Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Garner be a star (U13920)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 4 minutes ago
Having the instinct to protect women and children mean men generally see potential dangers.
===========

That'll be why all the men are the attackers then, what with the instinct to protect.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ALL MEN ARE THE ATTACKERS?
Does that include you your dad and everyman you know?

This my friends is what happens when some men (sorry if i incorrectly assumed you are one) get brainwashed by feminist agenda. The emphatise so much with the feminist cause that they don't stop to think about the bs they are saying.

i will help you out tho. Some men attack but majority of men protect. If not women will be getting attacked in broad day light.

Good men realise that bad men can attack women and their instinct is to stop it or prevent it from being possible.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Men are physically stronger, so they will either protect or take advantage of women. The feminists have spent decades trying to emasculate men and remove the concept of chivalry. In doing so, they have probably inadvertently created more predators.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Feminists create nonces is a new take.

I'm surprised we are so easily manipulated considering they better able to spot danger whilst also being so much more impressive at pretty much everything.

comment by United we win (U19958)
posted 38 seconds ago
There are some extremely crazy people today trying to convince us it’s okay for men to breast feed, doped up on hormones and chemicals so they can satisfy their ego and desires. They create experiments on innocent babies to achieve this also. It’s beyond insane and needs calling out. Where’s the line?

Society is teaching men to hate being men. It’s why you are now getting many disillusioned men who are going the other way and following people like Andrew Tate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What they’re doing is strategically destroying the core family unit, which is a key foundation to a functioning society and has been for 1000s of years. This and extreme feminism which tells women it’s degrading to be a mother, a carer looking after her household but liberating working 8 hours a day to a boss that will treat her like a piece of meat.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 30 seconds ago
Feminists create nonces is a new take.

I'm surprised we are so easily manipulated considering they better able to spot danger whilst also being so much more impressive at pretty much everything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No disrespect meant but I have a question to help me understand your pov. Are you a woman or a feminist by any chance?

comment by United we win (U19958)
posted 3 minutes ago
N2 - they have created man like Tate who has big following amongst the younger male generation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is he one of these loud mouths who thinks he's a man, but really just acts like a boy?

comment by Garner be a star (U13920)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 30 seconds ago
Feminists create nonces is a new take.

I'm surprised we are so easily manipulated considering they better able to spot danger whilst also being so much more impressive at pretty much everything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No disrespect meant but I have a question to help me understand your pov. Are you a woman or a feminist by any chance?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nope. Although I do like women, it's fine if you don't though.

comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 7 minutes ago
Feminists create nonces is a new take.

I'm surprised we are so easily manipulated considering they better able to spot danger whilst also being so much more impressive at pretty much everything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were raised by a single mother, weren't you?

Nope.

comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Garner be a star (U13920)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - Legacy Fan (U6374)
posted 30 seconds ago
Feminists create nonces is a new take.

I'm surprised we are so easily manipulated considering they better able to spot danger whilst also being so much more impressive at pretty much everything.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No disrespect meant but I have a question to help me understand your pov. Are you a woman or a feminist by any chance?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nope. Although I do like women, it's fine if you don't though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LoL. I love women
but you see that guys. I asked a genuine simple question and the reply was an attempt to shame me based on his own sense os superiority for "loving women". Now where have I said anything that says I don't .
I like a good intellectual debate but people like this are very disingenuous and like to create false narratives

this is why most don't engage in this type of convo. It is clearly a tactic people like this use to discourage convo.It often works and I have got other things to do rn so Iguess it worked again
well done Robbing

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Garner we win seems to hate women

And the first rule of any debate is to laugh at anyone who uses the term ‘woke brigade’. It’s the new ‘political correctness gawnnn maaaad’.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by United we win (U19958)
posted 9 minutes ago
N2 rich guy who is called top g by his followers and is extreme on his views with regards to male and female roles. But at the same time does it for views.

Issue is there are young men being told nowadays it’s bad to be a man and you should feel guilty about it. There is nothing wrong with men and women having different roles in society. Men can’t give birth but women can and that has a major impact on society.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
1000s of years of wisdom and common sense is being replaced with ideas which they can't even logically defend. Weird times we're living in.

comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 1 hour, 8 minutes ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 1 hour, 18 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 2 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 2 minutes ago
He should have stuck to writing research papers on psychology, rather than embarrassing himself by spouting tripe on sociopolitical and cultural matters he knows and understands little about.

The world would be a slightly saner place had he done so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Watch the Cathy Newman debate and come back and tell me who embarrassed themself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cathy Newman?

Watch him try to debate Zizek and then tell me who embarrassed themselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haven't seen that one.

