or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 102 comments are related to an article called:

Salah or Kane or Mbappe

Page 3 of 5

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

posted on 21/3/22

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 21/3/22

comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 second ago
Notable that CFC has immediately got onboard with the possible SMG bid, on the assumption that all things Saudi = bottomless pit of money and, of course, with no regard to their links to the Mohammed bin Salman regime and their appalling human rights record.

There are a couple of English based bids in for Chelsea , including one backed by Centricus who have made the statement that they want to maintain and support the existing management - but most fans would rather take the Saudi dollar in the hope they will prop up the club like Roman did for +15 years. Sad state of affairs IMO
----------------------------------------------------------------------

All the papers have been saying links to regime aren’t that strong.

Happy to be corrected though.

We don’t really need propping up that much as we have won multiple trophies since 2013 whilst breaking even many seasons

posted on 21/3/22

comment by The Mighty Tottenham Hotspur. (U7858)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 17 minutes ago
Kane isn't going to Chelsea. He knows he'd be hated by Spurs fans going there and what is the point of becoming a Spurs legend only to undo it in the click of a finger. Levy won't allow it either, he'd say to Kane he can go abroad instead.

Like others say, either City or Liverpool, or it's remaining at Spurs while Conte is there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why would Levy rather sell to City or Liverpool than Chelsea?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you seriously need to ask that ?

You are a London rival and levy refused modric his move there too

If city or Liverpool want him it will suit all parties , fans will understand , levy gets his money, Kane will be trying for the top trophies for 2/3 seasons (before retiring back at Tottenham)

He goes to Chelsea his entire legacy with Tottenham is ruined….like Sol Campbell (he is dispised but was at Tottenham a very long time)

Not sure what you arent understanding?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Salah to Barca, Kane to L’pool, Haaland to City, Andy Carroll to Spurs. The 4 big moves this summer
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Would Liverpool want Kane?

Chelsea’s new owners whoever they are will want a marquee signing

Players’ agents will be stirring the pot.

Not what Spurs want when they are going for top 4 spot

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 21/3/22

comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 second ago
Notable that CFC has immediately got onboard with the possible SMG bid, on the assumption that all things Saudi = bottomless pit of money and, of course, with no regard to their links to the Mohammed bin Salman regime and their appalling human rights record.

There are a couple of English based bids in for Chelsea , including one backed by Centricus who have made the statement that they want to maintain and support the existing management - but most fans would rather take the Saudi dollar in the hope they will prop up the club like Roman did for +15 years. Sad state of affairs IMO
----------------------------------------------------------------------

All the papers have been saying links to regime aren’t that strong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s a bit like telling your boss you don’t do it that often when IT send him a list of the prawn sites you’ve been on

posted on 21/3/22

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 second ago
Notable that CFC has immediately got onboard with the possible SMG bid, on the assumption that all things Saudi = bottomless pit of money and, of course, with no regard to their links to the Mohammed bin Salman regime and their appalling human rights record.

There are a couple of English based bids in for Chelsea , including one backed by Centricus who have made the statement that they want to maintain and support the existing management - but most fans would rather take the Saudi dollar in the hope they will prop up the club like Roman did for +15 years. Sad state of affairs IMO
----------------------------------------------------------------------

All the papers have been saying links to regime aren’t that strong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s a bit like telling your boss you don’t do it that often when IT send him a list of the prawn sites you’ve been on
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No direct links apparently. Inevitable there will be some connection

posted on 21/3/22

comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 second ago
Notable that CFC has immediately got onboard with the possible SMG bid, on the assumption that all things Saudi = bottomless pit of money and, of course, with no regard to their links to the Mohammed bin Salman regime and their appalling human rights record.

