comment by RB&W - What is it now, Ralf? (U21434)
posted 1 hour, 34 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 4 minutes ago
Taylor swift has had a lot of hits. That's the barometer of good music.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not even close to the Beatles. Next silly comment from you please.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She has 166 top 100 entries on the billboard. What are you talking about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What was the world population in 1963? In 2006?
Was there an internet or any worldwide way if broadcasting music in 1963?
She had a world pop. more than twice as big as the Beatles had in 1963 and the internet.
BTW which millenials were involved in creating the internet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
everybody listened to Radio Luxembourg in them days.
The boat that rocked
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Radio Luxembourg!
I think you mean Radio Caroline!
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 seconds ago
ffs we’re dealing with a wee laddie who might grow up one day
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ginger, this can't wouldn't last 5 minutes in a pub.
I'd have the landlord eject him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On what grounds?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On the grounds that if he doesn't I will make a mess if you and cause extensive damage to his pub.
Do you really need everything explained in detail?
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 seconds ago
ffs we’re dealing with a wee laddie who might grow up one day
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ginger, this can't wouldn't last 5 minutes in a pub.
I'd have the landlord eject him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On what grounds?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On the grounds that if he doesn't I will make a mess if you and cause extensive damage to his pub.
Do you really need everything explained in detail?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your about 78, relax old man, the only thing you'll make a mess of is your knee đđ
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 minutes ago
Yeah well done vc. She also exists in an era where sales are a lot lower due to streaming.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She also exists in a time where the world is much more heavily populated so should actually sell more but does not. She isn’t even anywhere near the top of the lists of solo women artists. Madonna, Rihanna, Marina Carey and Whitney Houston are all above her.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 minutes ago
Yeah well done vc. She also exists in an era where sales are a lot lower due to streaming.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She also exists in a time where the world is much more heavily populated so should actually sell more but does not. She isn’t even anywhere near the top of the lists of solo women artists. Madonna, Rihanna, Marina Carey and Whitney Houston are all above her.
------------------------------------------------------
With the exception of adelle no artist sells that much these days. You don't understand streaming or how it's numbers are converted to sales. That's fine but please shut up about it.
Some cwnt Chinese burn his neck ffs
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 seconds ago
Some cwnt Chinese burn his neck ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn't it past your bed time
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 minutes ago
Yeah well done vc. She also exists in an era where sales are a lot lower due to streaming.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She also exists in a time where the world is much more heavily populated so should actually sell more but does not. She isn’t even anywhere near the top of the lists of solo women artists. Madonna, Rihanna, Marina Carey and Whitney Houston are all above her.
------------------------------------------------------
With the exception of adelle no artist sells that much these days. You don't understand streaming or how it's numbers are converted to sales. That's fine but please shut up about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never mentioned streaming. You are goal post moving.
You were never going to win trying to claim that Taylor Swift is a better selling musical artist over the group that is # 1 on all charts.
Streaming is converted into sales figures you ginormous idiot
I said she had more top 100 hits, she does.
When I next post a wrong fact, I'll give you a call to ask you to defend me. You're good at trying to defend the indefensible.
The Beatles gave the Stones a song. It's a fact.
My entire point was that selling a lot does not mean the quality of music was good.
Yellow submarine is one of the worst songs inflicted on ears of all time
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 34 seconds ago
When I next post a wrong fact, I'll give you a call to ask you to defend me. You're good at trying to defend the indefensible.
The Beatles gave the Stones a song. It's a fact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't they use it then?
Yeah well done vc. She also exists in an era where sales are a lot lower due to streaming. - Rude Van Nist
Streaming is converted into sales figures you ginormous idiot - Rude Van Nist
The gift that keeps giving.
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 34 seconds ago
When I next post a wrong fact, I'll give you a call to ask you to defend me. You're good at trying to defend the indefensible.
The Beatles gave the Stones a song. It's a fact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't they use it then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably it was no good.
I said they gave them a song, I didn't say if it was good or bad.
You said I was lying.
I wasn't, you were wrong
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 minutes ago
Yeah well done vc. She also exists in an era where sales are a lot lower due to streaming.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She also exists in a time where the world is much more heavily populated so should actually sell more but does not. She isn’t even anywhere near the top of the lists of solo women artists. Madonna, Rihanna, Marina Carey and Whitney Houston are all above her.
------------------------------------------------------
With the exception of adelle no artist sells that much these days. You don't understand streaming or how it's numbers are converted to sales. That's fine but please shut up about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never mentioned streaming. You are goal post moving.
You were never going to win trying to claim that Taylor Swift is a better selling musical artist over the group that is # 1 on all charts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bit bit bit she's massive - someone said on twitter
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 34 seconds ago
When I next post a wrong fact, I'll give you a call to ask you to defend me. You're good at trying to defend the indefensible.
The Beatles gave the Stones a song. It's a fact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't they use it then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They did, to the extent that they recorded it on an album and officially released in multiple countries. This has been pointed out to you.
There is even a video of them singing it on YouTube.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 minutes ago
Yeah well done vc. She also exists in an era where sales are a lot lower due to streaming.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She also exists in a time where the world is much more heavily populated so should actually sell more but does not. She isn’t even anywhere near the top of the lists of solo women artists. Madonna, Rihanna, Marina Carey and Whitney Houston are all above her.
------------------------------------------------------
With the exception of adelle no artist sells that much these days. You don't understand streaming or how it's numbers are converted to sales. That's fine but please shut up about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never mentioned streaming. You are goal post moving.
You were never going to win trying to claim that Taylor Swift is a better selling musical artist over the group that is # 1 on all charts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bit bit bit she's massive - someone said on twitter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shes sold 134 million records, how many have you sold?
comment by babyen ansikt snikmorder (U9094)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 34 seconds ago
When I next post a wrong fact, I'll give you a call to ask you to defend me. You're good at trying to defend the indefensible.
The Beatles gave the Stones a song. It's a fact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't they use it then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They did, to the extent that they recorded it on an album and officially released in multiple countries. This has been pointed out to you.
There is even a video of them singing it on YouTube.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't they release it on an official album?
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by babyen ansikt snikmorder (U9094)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 34 seconds ago
When I next post a wrong fact, I'll give you a call to ask you to defend me. You're good at trying to defend the indefensible.
The Beatles gave the Stones a song. It's a fact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't they use it then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They did, to the extent that they recorded it on an album and officially released in multiple countries. This has been pointed out to you.
There is even a video of them singing it on YouTube.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't they release it on an official album?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See my comment just above your question.
comment by babyen ansikt snikmorder (U9094)
posted 8 minutes ago
Yeah well done vc. She also exists in an era where sales are a lot lower due to streaming. - Rude Van Nist
Streaming is converted into sales figures you ginormous idiot - Rude Van Nist
The gift that keeps giving.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh Jesus christ I knew I was gonna have to explain this despite my best efforts.
Streaming conversion to sale is not one to one. It needs to be streamed thousands of times to classify as one sale.
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 minutes ago
Yeah well done vc. She also exists in an era where sales are a lot lower due to streaming.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She also exists in a time where the world is much more heavily populated so should actually sell more but does not. She isn’t even anywhere near the top of the lists of solo women artists. Madonna, Rihanna, Marina Carey and Whitney Houston are all above her.
------------------------------------------------------
With the exception of adelle no artist sells that much these days. You don't understand streaming or how it's numbers are converted to sales. That's fine but please shut up about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never mentioned streaming. You are goal post moving.
You were never going to win trying to claim that Taylor Swift is a better selling musical artist over the group that is # 1 on all charts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bit bit bit she's massive - someone said on twitter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shes sold 134 million records, how many have you sold?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know a guy who sold millions.
He owned a record store for 20 years. Sold it in the 80s.
comment by babyen ansikt snikmorder (U9094)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by babyen ansikt snikmorder (U9094)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 34 seconds ago
When I next post a wrong fact, I'll give you a call to ask you to defend me. You're good at trying to defend the indefensible.
The Beatles gave the Stones a song. It's a fact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't they use it then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They did, to the extent that they recorded it on an album and officially released in multiple countries. This has been pointed out to you.
There is even a video of them singing it on YouTube.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't they release it on an official album?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See my comment just above your question.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well they didn't.
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 minutes ago
Yeah well done vc. She also exists in an era where sales are a lot lower due to streaming.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She also exists in a time where the world is much more heavily populated so should actually sell more but does not. She isn’t even anywhere near the top of the lists of solo women artists. Madonna, Rihanna, Marina Carey and Whitney Houston are all above her.
------------------------------------------------------
With the exception of adelle no artist sells that much these days. You don't understand streaming or how it's numbers are converted to sales. That's fine but please shut up about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never mentioned streaming. You are goal post moving.
You were never going to win trying to claim that Taylor Swift is a better selling musical artist over the group that is # 1 on all charts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bit bit bit she's massive - someone said on twitter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shes sold 134 million records, how many have you sold?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know a guy who sold millions.
He owned a record store for 20 years. Sold it in the 80s.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus man how old are you?
Sign in if you want to comment
Getting old
Page 11 of 31
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16
posted on 28/2/22
comment by RB&W - What is it now, Ralf? (U21434)
posted 1 hour, 34 minutes ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 4 minutes ago
Taylor swift has had a lot of hits. That's the barometer of good music.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not even close to the Beatles. Next silly comment from you please.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She has 166 top 100 entries on the billboard. What are you talking about?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What was the world population in 1963? In 2006?
