comment by RIP Terry Munro (U22874)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 48 minutes ago
It’s a convenient tool for right wing governments tbf. They don’t want people to actually be concerned with their corruption and the state of inequality in the West, better to whip up bigoted twaaats into a frenzy about things they didn’t even know they cared about until they got duped into being offended about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is actually spot on, it’s quite easily to manipulate these left wing and liberal millennials into thinking that these things are far more important than they really are.
When I was there age I was too busy getting blootered and enjoying life to be concerned
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When that is the response I get it’s no wonder this country is facked.
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Two Balls, One Saka (U19684)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 22 minutes ago
It’s a convenient tool for right wing governments tbf. They don’t want people to actually be concerned with their corruption and the state of inequality in the West, better to whip up bigoted twaaats into a frenzy about things they didn’t even know they cared about until they got duped into being offended about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, this was a head shot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Tories brought in gay marriage, not Labour.
Labour brought in uni tuition fees, not the Tories.
This black and white understanding of politics doesn't really stack up.
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Two Balls, One Saka (U19684)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 22 minutes ago
It’s a convenient tool for right wing governments tbf. They don’t want people to actually be concerned with their corruption and the state of inequality in the West, better to whip up bigoted twaaats into a frenzy about things they didn’t even know they cared about until they got duped into being offended about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, this was a head shot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Tories brought in gay marriage, not Labour.
Labour brought in uni tuition fees, not the Tories.
This black and white understanding of politics doesn't really stack up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree
No ‘side’ has a claim too the truth/one tru weigh
The Tories brought in section 28 and it only takes a cursory glance at the voting record of a plethora or their scvm MPs to see their stance on civil partnership over the years.
N2 embarrassing himself again.
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 46 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Two Balls, One Saka (U19684)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 22 minutes ago
It’s a convenient tool for right wing governments tbf. They don’t want people to actually be concerned with their corruption and the state of inequality in the West, better to whip up bigoted twaaats into a frenzy about things they didn’t even know they cared about until they got duped into being offended about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, this was a head shot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Tories brought in gay marriage, not Labour.
Labour brought in uni tuition fees, not the Tories.
This black and white understanding of politics doesn't really stack up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You seem to gave missed the bit where more tories voted against gay marriage than in favour right?
Those pesky facts getting in your way again
comment by #4zA accide cchiu a lengua ca a spata - 🇮🇹🇺🇦 (U22472)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Two Balls, One Saka (U19684)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 22 minutes ago
It’s a convenient tool for right wing governments tbf. They don’t want people to actually be concerned with their corruption and the state of inequality in the West, better to whip up bigoted twaaats into a frenzy about things they didn’t even know they cared about until they got duped into being offended about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, this was a head shot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Tories brought in gay marriage, not Labour.
Labour brought in uni tuition fees, not the Tories.
This black and white understanding of politics doesn't really stack up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree
No ‘side’ has a claim too the truth/one tru weigh
----------------------------------------------------------------------
👍
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 11 minutes ago
Mr. Apolitical.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It allows me to look at each party without the bias.
You're not doing it very well.
Robbing and Welsh missing the point again.
The Tories may not be the most gay friendly group even though their party is full of homosexuals.
The point is they did something you'd expect Labour to do, and Labour did something you'd expect the Tories to do.
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 11 minutes ago
Mr. Apolitical.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It allows me to look at each party without the bias.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 29 seconds ago
Robbing and Welsh missing the point again.
The Tories may not be the most gay friendly group even though their party is full of homosexuals.
The point is they did something you'd expect Labour to do, and Labour did something you'd expect the Tories to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not missing the point. Just explaining that your point is a figment if your imagination.
If it were left to the Tories, the bill would not have passed because more Tories voted against than in favour. At second reading there were 170 no votes and 136 of those were tory.
Over 200 Labour MPs voted in favour of gay marriage, compared to less than 130 Tories. Only 22 Labour mps voted against.
But yes, keep misrepresenting facts to make your argument.
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 29 seconds ago
Robbing and Welsh missing the point again.
The Tories may not be the most gay friendly group even though their party is full of homosexuals.