Also, psychology plays a role in culture, society and politics—so why would he not give his views on these from a psychologists perspective?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Outmanoeuvring a (rank average) TV news presenter, who is also a layperson, is one thing.

Debating (even average) academics who’ve spent half a lifetime studying the field is quite another.

And I don’t have any issue with him giving arguments about the psychological issues and challenges confronting people living through certain experiences, including cultural or political shifts or conflicts. In fact, on occasion, I’ve seen him do that. There he’s earned the right to be listened to.

But more often than not, that isn’t what he’s doing, and it doesn’t seem to me to be what he’s most famous for.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You think you're smarter than than him which is hilarious because you're rge stupidest people on this website. Shut up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I most certainly don’t think I’m smarter than him.

And last time I checked, I’m just the one person, but thanks for the promotion
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reagedles youre still an idiot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s a brave sentence to mess up 😬

comment by Robb - it’s Andrew Tate’s world and we’re just living in it. (U22716)
posted 8 minutes ago
Garner we win seems to hate women

And the first rule of any debate is to laugh at anyone who uses the term ‘woke brigade’. It’s the new ‘political correctness gawnnn maaaad’.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What was wrong with 'PC gone mad'?

comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 38 seconds ago
comment by Robb - it’s Andrew Tate’s world and we’re just living in it. (U22716)
posted 8 minutes ago
Garner we win seems to hate women

And the first rule of any debate is to laugh at anyone who uses the term ‘woke brigade’. It’s the new ‘political correctness gawnnn maaaad’.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What was wrong with 'PC gone mad'?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It was usually said by the type of people who read the Sun and decided on which class of person they hated based on what manufactured outrage the people doing the front page decided on creating that day.

The type of person who voted leave during Brexit because they wanted bendy bananas.

And the type of person who says ‘wake up sheeple’ one minute and then the next calls people they disagree with ‘woke’ and then doesn’t understand the irony.

A lotta v angry Jordan Peterson fanz on hear

Wunder y?

comment by Robb - it’s Andrew Tate’s world and we’re just living in it. (U22716)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 38 seconds ago
comment by Robb - it’s Andrew Tate’s world and we’re just living in it. (U22716)
posted 8 minutes ago
Garner we win seems to hate women

And the first rule of any debate is to laugh at anyone who uses the term ‘woke brigade’. It’s the new ‘political correctness gawnnn maaaad’.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What was wrong with 'PC gone mad'?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It was usually said by the type of people who read the Sun and decided on which class of person they hated based on what manufactured outrage the people doing the front page decided on creating that day.

The type of person who voted leave during Brexit because they wanted bendy bananas.

And the type of person who says ‘wake up sheeple’ one minute and then the next calls people they disagree with ‘woke’ and then doesn’t understand the irony.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What I don't get is where do people on the left draw the line? I mean most of us know what is extreme on the right, so what would be considered extreme on the left in today's society?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Garner be a star (U13920)
posted 1 hour, 34 minutes ago
i dont need to read your ultra left wing media bs to understand why men care

it comes down to the role men have played in society

Having the instinct to protect women and children mean men generally see potential dangers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m offering academic peer reviewed studies and independent polling of the general public’s own opinions; not editorial takes.

Where do you get “ultra left wing media bs” from?

comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 50 minutes ago
comment by Garner be a star (U13920)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 1 hour, 18 minutes ago
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 2 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by And... Rosso... Though its... Yeah and... That... (U17054)
posted 2 minutes ago
He should have stuck to writing research papers on psychology, rather than embarrassing himself by spouting tripe on sociopolitical and cultural matters he knows and understands little about.

The world would be a slightly saner place had he done so.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Watch the Cathy Newman debate and come back and tell me who embarrassed themself.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cathy Newman?

Watch him try to debate Zizek and then tell me who embarrassed themselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haven't seen that one.

Also, psychology plays a role in culture, society and politics—so why would he not give his views on these from a psychologists perspective?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't watched it either

When I need milk, I go to my grocers not my butcher . So, I tend to not go to JP for information about climate change. But I respect he migt have an opinion just like my butcher might have an opinion on milk. But I don't say that since his opinions on milk is wrong then he has no right to talk about meat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Peterson also isn’t a scholar of evolutionary biology, physiology, political science, gender studies, anthropology or sociopolitics 🤷‍♂️

And he hasn’t managed to persuade me, from any of what I’ve seen, that he’s really bothered seriously reading up in any of those areas before forming his opinions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what academics do you listen to? It would be interesting to know as many people on the left don't seem to follow any.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on the subject, but atm I’m enjoying Graeber (RIP), Varoufakis, Zizek, Rui Tavares, Chomsky (although not as much as his stuff through the 90s and 00s) and Richard Wolff.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator