comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
celtic agreed for the Oz game to be called the Old Firm, ergo agreed that they are still part of the old firm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your board said it wasn’t being marketed as that?! So, they’re wrong?? Ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
is that the case? I dont think that is....We have said it would be an OF, the Aus site said it wold be an OF (they may have changed their stance on that but there is still references to it being an OF when you go to buy tickets for it. I dont think your club were marketing it to your fans as that that could be the breach, all it takes is the Oz people to once say its not an OF for it to a breach.
comment by ukraine (U14278)
posted 1 minute ago
Is 10 years really that old?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
when you reach that age tell us
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 seconds ago
It’s a defence against incoming costs from the Oz organisers.
Nothing else.
Good luck with it. Where’s big Mike being told how much he can sue for by the way?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ve already got the arch they used yesterday at their bins waiting on collection!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Usually get my updates on court cases from Celtic fans anyway.
How about the Celtic court case any update on that? Ideally from a Rangers perspective there’s a large provision for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t really expect that from you.
Default position for the Neanderthal element.
Well done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardly, can’t pretend it doesn’t exist while going on about all our court cases and the CL money when financially it could have a big impact. There’s ugly parts of it clearly, I wasn’t and wouldn’t use that ad a stick at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly, you are.
As long as you’re happy with how you’ve brought it up, then that’s all that matters.
I think that’s more than a bit crass.
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 seconds ago
It’s a defence against incoming costs from the Oz organisers.
Nothing else.
Good luck with it. Where’s big Mike being told how much he can sue for by the way?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ve already got the arch they used yesterday at their bins waiting on collection!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Usually get my updates on court cases from Celtic fans anyway.
How about the Celtic court case any update on that? Ideally from a Rangers perspective there’s a large provision for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t really expect that from you.
Default position for the Neanderthal element.
Well done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardly, can’t pretend it doesn’t exist while going on about all our court cases and the CL money when financially it could have a big impact. There’s ugly parts of it clearly, I wasn’t and wouldn’t use that ad a stick at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly, you are.
As long as you’re happy with how you’ve brought it up, then that’s all that matters.
I think that’s more than a bit crass.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There’s plenty of insensitive comments that could be made in response to your comments. But simply from a financial perspective you can’t just pretend it doesn’t exist.
This place sure does get tedious at times. Petty boards pandering to petty fans on both sides of the divide. Move fvcking on, if we don't how can we expect the fans to?
In terms of the number of titles, I said a few years back that Rangers will get to 55 before Celtic, but Celtic will get to 60 before Rangers. Upsets like last season are always going to happen, but the financial advantage Celtic have built up is just too great at this point.
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 seconds ago
It’s a defence against incoming costs from the Oz organisers.
Nothing else.
Good luck with it. Where’s big Mike being told how much he can sue for by the way?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ve already got the arch they used yesterday at their bins waiting on collection!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Usually get my updates on court cases from Celtic fans anyway.
How about the Celtic court case any update on that? Ideally from a Rangers perspective there’s a large provision for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What court case is this?
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 seconds ago
It’s a defence against incoming costs from the Oz organisers.
Nothing else.
Good luck with it. Where’s big Mike being told how much he can sue for by the way?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ve already got the arch they used yesterday at their bins waiting on collection!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Usually get my updates on court cases from Celtic fans anyway.
How about the Celtic court case any update on that? Ideally from a Rangers perspective there’s a large provision for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t really expect that from you.
Default position for the Neanderthal element.
Well done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardly, can’t pretend it doesn’t exist while going on about all our court cases and the CL money when financially it could have a big impact. There’s ugly parts of it clearly, I wasn’t and wouldn’t use that ad a stick at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly, you are.
As long as you’re happy with how you’ve brought it up, then that’s all that matters.
I think that’s more than a bit crass.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There’s plenty of insensitive comments that could be made in response to your comments. But simply from a financial perspective you can’t just pretend it doesn’t exist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
your comments are clearly in regards to a financial capacity, not in anyway casting dark over the subject matter involved.
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 minute ago
This place sure does get tedious at times. Petty boards pandering to petty fans on both sides of the divide. Move fvcking on, if we don't how can we expect the fans to?
