comment by LustyMonc (U22632)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Der Post Nearly Mann (U1270)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by South Side (U20009)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Der Post Nearly Mann (U1270)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by South Side (U20009)
posted 4 seconds ago
Wasn't AIDS just god's way of telling us that anal fluid and the tip aren't best mates?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Woo hoo, creationism and homophobia. You and Mohamed Aboutrika should be best mates
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You haven't been reading my comments have you?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just that one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OP, AIDS is just the human version of the monkey (simian) AIDS. Why did your god/God/G-d create monkey AIDS first? Also, do monkeys do sodomy? [Clue: yes, they do.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh? He's not my god. I'm a Neo Marxist Atheist

comment by LustyMonc (U22632)
posted 2 minutes ago

OP, AIDS is just the human version of the monkey (simian) AIDS. Why did your god/God/G-d create monkey AIDS first? Also, do monkeys do sodomy? [Clue: yes, they do.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think you answered your own question there

Hes 43 years old and still is blinded by the idea of what he precieves to be purity.. Not living in the real world people like him.

comment by Der Post Nearly Mann (U1270)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Jadon The King Sancho (U10026)
posted 6 seconds ago
I’m talking about social Darwinism, Jinja. That seemed to be the angle you were going with when you said this:

I just thought it was interesting what people thought if it from an evolution/biology perspective rather than a religious one (the two seem to have similarities imo)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Wasn't limiting it to social darwinism. Wider context.

The footballer guy said it was against nature. The biology book I referred to says it's a malfunction (not reproducing). Darwin's (and others) work on sexual selection also focus on reproduction being the be all and end all.

Sounds similar to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you accept that once a species with no predators is established to the level that it's actually overpopulating its environment then reproduction as a survival technique is less of an imperative?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not so sure I do.

There is a theory that women with homosexual kin have more kids than women with hetrosexual kin.

Also a study showed homosexual couples who have kids have more than one. Iirc almost 40% of homosexual couples go on to have kids

comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Der Post Nearly Mann (U1270)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Jadon The King Sancho (U10026)
posted 6 seconds ago
I’m talking about social Darwinism, Jinja. That seemed to be the angle you were going with when you said this:

I just thought it was interesting what people thought if it from an evolution/biology perspective rather than a religious one (the two seem to have similarities imo)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Wasn't limiting it to social darwinism. Wider context.

The footballer guy said it was against nature. The biology book I referred to says it's a malfunction (not reproducing). Darwin's (and others) work on sexual selection also focus on reproduction being the be all and end all.

Sounds similar to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you accept that once a species with no predators is established to the level that it's actually overpopulating its environment then reproduction as a survival technique is less of an imperative?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not so sure I do.

There is a theory that women with homosexual kin have more kids than women with hetrosexual kin.

Also a study showed homosexual couples who have kids have more than one. Iirc almost 40% of homosexual couples go on to have kids
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have no idea where you're going with this one

comment by Der Post Nearly Mann (U1270)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Der Post Nearly Mann (U1270)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Jadon The King Sancho (U10026)
posted 6 seconds ago
I’m talking about social Darwinism, Jinja. That seemed to be the angle you were going with when you said this:

I just thought it was interesting what people thought if it from an evolution/biology perspective rather than a religious one (the two seem to have similarities imo)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Wasn't limiting it to social darwinism. Wider context.

The footballer guy said it was against nature. The biology book I referred to says it's a malfunction (not reproducing). Darwin's (and others) work on sexual selection also focus on reproduction being the be all and end all.

Sounds similar to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you accept that once a species with no predators is established to the level that it's actually overpopulating its environment then reproduction as a survival technique is less of an imperative?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not so sure I do.

There is a theory that women with homosexual kin have more kids than women with hetrosexual kin.

Also a study showed homosexual couples who have kids have more than one. Iirc almost 40% of homosexual couples go on to have kids
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have no idea where you're going with this one
----------------------------------------------------------------------

😂 Neither do I.

Should get some sleep really. I'm hungry now 😭

comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Der Post Nearly Mann (U1270)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by Jadon The King Sancho (U10026)
posted 6 seconds ago
I’m talking about social Darwinism, Jinja. That seemed to be the angle you were going with when you said this:

I just thought it was interesting what people thought if it from an evolution/biology perspective rather than a religious one (the two seem to have similarities imo)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Wasn't limiting it to social darwinism. Wider context.

The footballer guy said it was against nature. The biology book I referred to says it's a malfunction (not reproducing). Darwin's (and others) work on sexual selection also focus on reproduction being the be all and end all.

Sounds similar to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you accept that once a species with no predators is established to the level that it's actually overpopulating its environment then reproduction as a survival technique is less of an imperative?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not so sure I do.

There is a theory that women with homosexual kin have more kids than women with hetrosexual kin.

