Jose should never have been hired in the first place. His a washed up has been.
No one is against selling Kane as long as we get the right price
That's what people don't get about loyalty, it's a two way street. Say Kane suddenly turned into a rubbish player like Alexis did Levy would be offering him everywhere.
That said, Kane only has himself to blame signing that big new deal knowing what Levy is like, if he actually made a 'gentleman's agreement' with him after Modric then he was incredibly naive.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
Jose should never have been hired in the first place. His a washed up has been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesnt matter, he signed a contract, why does that mean fack all but for Kane he is being held to it?
comment by Anne Ziety (U22412)
posted 1 minute ago
That's what people don't get about loyalty, it's a two way street. Say Kane suddenly turned into a rubbish player like Alexis did Levy would be offering him everywhere.
That said, Kane only has himself to blame signing that big new deal knowing what Levy is like, if he actually made a 'gentleman's agreement' with him after Modric then he was incredibly naive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really naive. Kane probably thought he was respected enough within the club for a gentlemen's agreement to be respected - that's IF it was indeed made.
comment by Ace (U22467)
posted 43 seconds ago
One is an asset worth in excess of £100m to the club or, alternatively, +40 goal contributions a season, the other was no longer of any value to the club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I meant in the eyes of the fans.
You want Kane to stick to his contract, but not Mourinho.
It is a hypocritical argument
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Ace (U22467)
posted 43 seconds ago
One is an asset worth in excess of £100m to the club or, alternatively, +40 goal contributions a season, the other was no longer of any value to the club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I meant in the eyes of the fans.
You want Kane to stick to his contract, but not Mourinho.
It is a hypocritical argument
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lets be honest, if a player we were trying to buy stopped training to force a move, the same people criticising Kane right now, would have no problem.
How do you manage to post such stupid shiiit without being a wum
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
Jose should never have been hired in the first place. His a washed up has been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesnt matter, he signed a contract, why does that mean fack all but for Kane he is being held to it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cause he was fooking useless, Kane is a player and be it a very good one.
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
Jose should never have been hired in the first place. His a washed up has been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesnt matter, he signed a contract, why does that mean fack all but for Kane he is being held to it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cause he was fooking useless, Kane is a player and be it a very good one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So contracts mean nothing if it fits your narrative.
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me for not understanding the first comment.
Care to explain what I am missing?
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me for not understanding the first comment.
Care to explain what I am missing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t realise I’d have to write it out in crayon for you, but ok here we go:
Scenario 1: The employer (THFC) wish to terminate the employees (Jose Mourinho) contract. As they are effectively the ‘controlling party’, they are able to do this, either by paying the remainder of the contract in full, or reaching a settlement.
Scenario 2: The employee (Harry Kane) wishes to terminate the contract, but the employer (THFC) does not wish to do so. As such, they are entitled to hold him to the terms of his contract for the duration of its term. Unless an agreement is reached which is acceptable to the employer in terms of compensation etc, they are under no obligation to end the contract.
Hope that’s helped.
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me for not understanding the first comment.
Care to explain what I am missing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t realise I’d have to write it out in crayon for you, but ok here we go:
Scenario 1: The employer (THFC) wish to terminate the employees (Jose Mourinho) contract. As they are effectively the ‘controlling party’, they are able to do this, either by paying the remainder of the contract in full, or reaching a settlement.
Scenario 2: The employee (Harry Kane) wishes to terminate the contract, but the employer (THFC) does not wish to do so. As such, they are entitled to hold him to the terms of his contract for the duration of its term. Unless an agreement is reached which is acceptable to the employer in terms of compensation etc, they are under no obligation to end the contract.
Hope that’s helped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Spurs can say 'your contract means nothing' as far as Mourinho is concerned but then say 'you signed a cast iron contract, live with it' to Kane, talk about double standards.
Also Kane is well within his rights if there was a gentleman's agreement between him & Levy, especially if Levy had a 'reasonable offer' clause in it as £100m (reportedly offered by City) is a very reasonable offer in everybody else's eyes.
Free the 'Tottenham One'
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 2 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me for not understanding the first comment.
Care to explain what I am missing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t realise I’d have to write it out in crayon for you, but ok here we go:
Scenario 1: The employer (THFC) wish to terminate the employees (Jose Mourinho) contract. As they are effectively the ‘controlling party’, they are able to do this, either by paying the remainder of the contract in full, or reaching a settlement.
Scenario 2: The employee (Harry Kane) wishes to terminate the contract, but the employer (THFC) does not wish to do so. As such, they are entitled to hold him to the terms of his contract for the duration of its term. Unless an agreement is reached which is acceptable to the employer in terms of compensation etc, they are under no obligation to end the contract.
Hope that’s helped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I fecking get that, thats not what I am talking about though.
I am talking about the fans, wanting Mourinho out regardless of his contract. But want Kane to stick to his contract.
I never made this an employer/employee article.