There are a couple of English based bids in for Chelsea , including one backed by Centricus who have made the statement that they want to maintain and support the existing management - but most fans would rather take the Saudi dollar in the hope they will prop up the club like Roman did for +15 years. Sad state of affairs IMO
----------------------------------------------------------------------

All the papers have been saying links to regime aren’t that strong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s a bit like telling your boss you don’t do it that often when IT send him a list of the prawn sites you’ve been on
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No direct links apparently. Inevitable there will be some connection
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Apparently the links are quite close.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jul/19/independent-joins-saudi-group-to-launch-middle-east-websites

posted on 21/3/22

comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Tottenham Hotspur. (U7858)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 17 minutes ago
Kane isn't going to Chelsea. He knows he'd be hated by Spurs fans going there and what is the point of becoming a Spurs legend only to undo it in the click of a finger. Levy won't allow it either, he'd say to Kane he can go abroad instead.

Like others say, either City or Liverpool, or it's remaining at Spurs while Conte is there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why would Levy rather sell to City or Liverpool than Chelsea?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you seriously need to ask that ?

You are a London rival and levy refused modric his move there too

If city or Liverpool want him it will suit all parties , fans will understand , levy gets his money, Kane will be trying for the top trophies for 2/3 seasons (before retiring back at Tottenham)

He goes to Chelsea his entire legacy with Tottenham is ruined….like Sol Campbell (he is dispised but was at Tottenham a very long time)

Not sure what you arent understanding?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Salah to Barca, Kane to L’pool, Haaland to City, Andy Carroll to Spurs. The 4 big moves this summer
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Would Liverpool want Kane?

Chelsea’s new owners whoever they are will want a marquee signing

Players’ agents will be stirring the pot.

Not what Spurs want when they are going for top 4 spot
----------------------------------------------------------------------

£100m + Broja and Reece James, I could get behind that deal

comment by Phenom (U20037)

posted on 21/3/22

throw in Gallagher for good measure

posted on 21/3/22

comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - A... (U18109)
posted 47 seconds ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Tottenham Hotspur. (U7858)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 17 minutes ago
Kane isn't going to Chelsea. He knows he'd be hated by Spurs fans going there and what is the point of becoming a Spurs legend only to undo it in the click of a finger. Levy won't allow it either, he'd say to Kane he can go abroad instead.

Like others say, either City or Liverpool, or it's remaining at Spurs while Conte is there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why would Levy rather sell to City or Liverpool than Chelsea?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you seriously need to ask that ?

You are a London rival and levy refused modric his move there too

If city or Liverpool want him it will suit all parties , fans will understand , levy gets his money, Kane will be trying for the top trophies for 2/3 seasons (before retiring back at Tottenham)

He goes to Chelsea his entire legacy with Tottenham is ruined….like Sol Campbell (he is dispised but was at Tottenham a very long time)

Not sure what you arent understanding?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Salah to Barca, Kane to L’pool, Haaland to City, Andy Carroll to Spurs. The 4 big moves this summer
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Would Liverpool want Kane?

Chelsea’s new owners whoever they are will want a marquee signing

Players’ agents will be stirring the pot.

Not what Spurs want when they are going for top 4 spot
----------------------------------------------------------------------

£100m + Broja and Reece James, I could get behind that deal
----------------------------------------------------------------------

😂 I’m not too sure Reece would. He should’be captain of Chelsea for a decade

Allah Allah We are the Chelsea boys

posted on 21/3/22

Don't worry Devon dude, our owners are conficent that the saudi bid will be rejected in favour of ours. If Mourinho wants to reunite with Kane then they're prepared to give him whatever it will te for Spurs to let him go

posted on 21/3/22

comment by Wahl - 4zA Roma (U22566)
posted 2 minutes ago
Don't worry Devon dude, our owners are conficent that the saudi bid will be rejected in favour of ours. If Mourinho wants to reunite with Kane then they're prepared to give him whatever it will te for Spurs to let him go
----------------------------------------------------------------------

But does Jose want to reunite with you Wahl?

posted on 21/3/22

Kane's a sensible lad. He'll be desperate to hook up with José again.

posted on 21/3/22

Can see this happening. The long lost naaazi’s in Argentina will resurface with their war gold to buy chelsea.