Also a study showed homosexual couples who have kids have more than one. Iirc almost 40% of homosexual couples go on to have kids
----------------------------------------------------------------------
wtf?

comment by Der Post Nearly Mann (U1270)
posted 48 minutes ago
comment by LustyMonc (U22632)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Der Post Nearly Mann (U1270)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by South Side (U20009)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Der Post Nearly Mann (U1270)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by South Side (U20009)
posted 4 seconds ago
Wasn't AIDS just god's way of telling us that anal fluid and the tip aren't best mates?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Woo hoo, creationism and homophobia. You and Mohamed Aboutrika should be best mates
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You haven't been reading my comments have you?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just that one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OP, AIDS is just the human version of the monkey (simian) AIDS. Why did your god/God/G-d create monkey AIDS first? Also, do monkeys do sodomy? [Clue: yes, they do.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eh? He's not my god. I'm a Neo Marxist Atheist
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry Post Nearly, meant for South Side

comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by LustyMonc (U22632)
posted 2 minutes ago

OP, AIDS is just the human version of the monkey (simian) AIDS. Why did your god/God/G-d create monkey AIDS first? Also, do monkeys do sodomy? [Clue: yes, they do.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think you answered your own question there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was rhetorical. Just to let creationists know that what's considered "abnormal" is already pre-existing in nature. Which means it's normal. Just like homosexuality and butt-sex.

comment by LustyMonc (U22632)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by LustyMonc (U22632)
posted 2 minutes ago

OP, AIDS is just the human version of the monkey (simian) AIDS. Why did your god/God/G-d create monkey AIDS first? Also, do monkeys do sodomy? [Clue: yes, they do.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think you answered your own question there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was rhetorical. Just to let creationists know that what's considered "abnormal" is already pre-existing in nature. Which means it's normal. Just like homosexuality and butt-sex.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
From general observation much of the most abhorrent treatment of homosexuals comes from religious people battling against their own homosexuality

comment by LustyMonc (U22632)
posted 6 hours, 37 minutes ago
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by LustyMonc (U22632)
posted 2 minutes ago

OP, AIDS is just the human version of the monkey (simian) AIDS. Why did your god/God/G-d create monkey AIDS first? Also, do monkeys do sodomy? [Clue: yes, they do.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think you answered your own question there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was rhetorical. Just to let creationists know that what's considered "abnormal" is already pre-existing in nature. Which means it's normal. Just like homosexuality and butt-sex.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


So is cannibalism, rape, in cest and pedophilia. That's just chimps and bonobo monkeys.

comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
comment by LustyMonc (U22632)
posted 6 hours, 37 minutes ago
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by LustyMonc (U22632)
posted 2 minutes ago

OP, AIDS is just the human version of the monkey (simian) AIDS. Why did your god/God/G-d create monkey AIDS first? Also, do monkeys do sodomy? [Clue: yes, they do.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think you answered your own question there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was rhetorical. Just to let creationists know that what's considered "abnormal" is already pre-existing in nature. Which means it's normal. Just like homosexuality and butt-sex.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


So is cannibalism, rape, in cest and pedophilia. That's just chimps and bonobo monkeys.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thankfully they're rare traits although a couple of those happen to be far more common among religious people, especially the leaders of the major religions

comment by LustyMonc (U22632)
posted 7 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by LustyMonc (U22632)
posted 2 minutes ago

OP, AIDS is just the human version of the monkey (simian) AIDS. Why did your god/God/G-d create monkey AIDS first? Also, do monkeys do sodomy? [Clue: yes, they do.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think you answered your own question there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was rhetorical. Just to let creationists know that what's considered "abnormal" is already pre-existing in nature. Which means it's normal. Just like homosexuality and butt-sex.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I meant that following the logical chain, it's obvious that god/God/G-d created monkey AIDS to punish gay monkeys.

comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 1 hour, 25 minutes ago
comment by LustyMonc (U22632)
posted 6 hours, 37 minutes ago
It was rhetorical. Just to let creationists know that what's considered "abnormal" is already pre-existing in nature. Which means it's normal. Just like homosexuality and butt-sex.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


So is cannibalism, rape, in cest and pedophilia. That's just chimps and bonobo monkeys.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Afaik, chimps and bonobos don't do cannibalism. Chimps do kill chimps from rival groups, but I don't think they eat them. They do hunt and eat monkeys, though I don't know if that includes other ape species or not.

It would be interesting to know whether they fack dead chimps though, because if they don't, that might be interesting subject matter for a potential doctoral thesis about what actually separates humans from other animals.

I have nothing against anyone doing things in their private lives and am against violence to anyone living their lives peacefully no matter what they are or do. However, keep that private life private don’t force me to wear Rainbows or Ribbons am tired of all these politics in our games.

comment by Mrs Ramsdale (U21751)
posted 10 minutes ago
I have nothing against anyone doing things in their private lives and am against violence to anyone living their lives peacefully no matter what they are or do. However, keep that private life private don’t force me to wear Rainbows or Ribbons am tired of all these politics in our games.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nobody's forcing you to wear anything. It's a campaign promoting inclusion and diversity, why do you class that as politics?

