Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier
—-
Yeah but no one wanted them, did they?
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 7 minutes ago
Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier
—-
Yeah but no one wanted them, did they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lucky for us, huh
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 7 minutes ago
Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier
—-
Yeah but no one wanted them, did they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lucky for us, huh
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dunno. I only deal with facts.
Or things I’ve read on here and just taken at face value.
You can normally tell what is a fact on here by people putting FACT after what they said. Otherwise it's just conjecture and opinion.
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 13 minutes ago
Very lucky, I should say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus, you make it sound like 'lil 'ol Spurs should be grateful to have any good players.
Nobody forced him to sign the contract he's on, and Spurs, who have also stayed just as loyal to him, have provided him with as good a life style as any other player.
What do you you think. That all the good players should only play for clubs like City, RM or PSG ?
Spurs are currently listed as the 10th richest club in football, and are perfectly entitled to have world class players on their books, without feeling awfully lucky and, some how not entitled.
Go away and save your daft opinions for your own club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone's precious. What better centre forwards are there in world football? Arguably Lewandowski and Haaland, after that you'd be hard pushed to make a case for anyone. Players like that tend to want to play for clubs who are seriously pushing for league titles and champions leagues ever year. Despite having a shed load of money, Spurs are not one of those teams, and so are lucky that Kane has stayed loyal. Just like, further down the talent scale, Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier who might otherwise be expected to push themselves at a higher level of domestic competition. So rather than feeling "entitled" to world class players when you're not a world class club, maybe understand that Spurs are lucky to have a player of a level of talent that you don't normally get to see in your team? Spurs fans in your own thread were saying the front 3 are on a different level to the rest of the squad ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's called being under contract. Has nothing to do with being lucky.
You need me to run through the basics of contract law with you ?
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 13 minutes ago
Very lucky, I should say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus, you make it sound like 'lil 'ol Spurs should be grateful to have any good players.
Nobody forced him to sign the contract he's on, and Spurs, who have also stayed just as loyal to him, have provided him with as good a life style as any other player.
What do you you think. That all the good players should only play for clubs like City, RM or PSG ?
Spurs are currently listed as the 10th richest club in football, and are perfectly entitled to have world class players on their books, without feeling awfully lucky and, some how not entitled.
Go away and save your daft opinions for your own club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone's precious. What better centre forwards are there in world football? Arguably Lewandowski and Haaland, after that you'd be hard pushed to make a case for anyone. Players like that tend to want to play for clubs who are seriously pushing for league titles and champions leagues ever year. Despite having a shed load of money, Spurs are not one of those teams, and so are lucky that Kane has stayed loyal. Just like, further down the talent scale, Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier who might otherwise be expected to push themselves at a higher level of domestic competition. So rather than feeling "entitled" to world class players when you're not a world class club, maybe understand that Spurs are lucky to have a player of a level of talent that you don't normally get to see in your team? Spurs fans in your own thread were saying the front 3 are on a different level to the rest of the squad ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's called being under contract. Has nothing to do with being lucky.
You need me to run through the basics of contract law with you ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The option of Kane having run down his contract and left on a free rather than signing extensions out of loyalty to his team seems incomprehensible to you so let's just give it a miss.
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 13 minutes ago
Very lucky, I should say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus, you make it sound like 'lil 'ol Spurs should be grateful to have any good players.
Nobody forced him to sign the contract he's on, and Spurs, who have also stayed just as loyal to him, have provided him with as good a life style as any other player.
What do you you think. That all the good players should only play for clubs like City, RM or PSG ?
Spurs are currently listed as the 10th richest club in football, and are perfectly entitled to have world class players on their books, without feeling awfully lucky and, some how not entitled.
Go away and save your daft opinions for your own club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone's precious. What better centre forwards are there in world football? Arguably Lewandowski and Haaland, after that you'd be hard pushed to make a case for anyone. Players like that tend to want to play for clubs who are seriously pushing for league titles and champions leagues ever year. Despite having a shed load of money, Spurs are not one of those teams, and so are lucky that Kane has stayed loyal. Just like, further down the talent scale, Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier who might otherwise be expected to push themselves at a higher level of domestic competition. So rather than feeling "entitled" to world class players when you're not a world class club, maybe understand that Spurs are lucky to have a player of a level of talent that you don't normally get to see in your team? Spurs fans in your own thread were saying the front 3 are on a different level to the rest of the squad ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's called being under contract. Has nothing to do with being lucky.
You need me to run through the basics of contract law with you ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh and I am assuming you are under 20 and only know the modern game. Back before Sky invented football in 1992, players stayed with one club all the time. It's called loyalty. Something people just don't get in our current "grab the money and run" society we have now.
If you don't get my attitude, then maybe you don't get that Spurs fans are sick to death of all and sundry putting their two bob's worth in on where Harry Kane should be playing. We have had this cr*p pushed down our throats since the end of the season before last.
He plays for Spurs and until Levy agrees a move or his contract expires, he is a Spurs player, not a City player as the media kept telling us for nearly two years non stop.