Liverpool are on the way down, with klopp probably going to leave next season, will sell vvd and Salah to Chelsea, Haaland being blond and blue eyed will also sign as poster boy

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 21/3/22

comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - A... (U18109)
posted 47 seconds ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 35 minutes ago
comment by The Mighty Tottenham Hotspur. (U7858)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by Spurtle (U1608)
posted 17 minutes ago
Kane isn't going to Chelsea. He knows he'd be hated by Spurs fans going there and what is the point of becoming a Spurs legend only to undo it in the click of a finger. Levy won't allow it either, he'd say to Kane he can go abroad instead.

Like others say, either City or Liverpool, or it's remaining at Spurs while Conte is there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why would Levy rather sell to City or Liverpool than Chelsea?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you seriously need to ask that ?

You are a London rival and levy refused modric his move there too

If city or Liverpool want him it will suit all parties , fans will understand , levy gets his money, Kane will be trying for the top trophies for 2/3 seasons (before retiring back at Tottenham)

He goes to Chelsea his entire legacy with Tottenham is ruined….like Sol Campbell (he is dispised but was at Tottenham a very long time)

Not sure what you arent understanding?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Salah to Barca, Kane to L’pool, Haaland to City, Andy Carroll to Spurs. The 4 big moves this summer
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Would Liverpool want Kane?

Chelsea’s new owners whoever they are will want a marquee signing

Players’ agents will be stirring the pot.

Not what Spurs want when they are going for top 4 spot
----------------------------------------------------------------------

£100m + Broja and Reece James, I could get behind that deal
----------------------------------------------------------------------

😂 I’m not too sure Reece would. He should’be captain of Chelsea for a decade

Allah Allah We are the Chelsea boys
----------------------------------------------------------------------
very good

The red hand of London

Reorientate the bridge so it faces Mecca

posted on 21/3/22

comment by Wahl - 4zA Roma (U22566)
posted 1 hour, 37 minutes ago
Don't worry Devon dude, our owners are conficent that the saudi bid will be rejected in favour of ours. If Mourinho wants to reunite with Kane then they're prepared to give him whatever it will te for Spurs to let him go
----------------------------------------------------------------------
United are also trying to get Saudi buyers? Small world it seems

posted on 21/3/22

Comment by Simon West (U1830)

posted 15 minutes ago

comment by Wahl - 4zA Roma (U22566)
posted 1 hour, 37 minutes ago
Don't worry Devon dude, our owners are conficent that the saudi bid will be rejected in favour of ours. If Mourinho wants to reunite with Kane then they're prepared to give him whatever it will te for Spurs to let him go
----------------------------------------------------------------------
United are also trying to get Saudi buyers? Small world it seems
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure bro, but the saudis probably will look at buying another club after our consortium buys Chelsea

posted on 21/3/22

comment by Ole dirty Baztard - penited and penandes (U19119)
posted 1 hour, 40 minutes ago
Can see this happening. The long lost naaazi’s in Argentina will resurface with their war gold to buy chelsea.

Liverpool are on the way down, with klopp probably going to leave next season, will sell vvd and Salah to Chelsea, Haaland being blond and blue eyed will also sign as poster boy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did a double take then - thought it was either Culer or Wahl posting

posted on 21/3/22

Hopefully with our new owners we will be able to compete financially with United and City, we've been punching well above our weight recently under Roman

posted on 21/3/22

comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 18 minutes ago
Hopefully with our new owners we will be able to compete financially with United and City, we've been punching well above our weight recently under Roman
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Everyone will be dwarfed by Newcastle, in fact if I was them I would buy Chelsea amalgamate the 2 teams, call them Newsea and go from there. Play up in Newcastle - no capacity/Stadium problems any longer. Instant CL place and they could take Chelsea’s recent honours as their own - delivering Champions league glory straight away.

