence with this cash, put plenty of creative players around him, (and a backup like Ings) and we go again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not bothered about Kane deserving to win stuff...he's played 3 major finals and lost them with poor performances but I will wish him well but not Silver well.
posted on 23/7/21
posted on 23/7/21
Would be hilarious if he went to City and they don’t win anything in his time there, fingers crossed
posted on 23/7/21
Hope he gets a load of abuse when he returns in City colours
posted on 23/7/21
posted on 23/7/21
comment by The Hybrid Doos (U10416)
posted 39 minutes ago
Hope he gets a load of abuse when he returns in City colours
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would he get abused? I for one won’t boo him. Or cheer him. Once a player leaves I am largely indifferent to them. Unless it’s an absolute caaant like sol
posted on 23/7/21
The sun , so the other week Nuno does a conference saying we are keeping him and they break this story.
It's the sun ffs does anyone actually believe this because I don't.?
posted on 23/7/21
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
The sun, so the other week Nuno does a conference saying we are keeping him and they break this story.
It's the sun ffs does anyone actually believe this because I don't.?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully it’s a crap source. Nowhere near as happy and optimistic as a lot of Spurs fans on here about selling Kane. I don’t care how much money we get. When do Spurs invest the money well enough ? Now, if we were selling Kane and say buying Haaland as a replacement ( I know impossible ) but I’m trying to make a point, then I’d be content with selling Kane. Selling our only world class player with our track record of signing players = recipe for disaster. We need to be building, not taking 2 steps back.
posted on 23/7/21
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
The sun, so the other week Nuno does a conference saying we are keeping him and they break this story.
It's the sun ffs does anyone actually believe this because I don't.?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully it’s a crap source. Nowhere near as happy and optimistic as a lot of Spurs fans on here about selling Kane. I don’t care how much money we get. When do Spurs invest the money well enough ? Now, if we were selling Kane and say buying Haaland as a replacement ( I know impossible ) but I’m trying to make a point, then I’d be content with selling Kane. Selling our only world class player with our track record of signing players = recipe for disaster. We need to be building, not taking 2 steps back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly Don, sell Kane and what kind of message does that give? I love the way the story says Levy told him last Friday and yet its breaking news, they have also said the wages and contract length. If this story had any credibility SSN would have been the first to break this.
posted on 23/7/21
We've been linked with Dusan Vlahovic, 21 year old serbian at Fiorentina. 21 league goals in 32 last season. Lukaku scored 24in a much stronger team. This is the sort of player that fits the Levy mould .
I'd be very excited is we start to add these sorts of players to the team, with Romero (23) Gil (21). If we combined with a bit of experience like Ings. Just a decent right back needed.
posted on 23/7/21
As painful as it will be to see Kane leave, and as much as it will set us back years, using our last opportunity to get top money for him makes sense. People will be even angrier if we allow him to run down his contract and leave for a low fee, or even for free. Kane won't sign a new contract so this is our best option sadly. Not looking forward to seeing Kane play for City though!
posted on 23/7/21
I think you have to look at the examples of Ronaldo, Suarez, Countinho. These players left and the clubs were able to restructure their teams and gain or maintain success.
It is imperative that the replacements are quality and this remains to be seen but at least we have a very experienced DoF leading the line we are being linked with quality.
If Kane's going, lets get it done asap. and lets get a clause in that he doesnt play against us in game week 1.
posted on 23/7/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/7/21
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
The sun, so the other week Nuno does a conference saying we are keeping him and they break this story.
It's the sun ffs does anyone actually believe this because I don't.?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully it’s a crap source. Nowhere near as happy and optimistic as a lot of Spurs fans on here about selling Kane. I don’t care how much money we get. When do Spurs invest the money well enough ? Now, if we were selling Kane and say buying Haaland as a replacement ( I know impossible ) but I’m trying to make a point, then I’d be content with selling Kane. Selling our only world class player with our track record of signing players = recipe for disaster. We need to be building, not taking 2 steps back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly Don, sell Kane and what kind of message does that give? I love the way the story says Levy told him last Friday and yet its breaking news, they have also said the wages and contract length. If this story had any credibility SSN would have been the first to break this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The message it sends is fine. It’s 160m ffs. The general view is that you cannot really turn that amount down. If we had just accepted 100m plus Gabriel Jesus or some joker like that then you would have a point.
posted on 23/7/21
Now that this story has broken , it looks bad if we now sell for anything less. So if it’s garbage then at least the sun probably just hiked the price up for us.
posted on 23/7/21
I personally can see us not signing a striker and using Son as a replacement. Just a complete disaster this will be just watch.
posted on 23/7/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/7/21
Just the thought of Kane in a City shirt next season and potentially scoring against us sickens me. Why are Spurs fans content with this ? 160 mil does nothing for you or me. As far as I’m concerned, it’s there to keep the balance healthy as per usual. No chance are investing that money on his replacement.
posted on 23/7/21
comment by Ace (U22467)
posted 1 minute ago
Sheite if he goes. We get money that I don’t particularly trust us to reinvest. City, who are already the best team in the league, get the best player in the league. We lose our talisman, a world class striker who came through our ranks because we are too much of an average club and can’t keep pace with the leagues big guns. No different to us losing Berbatov, Modric or Bale, nothing has changed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly Ace and the same thing will happen in 6 years with Scarlett. Rinse and repeat.
posted on 23/7/21
comment by Tottenham Chronic (U3423)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
The sun, so the other week Nuno does a conference saying we are keeping him and they break this story.