The point is they did something you'd expect Labour to do, and Labour did something you'd expect the Tories to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not missing the point. Just explaining that your point is a figment if your imagination.
If it were left to the Tories, the bill would not have passed because more Tories voted against than in favour. At second reading there were 170 no votes and 136 of those were tory.
Over 200 Labour MPs voted in favour of gay marriage, compared to less than 130 Tories. Only 22 Labour mps voted against.
But yes, keep misrepresenting facts to make your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, totally missing the point, probably on purpose.
I'm well aware more Tories are against it, but it was still brought in under their watch. And this is not something we would expect according to your black and white narrative.
You're also conveniently overlooking Labour's tuition fees as it suits your argument.
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 29 seconds ago
Robbing and Welsh missing the point again.
The Tories may not be the most gay friendly group even though their party is full of homosexuals.
The point is they did something you'd expect Labour to do, and Labour did something you'd expect the Tories to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not missing the point. Just explaining that your point is a figment if your imagination.
If it were left to the Tories, the bill would not have passed because more Tories voted against than in favour. At second reading there were 170 no votes and 136 of those were tory.
Over 200 Labour MPs voted in favour of gay marriage, compared to less than 130 Tories. Only 22 Labour mps voted against.
But yes, keep misrepresenting facts to make your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, totally missing the point, probably on purpose.
I'm well aware more Tories are against it, but it was still brought in under their watch. And this is not something we would expect according to your black and white narrative.
You're also conveniently overlooking Labour's tuition fees as it suits your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm mot overlooking anything or even making whatever argument in your head you have decided I am making. I am simply correcting your deliberate misinformation that the Tories were responsible for hay marriage being legal. They aren't. The other parties were responsible.
It’s not black and white to understand how right wing governments, the press and their paymasters are deliberately stoking the fires of a culture war that distracts from their corruption and actions that have led to ridiculous levels of inequality.
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 29 seconds ago
Robbing and Welsh missing the point again.
The Tories may not be the most gay friendly group even though their party is full of homosexuals.
The point is they did something you'd expect Labour to do, and Labour did something you'd expect the Tories to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not missing the point. Just explaining that your point is a figment if your imagination.
If it were left to the Tories, the bill would not have passed because more Tories voted against than in favour. At second reading there were 170 no votes and 136 of those were tory.
Over 200 Labour MPs voted in favour of gay marriage, compared to less than 130 Tories. Only 22 Labour mps voted against.
But yes, keep misrepresenting facts to make your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, totally missing the point, probably on purpose.
I'm well aware more Tories are against it, but it was still brought in under their watch. And this is not something we would expect according to your black and white narrative.
You're also conveniently overlooking Labour's tuition fees as it suits your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm mot overlooking anything or even making whatever argument in your head you have decided I am making. I am simply correcting your deliberate misinformation that the Tories were responsible for hay marriage being legal. They aren't. The other parties were responsible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was a joint effort, that's how the system works. Cameron is the one who came up with it, without that there would be nothing
Your hatred of them means you won't give them even a bit of credit.
Imagine calling that misinfo.
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 7 minutes ago
It’s not black and white to understand how right wing governments, the press and their paymasters are deliberately stoking the fires of a culture war that distracts from their corruption and actions that have led to ridiculous levels of inequality.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are these inequalities you keep referring to?
I'm not sure whether you're talking about actual or bogus inequalities.
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 29 seconds ago
Robbing and Welsh missing the point again.
The Tories may not be the most gay friendly group even though their party is full of homosexuals.
The point is they did something you'd expect Labour to do, and Labour did something you'd expect the Tories to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not missing the point. Just explaining that your point is a figment if your imagination.
If it were left to the Tories, the bill would not have passed because more Tories voted against than in favour. At second reading there were 170 no votes and 136 of those were tory.
Over 200 Labour MPs voted in favour of gay marriage, compared to less than 130 Tories. Only 22 Labour mps voted against.
But yes, keep misrepresenting facts to make your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, totally missing the point, probably on purpose.
I'm well aware more Tories are against it, but it was still brought in under their watch. And this is not something we would expect according to your black and white narrative.