In terms of the number of titles, I said a few years back that Rangers will get to 55 before Celtic, but Celtic will get to 60 before Rangers. Upsets like last season are always going to happen, but the financial advantage Celtic have built up is just too great at this point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty much bang on
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
celtic agreed for the Oz game to be called the Old Firm, ergo agreed that they are still part of the old firm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your board said it wasn’t being marketed as that?! So, they’re wrong?? Ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
is that the case? I dont think that is....We have said it would be an OF, the Aus site said it wold be an OF (they may have changed their stance on that but there is still references to it being an OF when you go to buy tickets for it. I dont think your club were marketing it to your fans as that that could be the breach, all it takes is the Oz people to once say its not an OF for it to a breach.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s what they’ve said through fan media-the organisers weren’t using the OF brand properly, and marketing it as the OF.
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by ukraine (U14278)
posted 1 minute ago
Is 10 years really that old?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
when you reach that age tell us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
celtic agreed for the Oz game to be called the Old Firm, ergo agreed that they are still part of the old firm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your board said it wasn’t being marketed as that?! So, they’re wrong?? Ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
is that the case? I dont think that is....We have said it would be an OF, the Aus site said it wold be an OF (they may have changed their stance on that but there is still references to it being an OF when you go to buy tickets for it. I dont think your club were marketing it to your fans as that that could be the breach, all it takes is the Oz people to once say its not an OF for it to a breach.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s what they’ve said through fan media-the organisers weren’t using the OF brand properly, and marketing it as the OF.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like I said all they had to was once say it was the glasgow derby or Ange homecoming or anything other than the OF is a breach.
Ok thats what the fans said but what did the club say
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 minute ago
This place sure does get tedious at times. Petty boards pandering to petty fans on both sides of the divide. Move fvcking on, if we don't how can we expect the fans to?
In terms of the number of titles, I said a few years back that Rangers will get to 55 before Celtic, but Celtic will get to 60 before Rangers. Upsets like last season are always going to happen, but the financial advantage Celtic have built up is just too great at this point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty much bang on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yup🥲🍀
Fan media-Dingwall said what he was told.
Not fans.
comment by Bluenose (U6456)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by ukraine (U14278)
posted 1 minute ago
Is 10 years really that old?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
when you reach that age tell us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
👍
If I was ten years younger, I'd still be a silly aul bassa.
Just for the record you can absolutely trademark something that doesn’t exist.
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 11 seconds ago
Fan media-Dingwall said what he was told.
Not fans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fan-Media Dingwall.
Sounds like a Dutch inside-left🤔
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 52 seconds ago
Fan media-Dingwall said what he was told.
Not fans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Censor in chief
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 40 seconds ago
Just for the record you can absolutely trademark something that doesn’t exist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would be an ecumenical matter, surely.🙏
If what’s bothering you today is what Celtic fans think about the use of the OF name and what our board think, then you’re wasting useful energy. I think there’s bigger issues for you.
Anyway-as I said earlier…
https://mobile.twitter.com/dantausney/status/1510935281742061568?s=21&t=4NVcLkb_Dx3e8vKsLtCQow
Why are rangers fans against playing us in Australia?
Dont see what the fuss is all about.
Wow cardboard sign in the bin.
FFS
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 seconds ago
It’s a defence against incoming costs from the Oz organisers.
Nothing else.
Good luck with it. Where’s big Mike being told how much he can sue for by the way?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ve already got the arch they used yesterday at their bins waiting on collection!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Usually get my updates on court cases from Celtic fans anyway.
How about the Celtic court case any update on that? Ideally from a Rangers perspective there’s a large provision for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t really expect that from you.
Default position for the Neanderthal element.
Well done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardly, can’t pretend it doesn’t exist while going on about all our court cases and the CL money when financially it could have a big impact. There’s ugly parts of it clearly, I wasn’t and wouldn’t use that ad a stick at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly, you are.
As long as you’re happy with how you’ve brought it up, then that’s all that matters.
I think that’s more than a bit crass.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There’s plenty of insensitive comments that could be made in response to your comments. But simply from a financial perspective you can’t just pretend it doesn’t exist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll stick with my assessment of what you’ve said.
comment by ukraine (U14278)
posted 50 seconds ago
Why are rangers fans against playing us in Australia?
Dont see what the fuss is all about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You lot are supposed to be the rebels but the Green Brigade couldn't force your board into a U-Turn.
Our fans could but then again they do seem to give a fook about what we think.
