comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 53 minutes ago
Only way I’m happy and others should be is if we replace him with an elite forward. Kane goes? You shove 130 mil on the table to try and get Haaland or someone of that ilk otherwise you keep Kane. Selling Harry and signing Danny Ings and the vampire name Vlahovic or who ever the f*+ he’s called, doesn’t cut it for me. Keeping Harry and buying Ings? Awesome. Different story altogether. Selling Harry is a disaster I’m sorry. Will set us back years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ings and.Vlahovic would be decent replacements for Kane.
Still don't think Kane has been as loyal as people make out.
comment by MourGONEho (U22347)
posted 1 minute ago
I get the anger at selling Kane, but personally, I think £160m for 28 year old player who wants out it is too good to turn down.
I’ll be gutted to see him go, but absolutely understand the decision. If we were to block his move, we’d have an unhappy player who’s motivation will be diminished. He probably has another year or two at his peak. We can give the money to Paratici and utilise his contacts to build a squad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane`s motivation would remain, he is too professional and still loves Spurs, he has all kinds of individual records to target also, and we know he is chasing those.
He could also play on well into his 30`s, he looks after himself and is a model pro. Paratici may have a large book of contacts, but he does not know the PL, and we have proved before that bringing in a load of players from abroad with no PL experience, is unlikely to end well.
We would have to replace 70 odd goal involvements (Bale and Kane), from 2 PL proven players. Carlos kickaball from Serie A would be a clear downgrade.
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 4 minutes ago
It's the Sun ffs, does anyone really believe 2 of the biggest clubs in the PL are going to give the Sun an exclusive on their dealings?
It is either true or made up to sell newspapers, the latter being much more likely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s come from somewhere mate. The sun don’t just pluck stories out from their a** and splash it on the front page. It might of come from Harry’s agent brother, but it’s come from somewhere. No smoke without fire.
comment by Ioavirgo (U10470)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 53 minutes ago
Only way I’m happy and others should be is if we replace him with an elite forward. Kane goes? You shove 130 mil on the table to try and get Haaland or someone of that ilk otherwise you keep Kane. Selling Harry and signing Danny Ings and the vampire name Vlahovic or who ever the f*+ he’s called, doesn’t cut it for me. Keeping Harry and buying Ings? Awesome. Different story altogether. Selling Harry is a disaster I’m sorry. Will set us back years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ings and.Vlahovic would be decent replacements for Kane.
Still don't think Kane has been as loyal as people make out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To date, how has Kane been unloyal?
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* 2021* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by MourGONEho (U22347)
posted 1 minute ago
I get the anger at selling Kane, but personally, I think £160m for 28 year old player who wants out it is too good to turn down.
I’ll be gutted to see him go, but absolutely understand the decision. If we were to block his move, we’d have an unhappy player who’s motivation will be diminished. He probably has another year or two at his peak. We can give the money to Paratici and utilise his contacts to build a squad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane`s motivation would remain, he is too professional and still loves Spurs, he has all kinds of individual records to target also, and we know he is chasing those.
He could also play on well into his 30`s, he looks after himself and is a model pro. Paratici may have a large book of contacts, but he does not know the PL, and we have proved before that bringing in a load of players from abroad with no PL experience, is unlikely to end well.
We would have to replace 70 odd goal involvements (Bale and Kane), from 2 PL proven players. Carlos kickaball from Serie A would be a clear downgrade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, we are advocating selling Harry Kane and buying Count Dracula from Fiorentina who’s had 1 good season ffs
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* 2021* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by MourGONEho (U22347)
posted 1 minute ago
I get the anger at selling Kane, but personally, I think £160m for 28 year old player who wants out it is too good to turn down.
I’ll be gutted to see him go, but absolutely understand the decision. If we were to block his move, we’d have an unhappy player who’s motivation will be diminished. He probably has another year or two at his peak. We can give the money to Paratici and utilise his contacts to build a squad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane`s motivation would remain, he is too professional and still loves Spurs, he has all kinds of individual records to target also, and we know he is chasing those.
He could also play on well into his 30`s, he looks after himself and is a model pro. Paratici may have a large book of contacts, but he does not know the PL, and we have proved before that bringing in a load of players from abroad with no PL experience, is unlikely to end well.
We would have to replace 70 odd goal involvements (Bale and Kane), from 2 PL proven players. Carlos kickaball from Serie A would be a clear downgrade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, we are advocating selling Harry Kane and buying Count Dracula from Fiorentina who’s had 1 good season ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane used to be a one season wonder
Vlahovic is 6.3 and has a v good left foot. Good be a great foil for Son.
https://twitter.com/AlasdairGold?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
Ally Gold boshing the Sun
Seems like it's all just media talk at the moment. I hope it does go through so it can put the rumour to bed finally this summer.
