What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
ahh bless little Spurs-obsessed CFC Quad.
Im sure this extra 10m will help in closing the gap to Spurs revenues
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 32 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How were we financed previously?
I know you believe that all our money came from Roman but we did also generate a lot of revenue ourselves, and eill continue to do so. We were generating more revenue than spurs even before Roman arrived.
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 38 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its a marketing bolx by Boehly to win over the Chelsea stakeholders by promising huge investment into players. Wait until he shows up his game play!
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 32 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How were we financed previously?
I know you believe that all our money came from Roman but we did also generate a lot of revenue ourselves, and eill continue to do so. We were generating more revenue than spurs even before Roman arrived.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't Chelsea got sold off for £1?
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 38 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its a marketing bolx by Boehly to win over the Chelsea stakeholders by promising huge investment into players. Wait until he shows up his game play!
-------------------------------------------------------
Gotta admire the spirit. Keep the dream alive
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 32 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How were we financed previously?
I know you believe that all our money came from Roman but we did also generate a lot of revenue ourselves, and eill continue to do so. We were generating more revenue than spurs even before Roman arrived.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't Chelsea got sold off for £1?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, utter nonsense, the club financially had been run into the ground by Bates hence why it was sold so cheap.
What do I mean by how you were financed previously JFDI - well let’s start with the £1.5bn loan that Roman has now written off - it was hot news last week.
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 38 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its a marketing bolx by Boehly to win over the Chelsea stakeholders by promising huge investment into players. Wait until he shows up his game play!
-------------------------------------------------------
Gotta admire the spirit. Keep the dream alive
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We'll be ducked when Roman leaves us
In five years time when we've won more trophies and become an even bigger club, it will be 'we'll be ducked when Todd gets bored'
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - A... (U18109)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 32 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How were we financed previously?
I know you believe that all our money came from Roman but we did also generate a lot of revenue ourselves, and eill continue to do so. We were generating more revenue than spurs even before Roman arrived.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't Chelsea got sold off for £1?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, utter nonsense, the club financially had been run into the ground by Bates hence why it was sold so cheap.
What do I mean by how you were financed previously JFDI - well let’s start with the £1.5bn loan that Roman has now written off - it was hot news last week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes Roman bought it for £140m when our revenues were much bigger than Spurs and Arsenal. And sold it for £2.5bn
when our revenues were bigger than Spurs and Arsenal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deloitte_Football_Money_League#2002%E2%80%9303
As world and double European champions, Todd will be able to negotiate new improved sponsorship deals post sanctions
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 32 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How were we financed previously?
I know you believe that all our money came from Roman but we did also generate a lot of revenue ourselves, and eill continue to do so. We were generating more revenue than spurs even before Roman arrived.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't Chelsea got sold off for £1?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, utter nonsense, the club financially had been run into the ground by Bates hence why it was sold so cheap.
What do I mean by how you were financed previously JFDI - well let’s start with the £1.5bn loan that Roman has now written off - it was hot news last week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes we were sold for 1 pound once, debts were on top of that, when Roman bought us there were also debts and Roman, at least for a while spent more than we earned. The debt in the 70s came about due to investment in the ground, the east stand which enabled Bates to buy us for a pound though he had to take on the debt. The debt Roman took on was largely on the back of two decades of first securing our home at the bridge through legal battles with a development company then re building the bridge, Roman paid Bates for that when he bought us. The 1.5b is debt Roman chose to build up and right off putting us where we are now. The new owners have commited another 1.75b to invest in the club over the next ten years, which will enable us to generate more revenue, as one thing we have become pretty good at anyway just in more recent times had a lot of catching up to do. Which we do not have to do now.
Our sponsorships, growth of fan base and academy revenue streams are all helping there.
The fact is you don't have a clue how our finances , or seemingly how finance in general works.
As for the 1.5b owed to Roman and written off. Look at it like the 1.75b investment commited in the recent sale, albuet over half the time. It's all part of the plan.
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 32 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How were we financed previously?