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 11 minutes ago
You can normally tell what is a fact on here by people putting FACT after what they said. Otherwise it's just conjecture and opinion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See, that just reads like conjecture and opinion then.
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 13 minutes ago
Very lucky, I should say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus, you make it sound like 'lil 'ol Spurs should be grateful to have any good players.
Nobody forced him to sign the contract he's on, and Spurs, who have also stayed just as loyal to him, have provided him with as good a life style as any other player.
What do you you think. That all the good players should only play for clubs like City, RM or PSG ?
Spurs are currently listed as the 10th richest club in football, and are perfectly entitled to have world class players on their books, without feeling awfully lucky and, some how not entitled.
Go away and save your daft opinions for your own club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone's precious. What better centre forwards are there in world football? Arguably Lewandowski and Haaland, after that you'd be hard pushed to make a case for anyone. Players like that tend to want to play for clubs who are seriously pushing for league titles and champions leagues ever year. Despite having a shed load of money, Spurs are not one of those teams, and so are lucky that Kane has stayed loyal. Just like, further down the talent scale, Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier who might otherwise be expected to push themselves at a higher level of domestic competition. So rather than feeling "entitled" to world class players when you're not a world class club, maybe understand that Spurs are lucky to have a player of a level of talent that you don't normally get to see in your team? Spurs fans in your own thread were saying the front 3 are on a different level to the rest of the squad ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's called being under contract. Has nothing to do with being lucky.
You need me to run through the basics of contract law with you ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh and I am assuming you are under 20 and only know the modern game. Back before Sky invented football in 1992, players stayed with one club all the time. It's called loyalty. Something people just don't get in our current "grab the money and run" society we have now.
If you don't get my attitude, then maybe you don't get that Spurs fans are sick to death of all and sundry putting their two bob's worth in on where Harry Kane should be playing. We have had this cr*p pushed down our throats since the end of the season before last.
He plays for Spurs and until Levy agrees a move or his contract expires, he is a Spurs player, not a City player as the media kept telling us for nearly two years non stop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure we'd largely agree on how things should be, but unfortunately that's not how they are. Up here we're very aware how protectionist the top level clubs are - our league champions rarely even get direct entry to the "champion's league". It's not remotely a bad thing that Kane has stayed with Spurs, and elite football would be a whole lot more interesting if top players were spread out over more clubs and countries as they once were. Nonetheless that's not how things are, and Spurs remain fortunate that Kane has opted to stay and help "his" team push for glory rather than agitate for a transfer to a club that offers an easier route to soulless silverware.
I fooking wish I was still remotely anywhere near 20.
Spurs fans are so precious the pansies
Of course they’re lucky to have Kane, he’s a golden egg and one of the best in the world and they’re a rusty old frying pan who haven’t won a trophy for about 40 years
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 13 minutes ago
Very lucky, I should say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus, you make it sound like 'lil 'ol Spurs should be grateful to have any good players.
Nobody forced him to sign the contract he's on, and Spurs, who have also stayed just as loyal to him, have provided him with as good a life style as any other player.
What do you you think. That all the good players should only play for clubs like City, RM or PSG ?
Spurs are currently listed as the 10th richest club in football, and are perfectly entitled to have world class players on their books, without feeling awfully lucky and, some how not entitled.
Go away and save your daft opinions for your own club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone's precious. What better centre forwards are there in world football? Arguably Lewandowski and Haaland, after that you'd be hard pushed to make a case for anyone. Players like that tend to want to play for clubs who are seriously pushing for league titles and champions leagues ever year. Despite having a shed load of money, Spurs are not one of those teams, and so are lucky that Kane has stayed loyal. Just like, further down the talent scale, Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier who might otherwise be expected to push themselves at a higher level of domestic competition. So rather than feeling "entitled" to world class players when you're not a world class club, maybe understand that Spurs are lucky to have a player of a level of talent that you don't normally get to see in your team? Spurs fans in your own thread were saying the front 3 are on a different level to the rest of the squad ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's called being under contract. Has nothing to do with being lucky.
You need me to run through the basics of contract law with you ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh and I am assuming you are under 20 and only know the modern game. Back before Sky invented football in 1992, players stayed with one club all the time. It's called loyalty. Something people just don't get in our current "grab the money and run" society we have now.
If you don't get my attitude, then maybe you don't get that Spurs fans are sick to death of all and sundry putting their two bob's worth in on where Harry Kane should be playing. We have had this cr*p pushed down our throats since the end of the season before last.
He plays for Spurs and until Levy agrees a move or his contract expires, he is a Spurs player, not a City player as the media kept telling us for nearly two years non stop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure we'd largely agree on how things should be, but unfortunately that's not how they are. Up here we're very aware how protectionist the top level clubs are - our league champions rarely even get direct entry to the "champion's league". It's not remotely a bad thing that Kane has stayed with Spurs, and elite football would be a whole lot more interesting if top players were spread out over more clubs and countries as they once were. Nonetheless that's not how things are, and Spurs remain fortunate that Kane has opted to stay and help "his" team push for glory rather than agitate for a transfer to a club that offers an easier route to soulless silverware.
