What you mean get the best Jack Grealish price?

He has already agreed a deal and you have already spent the money.

comment by WolfWolf (U22512)
posted 3 minutes ago
He has already agreed a deal and you have already spent the money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What we bought has been covered by other sales.
The key will be when we purchase a striker with a huge transfer fee.

comment by WolfWolf (U22512)
posted 11 minutes ago
He has already agreed a deal and you have already spent the money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

We will just have to spend all the other money then

Not going to find any adequate replacements in just over a week before the season starts.

comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 9 minutes ago
Not going to find any adequate replacements in just over a week before the season starts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane is going to miss the start if the season anyway so no biggie.

If Kane stays lets go! If he goes we dough. #WinWin

We get dough (ffs)!

There are no adequate replacements. If money is right then sell but we'll need two strikers

I'd like Edouard and Abraham if he goes. Both no where near as good even in terms of ceiling but both affordable, at good ages, one homegrown.

If tanganga is loaned and kane goes think we need a homegrown player in. Winks goes too, then need 2.

comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 14 minutes ago
I'd like Edouard and Abraham if he goes. Both no where near as good even in terms of ceiling but both affordable, at good ages, one homegrown.

If tanganga is loaned and kane goes think we need a homegrown player in. Winks goes too, then need 2.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abraham? Have you seen his first touch? Awful player.

Imagine replacing Kane with Edouard and Abraham one has only ever proved himself in a mickey mouse league and the other is a Chelsea cast off

Abit if talk of Lautaro Martinez of Inter and Dušan Vlahović of Fiorentina as potential replacements not to mention Danny Ings.

I would be happy with any two of the three.

Ings injury prone

Should have spent the money on Watkins in hindsight

Definitely be happy with Ings coming in....but I disagree wether he deserves it or not we'll be facked if we sell Kane.

Kane is irreplaceable that's the point

Those two players from abroad are likely to come to us and flop, our history bringing in strikers like that is horrendous

Ings I like as a player but injury prone and even older than Kane. Would cost too much for a player with a year left on contract, £20m I'd be tempted

comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 20 seconds ago
Ings injury prone

Should have spent the money on Watkins in hindsight
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol £33m for a championship striker was a gamble which would have failed had he signed for us. Fairplay to Villa though and they continue to impress in the window by signing Leon Bailey.

comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 45 seconds ago
Ings I like as a player but injury prone and even older than Kane. Would cost too much for a player with a year left on contract, £20m I'd be tempted
----------------------------------------------------------------------
£20m-£25m is the max. If we sign another striker too then I can live with his injury concerns.

His HG status would be needed too.

If I was City I would just buy Grealish for the £100m and go for Ings for less than half the amount.

comment by LukaBrasi COYS #FreePalestine (U22178)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 45 seconds ago
Ings I like as a player but injury prone and even older than Kane. Would cost too much for a player with a year left on contract, £20m I'd be tempted
----------------------------------------------------------------------
£20m-£25m is the max. If we sign another striker too then I can live with his injury concerns.

His HG status would be needed too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah he'd be fine

The plan:
1. screw City for the absolute maximum we can get - minimum £130m
2. Reconstruct the entire defense ( except LB ) but with expensive quality, not the usual Levy bargain knockoff's
3. Get a reasonably CF, who can give us 15/20 goals a season.
4. Work on everyone else ( except Son ) to contribute more goals. At the moment, apart from Son, the rest of the recognised first team contribute nothing.

Get this right and Kane will be soon forgotten.

And to think Levy gets £6m+ each year to do this. I managed it in 2 minutes over breakfast.

Dont think Spurs are going to get thier grabbing hands on any of Citys cash, sorry about that
Would you like some nectar points instead

What is this mess?

comment by Bryãn's left boot (U22081)
posted 35 minutes ago
What is this mess?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The OP wants Kane gone. Very clear tbh.