Hope that helps too ffs
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 day ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 2 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me for not understanding the first comment.
Care to explain what I am missing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t realise I’d have to write it out in crayon for you, but ok here we go:
Scenario 1: The employer (THFC) wish to terminate the employees (Jose Mourinho) contract. As they are effectively the ‘controlling party’, they are able to do this, either by paying the remainder of the contract in full, or reaching a settlement.
Scenario 2: The employee (Harry Kane) wishes to terminate the contract, but the employer (THFC) does not wish to do so. As such, they are entitled to hold him to the terms of his contract for the duration of its term. Unless an agreement is reached which is acceptable to the employer in terms of compensation etc, they are under no obligation to end the contract.
Hope that’s helped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I fecking get that, thats not what I am talking about though.
I am talking about the fans, wanting Mourinho out regardless of his contract. But want Kane to stick to his contract.
I never made this an employer/employee article.
Hope that helps tooffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One love.....more like one brain cell
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 day ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 2 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me for not understanding the first comment.
Care to explain what I am missing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t realise I’d have to write it out in crayon for you, but ok here we go:
Scenario 1: The employer (THFC) wish to terminate the employees (Jose Mourinho) contract. As they are effectively the ‘controlling party’, they are able to do this, either by paying the remainder of the contract in full, or reaching a settlement.
Scenario 2: The employee (Harry Kane) wishes to terminate the contract, but the employer (THFC) does not wish to do so. As such, they are entitled to hold him to the terms of his contract for the duration of its term. Unless an agreement is reached which is acceptable to the employer in terms of compensation etc, they are under no obligation to end the contract.
Hope that’s helped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I fecking get that, thats not what I am talking about though.
I am talking about the fans, wanting Mourinho out regardless of his contract. But want Kane to stick to his contract.
I never made this an employer/employee article.
Hope that helps tooffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One love.....more like one brain cell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't be so hard on yourself, I'm sure if you try you can increase that to 2 brain cells and finally get your IQ into positive figures.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Mourinho v Kane contracts
Page 1 of 1
posted on 3/8/21
..and count his money !
posted on 3/8/21
Jose should never have been hired in the first place. His a washed up has been.
posted on 3/8/21
No one is against selling Kane as long as we get the right price
posted on 3/8/21
That's what people don't get about loyalty, it's a two way street. Say Kane suddenly turned into a rubbish player like Alexis did Levy would be offering him everywhere.
That said, Kane only has himself to blame signing that big new deal knowing what Levy is like, if he actually made a 'gentleman's agreement' with him after Modric then he was incredibly naive.
posted on 3/8/21
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/8/21
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
Jose should never have been hired in the first place. His a washed up has been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesnt matter, he signed a contract, why does that mean fack all but for Kane he is being held to it?
posted on 3/8/21
comment by Anne Ziety (U22412)
posted 1 minute ago
That's what people don't get about loyalty, it's a two way street. Say Kane suddenly turned into a rubbish player like Alexis did Levy would be offering him everywhere.
That said, Kane only has himself to blame signing that big new deal knowing what Levy is like, if he actually made a 'gentleman's agreement' with him after Modric then he was incredibly naive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really naive. Kane probably thought he was respected enough within the club for a gentlemen's agreement to be respected - that's IF it was indeed made.
posted on 3/8/21
comment by Ace (U22467)
posted 43 seconds ago
One is an asset worth in excess of £100m to the club or, alternatively, +40 goal contributions a season, the other was no longer of any value to the club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I meant in the eyes of the fans.
You want Kane to stick to his contract, but not Mourinho.
It is a hypocritical argument
posted on 3/8/21
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 43 seconds ago
comment by Ace (U22467)
posted 43 seconds ago
One is an asset worth in excess of £100m to the club or, alternatively, +40 goal contributions a season, the other was no longer of any value to the club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I meant in the eyes of the fans.
You want Kane to stick to his contract, but not Mourinho.
It is a hypocritical argument
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lets be honest, if a player we were trying to buy stopped training to force a move, the same people criticising Kane right now, would have no problem.
posted on 3/8/21
How do you manage to post such stupid shiiit without being a wum
posted on 3/8/21
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
posted on 3/8/21
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
Jose should never have been hired in the first place. His a washed up has been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesnt matter, he signed a contract, why does that mean fack all but for Kane he is being held to it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cause he was fooking useless, Kane is a player and be it a very good one.
posted on 3/8/21
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
posted on 3/8/21
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 11 minutes ago
Jose should never have been hired in the first place. His a washed up has been.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesnt matter, he signed a contract, why does that mean fack all but for Kane he is being held to it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cause he was fooking useless, Kane is a player and be it a very good one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So contracts mean nothing if it fits your narrative.
posted on 3/8/21
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
posted on 3/8/21
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
posted on 3/8/21
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me for not understanding the first comment.
Care to explain what I am missing?
posted on 3/8/21
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me for not understanding the first comment.