I fooking wish I was still remotely anywhere near 20.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please spare us the almighty righteous. Celtic and Rangers have been buying other clubs in scotlands best players for decades at below their true value. All because you know teams historically like Hearts, Hibs and cowden beath need whatever shillings they can get.
Spurs are used to teams like United in yesteryear taking our best players. The things is, Levy (for all his shortcomings) has built spurs up organically to compete with the best in the world.
The fact we have Conte as Manager and the PL deadliest EVER duo in Kane and Son is testament to that. Now away and chase a bus
comment by BelfastSpur (U15068)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 13 minutes ago
Very lucky, I should say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus, you make it sound like 'lil 'ol Spurs should be grateful to have any good players.
Nobody forced him to sign the contract he's on, and Spurs, who have also stayed just as loyal to him, have provided him with as good a life style as any other player.
What do you you think. That all the good players should only play for clubs like City, RM or PSG ?
Spurs are currently listed as the 10th richest club in football, and are perfectly entitled to have world class players on their books, without feeling awfully lucky and, some how not entitled.
Go away and save your daft opinions for your own club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone's precious. What better centre forwards are there in world football? Arguably Lewandowski and Haaland, after that you'd be hard pushed to make a case for anyone. Players like that tend to want to play for clubs who are seriously pushing for league titles and champions leagues ever year. Despite having a shed load of money, Spurs are not one of those teams, and so are lucky that Kane has stayed loyal. Just like, further down the talent scale, Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier who might otherwise be expected to push themselves at a higher level of domestic competition. So rather than feeling "entitled" to world class players when you're not a world class club, maybe understand that Spurs are lucky to have a player of a level of talent that you don't normally get to see in your team? Spurs fans in your own thread were saying the front 3 are on a different level to the rest of the squad ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's called being under contract. Has nothing to do with being lucky.
You need me to run through the basics of contract law with you ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh and I am assuming you are under 20 and only know the modern game. Back before Sky invented football in 1992, players stayed with one club all the time. It's called loyalty. Something people just don't get in our current "grab the money and run" society we have now.
If you don't get my attitude, then maybe you don't get that Spurs fans are sick to death of all and sundry putting their two bob's worth in on where Harry Kane should be playing. We have had this cr*p pushed down our throats since the end of the season before last.
He plays for Spurs and until Levy agrees a move or his contract expires, he is a Spurs player, not a City player as the media kept telling us for nearly two years non stop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure we'd largely agree on how things should be, but unfortunately that's not how they are. Up here we're very aware how protectionist the top level clubs are - our league champions rarely even get direct entry to the "champion's league". It's not remotely a bad thing that Kane has stayed with Spurs, and elite football would be a whole lot more interesting if top players were spread out over more clubs and countries as they once were. Nonetheless that's not how things are, and Spurs remain fortunate that Kane has opted to stay and help "his" team push for glory rather than agitate for a transfer to a club that offers an easier route to soulless silverware.
I fooking wish I was still remotely anywhere near 20.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please spare us the almighty righteous. Celtic and Rangers have been buying other clubs in scotlands best players for decades at below their true value. All because you know teams historically like Hearts, Hibs and cowden beath need whatever shillings they can get.
Spurs are used to teams like United in yesteryear taking our best players. The things is, Levy (for all his shortcomings) has built spurs up organically to compete with the best in the world.
The fact we have Conte as Manager and the PL deadliest EVER duo in Kane and Son is testament to that. Now away and chase a bus
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PL’s deadliest duo who have never won a trophy fack off
Fair point tbh, Cowdenbeath would be right up there challenging for leagues and cups if we didn't keep poaching all their best players.
Spurs have kept all their top players for the last 5 years and still won Jack all
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 minute ago
Fair point tbh, Cowdenbeath would be right up there challenging for leagues and cups if we didn't keep poaching all their best players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cowdenbeath was a minnow I used purely as an example.
Souttar
Wright
Docherty
Holt
Templeton
Boyd
Just in recent times from memory and thats not including the freebies which I am sure there are plenty.
I could go further back in history. But that would’ve been the original rangers
comment by Oscar #TeamFury. Champion of NBA Predictions and 2021/2022 Winner (U12980)
posted 5 minutes ago
Spurs have kept all their top players for the last 5 years and still won Jack all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean at least they built their squad like a genuine football club rather than as a billionaire's toy.
I think. Genuinely no idea who tf owns Spurs.
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Oscar #TeamFury. Champion of NBA Predictions and 2021/2022 Winner (U12980)
posted 5 minutes ago
Spurs have kept all their top players for the last 5 years and still won Jack all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean at least they built their squad like a genuine football club rather than as a billionaire's toy.
I think. Genuinely no idea who tf owns Spurs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENIC the same people than previously owned the original Rangers. Before the realised you can’t polish a tuurd
comment by BelfastSpur (U15068)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Oscar #TeamFury. Champion of NBA Predictions and 2021/2022 Winner (U12980)
posted 5 minutes ago
Spurs have kept all their top players for the last 5 years and still won Jack all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean at least they built their squad like a genuine football club rather than as a billionaire's toy.