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 seconds ago
It’s a defence against incoming costs from the Oz organisers.
Nothing else.
Good luck with it. Where’s big Mike being told how much he can sue for by the way?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ve already got the arch they used yesterday at their bins waiting on collection!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Usually get my updates on court cases from Celtic fans anyway.
How about the Celtic court case any update on that? Ideally from a Rangers perspective there’s a large provision for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t really expect that from you.
Default position for the Neanderthal element.
Well done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardly, can’t pretend it doesn’t exist while going on about all our court cases and the CL money when financially it could have a big impact. There’s ugly parts of it clearly, I wasn’t and wouldn’t use that ad a stick at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly, you are.
As long as you’re happy with how you’ve brought it up, then that’s all that matters.
I think that’s more than a bit crass.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There’s plenty of insensitive comments that could be made in response to your comments. But simply from a financial perspective you can’t just pretend it doesn’t exist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll stick with my assessment of what you’ve said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can do whatever you like. Quite clearly the subject of finances, CL money, Rangers court cases and lack of funds was what was being discussed. Will say no more.
comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 2 hours, 49 minutes ago
comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 21 seconds ago
He thinks he is way better than he is and its time to go.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Happens with a lot of Rangers players - maybe something to do with the entitled attitude of your bottle-throwing fans and that WATP sh!te.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does it happen a lot, aye?
It takes some twisted mentality to link the psychology of a professional footballer getting ideas above his station and thinking he can get a better contract with some Weegie bam throwing a bottle on the park....there is some pash spouted on here but that is a bit special.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still a bit raw this morning - the entitled attitude is the point. Its just an additional fact that your fans are thugs - pesky facts indeed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And there was no need for our own thugs to try and glue the turnstile shutters. Lots of morons both sides.
Sign in if you want to comment
Observations on yesterday's performance
Page 6 of 12
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
posted on 4/4/22
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
celtic agreed for the Oz game to be called the Old Firm, ergo agreed that they are still part of the old firm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your board said it wasn’t being marketed as that?! So, they’re wrong?? Ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
is that the case? I dont think that is....We have said it would be an OF, the Aus site said it wold be an OF (they may have changed their stance on that but there is still references to it being an OF when you go to buy tickets for it. I dont think your club were marketing it to your fans as that that could be the breach, all it takes is the Oz people to once say its not an OF for it to a breach.
posted on 4/4/22
comment by ukraine (U14278)
posted 1 minute ago
Is 10 years really that old?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
when you reach that age tell us
posted on 4/4/22
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 seconds ago
It’s a defence against incoming costs from the Oz organisers.
Nothing else.
Good luck with it. Where’s big Mike being told how much he can sue for by the way?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ve already got the arch they used yesterday at their bins waiting on collection!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Usually get my updates on court cases from Celtic fans anyway.
How about the Celtic court case any update on that? Ideally from a Rangers perspective there’s a large provision for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t really expect that from you.
Default position for the Neanderthal element.
Well done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardly, can’t pretend it doesn’t exist while going on about all our court cases and the CL money when financially it could have a big impact. There’s ugly parts of it clearly, I wasn’t and wouldn’t use that ad a stick at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly, you are.
As long as you’re happy with how you’ve brought it up, then that’s all that matters.
I think that’s more than a bit crass.
posted on 4/4/22
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 seconds ago
It’s a defence against incoming costs from the Oz organisers.
Nothing else.
Good luck with it. Where’s big Mike being told how much he can sue for by the way?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ve already got the arch they used yesterday at their bins waiting on collection!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Usually get my updates on court cases from Celtic fans anyway.
How about the Celtic court case any update on that? Ideally from a Rangers perspective there’s a large provision for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t really expect that from you.
Default position for the Neanderthal element.
Well done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardly, can’t pretend it doesn’t exist while going on about all our court cases and the CL money when financially it could have a big impact. There’s ugly parts of it clearly, I wasn’t and wouldn’t use that ad a stick at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly, you are.
As long as you’re happy with how you’ve brought it up, then that’s all that matters.
I think that’s more than a bit crass.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There’s plenty of insensitive comments that could be made in response to your comments. But simply from a financial perspective you can’t just pretend it doesn’t exist.
posted on 4/4/22
This place sure does get tedious at times. Petty boards pandering to petty fans on both sides of the divide. Move fvcking on, if we don't how can we expect the fans to?