I know you believe that all our money came from Roman but we did also generate a lot of revenue ourselves, and eill continue to do so. We were generating more revenue than spurs even before Roman arrived.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't Chelsea got sold off for £1?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, utter nonsense, the club financially had been run into the ground by Bates hence why it was sold so cheap.
What do I mean by how you were financed previously JFDI - well let’s start with the £1.5bn loan that Roman has now written off - it was hot news last week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes we were sold for 1 pound once, debts were on top of that, when Roman bought us there were also debts and Roman, at least for a while spent more than we earned. The debt in the 70s came about due to investment in the ground, the east stand which enabled Bates to buy us for a pound though he had to take on the debt. The debt Roman took on was largely on the back of two decades of first securing our home at the bridge through legal battles with a development company then re building the bridge, Roman paid Bates for that when he bought us. The 1.5b is debt Roman chose to build up and right off putting us where we are now. The new owners have commited another 1.75b to invest in the club over the next ten years, which will enable us to generate more revenue, as one thing we have become pretty good at anyway just in more recent times had a lot of catching up to do. Which we do not have to do now.
Our sponsorships, growth of fan base and academy revenue streams are all helping there.
The fact is you don't have a clue how our finances , or seemingly how finance in general works.
As for the 1.5b owed to Roman and written off. Look at it like the 1.75b investment commited in the recent sale, albuet over half the time. It's all part of the plan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The 1.75bn investment is to be spent on the ground, the womens team and other things outside of the mens team and will be staggered over a number of years - this was all front page (back page if you like) news last week. They ain’t spending £1.75bn on Chelsea’s first team.
Your revenues will be in line with the rest of the top 6, aside from City and possibly Newcastle now. Whether you like it or not, your “edge” in the past was that Roman could just go out and drop £200m+ on a summer spending spree - that won’t be happening anymore, you will probably spend around similar levels to Spurs and Arsenal this summer and slowly but surely slink down to our level - it’s essentially already started in the league with you dropping much closer to us since Roman went.
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 38 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its a marketing bolx by Boehly to win over the Chelsea stakeholders by promising huge investment into players. Wait until he shows up his game play!
-------------------------------------------------------
Gotta admire the spirit. Keep the dream alive
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We'll be ducked when Roman leaves us
In five years time when we've won more trophies and become an even bigger club, it will be 'we'll be ducked when Todd gets bored'
-----------------------------------------------------
The problem for Spurs fans is the damage has been done - we're now a bigger club than them. They can say otherwise but pretty much every metric people use to define one (besides maybe the stadium) we supersede them.
Boehly could be a dreadful owner, but that won't change unless they do something to change it themselves.
Not getting their pants pulled down by us regularly when we play each other would be a good starting point
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 38 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its a marketing bolx by Boehly to win over the Chelsea stakeholders by promising huge investment into players. Wait until he shows up his game play!
-------------------------------------------------------
Gotta admire the spirit. Keep the dream alive
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yep
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 38 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its a marketing bolx by Boehly to win over the Chelsea stakeholders by promising huge investment into players. Wait until he shows up his game play!
-------------------------------------------------------
Gotta admire the spirit. Keep the dream alive
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We'll be ducked when Roman leaves us
In five years time when we've won more trophies and become an even bigger club, it will be 'we'll be ducked when Todd gets bored'
-----------------------------------------------------
The problem for Spurs fans is the damage has been done - we're now a bigger club than them. They can say otherwise but pretty much every metric people use to define one (besides maybe the stadium) we supersede them.
Boehly could be a dreadful owner, but that won't change unless they do something to change it themselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bigger currently, but you were smaller than us for 100 years and the current gap between the sides is not exactly insurmountable.
The truth is and again Sandy will probably disagree, Spurs have also grown over the period Roman has been at your club - con incidental but undeniable. We have gone from a side that flirted with relegation in the 90’s but mostly finished around 11th to a side that qualifies for Europe every year, has seen consecutive CL qualification and taking on the continents top sides and built the best football stadium in the world.
What we lack is the trophies, but we’re not as far off as some think
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 7 minutes ago
Not getting their pants pulled down by us regularly when we play each other would be a good starting point
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve always been a bogey side for us, even back when you were getting relegated in the 90’s.