I think. Genuinely no idea who tf owns Spurs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENIC the same people than previously owned the original Rangers. Before the realised you can’t polish a tuurd
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said tuuurd I take it won silverware under ENIC ownership,how's that going on at Spurs?
Said tuuurd I take it won silverware under ENIC ownership
—-
Well…kind of. Although we talked it over a LOT on the Scottish boards afterwards and eventually we all decided they’d cheated. So not really.
Been really peaceful on here since though.
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by BelfastSpur (U15068)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Oscar #TeamFury. Champion of NBA Predictions and 2021/2022 Winner (U12980)
posted 5 minutes ago
Spurs have kept all their top players for the last 5 years and still won Jack all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean at least they built their squad like a genuine football club rather than as a billionaire's toy.
I think. Genuinely no idea who tf owns Spurs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENIC the same people than previously owned the original Rangers. Before the realised you can’t polish a tuurd
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said tuuurd I take it won silverware under ENIC ownership,how's that going on at Spurs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We’ve won a league cup under Enic actually - how’s it going with Moshiri
Half a billion spent on a side that will be lucky to stay up next year - Everton that
comment by Oscar #TeamFury. Champion of NBA Predictions and 2021/2022 Winner (U12980)
posted 2 hours, 28 minutes ago
comment by BelfastSpur (U15068)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 13 minutes ago
Very lucky, I should say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus, you make it sound like 'lil 'ol Spurs should be grateful to have any good players.
Nobody forced him to sign the contract he's on, and Spurs, who have also stayed just as loyal to him, have provided him with as good a life style as any other player.
What do you you think. That all the good players should only play for clubs like City, RM or PSG ?
Spurs are currently listed as the 10th richest club in football, and are perfectly entitled to have world class players on their books, without feeling awfully lucky and, some how not entitled.
Go away and save your daft opinions for your own club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone's precious. What better centre forwards are there in world football? Arguably Lewandowski and Haaland, after that you'd be hard pushed to make a case for anyone. Players like that tend to want to play for clubs who are seriously pushing for league titles and champions leagues ever year. Despite having a shed load of money, Spurs are not one of those teams, and so are lucky that Kane has stayed loyal. Just like, further down the talent scale, Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier who might otherwise be expected to push themselves at a higher level of domestic competition. So rather than feeling "entitled" to world class players when you're not a world class club, maybe understand that Spurs are lucky to have a player of a level of talent that you don't normally get to see in your team? Spurs fans in your own thread were saying the front 3 are on a different level to the rest of the squad ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's called being under contract. Has nothing to do with being lucky.
You need me to run through the basics of contract law with you ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh and I am assuming you are under 20 and only know the modern game. Back before Sky invented football in 1992, players stayed with one club all the time. It's called loyalty. Something people just don't get in our current "grab the money and run" society we have now.
If you don't get my attitude, then maybe you don't get that Spurs fans are sick to death of all and sundry putting their two bob's worth in on where Harry Kane should be playing. We have had this cr*p pushed down our throats since the end of the season before last.
He plays for Spurs and until Levy agrees a move or his contract expires, he is a Spurs player, not a City player as the media kept telling us for nearly two years non stop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure we'd largely agree on how things should be, but unfortunately that's not how they are. Up here we're very aware how protectionist the top level clubs are - our league champions rarely even get direct entry to the "champion's league". It's not remotely a bad thing that Kane has stayed with Spurs, and elite football would be a whole lot more interesting if top players were spread out over more clubs and countries as they once were. Nonetheless that's not how things are, and Spurs remain fortunate that Kane has opted to stay and help "his" team push for glory rather than agitate for a transfer to a club that offers an easier route to soulless silverware.
I fooking wish I was still remotely anywhere near 20.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please spare us the almighty righteous. Celtic and Rangers have been buying other clubs in scotlands best players for decades at below their true value. All because you know teams historically like Hearts, Hibs and cowden beath need whatever shillings they can get.
Spurs are used to teams like United in yesteryear taking our best players. The things is, Levy (for all his shortcomings) has built spurs up organically to compete with the best in the world.
The fact we have Conte as Manager and the PL deadliest EVER duo in Kane and Son is testament to that. Now away and chase a bus
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PL’s deadliest duo who have never won a trophyfack off
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Errrr, we literally won a trophy today you plastic caaaant
I know i know, you’re probably a real Chelsea fan who followed them pre Roman
According to Spurs fans it is an "elite" trophy 🤣
comment by Kingdom of Davids (U21957)
posted 6 hours, 50 minutes ago
According to Spurs fans it is an "elite" trophy 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You lost to Rangers mid week - 42 years since your tin pot outfit won anything, you would have paraded this like the World Cup
Well done Spurs...no really...well done
You must be hugely proud...& don't let the nasty posters who say it's a tin pot nothing get you down...it's yours you won it
DVD & bus parade time
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 12 minutes ago
Well done Spurs...no really...well done
You must be hugely proud...& don't let the nasty posters who say it's a tin pot nothing get you down...it's yours you won it
DVD & bus parade time
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks Rusty sheriffs badge
A commemorative coin would be nice also
Sign in if you want to comment
Git tae pump Rangers
Page 2 of 3
posted on 23/7/22
Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier
—-
Yeah but no one wanted them, did they?
posted on 23/7/22
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 7 minutes ago
Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier
—-
Yeah but no one wanted them, did they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lucky for us, huh
posted on 23/7/22
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 7 minutes ago
Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier
—-
Yeah but no one wanted them, did they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lucky for us, huh
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dunno. I only deal with facts.
