We do have both a buy back clause and a sell on clause.
Is he English by the way ? just asking.
comment by ＴＬＬＬ (U4640)
posted 54 minutes ago
We do have both a buy back clause and a sell on clause.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly....its just a hybrid loan/sale deal. Good move by Chelsea to structure it that way.
Isn’t this kid meant to be pretty special?
comment by HarlequinHebdo (U16981)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
Is he English by the way ? just asking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ye
The amount of talented English right backs is ridiculous.
comment by HarlequinHebdo (U16981)
posted 2 hours, 28 minutes ago
Is he English by the way ? just asking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Born in Croydon!
comment by bloomike (U7734)
posted 2 hours, 36 minutes ago
Yeah, but...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
People can spin it anyway Bloo, don't change the fact it's another terrible mistake by Chelsea!
I said in another article you are falling victim of your own success the same way Barcelona did, you simply have too much coming through. Even Lampard couldn't prevent Lamptey leaving you for the same reason this guy did.
Anyway the buy back clause turns this into a loan for all intents and purposes, if he lives up to his billing you'll get him back quicker than you can say boo.
No doubt we'll end up activating the buyback clause
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
No doubt we'll end up activating the buyback clause
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We hope!!
It's been stated since day 1 pretty much that the academy will be used to generate revenue as well as produce future stars. It may be painful to watch but we have to get used to it.
I don't see what choice Chelsea had. Like Lamptey into the last year of deal and refused a new one. Both could leave for free with no clause to buy back. This way we have a grip on the players career. Best outcome in this situation
comment by Bov (U6696)
posted 11 hours, 10 minutes ago
I don't see what choice Chelsea had. Like Lamptey into the last year of deal and refused a new one. Both could leave for free with no clause to buy back. This way we have a grip on the players career. Best outcome in this situation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. We still have control if we want him back. Much better than just selling him like we did with Tomori.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Livramento to Southampton...
Page 1 of 1
posted on 2/8/21
We do have both a buy back clause and a sell on clause.
posted on 2/8/21
Yeah, but...
posted on 2/8/21
Is he English by the way ? just asking.
posted on 2/8/21
comment by ＴＬＬＬ (U4640)
posted 54 minutes ago
We do have both a buy back clause and a sell on clause.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly....its just a hybrid loan/sale deal. Good move by Chelsea to structure it that way.
posted on 2/8/21
Isn’t this kid meant to be pretty special?
posted on 2/8/21
comment by HarlequinHebdo (U16981)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
Is he English by the way ? just asking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ye
posted on 2/8/21
The amount of talented English right backs is ridiculous.
posted on 2/8/21
comment by HarlequinHebdo (U16981)
posted 2 hours, 28 minutes ago
Is he English by the way ? just asking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Born in Croydon!
posted on 2/8/21
comment by bloomike (U7734)
posted 2 hours, 36 minutes ago
Yeah, but...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
People can spin it anyway Bloo, don't change the fact it's another terrible mistake by Chelsea!
posted on 3/8/21
I said in another article you are falling victim of your own success the same way Barcelona did, you simply have too much coming through. Even Lampard couldn't prevent Lamptey leaving you for the same reason this guy did.
Anyway the buy back clause turns this into a loan for all intents and purposes, if he lives up to his billing you'll get him back quicker than you can say boo.
posted on 3/8/21
No doubt we'll end up activating the buyback clause
posted on 3/8/21
comment by Superb (U6486)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
No doubt we'll end up activating the buyback clause
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We hope!!
posted on 3/8/21
It's been stated since day 1 pretty much that the academy will be used to generate revenue as well as produce future stars. It may be painful to watch but we have to get used to it.
posted on 4/8/21
I don't see what choice Chelsea had. Like Lamptey into the last year of deal and refused a new one. Both could leave for free with no clause to buy back. This way we have a grip on the players career. Best outcome in this situation
posted on 4/8/21
comment by Bov (U6696)
posted 11 hours, 10 minutes ago
I don't see what choice Chelsea had. Like Lamptey into the last year of deal and refused a new one. Both could leave for free with no clause to buy back. This way we have a grip on the players career. Best outcome in this situation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. We still have control if we want him back. Much better than just selling him like we did with Tomori.
Page 1 of 1