We seem to be a bogey team for Man City, odd how these things work out.
Bigger currently, but you were smaller than us for 100 years and the current gap between the sides is not exactly insurmountable.
The truth is and again Sandy will probably disagree, Spurs have also grown over the period Roman has been at your club - con incidental but undeniable. We have gone from a side that flirted with relegation in the 90’s but mostly finished around 11th to a side that qualifies for Europe every year, has seen consecutive CL qualification and taking on the continents top sides and built the best football stadium in the world.
What we lack is the trophies, but we’re not as far off as some think
------------------------------------------------------------
It's not insurmountable at all, but the point is you need to do something yourselves now - us being sh!tter in the present won't be enough anymore, were that to happen in the immediate future.
You need to make a fresh stamp in Europe I think. Going deep in the CL regularly for a spell or winning a few Europa's at least.
There will be a full ground tonight for THE London derby
Arsenal won’t be singing “there’s nobody here there’s nobody here just like the old days there’s nobody here”to us.
Let’s hope they don’t score 4 against us and beat us like they did to you lot.
Let’s see how your new owners do when they take over.
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 32 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How were we financed previously?
I know you believe that all our money came from Roman but we did also generate a lot of revenue ourselves, and eill continue to do so. We were generating more revenue than spurs even before Roman arrived.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't Chelsea got sold off for £1?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, utter nonsense, the club financially had been run into the ground by Bates hence why it was sold so cheap.
What do I mean by how you were financed previously JFDI - well let’s start with the £1.5bn loan that Roman has now written off - it was hot news last week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes we were sold for 1 pound once, debts were on top of that, when Roman bought us there were also debts and Roman, at least for a while spent more than we earned. The debt in the 70s came about due to investment in the ground, the east stand which enabled Bates to buy us for a pound though he had to take on the debt. The debt Roman took on was largely on the back of two decades of first securing our home at the bridge through legal battles with a development company then re building the bridge, Roman paid Bates for that when he bought us. The 1.5b is debt Roman chose to build up and right off putting us where we are now. The new owners have commited another 1.75b to invest in the club over the next ten years, which will enable us to generate more revenue, as one thing we have become pretty good at anyway just in more recent times had a lot of catching up to do. Which we do not have to do now.
Our sponsorships, growth of fan base and academy revenue streams are all helping there.
The fact is you don't have a clue how our finances , or seemingly how finance in general works.
As for the 1.5b owed to Roman and written off. Look at it like the 1.75b investment commited in the recent sale, albuet over half the time. It's all part of the plan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The 1.75bn investment is to be spent on the ground, the womens team and other things outside of the mens team and will be staggered over a number of years - this was all front page (back page if you like) news last week. They ain’t spending £1.75bn on Chelsea’s first team.
Your revenues will be in line with the rest of the top 6, aside from City and possibly Newcastle now. Whether you like it or not, your “edge” in the past was that Roman could just go out and drop £200m+ on a summer spending spree - that won’t be happening anymore, you will probably spend around similar levels to Spurs and Arsenal this summer and slowly but surely slink down to our level - it’s essentially already started in the league with you dropping much closer to us since Roman went.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We haven’t done a £200m spending spree for about 10 years
We’ve barely got any net spend over the last decade it’s lower than Spurs’
comment by Oscar #TeamFury. Champion of NBA Predictions (U12980)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 32 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How were we financed previously?
I know you believe that all our money came from Roman but we did also generate a lot of revenue ourselves, and eill continue to do so. We were generating more revenue than spurs even before Roman arrived.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't Chelsea got sold off for £1?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, utter nonsense, the club financially had been run into the ground by Bates hence why it was sold so cheap.