It's the sun ffs does anyone actually believe this because I don't.?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully it’s a crap source. Nowhere near as happy and optimistic as a lot of Spurs fans on here about selling Kane. I don’t care how much money we get. When do Spurs invest the money well enough ? Now, if we were selling Kane and say buying Haaland as a replacement ( I know impossible ) but I’m trying to make a point, then I’d be content with selling Kane. Selling our only world class player with our track record of signing players = recipe for disaster. We need to be building, not taking 2 steps back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly Don, sell Kane and what kind of message does that give? I love the way the story says Levy told him last Friday and yet its breaking news, they have also said the wages and contract length. If this story had any credibility SSN would have been the first to break this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The message it sends is fine. It’s 160m ffs. The general view is that you cannot really turn that amount down. If we had just accepted 100m plus Gabriel Jesus or some joker like that then you would have a point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember what happened last time we sold a world class player and reinvested. We signed Vlad Chiriches.
posted on 23/7/21
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tottenham Chronic (U3423)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
The sun, so the other week Nuno does a conference saying we are keeping him and they break this story.
It's the sun ffs does anyone actually believe this because I don't.?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully it’s a crap source. Nowhere near as happy and optimistic as a lot of Spurs fans on here about selling Kane. I don’t care how much money we get. When do Spurs invest the money well enough ? Now, if we were selling Kane and say buying Haaland as a replacement ( I know impossible ) but I’m trying to make a point, then I’d be content with selling Kane. Selling our only world class player with our track record of signing players = recipe for disaster. We need to be building, not taking 2 steps back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly Don, sell Kane and what kind of message does that give? I love the way the story says Levy told him last Friday and yet its breaking news, they have also said the wages and contract length. If this story had any credibility SSN would have been the first to break this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The message it sends is fine. It’s 160m ffs. The general view is that you cannot really turn that amount down. If we had just accepted 100m plus Gabriel Jesus or some joker like that then you would have a point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember what happened last time we sold a world class player and reinvested. We signed Vlad Chiriches.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, we signed the s** seven. Well, Eriksen being the only true success story and to a smaller extent Lamela, but all the other 5 utter s**. Same old story. Spurs bending over and giving our best players to the likes of City etc. City are like the old United with berbatov
posted on 23/7/21
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tottenham Chronic (U3423)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
The sun, so the other week Nuno does a conference saying we are keeping him and they break this story.
It's the sun ffs does anyone actually believe this because I don't.?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully it’s a crap source. Nowhere near as happy and optimistic as a lot of Spurs fans on here about selling Kane. I don’t care how much money we get. When do Spurs invest the money well enough ? Now, if we were selling Kane and say buying Haaland as a replacement ( I know impossible ) but I’m trying to make a point, then I’d be content with selling Kane. Selling our only world class player with our track record of signing players = recipe for disaster. We need to be building, not taking 2 steps back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly Don, sell Kane and what kind of message does that give? I love the way the story says Levy told him last Friday and yet its breaking news, they have also said the wages and contract length. If this story had any credibility SSN would have been the first to break this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The message it sends is fine. It’s 160m ffs. The general view is that you cannot really turn that amount down. If we had just accepted 100m plus Gabriel Jesus or some joker like that then you would have a point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember what happened last time we sold a world class player and reinvested. We signed Vlad Chiriches.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, we signed the s** seven. Well, Eriksen being the only true success story and to a smaller extent Lamela, but all the other 5 utter s**. Same old story. Spurs bending over and giving our best players to the likes of City etc. City are like the old United with berbatov
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What was it Don sold Elvis and baught the Beatles, more like facking Blazing Squad.
posted on 23/7/21
Would be a good deal all round. That's a huge amount of money for a 28 year old.
We need a rebuild and ENIC will not be dipping into their pockets so I think our best chance of becoming a top 4 team again is to sell Kane and reinvest wisely. Hopefully the new DoF knows what he's doing.
posted on 23/7/21
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Tottenham Chronic (U3423)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
The sun, so the other week Nuno does a conference saying we are keeping him and they break this story.
It's the sun ffs does anyone actually believe this because I don't.?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hopefully it’s a crap source. Nowhere near as happy and optimistic as a lot of Spurs fans on here about selling Kane. I don’t care how much money we get. When do Spurs invest the money well enough ? Now, if we were selling Kane and say buying Haaland as a replacement ( I know impossible ) but I’m trying to make a point, then I’d be content with selling Kane. Selling our only world class player with our track record of signing players = recipe for disaster. We need to be building, not taking 2 steps back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly Don, sell Kane and what kind of message does that give? I love the way the story says Levy told him last Friday and yet its breaking news, they have also said the wages and contract length. If this story had any credibility SSN would have been the first to break this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The message it sends is fine. It’s 160m ffs. The general view is that you cannot really turn that amount down. If we had just accepted 100m plus Gabriel Jesus or some joker like that then you would have a point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember what happened last time we sold a world class player and reinvested. We signed Vlad Chiriches.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, we signed the s** seven. Well, Eriksen being the only true success story and to a smaller extent Lamela, but all the other 5 utter s**. Same old story. Spurs bending over and giving our best players to the likes of City etc. City are like the old United with berbatov
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What was it Don sold Elvis and baught the Beatles, more like facking Blazing Squad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
at least blazing Squad had some relative success unlike our sorry mob
posted on 23/7/21
Only way I’m happy and others should be is if we replace him with an elite forward. Kane goes? You shove 130 mil on the table to try and get Haaland or someone of that ilk otherwise you keep Kane. Selling Harry and signing Danny Ings and the vampire name Vlahovic or who ever the f*+ he’s called, doesn’t cut it for me. Keeping Harry and buying Ings? Awesome. Different story altogether. Selling Harry is a disaster I’m sorry. Will set us back years.
Page 2 of 5