Care to explain what I am missing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t realise I’d have to write it out in crayon for you, but ok here we go:
Scenario 1: The employer (THFC) wish to terminate the employees (Jose Mourinho) contract. As they are effectively the ‘controlling party’, they are able to do this, either by paying the remainder of the contract in full, or reaching a settlement.
Scenario 2: The employee (Harry Kane) wishes to terminate the contract, but the employer (THFC) does not wish to do so. As such, they are entitled to hold him to the terms of his contract for the duration of its term. Unless an agreement is reached which is acceptable to the employer in terms of compensation etc, they are under no obligation to end the contract.
Hope that’s helped.
posted on 3/8/21
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me for not understanding the first comment.
Care to explain what I am missing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t realise I’d have to write it out in crayon for you, but ok here we go:
Scenario 1: The employer (THFC) wish to terminate the employees (Jose Mourinho) contract. As they are effectively the ‘controlling party’, they are able to do this, either by paying the remainder of the contract in full, or reaching a settlement.
Scenario 2: The employee (Harry Kane) wishes to terminate the contract, but the employer (THFC) does not wish to do so. As such, they are entitled to hold him to the terms of his contract for the duration of its term. Unless an agreement is reached which is acceptable to the employer in terms of compensation etc, they are under no obligation to end the contract.
Hope that’s helped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Spurs can say 'your contract means nothing' as far as Mourinho is concerned but then say 'you signed a cast iron contract, live with it' to Kane, talk about double standards.
Also Kane is well within his rights if there was a gentleman's agreement between him & Levy, especially if Levy had a 'reasonable offer' clause in it as £100m (reportedly offered by City) is a very reasonable offer in everybody else's eyes.
Free the 'Tottenham One'
posted on 3/8/21
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 2 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me for not understanding the first comment.
Care to explain what I am missing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t realise I’d have to write it out in crayon for you, but ok here we go:
Scenario 1: The employer (THFC) wish to terminate the employees (Jose Mourinho) contract. As they are effectively the ‘controlling party’, they are able to do this, either by paying the remainder of the contract in full, or reaching a settlement.
Scenario 2: The employee (Harry Kane) wishes to terminate the contract, but the employer (THFC) does not wish to do so. As such, they are entitled to hold him to the terms of his contract for the duration of its term. Unless an agreement is reached which is acceptable to the employer in terms of compensation etc, they are under no obligation to end the contract.
Hope that’s helped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I fecking get that, thats not what I am talking about though.
I am talking about the fans, wanting Mourinho out regardless of his contract. But want Kane to stick to his contract.
I never made this an employer/employee article.
Hope that helps too ffs
posted on 4/8/21
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 day ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 2 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me for not understanding the first comment.
Care to explain what I am missing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t realise I’d have to write it out in crayon for you, but ok here we go:
Scenario 1: The employer (THFC) wish to terminate the employees (Jose Mourinho) contract. As they are effectively the ‘controlling party’, they are able to do this, either by paying the remainder of the contract in full, or reaching a settlement.
Scenario 2: The employee (Harry Kane) wishes to terminate the contract, but the employer (THFC) does not wish to do so. As such, they are entitled to hold him to the terms of his contract for the duration of its term. Unless an agreement is reached which is acceptable to the employer in terms of compensation etc, they are under no obligation to end the contract.
Hope that’s helped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I fecking get that, thats not what I am talking about though.
I am talking about the fans, wanting Mourinho out regardless of his contract. But want Kane to stick to his contract.
I never made this an employer/employee article.
Hope that helps tooffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One love.....more like one brain cell
posted on 4/8/21
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 day ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 2 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by One Love - Admin 3 (U1250)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 33 minutes ago
So you’re saying you don’t understand the difference between an employer and an employee when it comes to contracts?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mourinho and Kane are both employees of the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the sharpest is he…
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Forgive me for not understanding the first comment.
Care to explain what I am missing?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn’t realise I’d have to write it out in crayon for you, but ok here we go:
Scenario 1: The employer (THFC) wish to terminate the employees (Jose Mourinho) contract. As they are effectively the ‘controlling party’, they are able to do this, either by paying the remainder of the contract in full, or reaching a settlement.
Scenario 2: The employee (Harry Kane) wishes to terminate the contract, but the employer (THFC) does not wish to do so. As such, they are entitled to hold him to the terms of his contract for the duration of its term. Unless an agreement is reached which is acceptable to the employer in terms of compensation etc, they are under no obligation to end the contract.
Hope that’s helped.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I fecking get that, thats not what I am talking about though.
I am talking about the fans, wanting Mourinho out regardless of his contract. But want Kane to stick to his contract.
I never made this an employer/employee article.
Hope that helps tooffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One love.....more like one brain cell
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't be so hard on yourself, I'm sure if you try you can increase that to 2 brain cells and finally get your IQ into positive figures.
Page 1 of 1