What do I mean by how you were financed previously JFDI - well let’s start with the £1.5bn loan that Roman has now written off - it was hot news last week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes we were sold for 1 pound once, debts were on top of that, when Roman bought us there were also debts and Roman, at least for a while spent more than we earned. The debt in the 70s came about due to investment in the ground, the east stand which enabled Bates to buy us for a pound though he had to take on the debt. The debt Roman took on was largely on the back of two decades of first securing our home at the bridge through legal battles with a development company then re building the bridge, Roman paid Bates for that when he bought us. The 1.5b is debt Roman chose to build up and right off putting us where we are now. The new owners have commited another 1.75b to invest in the club over the next ten years, which will enable us to generate more revenue, as one thing we have become pretty good at anyway just in more recent times had a lot of catching up to do. Which we do not have to do now.
Our sponsorships, growth of fan base and academy revenue streams are all helping there.
The fact is you don't have a clue how our finances , or seemingly how finance in general works.
As for the 1.5b owed to Roman and written off. Look at it like the 1.75b investment commited in the recent sale, albuet over half the time. It's all part of the plan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The 1.75bn investment is to be spent on the ground, the womens team and other things outside of the mens team and will be staggered over a number of years - this was all front page (back page if you like) news last week. They ain’t spending £1.75bn on Chelsea’s first team.
Your revenues will be in line with the rest of the top 6, aside from City and possibly Newcastle now. Whether you like it or not, your “edge” in the past was that Roman could just go out and drop £200m+ on a summer spending spree - that won’t be happening anymore, you will probably spend around similar levels to Spurs and Arsenal this summer and slowly but surely slink down to our level - it’s essentially already started in the league with you dropping much closer to us since Roman went.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We haven’t done a £200m spending spree for about 10 years
We’ve barely got any net spend over the last decade it’s lower than Spurs’
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summer before last actually
https://talksport.com/football/769494/premier-league-clubs-transfers-spent-2020-summer-window-chelsea-everton-arsenal-news/amp/
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 27 minutes ago
Bigger currently, but you were smaller than us for 100 years and the current gap between the sides is not exactly insurmountable.
The truth is and again Sandy will probably disagree, Spurs have also grown over the period Roman has been at your club - con incidental but undeniable. We have gone from a side that flirted with relegation in the 90’s but mostly finished around 11th to a side that qualifies for Europe every year, has seen consecutive CL qualification and taking on the continents top sides and built the best football stadium in the world.
What we lack is the trophies, but we’re not as far off as some think
------------------------------------------------------------
It's not insurmountable at all, but the point is you need to do something yourselves now - us being sh!tter in the present won't be enough anymore, were that to happen in the immediate future.
You need to make a fresh stamp in Europe I think. Going deep in the CL regularly for a spell or winning a few Europa's at least.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A Europa an FA cup and we would be flying again - the problem is too often are managers throw everything at a top 4 finish rather than a “lesser” trophy
https://www.si.com/fannation/soccer/futbol/news/man-utd-city-and-psg-spend-over-1b-net-on-transfers-in-10-years
We’ve spent £80m more than spurs in the last 10 years and win about 10 more trophies
Also that doesn’t even take into account our loan fees which we earn £30m on a season so our net spend is more like 30m over the last decade
comment by Oscar #TeamFury. Champion of NBA Predictions (U12980)
posted 17 minutes ago
https://www.si.com/fannation/soccer/futbol/news/man-utd-city-and-psg-spend-over-1b-net-on-transfers-in-10-years
We’ve spent £80m more than spurs in the last 10 years and win about 10 more trophies
Also that doesn’t even take into account our loan fees which we earn £30m on a season so our net spend is more like 30m over the last decade
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but as has been highlighted many times before the decade before you far outspent us and gave yourself a platform to build from. If Burnley spend £200m next summer and Man City spend the same, the end result won’t be the same due to the base that City have.
That’s the whole point, Roman built the base level by writing off £1.5bn
Sign in if you want to comment
Here comes the money....
Page 1 of 3
posted on 12/5/22
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
posted on 12/5/22
ahh bless little Spurs-obsessed CFC Quad.
Im sure this extra 10m will help in closing the gap to Spurs revenues
posted on 12/5/22
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 32 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How were we financed previously?