You're also conveniently overlooking Labour's tuition fees as it suits your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm mot overlooking anything or even making whatever argument in your head you have decided I am making. I am simply correcting your deliberate misinformation that the Tories were responsible for hay marriage being legal. They aren't. The other parties were responsible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was a joint effort, that's how the system works. Cameron is the one who came up with it, without that there would be nothing
Your hatred of them means you won't give them even a bit of credit.
Imagine calling that misinfo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
David Cameron isn't "the tories". The tories voted against gay marriage. This is an undeniable fact that you kept trying to avoid for some bizarre reason. So yes, claiming the tories brought in gay marriage is misinformation because without the other parties it would have not been brought I because the tories were against it.
Imagine trying to claim that a party who voted against bringing gay marriage in were responsible for it coming in. Weird right wing propaganda.
Economic inequality, have you been living under a rock the last 12 years?
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 9 minutes ago
It’s not black and white to understand how right wing governments, the press and their paymasters are deliberately stoking the fires of a culture war that distracts from their corruption and actions that have led to ridiculous levels of inequality.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And it’s the left wing / liberal millennial some brigade they are using to do it, and they are falling for it big style!
Unless you think a right wing government are trying to distract right wing voters from bringing in right wing policies?
The people falling for it are fekin laughable!
It’s distracting them from the reality. It’s how they continually get people to vote against their own economic interests. Just look at Brexit.
You are one of these people I suspect.
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 5 minutes ago
It’s distracting them from the reality. It’s how they continually get people to vote against their own economic interests. Just look at Brexit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who are them? Who are they distracting?
Idiots that vote for them.
So the right wing party are distracting right wing voters so they can bring in right wing policies, got you 👍
Sign in if you want to comment
Jordan Peterson
Page 17 of 18
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18
posted on 11/7/22
comment by RIP Terry Munro (U22874)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 48 minutes ago
It’s a convenient tool for right wing governments tbf. They don’t want people to actually be concerned with their corruption and the state of inequality in the West, better to whip up bigoted twaaats into a frenzy about things they didn’t even know they cared about until they got duped into being offended about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That is actually spot on, it’s quite easily to manipulate these left wing and liberal millennials into thinking that these things are far more important than they really are.
When I was there age I was too busy getting blootered and enjoying life to be concerned
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When that is the response I get it’s no wonder this country is facked.
posted on 11/7/22
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Two Balls, One Saka (U19684)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 22 minutes ago
It’s a convenient tool for right wing governments tbf. They don’t want people to actually be concerned with their corruption and the state of inequality in the West, better to whip up bigoted twaaats into a frenzy about things they didn’t even know they cared about until they got duped into being offended about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, this was a head shot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Tories brought in gay marriage, not Labour.
Labour brought in uni tuition fees, not the Tories.
This black and white understanding of politics doesn't really stack up.
posted on 11/7/22
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Two Balls, One Saka (U19684)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 22 minutes ago
It’s a convenient tool for right wing governments tbf. They don’t want people to actually be concerned with their corruption and the state of inequality in the West, better to whip up bigoted twaaats into a frenzy about things they didn’t even know they cared about until they got duped into being offended about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, this was a head shot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Tories brought in gay marriage, not Labour.
Labour brought in uni tuition fees, not the Tories.
This black and white understanding of politics doesn't really stack up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree
No ‘side’ has a claim too the truth/one tru weigh
posted on 11/7/22
The Tories brought in section 28 and it only takes a cursory glance at the voting record of a plethora or their scvm MPs to see their stance on civil partnership over the years.
N2 embarrassing himself again.
posted on 11/7/22
Mr. Apolitical.
posted on 11/7/22
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 46 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Two Balls, One Saka (U19684)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 22 minutes ago
It’s a convenient tool for right wing governments tbf. They don’t want people to actually be concerned with their corruption and the state of inequality in the West, better to whip up bigoted twaaats into a frenzy about things they didn’t even know they cared about until they got duped into being offended about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, this was a head shot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Tories brought in gay marriage, not Labour.
Labour brought in uni tuition fees, not the Tories.
This black and white understanding of politics doesn't really stack up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You seem to gave missed the bit where more tories voted against gay marriage than in favour right?