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* 2021* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 1 minute ago
https://twitter.com/AlasdairGold?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
Ally Gold boshing the Sun
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Awesome. Go on Ally G.
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* 2021* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 42 seconds ago
https://twitter.com/AlasdairGold?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
Ally Gold boshing the Sun
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looks like Spurs have briefed all the relevant journos. We are never gonna say Kane is for sale are we? Puts pressure on City to pay want we want or feck off.
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 4 minutes ago
It's the Sun ffs, does anyone really believe 2 of the biggest clubs in the PL are going to give the Sun an exclusive on their dealings?
It is either true or made up to sell newspapers, the latter being much more likely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s come from somewhere mate. The sun don’t just pluck stories out from their a** and splash it on the front page. It might of come from Harry’s agent brother, but it’s come from somewhere. No smoke without fire.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s literally exactly what the media do though don
Kane leaving Spurs has always had an air of inevitability about it. You can count on one hand how many players have stayed at one club throughout their career.
We've come close. Champions league final, domestic cup semi's and finals, title races, but if Harry wants guaranteed titles at a club like City how can we compete?
It's a shame that the promise of success and riches is to much of a draw for players at a club like City with everything their club stands for. It's not a true accomplishment in my eyes. It's a view I've always held and isn't a bitter reaction to the news that broke last night. I've even heard some supporters clamouring for a regime in the same vein as City's. I wouldn't be happy with that. The Arabs over there have a got a distorted view of the world and it's not something I would want my football club to be associated with. Whatever hollow prosperity that would bring. If players want a part of it, good luck to 'em.
Kane will be a miss but we we've managed without him in the past and done pretty well. It will fix our issues at the back and build a team that isn't organised around one player. 160m certainly softens the blow.
comment by Tottenham Chronic (U3423)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 4 minutes ago
It's the Sun ffs, does anyone really believe 2 of the biggest clubs in the PL are going to give the Sun an exclusive on their dealings?
It is either true or made up to sell newspapers, the latter being much more likely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s come from somewhere mate. The sun don’t just pluck stories out from their a** and splash it on the front page. It might of come from Harry’s agent brother, but it’s come from somewhere. No smoke without fire.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s literally exactly what the media do though don
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They got it from somewhere this particular story
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
All that remains to be seen now is what absolute sh!te Spurs blow the money on this time.
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* 2021* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 42 seconds ago
https://twitter.com/AlasdairGold?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
Ally Gold boshing the Sun
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looks like Spurs have briefed all the relevant journos. We are never gonna say Kane is for sale are we? Puts pressure on City to pay want we want or feck off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the Sun is a piece of filth but for once it seems at least semi-plausible that the reporter in question, who is a family friend, picked something up at Kane's brother's (who is his agent) wedding. Mountain of salt and all that though
David Ornstein calling the Sun story bulls** so that’s a bit of positivity. He’s basically saying what we all know is if City we’re to cough up the 160 mil Spurs want, then there’s a strong possibility Spurs would sell, but he’s saying this isn’t happening like the Sun have said. Basically reiterating Spurs are keeping Harry. No way should any Spurs fan be advocating selling him, madness
I personally think Harry is gone
comment by Dele Boy (U22000)
posted 8 seconds ago
I personally think Harry is gone
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So do I , but reliable sources are calling the Sun story bulls**
Kane would be trading immortality at his boyhood club for a few easy and virtually meaningless league titles and cups.
Staying at Spurs and winning just 1 piece of silverware would carry way more kudos and sense of achievement than anything he would ever win at £ity.
depends if City actually will bid £160m
dont think he is gone at all, not sure City will pay the fee, maybe £110m and a player or two, but said players wont wanna join us
hes gone next summer unless we have an insane season. then we just get him leaving out the way early and get a couple of top quality attacking players to try and make up for the lost goals.
Irrespective of what eventually happens, this story is complete and utter bull.
Honestly guys do not get wound up by a made up story in the sun.
this pretty much https://twitter.com/Lilywhite_Rose/status/1418469145293754368
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 47 seconds ago
depends if City actually will bid £160m
dont think he is gone at all, not sure City will pay the fee, maybe £110m and a player or two, but said players wont wanna join us
hes gone next summer unless we have an insane season. then we just get him leaving out the way early and get a couple of top quality attacking players to try and make up for the lost goals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Knowing our luck we'd probably end up with Raheem the dream.
Sign in if you want to comment
Kane off to City for £160m
Page 4 of 5
posted on 23/7/21
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 53 minutes ago
Only way I’m happy and others should be is if we replace him with an elite forward. Kane goes? You shove 130 mil on the table to try and get Haaland or someone of that ilk otherwise you keep Kane. Selling Harry and signing Danny Ings and the vampire name Vlahovic or who ever the f*+ he’s called, doesn’t cut it for me. Keeping Harry and buying Ings? Awesome. Different story altogether. Selling Harry is a disaster I’m sorry. Will set us back years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ings and.Vlahovic would be decent replacements for Kane.