I know you believe that all our money came from Roman but we did also generate a lot of revenue ourselves, and eill continue to do so. We were generating more revenue than spurs even before Roman arrived.
posted on 12/5/22
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 38 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its a marketing bolx by Boehly to win over the Chelsea stakeholders by promising huge investment into players. Wait until he shows up his game play!
posted on 12/5/22
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 32 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How were we financed previously?
I know you believe that all our money came from Roman but we did also generate a lot of revenue ourselves, and eill continue to do so. We were generating more revenue than spurs even before Roman arrived.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't Chelsea got sold off for £1?
posted on 12/5/22
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 38 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its a marketing bolx by Boehly to win over the Chelsea stakeholders by promising huge investment into players. Wait until he shows up his game play!
-------------------------------------------------------
Gotta admire the spirit. Keep the dream alive
posted on 12/5/22
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 32 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How were we financed previously?
I know you believe that all our money came from Roman but we did also generate a lot of revenue ourselves, and eill continue to do so. We were generating more revenue than spurs even before Roman arrived.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't Chelsea got sold off for £1?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, utter nonsense, the club financially had been run into the ground by Bates hence why it was sold so cheap.
What do I mean by how you were financed previously JFDI - well let’s start with the £1.5bn loan that Roman has now written off - it was hot news last week.
posted on 12/5/22
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 38 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its a marketing bolx by Boehly to win over the Chelsea stakeholders by promising huge investment into players. Wait until he shows up his game play!
-------------------------------------------------------
Gotta admire the spirit. Keep the dream alive
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We'll be ducked when Roman leaves us
In five years time when we've won more trophies and become an even bigger club, it will be 'we'll be ducked when Todd gets bored'
posted on 12/5/22
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - A... (U18109)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 32 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How were we financed previously?
I know you believe that all our money came from Roman but we did also generate a lot of revenue ourselves, and eill continue to do so. We were generating more revenue than spurs even before Roman arrived.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't Chelsea got sold off for £1?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, utter nonsense, the club financially had been run into the ground by Bates hence why it was sold so cheap.
What do I mean by how you were financed previously JFDI - well let’s start with the £1.5bn loan that Roman has now written off - it was hot news last week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes Roman bought it for £140m when our revenues were much bigger than Spurs and Arsenal. And sold it for £2.5bn
when our revenues were bigger than Spurs and Arsenal
posted on 12/5/22
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deloitte_Football_Money_League#2002%E2%80%9303
posted on 12/5/22
As world and double European champions, Todd will be able to negotiate new improved sponsorship deals post sanctions
posted on 12/5/22
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 32 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How were we financed previously?
I know you believe that all our money came from Roman but we did also generate a lot of revenue ourselves, and eill continue to do so. We were generating more revenue than spurs even before Roman arrived.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't Chelsea got sold off for £1?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, utter nonsense, the club financially had been run into the ground by Bates hence why it was sold so cheap.
What do I mean by how you were financed previously JFDI - well let’s start with the £1.5bn loan that Roman has now written off - it was hot news last week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes we were sold for 1 pound once, debts were on top of that, when Roman bought us there were also debts and Roman, at least for a while spent more than we earned. The debt in the 70s came about due to investment in the ground, the east stand which enabled Bates to buy us for a pound though he had to take on the debt. The debt Roman took on was largely on the back of two decades of first securing our home at the bridge through legal battles with a development company then re building the bridge, Roman paid Bates for that when he bought us. The 1.5b is debt Roman chose to build up and right off putting us where we are now. The new owners have commited another 1.75b to invest in the club over the next ten years, which will enable us to generate more revenue, as one thing we have become pretty good at anyway just in more recent times had a lot of catching up to do. Which we do not have to do now.
Our sponsorships, growth of fan base and academy revenue streams are all helping there.
The fact is you don't have a clue how our finances , or seemingly how finance in general works.
As for the 1.5b owed to Roman and written off. Look at it like the 1.75b investment commited in the recent sale, albuet over half the time. It's all part of the plan.
posted on 12/5/22
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 32 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How were we financed previously?
I know you believe that all our money came from Roman but we did also generate a lot of revenue ourselves, and eill continue to do so. We were generating more revenue than spurs even before Roman arrived.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't Chelsea got sold off for £1?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, utter nonsense, the club financially had been run into the ground by Bates hence why it was sold so cheap.