In terms of the number of titles, I said a few years back that Rangers will get to 55 before Celtic, but Celtic will get to 60 before Rangers. Upsets like last season are always going to happen, but the financial advantage Celtic have built up is just too great at this point.
posted on 4/4/22
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 seconds ago
It’s a defence against incoming costs from the Oz organisers.
Nothing else.
Good luck with it. Where’s big Mike being told how much he can sue for by the way?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ve already got the arch they used yesterday at their bins waiting on collection!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Usually get my updates on court cases from Celtic fans anyway.
How about the Celtic court case any update on that? Ideally from a Rangers perspective there’s a large provision for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What court case is this?
posted on 4/4/22
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 seconds ago
It’s a defence against incoming costs from the Oz organisers.
Nothing else.
Good luck with it. Where’s big Mike being told how much he can sue for by the way?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ve already got the arch they used yesterday at their bins waiting on collection!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Usually get my updates on court cases from Celtic fans anyway.
How about the Celtic court case any update on that? Ideally from a Rangers perspective there’s a large provision for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t really expect that from you.
Default position for the Neanderthal element.
Well done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardly, can’t pretend it doesn’t exist while going on about all our court cases and the CL money when financially it could have a big impact. There’s ugly parts of it clearly, I wasn’t and wouldn’t use that ad a stick at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly, you are.
As long as you’re happy with how you’ve brought it up, then that’s all that matters.
I think that’s more than a bit crass.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There’s plenty of insensitive comments that could be made in response to your comments. But simply from a financial perspective you can’t just pretend it doesn’t exist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
your comments are clearly in regards to a financial capacity, not in anyway casting dark over the subject matter involved.
posted on 4/4/22
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 minute ago
This place sure does get tedious at times. Petty boards pandering to petty fans on both sides of the divide. Move fvcking on, if we don't how can we expect the fans to?
In terms of the number of titles, I said a few years back that Rangers will get to 55 before Celtic, but Celtic will get to 60 before Rangers. Upsets like last season are always going to happen, but the financial advantage Celtic have built up is just too great at this point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty much bang on
posted on 4/4/22
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
celtic agreed for the Oz game to be called the Old Firm, ergo agreed that they are still part of the old firm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your board said it wasn’t being marketed as that?! So, they’re wrong?? Ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
is that the case? I dont think that is....We have said it would be an OF, the Aus site said it wold be an OF (they may have changed their stance on that but there is still references to it being an OF when you go to buy tickets for it. I dont think your club were marketing it to your fans as that that could be the breach, all it takes is the Oz people to once say its not an OF for it to a breach.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s what they’ve said through fan media-the organisers weren’t using the OF brand properly, and marketing it as the OF.
posted on 4/4/22
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by ukraine (U14278)
posted 1 minute ago
Is 10 years really that old?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
when you reach that age tell us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 4/4/22
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
celtic agreed for the Oz game to be called the Old Firm, ergo agreed that they are still part of the old firm.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your board said it wasn’t being marketed as that?! So, they’re wrong?? Ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
is that the case? I dont think that is....We have said it would be an OF, the Aus site said it wold be an OF (they may have changed their stance on that but there is still references to it being an OF when you go to buy tickets for it. I dont think your club were marketing it to your fans as that that could be the breach, all it takes is the Oz people to once say its not an OF for it to a breach.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s what they’ve said through fan media-the organisers weren’t using the OF brand properly, and marketing it as the OF.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like I said all they had to was once say it was the glasgow derby or Ange homecoming or anything other than the OF is a breach.
Ok thats what the fans said but what did the club say
posted on 4/4/22
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 minute ago
This place sure does get tedious at times. Petty boards pandering to petty fans on both sides of the divide. Move fvcking on, if we don't how can we expect the fans to?
In terms of the number of titles, I said a few years back that Rangers will get to 55 before Celtic, but Celtic will get to 60 before Rangers. Upsets like last season are always going to happen, but the financial advantage Celtic have built up is just too great at this point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty much bang on
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yup🥲🍀
posted on 4/4/22
Fan media-Dingwall said what he was told.