Was there an internet or any worldwide way if broadcasting music in 1963?
She had a world pop. more than twice as big as the Beatles had in 1963 and the internet.
BTW which millenials were involved in creating the internet?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
everybody listened to Radio Luxembourg in them days.
The boat that rocked
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Radio Luxembourg!
I think you mean Radio Caroline!
posted on 28/2/22
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 seconds ago
ffs we’re dealing with a wee laddie who might grow up one day
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ginger, this can't wouldn't last 5 minutes in a pub.
I'd have the landlord eject him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On what grounds?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On the grounds that if he doesn't I will make a mess if you and cause extensive damage to his pub.
Do you really need everything explained in detail?
posted on 28/2/22
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 seconds ago
ffs we’re dealing with a wee laddie who might grow up one day
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ginger, this can't wouldn't last 5 minutes in a pub.
I'd have the landlord eject him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On what grounds?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On the grounds that if he doesn't I will make a mess if you and cause extensive damage to his pub.
Do you really need everything explained in detail?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your about 78, relax old man, the only thing you'll make a mess of is your knee đđ
posted on 28/2/22
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 minutes ago
Yeah well done vc. She also exists in an era where sales are a lot lower due to streaming.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She also exists in a time where the world is much more heavily populated so should actually sell more but does not. She isn’t even anywhere near the top of the lists of solo women artists. Madonna, Rihanna, Marina Carey and Whitney Houston are all above her.
posted on 28/2/22
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 minutes ago
Yeah well done vc. She also exists in an era where sales are a lot lower due to streaming.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She also exists in a time where the world is much more heavily populated so should actually sell more but does not. She isn’t even anywhere near the top of the lists of solo women artists. Madonna, Rihanna, Marina Carey and Whitney Houston are all above her.
------------------------------------------------------
With the exception of adelle no artist sells that much these days. You don't understand streaming or how it's numbers are converted to sales. That's fine but please shut up about it.
posted on 28/2/22
Some cwnt Chinese burn his neck ffs
posted on 28/2/22
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 seconds ago
Some cwnt Chinese burn his neck ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Isn't it past your bed time
posted on 28/2/22
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 minutes ago
Yeah well done vc. She also exists in an era where sales are a lot lower due to streaming.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She also exists in a time where the world is much more heavily populated so should actually sell more but does not. She isn’t even anywhere near the top of the lists of solo women artists. Madonna, Rihanna, Marina Carey and Whitney Houston are all above her.
------------------------------------------------------
With the exception of adelle no artist sells that much these days. You don't understand streaming or how it's numbers are converted to sales. That's fine but please shut up about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never mentioned streaming. You are goal post moving.
You were never going to win trying to claim that Taylor Swift is a better selling musical artist over the group that is # 1 on all charts.
posted on 28/2/22
Streaming is converted into sales figures you ginormous idiot
posted on 28/2/22
I said she had more top 100 hits, she does.
posted on 28/2/22
When I next post a wrong fact, I'll give you a call to ask you to defend me. You're good at trying to defend the indefensible.
The Beatles gave the Stones a song. It's a fact.
posted on 28/2/22
My entire point was that selling a lot does not mean the quality of music was good.
Yellow submarine is one of the worst songs inflicted on ears of all time
posted on 28/2/22
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 34 seconds ago
When I next post a wrong fact, I'll give you a call to ask you to defend me. You're good at trying to defend the indefensible.
The Beatles gave the Stones a song. It's a fact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't they use it then?
posted on 28/2/22
Yeah well done vc. She also exists in an era where sales are a lot lower due to streaming. - Rude Van Nist
Streaming is converted into sales figures you ginormous idiot - Rude Van Nist
The gift that keeps giving.
posted on 28/2/22
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 34 seconds ago
When I next post a wrong fact, I'll give you a call to ask you to defend me. You're good at trying to defend the indefensible.
The Beatles gave the Stones a song. It's a fact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't they use it then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably it was no good.
I said they gave them a song, I didn't say if it was good or bad.
You said I was lying.
I wasn't, you were wrong
posted on 28/2/22
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 minutes ago
Yeah well done vc. She also exists in an era where sales are a lot lower due to streaming.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She also exists in a time where the world is much more heavily populated so should actually sell more but does not. She isn’t even anywhere near the top of the lists of solo women artists. Madonna, Rihanna, Marina Carey and Whitney Houston are all above her.
------------------------------------------------------
With the exception of adelle no artist sells that much these days. You don't understand streaming or how it's numbers are converted to sales. That's fine but please shut up about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never mentioned streaming. You are goal post moving.