What do I mean by how you were financed previously JFDI - well let’s start with the £1.5bn loan that Roman has now written off - it was hot news last week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes we were sold for 1 pound once, debts were on top of that, when Roman bought us there were also debts and Roman, at least for a while spent more than we earned. The debt in the 70s came about due to investment in the ground, the east stand which enabled Bates to buy us for a pound though he had to take on the debt. The debt Roman took on was largely on the back of two decades of first securing our home at the bridge through legal battles with a development company then re building the bridge, Roman paid Bates for that when he bought us. The 1.5b is debt Roman chose to build up and right off putting us where we are now. The new owners have commited another 1.75b to invest in the club over the next ten years, which will enable us to generate more revenue, as one thing we have become pretty good at anyway just in more recent times had a lot of catching up to do. Which we do not have to do now.
Our sponsorships, growth of fan base and academy revenue streams are all helping there.
The fact is you don't have a clue how our finances , or seemingly how finance in general works.
As for the 1.5b owed to Roman and written off. Look at it like the 1.75b investment commited in the recent sale, albuet over half the time. It's all part of the plan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The 1.75bn investment is to be spent on the ground, the womens team and other things outside of the mens team and will be staggered over a number of years - this was all front page (back page if you like) news last week. They ain’t spending £1.75bn on Chelsea’s first team.
Your revenues will be in line with the rest of the top 6, aside from City and possibly Newcastle now. Whether you like it or not, your “edge” in the past was that Roman could just go out and drop £200m+ on a summer spending spree - that won’t be happening anymore, you will probably spend around similar levels to Spurs and Arsenal this summer and slowly but surely slink down to our level - it’s essentially already started in the league with you dropping much closer to us since Roman went.
posted on 12/5/22
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 38 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its a marketing bolx by Boehly to win over the Chelsea stakeholders by promising huge investment into players. Wait until he shows up his game play!
-------------------------------------------------------
Gotta admire the spirit. Keep the dream alive
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We'll be ducked when Roman leaves us
In five years time when we've won more trophies and become an even bigger club, it will be 'we'll be ducked when Todd gets bored'
-----------------------------------------------------
The problem for Spurs fans is the damage has been done - we're now a bigger club than them. They can say otherwise but pretty much every metric people use to define one (besides maybe the stadium) we supersede them.
Boehly could be a dreadful owner, but that won't change unless they do something to change it themselves.
posted on 12/5/22
Not getting their pants pulled down by us regularly when we play each other would be a good starting point
posted on 12/5/22
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 38 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its a marketing bolx by Boehly to win over the Chelsea stakeholders by promising huge investment into players. Wait until he shows up his game play!
-------------------------------------------------------
Gotta admire the spirit. Keep the dream alive
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yep
posted on 12/5/22
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 38 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its a marketing bolx by Boehly to win over the Chelsea stakeholders by promising huge investment into players. Wait until he shows up his game play!
-------------------------------------------------------
Gotta admire the spirit. Keep the dream alive
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We'll be ducked when Roman leaves us
In five years time when we've won more trophies and become an even bigger club, it will be 'we'll be ducked when Todd gets bored'
-----------------------------------------------------
The problem for Spurs fans is the damage has been done - we're now a bigger club than them. They can say otherwise but pretty much every metric people use to define one (besides maybe the stadium) we supersede them.
Boehly could be a dreadful owner, but that won't change unless they do something to change it themselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bigger currently, but you were smaller than us for 100 years and the current gap between the sides is not exactly insurmountable.
The truth is and again Sandy will probably disagree, Spurs have also grown over the period Roman has been at your club - con incidental but undeniable. We have gone from a side that flirted with relegation in the 90’s but mostly finished around 11th to a side that qualifies for Europe every year, has seen consecutive CL qualification and taking on the continents top sides and built the best football stadium in the world.
What we lack is the trophies, but we’re not as far off as some think
posted on 12/5/22
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 7 minutes ago
Not getting their pants pulled down by us regularly when we play each other would be a good starting point
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’ve always been a bogey side for us, even back when you were getting relegated in the 90’s.