Still don't think Kane has been as loyal as people make out.
posted on 23/7/21
comment by MourGONEho (U22347)
posted 1 minute ago
I get the anger at selling Kane, but personally, I think £160m for 28 year old player who wants out it is too good to turn down.
I’ll be gutted to see him go, but absolutely understand the decision. If we were to block his move, we’d have an unhappy player who’s motivation will be diminished. He probably has another year or two at his peak. We can give the money to Paratici and utilise his contacts to build a squad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane`s motivation would remain, he is too professional and still loves Spurs, he has all kinds of individual records to target also, and we know he is chasing those.
He could also play on well into his 30`s, he looks after himself and is a model pro. Paratici may have a large book of contacts, but he does not know the PL, and we have proved before that bringing in a load of players from abroad with no PL experience, is unlikely to end well.
We would have to replace 70 odd goal involvements (Bale and Kane), from 2 PL proven players. Carlos kickaball from Serie A would be a clear downgrade.
posted on 23/7/21
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 4 minutes ago
It's the Sun ffs, does anyone really believe 2 of the biggest clubs in the PL are going to give the Sun an exclusive on their dealings?
It is either true or made up to sell newspapers, the latter being much more likely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s come from somewhere mate. The sun don’t just pluck stories out from their a** and splash it on the front page. It might of come from Harry’s agent brother, but it’s come from somewhere. No smoke without fire.
posted on 23/7/21
comment by Ioavirgo (U10470)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 53 minutes ago
Only way I’m happy and others should be is if we replace him with an elite forward. Kane goes? You shove 130 mil on the table to try and get Haaland or someone of that ilk otherwise you keep Kane. Selling Harry and signing Danny Ings and the vampire name Vlahovic or who ever the f*+ he’s called, doesn’t cut it for me. Keeping Harry and buying Ings? Awesome. Different story altogether. Selling Harry is a disaster I’m sorry. Will set us back years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ings and.Vlahovic would be decent replacements for Kane.
Still don't think Kane has been as loyal as people make out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To date, how has Kane been unloyal?
posted on 23/7/21
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* 2021* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by MourGONEho (U22347)
posted 1 minute ago
I get the anger at selling Kane, but personally, I think £160m for 28 year old player who wants out it is too good to turn down.
I’ll be gutted to see him go, but absolutely understand the decision. If we were to block his move, we’d have an unhappy player who’s motivation will be diminished. He probably has another year or two at his peak. We can give the money to Paratici and utilise his contacts to build a squad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane`s motivation would remain, he is too professional and still loves Spurs, he has all kinds of individual records to target also, and we know he is chasing those.
He could also play on well into his 30`s, he looks after himself and is a model pro. Paratici may have a large book of contacts, but he does not know the PL, and we have proved before that bringing in a load of players from abroad with no PL experience, is unlikely to end well.
We would have to replace 70 odd goal involvements (Bale and Kane), from 2 PL proven players. Carlos kickaball from Serie A would be a clear downgrade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, we are advocating selling Harry Kane and buying Count Dracula from Fiorentina who’s had 1 good season ffs
posted on 23/7/21
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* 2021* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by MourGONEho (U22347)
posted 1 minute ago
I get the anger at selling Kane, but personally, I think £160m for 28 year old player who wants out it is too good to turn down.
I’ll be gutted to see him go, but absolutely understand the decision. If we were to block his move, we’d have an unhappy player who’s motivation will be diminished. He probably has another year or two at his peak. We can give the money to Paratici and utilise his contacts to build a squad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane`s motivation would remain, he is too professional and still loves Spurs, he has all kinds of individual records to target also, and we know he is chasing those.
He could also play on well into his 30`s, he looks after himself and is a model pro. Paratici may have a large book of contacts, but he does not know the PL, and we have proved before that bringing in a load of players from abroad with no PL experience, is unlikely to end well.
We would have to replace 70 odd goal involvements (Bale and Kane), from 2 PL proven players. Carlos kickaball from Serie A would be a clear downgrade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, we are advocating selling Harry Kane and buying Count Dracula from Fiorentina who’s had 1 good season ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane used to be a one season wonder
posted on 23/7/21
Vlahovic is 6.3 and has a v good left foot. Good be a great foil for Son.
posted on 23/7/21
https://twitter.com/AlasdairGold?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
Ally Gold boshing the Sun
posted on 23/7/21
Seems like it's all just media talk at the moment. I hope it does go through so it can put the rumour to bed finally this summer.
posted on 23/7/21
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* 2021* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 1 minute ago
https://twitter.com/AlasdairGold?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
Ally Gold boshing the Sun
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Awesome. Go on Ally G.
posted on 23/7/21
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* 2021* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 42 seconds ago
https://twitter.com/AlasdairGold?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
Ally Gold boshing the Sun
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looks like Spurs have briefed all the relevant journos. We are never gonna say Kane is for sale are we? Puts pressure on City to pay want we want or feck off.
posted on 23/7/21
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 4 minutes ago
It's the Sun ffs, does anyone really believe 2 of the biggest clubs in the PL are going to give the Sun an exclusive on their dealings?