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 11 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by Jadon The King Sancho (U10026)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Jadon The King Sancho (U10026)
posted 38 seconds ago
It’s a daft quote, to be fair.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s poorly put point, but the general message behind it is a valid one. Religion is the source behind many of the planets ills. But then so is politics and money amongst other things. The one common denominator is man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But that isn’t the general message, it’s an atheist view of religion. It’s not giving agency to man but to religion itself.

But it’s a daft quote because it doesn’t really make any sense, there’s numerous different ways in which good people can do evil without religion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It could be said that religon is a driver for good.

Most of our laws are based on the 10 Commandments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And the Ten Commandments are some derivative of Hammurabi’s Code.

It wasn’t a lawless free-for-all before the Ten Commandments rocked up.

I'm no theological scholar, but if god made man in his own image does that mean there's a part of him that's a little bit gay?

comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 10 hours, 22 minutes ago
comment by Jadon The King Sancho (U10026)
posted 52 seconds ago
People espouse social Darwinism, they are every bit as backwards as religious fanatics.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A good number of 19th century European intellectuals, politicians and soldiers felt that Darwin's theories justified their efforts to wipe out entire peoples. Their reasoning was that according to the theory of evolution, those peoples they viewed as inferior were destined to become extinct, so killing them was simply enacting God's will. Some even argued that it was an act of mercy to put them out of their misery rather than allow them to slowly die out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think Darwin is probably resting as comfortably in his coffin as Nietzsche

comment by Two Balls, One Saka (U19684)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
comment by LustyMonc (U22632)
posted 6 hours, 37 minutes ago
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by LustyMonc (U22632)
posted 2 minutes ago

OP, AIDS is just the human version of the monkey (simian) AIDS. Why did your god/God/G-d create monkey AIDS first? Also, do monkeys do sodomy? [Clue: yes, they do.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think you answered your own question there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was rhetorical. Just to let creationists know that what's considered "abnormal" is already pre-existing in nature. Which means it's normal. Just like homosexuality and butt-sex.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


So is cannibalism, rape, in cest and pedophilia. That's just chimps and bonobo monkeys.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thankfully they're rare traits although a couple of those happen to be far more common among religious people, especially the leaders of the major religions
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not all of those are that rare.

Point being just coz monkeys do it doesn't mean we should.

comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 1 hour, 25 minutes ago
comment by LustyMonc (U22632)
posted 6 hours, 37 minutes ago
It was rhetorical. Just to let creationists know that what's considered "abnormal" is already pre-existing in nature. Which means it's normal. Just like homosexuality and butt-sex.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


So is cannibalism, rape, in cest and pedophilia. That's just chimps and bonobo monkeys.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Afaik, chimps and bonobos don't do cannibalism. Chimps do kill chimps from rival groups, but I don't think they eat them. They do hunt and eat monkeys, though I don't know if that includes other ape species or not.

It would be interesting to know whether they fack dead chimps though, because if they don't, that might be interesting subject matter for a potential doctoral thesis about what actually separates humans from other animals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

From primates chimps do resort to cannibalism.

comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Two Balls, One Saka (U19684)
posted 1 hour, 45 minutes ago
comment by Jinja Ninja (U19849)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
comment by LustyMonc (U22632)
posted 6 hours, 37 minutes ago
comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 49 minutes ago
comment by LustyMonc (U22632)
posted 2 minutes ago

OP, AIDS is just the human version of the monkey (simian) AIDS. Why did your god/God/G-d create monkey AIDS first? Also, do monkeys do sodomy? [Clue: yes, they do.]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think you answered your own question there
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was rhetorical. Just to let creationists know that what's considered "abnormal" is already pre-existing in nature. Which means it's normal. Just like homosexuality and butt-sex.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


So is cannibalism, rape, in cest and pedophilia. That's just chimps and bonobo monkeys.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thankfully they're rare traits although a couple of those happen to be far more common among religious people, especially the leaders of the major religions
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not all of those are that rare.

Point being just coz monkeys do it doesn't mean we should.




----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your "point" is moronic

I'm trying to untangle your logic here, Jinja. Are you using this primates example to support what Mohamed Aboutrika said?

We don’t resort to cannibalism due to social convention, not because it’s unhealthy

comment by Der Post Nearly Mann (U1270)
posted 5 minutes ago
I'm trying to untangle your logic here, Jinja. Are you using this primates example to support what Mohamed Aboutrika said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair, what he said might not be acceptable in the west but the country he lives in and a lot of other countries, Muslim or not probably share his views. Even China is against it and that's one of the biggest atheist country in the world. Saying that sometimes you need to be careful what you say to the media as it will be scrutinised to the fullest, especially anything related to LGBT.

In the west, homosexuality and transgenderism etc might be considered as normal and acceptable (and that's only the past 20 years), but in a lot of other countries, they see this as shameful and immoral.