We seem to be a bogey team for Man City, odd how these things work out.
posted on 12/5/22
Bigger currently, but you were smaller than us for 100 years and the current gap between the sides is not exactly insurmountable.
The truth is and again Sandy will probably disagree, Spurs have also grown over the period Roman has been at your club - con incidental but undeniable. We have gone from a side that flirted with relegation in the 90’s but mostly finished around 11th to a side that qualifies for Europe every year, has seen consecutive CL qualification and taking on the continents top sides and built the best football stadium in the world.
What we lack is the trophies, but we’re not as far off as some think
------------------------------------------------------------
It's not insurmountable at all, but the point is you need to do something yourselves now - us being sh!tter in the present won't be enough anymore, were that to happen in the immediate future.
You need to make a fresh stamp in Europe I think. Going deep in the CL regularly for a spell or winning a few Europa's at least.
posted on 12/5/22
There will be a full ground tonight for THE London derby
Arsenal won’t be singing “there’s nobody here there’s nobody here just like the old days there’s nobody here”to us.
Let’s hope they don’t score 4 against us and beat us like they did to you lot.
Let’s see how your new owners do when they take over.
posted on 12/5/22
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 32 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How were we financed previously?
I know you believe that all our money came from Roman but we did also generate a lot of revenue ourselves, and eill continue to do so. We were generating more revenue than spurs even before Roman arrived.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't Chelsea got sold off for £1?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, utter nonsense, the club financially had been run into the ground by Bates hence why it was sold so cheap.
What do I mean by how you were financed previously JFDI - well let’s start with the £1.5bn loan that Roman has now written off - it was hot news last week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes we were sold for 1 pound once, debts were on top of that, when Roman bought us there were also debts and Roman, at least for a while spent more than we earned. The debt in the 70s came about due to investment in the ground, the east stand which enabled Bates to buy us for a pound though he had to take on the debt. The debt Roman took on was largely on the back of two decades of first securing our home at the bridge through legal battles with a development company then re building the bridge, Roman paid Bates for that when he bought us. The 1.5b is debt Roman chose to build up and right off putting us where we are now. The new owners have commited another 1.75b to invest in the club over the next ten years, which will enable us to generate more revenue, as one thing we have become pretty good at anyway just in more recent times had a lot of catching up to do. Which we do not have to do now.
Our sponsorships, growth of fan base and academy revenue streams are all helping there.
The fact is you don't have a clue how our finances , or seemingly how finance in general works.
As for the 1.5b owed to Roman and written off. Look at it like the 1.75b investment commited in the recent sale, albuet over half the time. It's all part of the plan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The 1.75bn investment is to be spent on the ground, the womens team and other things outside of the mens team and will be staggered over a number of years - this was all front page (back page if you like) news last week. They ain’t spending £1.75bn on Chelsea’s first team.
Your revenues will be in line with the rest of the top 6, aside from City and possibly Newcastle now. Whether you like it or not, your “edge” in the past was that Roman could just go out and drop £200m+ on a summer spending spree - that won’t be happening anymore, you will probably spend around similar levels to Spurs and Arsenal this summer and slowly but surely slink down to our level - it’s essentially already started in the league with you dropping much closer to us since Roman went.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We haven’t done a £200m spending spree for about 10 years
We’ve barely got any net spend over the last decade it’s lower than Spurs’
posted on 12/5/22
comment by Oscar #TeamFury. Champion of NBA Predictions (U12980)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 57 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 14 seconds ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 (U18109)
posted 32 minutes ago
What’s Boehly taking out from this?
Let’s see what actually happens, Absolutelybno way are you being financed like you have been previously, you have American owners now and are more of an investment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How were we financed previously?
I know you believe that all our money came from Roman but we did also generate a lot of revenue ourselves, and eill continue to do so. We were generating more revenue than spurs even before Roman arrived.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Didn't Chelsea got sold off for £1?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, utter nonsense, the club financially had been run into the ground by Bates hence why it was sold so cheap.