Those pesky facts getting in your way again
posted on 11/7/22
comment by #4zA accide cchiu a lengua ca a spata - 🇮🇹🇺🇦 (U22472)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Two Balls, One Saka (U19684)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 22 minutes ago
It’s a convenient tool for right wing governments tbf. They don’t want people to actually be concerned with their corruption and the state of inequality in the West, better to whip up bigoted twaaats into a frenzy about things they didn’t even know they cared about until they got duped into being offended about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
End of thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, this was a head shot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Tories brought in gay marriage, not Labour.
Labour brought in uni tuition fees, not the Tories.
This black and white understanding of politics doesn't really stack up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree
No ‘side’ has a claim too the truth/one tru weigh
----------------------------------------------------------------------
👍
posted on 11/7/22
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 11 minutes ago
Mr. Apolitical.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It allows me to look at each party without the bias.
posted on 11/7/22
You're not doing it very well.
posted on 11/7/22
Robbing and Welsh missing the point again.
The Tories may not be the most gay friendly group even though their party is full of homosexuals.
The point is they did something you'd expect Labour to do, and Labour did something you'd expect the Tories to do.
posted on 11/7/22
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 11 minutes ago
Mr. Apolitical.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It allows me to look at each party without the bias.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 11/7/22
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 29 seconds ago
Robbing and Welsh missing the point again.
The Tories may not be the most gay friendly group even though their party is full of homosexuals.
The point is they did something you'd expect Labour to do, and Labour did something you'd expect the Tories to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not missing the point. Just explaining that your point is a figment if your imagination.
If it were left to the Tories, the bill would not have passed because more Tories voted against than in favour. At second reading there were 170 no votes and 136 of those were tory.
Over 200 Labour MPs voted in favour of gay marriage, compared to less than 130 Tories. Only 22 Labour mps voted against.
But yes, keep misrepresenting facts to make your argument.
posted on 11/7/22
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 29 seconds ago
Robbing and Welsh missing the point again.
The Tories may not be the most gay friendly group even though their party is full of homosexuals.
The point is they did something you'd expect Labour to do, and Labour did something you'd expect the Tories to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not missing the point. Just explaining that your point is a figment if your imagination.
If it were left to the Tories, the bill would not have passed because more Tories voted against than in favour. At second reading there were 170 no votes and 136 of those were tory.
Over 200 Labour MPs voted in favour of gay marriage, compared to less than 130 Tories. Only 22 Labour mps voted against.
But yes, keep misrepresenting facts to make your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, totally missing the point, probably on purpose.
I'm well aware more Tories are against it, but it was still brought in under their watch. And this is not something we would expect according to your black and white narrative.
You're also conveniently overlooking Labour's tuition fees as it suits your argument.
posted on 11/7/22
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 29 seconds ago
Robbing and Welsh missing the point again.
The Tories may not be the most gay friendly group even though their party is full of homosexuals.
The point is they did something you'd expect Labour to do, and Labour did something you'd expect the Tories to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not missing the point. Just explaining that your point is a figment if your imagination.
If it were left to the Tories, the bill would not have passed because more Tories voted against than in favour. At second reading there were 170 no votes and 136 of those were tory.
Over 200 Labour MPs voted in favour of gay marriage, compared to less than 130 Tories. Only 22 Labour mps voted against.
But yes, keep misrepresenting facts to make your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, totally missing the point, probably on purpose.
I'm well aware more Tories are against it, but it was still brought in under their watch. And this is not something we would expect according to your black and white narrative.
You're also conveniently overlooking Labour's tuition fees as it suits your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm mot overlooking anything or even making whatever argument in your head you have decided I am making. I am simply correcting your deliberate misinformation that the Tories were responsible for hay marriage being legal. They aren't. The other parties were responsible.
posted on 11/7/22
It’s not black and white to understand how right wing governments, the press and their paymasters are deliberately stoking the fires of a culture war that distracts from their corruption and actions that have led to ridiculous levels of inequality.
posted on 11/7/22
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 29 seconds ago
Robbing and Welsh missing the point again.
The Tories may not be the most gay friendly group even though their party is full of homosexuals.
