Responding to a comment is biting?

Ok, so people bit (seeing as you’re focused so much on this as some kind of win on GB’s part). So what?

Every single reply to anyone on here can then be regarded as a bite. Is you responding to me you biting? Me responding to you biting?

If so, then again, so what? Does it make GB’s comment somehow less stupid? Less “wummy”?

His comment is still stupid, no matter how you want to dress it up. No matter how many people supposedly bite.

comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 4 minutes ago

Responding to a comment is biting?
====
No, responding to a wummy comment is biting. The comment was wummy, by your own admission.

Every single reply to anyone on here can then be regarded as a bite. Is you responding to me you biting? Me responding to you biting?
=====
If you're trying to wum me then yes, its a bite. If I'm trying to wum you its a bite. If neither is trying to wum and engaging in good debate then its not a bite. Its not rocket sconce.

If so, then again, so what? Does it make GB’s comment somehow less stupid? Less “wummy”?
====
I didn't say it was or wasn't stupid, I digress from that. But it was wummy for sure.

comment by *No Love (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 4 minutes ago

Responding to a comment is biting?
====
No, responding to a wummy comment is biting. The comment was wummy, by your own admission.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You called the comment wummy.

But again, so what if it is?

All you’ve said is that responding to a “wummy” comment (you called it “wummy&rdquo, is biting.

I’m saying so what if it is?

*you called it “wummy”. Not sure what happened there

You called the comment wummy.
====
You agreed.




But again, so what if it is?

All you’ve said is that responding to a “wummy” comment (you called it “wummy&rdquo, is biting.

I’m saying so what if it is?
====
To be fair my point is already made so I'm happy. I don't know what it means if the comment is wummy. I didn't think that far ahead.

I don’t care if he was or wasn’t wumming. Me agreeing with you that he was wumming doesn’t change anything. Wum or not, his comment was stupid. People biting or not, his comment was still stupid.

You come along and all you’ve tried to do is say people are stupid for responding to a stupid comment.

When all that actually happened is people picked GB up on his stupid comment. Or in other words, even if he was wumming, responding to his comment by pointing out its stupidity can’t really be labelled a bite, because these little fishes didn’t end up being dragged out of the water.

comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago

I don’t care if he was or wasn’t wumming. Me agreeing with you that he was wumming doesn’t change anything. Wum or not, his comment was stupid. People biting or not, his comment was still stupid.
=====
Whether its stupid or not is besides my point so I won't go into that.



You come along and all you’ve tried to do is say people are stupid for responding to a stupid comment.
=====
I haven't tried to say people are stupid. I just pointed out that GB had caught a few fish. please don't put words in my mouth.

Nah, that would be a hook in your mouth.

You know full well what you were doing. And so do I

Yeah, I know what I was doing. I was surprised by the replies to what is clearly bait tbh.

What you actually said was it’s even worse to respond to a comment that was a bit wummy and a bit stupid. Your words: “Even worse”.

It’s clear what your intent on this thread is. You’re trying to make out anyone who responded to GB is worse than he is.

comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 2 minutes ago
What you actually said was it’s even worse to respond to a comment that was a bit wummy and a bit stupid. Your words: “Even worse”.
======
That was a reply to a comment that you made so you're taking it out of context. Its not like thats what I said when I joined the thread. You took it in that direction, not me.



It’s clear what your intent on this thread is. You’re trying to make out anyone who responded to GB is worse than he is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh?

My intent was to just point out that GB nabbed a coupla fish.

Except he didn’t did he? Because no one fell for what he said, and everyone thought he was just being stupid for saying it.

What you’re trying to do is claim that as some kind of win for GB

comment by *No Love (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
My intent was to just point out that GB nabbed a coupla fish.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

But he hasn’t.

And Ripley is right.

The best wums are where the victims are left saying what you guys are saying, no?

The fall and rise of Got Better.

Wishing death on the continent of Africa one day, master wum the next.

Wow.

comment by *No Love (U1282)
posted 37 minutes ago
The best wums are where the victims are left saying what you guys are saying, no?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No. That isn’t what I would call a “best wum.”

Not even close, son.

Away from the thickness/wummery

5 games, 5 wins in November.

The heat on the slow-cooker being gently turned up.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 31 minutes ago
Away from the thickness/wummery

5 games, 5 wins in November.

The heat on the slow-cooker being gently turned up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think you will win it. Just. Still the best footballing team in the division for me. A striker in January just for those games that don't go to plan and you're golden.

Much prefer you lot to win it than the vermin although obviously Chelsea would be beneficial from a Utd fans view.

Looks like City are waiting for the 'right' striker.

Big job filling Sergio's boots and it won't come cheap.

Just saying something stupid isn’t a wum, nor is pointing out that someone said something stupid being “hooked”.

*No Love (U1282) chomped hard on Ripley