It is either true or made up to sell newspapers, the latter being much more likely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s come from somewhere mate. The sun don’t just pluck stories out from their a** and splash it on the front page. It might of come from Harry’s agent brother, but it’s come from somewhere. No smoke without fire.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s literally exactly what the media do though don
posted on 23/7/21
Kane leaving Spurs has always had an air of inevitability about it. You can count on one hand how many players have stayed at one club throughout their career.
We've come close. Champions league final, domestic cup semi's and finals, title races, but if Harry wants guaranteed titles at a club like City how can we compete?
It's a shame that the promise of success and riches is to much of a draw for players at a club like City with everything their club stands for. It's not a true accomplishment in my eyes. It's a view I've always held and isn't a bitter reaction to the news that broke last night. I've even heard some supporters clamouring for a regime in the same vein as City's. I wouldn't be happy with that. The Arabs over there have a got a distorted view of the world and it's not something I would want my football club to be associated with. Whatever hollow prosperity that would bring. If players want a part of it, good luck to 'em.
Kane will be a miss but we we've managed without him in the past and done pretty well. It will fix our issues at the back and build a team that isn't organised around one player. 160m certainly softens the blow.
posted on 23/7/21
comment by Tottenham Chronic (U3423)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 4 minutes ago
It's the Sun ffs, does anyone really believe 2 of the biggest clubs in the PL are going to give the Sun an exclusive on their dealings?
It is either true or made up to sell newspapers, the latter being much more likely.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s come from somewhere mate. The sun don’t just pluck stories out from their a** and splash it on the front page. It might of come from Harry’s agent brother, but it’s come from somewhere. No smoke without fire.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s literally exactly what the media do though don
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They got it from somewhere this particular story
posted on 23/7/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/7/21
All that remains to be seen now is what absolute sh!te Spurs blow the money on this time.
posted on 23/7/21
comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by ● Billy The Yidd ● 2020* 2021* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 42 seconds ago
https://twitter.com/AlasdairGold?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
Ally Gold boshing the Sun
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Looks like Spurs have briefed all the relevant journos. We are never gonna say Kane is for sale are we? Puts pressure on City to pay want we want or feck off.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the Sun is a piece of filth but for once it seems at least semi-plausible that the reporter in question, who is a family friend, picked something up at Kane's brother's (who is his agent) wedding. Mountain of salt and all that though
posted on 23/7/21
David Ornstein calling the Sun story bulls** so that’s a bit of positivity. He’s basically saying what we all know is if City we’re to cough up the 160 mil Spurs want, then there’s a strong possibility Spurs would sell, but he’s saying this isn’t happening like the Sun have said. Basically reiterating Spurs are keeping Harry. No way should any Spurs fan be advocating selling him, madness
posted on 23/7/21
I personally think Harry is gone
posted on 23/7/21
comment by Dele Boy (U22000)
posted 8 seconds ago
I personally think Harry is gone
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So do I , but reliable sources are calling the Sun story bulls**
posted on 23/7/21
Kane would be trading immortality at his boyhood club for a few easy and virtually meaningless league titles and cups.
Staying at Spurs and winning just 1 piece of silverware would carry way more kudos and sense of achievement than anything he would ever win at £ity.
posted on 23/7/21
depends if City actually will bid £160m
dont think he is gone at all, not sure City will pay the fee, maybe £110m and a player or two, but said players wont wanna join us
hes gone next summer unless we have an insane season. then we just get him leaving out the way early and get a couple of top quality attacking players to try and make up for the lost goals.
posted on 23/7/21
Irrespective of what eventually happens, this story is complete and utter bull.
Honestly guys do not get wound up by a made up story in the sun.
posted on 23/7/21
this pretty much https://twitter.com/Lilywhite_Rose/status/1418469145293754368
posted on 23/7/21
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 47 seconds ago
depends if City actually will bid £160m
dont think he is gone at all, not sure City will pay the fee, maybe £110m and a player or two, but said players wont wanna join us
hes gone next summer unless we have an insane season. then we just get him leaving out the way early and get a couple of top quality attacking players to try and make up for the lost goals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Knowing our luck we'd probably end up with Raheem the dream.
Page 4 of 5