Or things I’ve read on here and just taken at face value.
posted on 23/7/22
You can normally tell what is a fact on here by people putting FACT after what they said. Otherwise it's just conjecture and opinion.
posted on 23/7/22
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 13 minutes ago
Very lucky, I should say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus, you make it sound like 'lil 'ol Spurs should be grateful to have any good players.
Nobody forced him to sign the contract he's on, and Spurs, who have also stayed just as loyal to him, have provided him with as good a life style as any other player.
What do you you think. That all the good players should only play for clubs like City, RM or PSG ?
Spurs are currently listed as the 10th richest club in football, and are perfectly entitled to have world class players on their books, without feeling awfully lucky and, some how not entitled.
Go away and save your daft opinions for your own club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone's precious. What better centre forwards are there in world football? Arguably Lewandowski and Haaland, after that you'd be hard pushed to make a case for anyone. Players like that tend to want to play for clubs who are seriously pushing for league titles and champions leagues ever year. Despite having a shed load of money, Spurs are not one of those teams, and so are lucky that Kane has stayed loyal. Just like, further down the talent scale, Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier who might otherwise be expected to push themselves at a higher level of domestic competition. So rather than feeling "entitled" to world class players when you're not a world class club, maybe understand that Spurs are lucky to have a player of a level of talent that you don't normally get to see in your team? Spurs fans in your own thread were saying the front 3 are on a different level to the rest of the squad ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's called being under contract. Has nothing to do with being lucky.
You need me to run through the basics of contract law with you ?
posted on 23/7/22
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 13 minutes ago
Very lucky, I should say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus, you make it sound like 'lil 'ol Spurs should be grateful to have any good players.
Nobody forced him to sign the contract he's on, and Spurs, who have also stayed just as loyal to him, have provided him with as good a life style as any other player.
What do you you think. That all the good players should only play for clubs like City, RM or PSG ?
Spurs are currently listed as the 10th richest club in football, and are perfectly entitled to have world class players on their books, without feeling awfully lucky and, some how not entitled.
Go away and save your daft opinions for your own club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone's precious. What better centre forwards are there in world football? Arguably Lewandowski and Haaland, after that you'd be hard pushed to make a case for anyone. Players like that tend to want to play for clubs who are seriously pushing for league titles and champions leagues ever year. Despite having a shed load of money, Spurs are not one of those teams, and so are lucky that Kane has stayed loyal. Just like, further down the talent scale, Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier who might otherwise be expected to push themselves at a higher level of domestic competition. So rather than feeling "entitled" to world class players when you're not a world class club, maybe understand that Spurs are lucky to have a player of a level of talent that you don't normally get to see in your team? Spurs fans in your own thread were saying the front 3 are on a different level to the rest of the squad ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's called being under contract. Has nothing to do with being lucky.
You need me to run through the basics of contract law with you ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The option of Kane having run down his contract and left on a free rather than signing extensions out of loyalty to his team seems incomprehensible to you so let's just give it a miss.
posted on 23/7/22
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 13 minutes ago
Very lucky, I should say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus, you make it sound like 'lil 'ol Spurs should be grateful to have any good players.
Nobody forced him to sign the contract he's on, and Spurs, who have also stayed just as loyal to him, have provided him with as good a life style as any other player.
What do you you think. That all the good players should only play for clubs like City, RM or PSG ?
Spurs are currently listed as the 10th richest club in football, and are perfectly entitled to have world class players on their books, without feeling awfully lucky and, some how not entitled.
Go away and save your daft opinions for your own club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone's precious. What better centre forwards are there in world football? Arguably Lewandowski and Haaland, after that you'd be hard pushed to make a case for anyone. Players like that tend to want to play for clubs who are seriously pushing for league titles and champions leagues ever year. Despite having a shed load of money, Spurs are not one of those teams, and so are lucky that Kane has stayed loyal. Just like, further down the talent scale, Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier who might otherwise be expected to push themselves at a higher level of domestic competition. So rather than feeling "entitled" to world class players when you're not a world class club, maybe understand that Spurs are lucky to have a player of a level of talent that you don't normally get to see in your team? Spurs fans in your own thread were saying the front 3 are on a different level to the rest of the squad ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's called being under contract. Has nothing to do with being lucky.