The point is they did something you'd expect Labour to do, and Labour did something you'd expect the Tories to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not missing the point. Just explaining that your point is a figment if your imagination.
If it were left to the Tories, the bill would not have passed because more Tories voted against than in favour. At second reading there were 170 no votes and 136 of those were tory.
Over 200 Labour MPs voted in favour of gay marriage, compared to less than 130 Tories. Only 22 Labour mps voted against.
But yes, keep misrepresenting facts to make your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, totally missing the point, probably on purpose.
I'm well aware more Tories are against it, but it was still brought in under their watch. And this is not something we would expect according to your black and white narrative.
You're also conveniently overlooking Labour's tuition fees as it suits your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm mot overlooking anything or even making whatever argument in your head you have decided I am making. I am simply correcting your deliberate misinformation that the Tories were responsible for hay marriage being legal. They aren't. The other parties were responsible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was a joint effort, that's how the system works. Cameron is the one who came up with it, without that there would be nothing
Your hatred of them means you won't give them even a bit of credit.
Imagine calling that misinfo.
posted on 11/7/22
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 7 minutes ago
It’s not black and white to understand how right wing governments, the press and their paymasters are deliberately stoking the fires of a culture war that distracts from their corruption and actions that have led to ridiculous levels of inequality.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are these inequalities you keep referring to?
I'm not sure whether you're talking about actual or bogus inequalities.
posted on 11/7/22
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 29 seconds ago
Robbing and Welsh missing the point again.
The Tories may not be the most gay friendly group even though their party is full of homosexuals.
The point is they did something you'd expect Labour to do, and Labour did something you'd expect the Tories to do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope, not missing the point. Just explaining that your point is a figment if your imagination.
If it were left to the Tories, the bill would not have passed because more Tories voted against than in favour. At second reading there were 170 no votes and 136 of those were tory.
Over 200 Labour MPs voted in favour of gay marriage, compared to less than 130 Tories. Only 22 Labour mps voted against.
But yes, keep misrepresenting facts to make your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep, totally missing the point, probably on purpose.
I'm well aware more Tories are against it, but it was still brought in under their watch. And this is not something we would expect according to your black and white narrative.
You're also conveniently overlooking Labour's tuition fees as it suits your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm mot overlooking anything or even making whatever argument in your head you have decided I am making. I am simply correcting your deliberate misinformation that the Tories were responsible for hay marriage being legal. They aren't. The other parties were responsible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was a joint effort, that's how the system works. Cameron is the one who came up with it, without that there would be nothing
Your hatred of them means you won't give them even a bit of credit.
Imagine calling that misinfo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
David Cameron isn't "the tories". The tories voted against gay marriage. This is an undeniable fact that you kept trying to avoid for some bizarre reason. So yes, claiming the tories brought in gay marriage is misinformation because without the other parties it would have not been brought I because the tories were against it.
Imagine trying to claim that a party who voted against bringing gay marriage in were responsible for it coming in. Weird right wing propaganda.
posted on 11/7/22
Economic inequality, have you been living under a rock the last 12 years?
posted on 11/7/22
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 9 minutes ago
It’s not black and white to understand how right wing governments, the press and their paymasters are deliberately stoking the fires of a culture war that distracts from their corruption and actions that have led to ridiculous levels of inequality.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And it’s the left wing / liberal millennial some brigade they are using to do it, and they are falling for it big style!
Unless you think a right wing government are trying to distract right wing voters from bringing in right wing policies?
The people falling for it are fekin laughable!
posted on 11/7/22
It’s distracting them from the reality. It’s how they continually get people to vote against their own economic interests. Just look at Brexit.
posted on 11/7/22
You are one of these people I suspect.
posted on 11/7/22
comment by Darren The King Fletcher (U10026)
posted 5 minutes ago
It’s distracting them from the reality. It’s how they continually get people to vote against their own economic interests. Just look at Brexit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who are them? Who are they distracting?
posted on 11/7/22
Idiots that vote for them.
posted on 11/7/22
So the right wing party are distracting right wing voters so they can bring in right wing policies, got you 👍
Page 17 of 18
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18