Not fans.
posted on 4/4/22
comment by Bluenose (U6456)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by ukraine (U14278)
posted 1 minute ago
Is 10 years really that old?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
when you reach that age tell us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
👍
If I was ten years younger, I'd still be a silly aul bassa.
posted on 4/4/22
Just for the record you can absolutely trademark something that doesn’t exist.
posted on 4/4/22
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 11 seconds ago
Fan media-Dingwall said what he was told.
Not fans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fan-Media Dingwall.
Sounds like a Dutch inside-left🤔
posted on 4/4/22
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 52 seconds ago
Fan media-Dingwall said what he was told.
Not fans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Censor in chief
posted on 4/4/22
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 40 seconds ago
Just for the record you can absolutely trademark something that doesn’t exist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That would be an ecumenical matter, surely.🙏
posted on 4/4/22
If what’s bothering you today is what Celtic fans think about the use of the OF name and what our board think, then you’re wasting useful energy. I think there’s bigger issues for you.
Anyway-as I said earlier…
https://mobile.twitter.com/dantausney/status/1510935281742061568?s=21&t=4NVcLkb_Dx3e8vKsLtCQow
posted on 4/4/22
Why are rangers fans against playing us in Australia?
Dont see what the fuss is all about.
posted on 4/4/22
Wow cardboard sign in the bin.
FFS
posted on 4/4/22
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 seconds ago
It’s a defence against incoming costs from the Oz organisers.
Nothing else.
Good luck with it. Where’s big Mike being told how much he can sue for by the way?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ve already got the arch they used yesterday at their bins waiting on collection!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Usually get my updates on court cases from Celtic fans anyway.
How about the Celtic court case any update on that? Ideally from a Rangers perspective there’s a large provision for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t really expect that from you.
Default position for the Neanderthal element.
Well done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardly, can’t pretend it doesn’t exist while going on about all our court cases and the CL money when financially it could have a big impact. There’s ugly parts of it clearly, I wasn’t and wouldn’t use that ad a stick at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly, you are.
As long as you’re happy with how you’ve brought it up, then that’s all that matters.
I think that’s more than a bit crass.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There’s plenty of insensitive comments that could be made in response to your comments. But simply from a financial perspective you can’t just pretend it doesn’t exist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll stick with my assessment of what you’ve said.
posted on 4/4/22
comment by ukraine (U14278)
posted 50 seconds ago
Why are rangers fans against playing us in Australia?
Dont see what the fuss is all about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You lot are supposed to be the rebels but the Green Brigade couldn't force your board into a U-Turn.
Our fans could but then again they do seem to give a fook about what we think.
posted on 4/4/22
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 seconds ago
It’s a defence against incoming costs from the Oz organisers.
Nothing else.
Good luck with it. Where’s big Mike being told how much he can sue for by the way?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’ve already got the arch they used yesterday at their bins waiting on collection!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Usually get my updates on court cases from Celtic fans anyway.
How about the Celtic court case any update on that? Ideally from a Rangers perspective there’s a large provision for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t really expect that from you.
Default position for the Neanderthal element.
Well done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardly, can’t pretend it doesn’t exist while going on about all our court cases and the CL money when financially it could have a big impact. There’s ugly parts of it clearly, I wasn’t and wouldn’t use that ad a stick at all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clearly, you are.
As long as you’re happy with how you’ve brought it up, then that’s all that matters.
I think that’s more than a bit crass.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There’s plenty of insensitive comments that could be made in response to your comments. But simply from a financial perspective you can’t just pretend it doesn’t exist.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll stick with my assessment of what you’ve said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can do whatever you like. Quite clearly the subject of finances, CL money, Rangers court cases and lack of funds was what was being discussed. Will say no more.
posted on 4/4/22
comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 2 hours, 49 minutes ago
comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by IfUNo (U4755)
posted 21 seconds ago
He thinks he is way better than he is and its time to go.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Happens with a lot of Rangers players - maybe something to do with the entitled attitude of your bottle-throwing fans and that WATP sh!te.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does it happen a lot, aye?
It takes some twisted mentality to link the psychology of a professional footballer getting ideas above his station and thinking he can get a better contract with some Weegie bam throwing a bottle on the park....there is some pash spouted on here but that is a bit special.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Still a bit raw this morning - the entitled attitude is the point. Its just an additional fact that your fans are thugs - pesky facts indeed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And there was no need for our own thugs to try and glue the turnstile shutters. Lots of morons both sides.
Page 6 of 12
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11