You need me to run through the basics of contract law with you ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh and I am assuming you are under 20 and only know the modern game. Back before Sky invented football in 1992, players stayed with one club all the time. It's called loyalty. Something people just don't get in our current "grab the money and run" society we have now.
If you don't get my attitude, then maybe you don't get that Spurs fans are sick to death of all and sundry putting their two bob's worth in on where Harry Kane should be playing. We have had this cr*p pushed down our throats since the end of the season before last.
He plays for Spurs and until Levy agrees a move or his contract expires, he is a Spurs player, not a City player as the media kept telling us for nearly two years non stop.
posted on 23/7/22
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 11 minutes ago
You can normally tell what is a fact on here by people putting FACT after what they said. Otherwise it's just conjecture and opinion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See, that just reads like conjecture and opinion then.
posted on 23/7/22
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 13 minutes ago
Very lucky, I should say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus, you make it sound like 'lil 'ol Spurs should be grateful to have any good players.
Nobody forced him to sign the contract he's on, and Spurs, who have also stayed just as loyal to him, have provided him with as good a life style as any other player.
What do you you think. That all the good players should only play for clubs like City, RM or PSG ?
Spurs are currently listed as the 10th richest club in football, and are perfectly entitled to have world class players on their books, without feeling awfully lucky and, some how not entitled.
Go away and save your daft opinions for your own club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone's precious. What better centre forwards are there in world football? Arguably Lewandowski and Haaland, after that you'd be hard pushed to make a case for anyone. Players like that tend to want to play for clubs who are seriously pushing for league titles and champions leagues ever year. Despite having a shed load of money, Spurs are not one of those teams, and so are lucky that Kane has stayed loyal. Just like, further down the talent scale, Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier who might otherwise be expected to push themselves at a higher level of domestic competition. So rather than feeling "entitled" to world class players when you're not a world class club, maybe understand that Spurs are lucky to have a player of a level of talent that you don't normally get to see in your team? Spurs fans in your own thread were saying the front 3 are on a different level to the rest of the squad ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's called being under contract. Has nothing to do with being lucky.
You need me to run through the basics of contract law with you ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh and I am assuming you are under 20 and only know the modern game. Back before Sky invented football in 1992, players stayed with one club all the time. It's called loyalty. Something people just don't get in our current "grab the money and run" society we have now.
If you don't get my attitude, then maybe you don't get that Spurs fans are sick to death of all and sundry putting their two bob's worth in on where Harry Kane should be playing. We have had this cr*p pushed down our throats since the end of the season before last.
He plays for Spurs and until Levy agrees a move or his contract expires, he is a Spurs player, not a City player as the media kept telling us for nearly two years non stop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure we'd largely agree on how things should be, but unfortunately that's not how they are. Up here we're very aware how protectionist the top level clubs are - our league champions rarely even get direct entry to the "champion's league". It's not remotely a bad thing that Kane has stayed with Spurs, and elite football would be a whole lot more interesting if top players were spread out over more clubs and countries as they once were. Nonetheless that's not how things are, and Spurs remain fortunate that Kane has opted to stay and help "his" team push for glory rather than agitate for a transfer to a club that offers an easier route to soulless silverware.
I fooking wish I was still remotely anywhere near 20.
posted on 23/7/22
Spurs fans are so precious the pansies
Of course they’re lucky to have Kane, he’s a golden egg and one of the best in the world and they’re a rusty old frying pan who haven’t won a trophy for about 40 years
posted on 23/7/22
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 13 minutes ago
Very lucky, I should say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus, you make it sound like 'lil 'ol Spurs should be grateful to have any good players.
Nobody forced him to sign the contract he's on, and Spurs, who have also stayed just as loyal to him, have provided him with as good a life style as any other player.
What do you you think. That all the good players should only play for clubs like City, RM or PSG ?
Spurs are currently listed as the 10th richest club in football, and are perfectly entitled to have world class players on their books, without feeling awfully lucky and, some how not entitled.
Go away and save your daft opinions for your own club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone's precious. What better centre forwards are there in world football? Arguably Lewandowski and Haaland, after that you'd be hard pushed to make a case for anyone. Players like that tend to want to play for clubs who are seriously pushing for league titles and champions leagues ever year. Despite having a shed load of money, Spurs are not one of those teams, and so are lucky that Kane has stayed loyal. Just like, further down the talent scale, Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier who might otherwise be expected to push themselves at a higher level of domestic competition. So rather than feeling "entitled" to world class players when you're not a world class club, maybe understand that Spurs are lucky to have a player of a level of talent that you don't normally get to see in your team? Spurs fans in your own thread were saying the front 3 are on a different level to the rest of the squad ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's called being under contract. Has nothing to do with being lucky.
You need me to run through the basics of contract law with you ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh and I am assuming you are under 20 and only know the modern game. Back before Sky invented football in 1992, players stayed with one club all the time. It's called loyalty. Something people just don't get in our current "grab the money and run" society we have now.
If you don't get my attitude, then maybe you don't get that Spurs fans are sick to death of all and sundry putting their two bob's worth in on where Harry Kane should be playing. We have had this cr*p pushed down our throats since the end of the season before last.