I’m struggling to find a downside to this brilliant idea.

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 21/3/22

comment by Wahl - 4zA Roma (U22566)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Comment by Simon West (U1830)

posted 15 minutes ago

comment by Wahl - 4zA Roma (U22566)
posted 1 hour, 37 minutes ago
Don't worry Devon dude, our owners are conficent that the saudi bid will be rejected in favour of ours. If Mourinho wants to reunite with Kane then they're prepared to give him whatever it will te for Spurs to let him go
----------------------------------------------------------------------
United are also trying to get Saudi buyers? Small world it seems
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure bro, but the saudis probably will look at buying another club after our consortium buys Chelsea
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair if they just played all the games in the gulf region it would probably be optimal for global viewing figures? Use all those white elephant stadiums in Qatar after the WC?

posted on 21/3/22

Chelsea will be back to a nothing club now there crooked financier has done a runner. Although I suspect he will come out of hiding to take Chelsea's new owners to court for the one and a half billion he is owed. Which which would effectively be the end of Chelsea.

posted on 21/3/22

comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - A... (U18109)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 18 minutes ago
Hopefully with our new owners we will be able to compete financially with United and City, we've been punching well above our weight recently under Roman
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Everyone will be dwarfed by Newcastle, in fact if I was them I would buy Chelsea amalgamate the 2 teams, call them Newsea and go from there. Play up in Newcastle - no capacity/Stadium problems any longer. Instant CL place and they could take Chelsea’s recent honours as their own - delivering Champions league glory straight away.

I’m struggling to find a downside to this brilliant idea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought Saudi Media Group was worth 1 trn and PIF only 500 bn

posted on 21/3/22

comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)

posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago

Chelsea will be back to a nothing club now there crooked financier has done a runner. Although I suspect he will come out of hiding to take Chelsea's new owners to court for the one and a half billion he is owed. Which which would effectively be the end of Chelsea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No need to worry sand dude. Even if that did happen our consortium can more than afford it, while still financing Chelsea's rise to the top of world football for many years to come

posted on 21/3/22

comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - A... (U18109)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 18 minutes ago
Hopefully with our new owners we will be able to compete financially with United and City, we've been punching well above our weight recently under Roman
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Everyone will be dwarfed by Newcastle, in fact if I was them I would buy Chelsea amalgamate the 2 teams, call them Newsea and go from there. Play up in Newcastle - no capacity/Stadium problems any longer. Instant CL place and they could take Chelsea’s recent honours as their own - delivering Champions league glory straight away.

I’m struggling to find a downside to this brilliant idea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought Saudi Media Group was worth 1 trn and PIF only 500 bn
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If that’s true then it makes even more sense to amalgamate the two, you can then be worth 1.5trn!!

Newsea FC, it’s the team of the future. Newcastle gain some winning pedigree, Chelsea lose their poor reputation. Together you are stronger

posted on 21/3/22

comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - A... (U18109)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - A... (U18109)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 18 minutes ago
Hopefully with our new owners we will be able to compete financially with United and City, we've been punching well above our weight recently under Roman
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Everyone will be dwarfed by Newcastle, in fact if I was them I would buy Chelsea amalgamate the 2 teams, call them Newsea and go from there. Play up in Newcastle - no capacity/Stadium problems any longer. Instant CL place and they could take Chelsea’s recent honours as their own - delivering Champions league glory straight away.

I’m struggling to find a downside to this brilliant idea.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought Saudi Media Group was worth 1 trn and PIF only 500 bn
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If that’s true then it makes even more sense to amalgamate the two, you can then be worth 1.5trn!!

Newsea FC, it’s the team of the future. Newcastle gain some winning pedigree, Chelsea lose their poor reputation. Together you are stronger
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Spurs certainly looking a lot weaker that is for sure

Page 3 of 5

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
Sign in if you want to comment