You were never going to win trying to claim that Taylor Swift is a better selling musical artist over the group that is # 1 on all charts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bit bit bit she's massive - someone said on twitter
posted on 28/2/22
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 34 seconds ago
When I next post a wrong fact, I'll give you a call to ask you to defend me. You're good at trying to defend the indefensible.
The Beatles gave the Stones a song. It's a fact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't they use it then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They did, to the extent that they recorded it on an album and officially released in multiple countries. This has been pointed out to you.
There is even a video of them singing it on YouTube.
posted on 28/2/22
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 28/2/22
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 minutes ago
Yeah well done vc. She also exists in an era where sales are a lot lower due to streaming.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She also exists in a time where the world is much more heavily populated so should actually sell more but does not. She isn’t even anywhere near the top of the lists of solo women artists. Madonna, Rihanna, Marina Carey and Whitney Houston are all above her.
------------------------------------------------------
With the exception of adelle no artist sells that much these days. You don't understand streaming or how it's numbers are converted to sales. That's fine but please shut up about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never mentioned streaming. You are goal post moving.
You were never going to win trying to claim that Taylor Swift is a better selling musical artist over the group that is # 1 on all charts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bit bit bit she's massive - someone said on twitter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shes sold 134 million records, how many have you sold?
posted on 28/2/22
comment by babyen ansikt snikmorder (U9094)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 34 seconds ago
When I next post a wrong fact, I'll give you a call to ask you to defend me. You're good at trying to defend the indefensible.
The Beatles gave the Stones a song. It's a fact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't they use it then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They did, to the extent that they recorded it on an album and officially released in multiple countries. This has been pointed out to you.
There is even a video of them singing it on YouTube.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't they release it on an official album?
posted on 28/2/22
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by babyen ansikt snikmorder (U9094)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 34 seconds ago
When I next post a wrong fact, I'll give you a call to ask you to defend me. You're good at trying to defend the indefensible.
The Beatles gave the Stones a song. It's a fact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't they use it then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They did, to the extent that they recorded it on an album and officially released in multiple countries. This has been pointed out to you.
There is even a video of them singing it on YouTube.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't they release it on an official album?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See my comment just above your question.
posted on 28/2/22
comment by babyen ansikt snikmorder (U9094)
posted 8 minutes ago
Yeah well done vc. She also exists in an era where sales are a lot lower due to streaming. - Rude Van Nist
Streaming is converted into sales figures you ginormous idiot - Rude Van Nist
The gift that keeps giving.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh Jesus christ I knew I was gonna have to explain this despite my best efforts.
Streaming conversion to sale is not one to one. It needs to be streamed thousands of times to classify as one sale.
posted on 28/2/22
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 minutes ago
Yeah well done vc. She also exists in an era where sales are a lot lower due to streaming.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She also exists in a time where the world is much more heavily populated so should actually sell more but does not. She isn’t even anywhere near the top of the lists of solo women artists. Madonna, Rihanna, Marina Carey and Whitney Houston are all above her.
------------------------------------------------------
With the exception of adelle no artist sells that much these days. You don't understand streaming or how it's numbers are converted to sales. That's fine but please shut up about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never mentioned streaming. You are goal post moving.
You were never going to win trying to claim that Taylor Swift is a better selling musical artist over the group that is # 1 on all charts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bit bit bit she's massive - someone said on twitter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shes sold 134 million records, how many have you sold?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know a guy who sold millions.
He owned a record store for 20 years. Sold it in the 80s.
posted on 28/2/22
comment by babyen ansikt snikmorder (U9094)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by babyen ansikt snikmorder (U9094)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 34 seconds ago
When I next post a wrong fact, I'll give you a call to ask you to defend me. You're good at trying to defend the indefensible.
The Beatles gave the Stones a song. It's a fact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't they use it then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They did, to the extent that they recorded it on an album and officially released in multiple countries. This has been pointed out to you.
There is even a video of them singing it on YouTube.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why didn't they release it on an official album?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See my comment just above your question.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well they didn't.
posted on 28/2/22
comment by son of quebec (U8127)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 minutes ago
Yeah well done vc. She also exists in an era where sales are a lot lower due to streaming.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She also exists in a time where the world is much more heavily populated so should actually sell more but does not. She isn’t even anywhere near the top of the lists of solo women artists. Madonna, Rihanna, Marina Carey and Whitney Houston are all above her.
------------------------------------------------------
With the exception of adelle no artist sells that much these days. You don't understand streaming or how it's numbers are converted to sales. That's fine but please shut up about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never mentioned streaming. You are goal post moving.
You were never going to win trying to claim that Taylor Swift is a better selling musical artist over the group that is # 1 on all charts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bit bit bit she's massive - someone said on twitter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Shes sold 134 million records, how many have you sold?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I know a guy who sold millions.
He owned a record store for 20 years. Sold it in the 80s.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus man how old are you?
Page 11 of 31
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16