He plays for Spurs and until Levy agrees a move or his contract expires, he is a Spurs player, not a City player as the media kept telling us for nearly two years non stop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure we'd largely agree on how things should be, but unfortunately that's not how they are. Up here we're very aware how protectionist the top level clubs are - our league champions rarely even get direct entry to the "champion's league". It's not remotely a bad thing that Kane has stayed with Spurs, and elite football would be a whole lot more interesting if top players were spread out over more clubs and countries as they once were. Nonetheless that's not how things are, and Spurs remain fortunate that Kane has opted to stay and help "his" team push for glory rather than agitate for a transfer to a club that offers an easier route to soulless silverware.
I fooking wish I was still remotely anywhere near 20.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please spare us the almighty righteous. Celtic and Rangers have been buying other clubs in scotlands best players for decades at below their true value. All because you know teams historically like Hearts, Hibs and cowden beath need whatever shillings they can get.
Spurs are used to teams like United in yesteryear taking our best players. The things is, Levy (for all his shortcomings) has built spurs up organically to compete with the best in the world.
The fact we have Conte as Manager and the PL deadliest EVER duo in Kane and Son is testament to that. Now away and chase a bus
posted on 23/7/22
comment by BelfastSpur (U15068)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 13 minutes ago
Very lucky, I should say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus, you make it sound like 'lil 'ol Spurs should be grateful to have any good players.
Nobody forced him to sign the contract he's on, and Spurs, who have also stayed just as loyal to him, have provided him with as good a life style as any other player.
What do you you think. That all the good players should only play for clubs like City, RM or PSG ?
Spurs are currently listed as the 10th richest club in football, and are perfectly entitled to have world class players on their books, without feeling awfully lucky and, some how not entitled.
Go away and save your daft opinions for your own club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone's precious. What better centre forwards are there in world football? Arguably Lewandowski and Haaland, after that you'd be hard pushed to make a case for anyone. Players like that tend to want to play for clubs who are seriously pushing for league titles and champions leagues ever year. Despite having a shed load of money, Spurs are not one of those teams, and so are lucky that Kane has stayed loyal. Just like, further down the talent scale, Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier who might otherwise be expected to push themselves at a higher level of domestic competition. So rather than feeling "entitled" to world class players when you're not a world class club, maybe understand that Spurs are lucky to have a player of a level of talent that you don't normally get to see in your team? Spurs fans in your own thread were saying the front 3 are on a different level to the rest of the squad ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's called being under contract. Has nothing to do with being lucky.
You need me to run through the basics of contract law with you ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh and I am assuming you are under 20 and only know the modern game. Back before Sky invented football in 1992, players stayed with one club all the time. It's called loyalty. Something people just don't get in our current "grab the money and run" society we have now.
If you don't get my attitude, then maybe you don't get that Spurs fans are sick to death of all and sundry putting their two bob's worth in on where Harry Kane should be playing. We have had this cr*p pushed down our throats since the end of the season before last.
He plays for Spurs and until Levy agrees a move or his contract expires, he is a Spurs player, not a City player as the media kept telling us for nearly two years non stop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure we'd largely agree on how things should be, but unfortunately that's not how they are. Up here we're very aware how protectionist the top level clubs are - our league champions rarely even get direct entry to the "champion's league". It's not remotely a bad thing that Kane has stayed with Spurs, and elite football would be a whole lot more interesting if top players were spread out over more clubs and countries as they once were. Nonetheless that's not how things are, and Spurs remain fortunate that Kane has opted to stay and help "his" team push for glory rather than agitate for a transfer to a club that offers an easier route to soulless silverware.
I fooking wish I was still remotely anywhere near 20.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please spare us the almighty righteous. Celtic and Rangers have been buying other clubs in scotlands best players for decades at below their true value. All because you know teams historically like Hearts, Hibs and cowden beath need whatever shillings they can get.
Spurs are used to teams like United in yesteryear taking our best players. The things is, Levy (for all his shortcomings) has built spurs up organically to compete with the best in the world.
The fact we have Conte as Manager and the PL deadliest EVER duo in Kane and Son is testament to that. Now away and chase a bus
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PL’s deadliest duo who have never won a trophy fack off
posted on 23/7/22
Fair point tbh, Cowdenbeath would be right up there challenging for leagues and cups if we didn't keep poaching all their best players.
posted on 23/7/22
Spurs have kept all their top players for the last 5 years and still won Jack all
posted on 23/7/22
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 minute ago
Fair point tbh, Cowdenbeath would be right up there challenging for leagues and cups if we didn't keep poaching all their best players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cowdenbeath was a minnow I used purely as an example.
Souttar
Wright
Docherty
Holt
Templeton
Boyd
Just in recent times from memory and thats not including the freebies which I am sure there are plenty.
I could go further back in history. But that would’ve been the original rangers
posted on 23/7/22
comment by Oscar #TeamFury. Champion of NBA Predictions and 2021/2022 Winner (U12980)
posted 5 minutes ago
Spurs have kept all their top players for the last 5 years and still won Jack all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean at least they built their squad like a genuine football club rather than as a billionaire's toy.