What do I mean by how you were financed previously JFDI - well let’s start with the £1.5bn loan that Roman has now written off - it was hot news last week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes we were sold for 1 pound once, debts were on top of that, when Roman bought us there were also debts and Roman, at least for a while spent more than we earned. The debt in the 70s came about due to investment in the ground, the east stand which enabled Bates to buy us for a pound though he had to take on the debt. The debt Roman took on was largely on the back of two decades of first securing our home at the bridge through legal battles with a development company then re building the bridge, Roman paid Bates for that when he bought us. The 1.5b is debt Roman chose to build up and right off putting us where we are now. The new owners have commited another 1.75b to invest in the club over the next ten years, which will enable us to generate more revenue, as one thing we have become pretty good at anyway just in more recent times had a lot of catching up to do. Which we do not have to do now.
Our sponsorships, growth of fan base and academy revenue streams are all helping there.
The fact is you don't have a clue how our finances , or seemingly how finance in general works.
As for the 1.5b owed to Roman and written off. Look at it like the 1.75b investment commited in the recent sale, albuet over half the time. It's all part of the plan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The 1.75bn investment is to be spent on the ground, the womens team and other things outside of the mens team and will be staggered over a number of years - this was all front page (back page if you like) news last week. They ain’t spending £1.75bn on Chelsea’s first team.
Your revenues will be in line with the rest of the top 6, aside from City and possibly Newcastle now. Whether you like it or not, your “edge” in the past was that Roman could just go out and drop £200m+ on a summer spending spree - that won’t be happening anymore, you will probably spend around similar levels to Spurs and Arsenal this summer and slowly but surely slink down to our level - it’s essentially already started in the league with you dropping much closer to us since Roman went.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We haven’t done a £200m spending spree for about 10 years
We’ve barely got any net spend over the last decade it’s lower than Spurs’
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summer before last actually
https://talksport.com/football/769494/premier-league-clubs-transfers-spent-2020-summer-window-chelsea-everton-arsenal-news/amp/
posted on 12/5/22
comment by Devil (U6522)
posted 27 minutes ago
Bigger currently, but you were smaller than us for 100 years and the current gap between the sides is not exactly insurmountable.
The truth is and again Sandy will probably disagree, Spurs have also grown over the period Roman has been at your club - con incidental but undeniable. We have gone from a side that flirted with relegation in the 90’s but mostly finished around 11th to a side that qualifies for Europe every year, has seen consecutive CL qualification and taking on the continents top sides and built the best football stadium in the world.
What we lack is the trophies, but we’re not as far off as some think
------------------------------------------------------------
It's not insurmountable at all, but the point is you need to do something yourselves now - us being sh!tter in the present won't be enough anymore, were that to happen in the immediate future.
You need to make a fresh stamp in Europe I think. Going deep in the CL regularly for a spell or winning a few Europa's at least.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A Europa an FA cup and we would be flying again - the problem is too often are managers throw everything at a top 4 finish rather than a “lesser” trophy
posted on 12/5/22
https://www.si.com/fannation/soccer/futbol/news/man-utd-city-and-psg-spend-over-1b-net-on-transfers-in-10-years
We’ve spent £80m more than spurs in the last 10 years and win about 10 more trophies
Also that doesn’t even take into account our loan fees which we earn £30m on a season so our net spend is more like 30m over the last decade
posted on 12/5/22
comment by Oscar #TeamFury. Champion of NBA Predictions (U12980)
posted 17 minutes ago
https://www.si.com/fannation/soccer/futbol/news/man-utd-city-and-psg-spend-over-1b-net-on-transfers-in-10-years
We’ve spent £80m more than spurs in the last 10 years and win about 10 more trophies
Also that doesn’t even take into account our loan fees which we earn £30m on a season so our net spend is more like 30m over the last decade
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but as has been highlighted many times before the decade before you far outspent us and gave yourself a platform to build from. If Burnley spend £200m next summer and Man City spend the same, the end result won’t be the same due to the base that City have.
That’s the whole point, Roman built the base level by writing off £1.5bn
Page 1 of 3