I think. Genuinely no idea who tf owns Spurs.
posted on 23/7/22
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Oscar #TeamFury. Champion of NBA Predictions and 2021/2022 Winner (U12980)
posted 5 minutes ago
Spurs have kept all their top players for the last 5 years and still won Jack all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean at least they built their squad like a genuine football club rather than as a billionaire's toy.
I think. Genuinely no idea who tf owns Spurs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENIC the same people than previously owned the original Rangers. Before the realised you can’t polish a tuurd
posted on 23/7/22
comment by BelfastSpur (U15068)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Oscar #TeamFury. Champion of NBA Predictions and 2021/2022 Winner (U12980)
posted 5 minutes ago
Spurs have kept all their top players for the last 5 years and still won Jack all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean at least they built their squad like a genuine football club rather than as a billionaire's toy.
I think. Genuinely no idea who tf owns Spurs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENIC the same people than previously owned the original Rangers. Before the realised you can’t polish a tuurd
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said tuuurd I take it won silverware under ENIC ownership,how's that going on at Spurs?
posted on 23/7/22
Said tuuurd I take it won silverware under ENIC ownership
—-
Well…kind of. Although we talked it over a LOT on the Scottish boards afterwards and eventually we all decided they’d cheated. So not really.
Been really peaceful on here since though.
posted on 23/7/22
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرائيلي (U22246)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by BelfastSpur (U15068)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Oscar #TeamFury. Champion of NBA Predictions and 2021/2022 Winner (U12980)
posted 5 minutes ago
Spurs have kept all their top players for the last 5 years and still won Jack all
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean at least they built their squad like a genuine football club rather than as a billionaire's toy.
I think. Genuinely no idea who tf owns Spurs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENIC the same people than previously owned the original Rangers. Before the realised you can’t polish a tuurd
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Said tuuurd I take it won silverware under ENIC ownership,how's that going on at Spurs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We’ve won a league cup under Enic actually - how’s it going with Moshiri
Half a billion spent on a side that will be lucky to stay up next year - Everton that
posted on 23/7/22
comment by Oscar #TeamFury. Champion of NBA Predictions and 2021/2022 Winner (U12980)
posted 2 hours, 28 minutes ago
comment by BelfastSpur (U15068)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
comment by SteveF (U22027)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 13 minutes ago
Very lucky, I should say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus, you make it sound like 'lil 'ol Spurs should be grateful to have any good players.
Nobody forced him to sign the contract he's on, and Spurs, who have also stayed just as loyal to him, have provided him with as good a life style as any other player.
What do you you think. That all the good players should only play for clubs like City, RM or PSG ?
Spurs are currently listed as the 10th richest club in football, and are perfectly entitled to have world class players on their books, without feeling awfully lucky and, some how not entitled.
Go away and save your daft opinions for your own club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone's precious. What better centre forwards are there in world football? Arguably Lewandowski and Haaland, after that you'd be hard pushed to make a case for anyone. Players like that tend to want to play for clubs who are seriously pushing for league titles and champions leagues ever year. Despite having a shed load of money, Spurs are not one of those teams, and so are lucky that Kane has stayed loyal. Just like, further down the talent scale, Rangers are lucky to have players like Goldson and Tavernier who might otherwise be expected to push themselves at a higher level of domestic competition. So rather than feeling "entitled" to world class players when you're not a world class club, maybe understand that Spurs are lucky to have a player of a level of talent that you don't normally get to see in your team? Spurs fans in your own thread were saying the front 3 are on a different level to the rest of the squad ffs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's called being under contract. Has nothing to do with being lucky.
You need me to run through the basics of contract law with you ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh and I am assuming you are under 20 and only know the modern game. Back before Sky invented football in 1992, players stayed with one club all the time. It's called loyalty. Something people just don't get in our current "grab the money and run" society we have now.
If you don't get my attitude, then maybe you don't get that Spurs fans are sick to death of all and sundry putting their two bob's worth in on where Harry Kane should be playing. We have had this cr*p pushed down our throats since the end of the season before last.
He plays for Spurs and until Levy agrees a move or his contract expires, he is a Spurs player, not a City player as the media kept telling us for nearly two years non stop.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure we'd largely agree on how things should be, but unfortunately that's not how they are. Up here we're very aware how protectionist the top level clubs are - our league champions rarely even get direct entry to the "champion's league". It's not remotely a bad thing that Kane has stayed with Spurs, and elite football would be a whole lot more interesting if top players were spread out over more clubs and countries as they once were. Nonetheless that's not how things are, and Spurs remain fortunate that Kane has opted to stay and help "his" team push for glory rather than agitate for a transfer to a club that offers an easier route to soulless silverware.
I fooking wish I was still remotely anywhere near 20.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please spare us the almighty righteous. Celtic and Rangers have been buying other clubs in scotlands best players for decades at below their true value. All because you know teams historically like Hearts, Hibs and cowden beath need whatever shillings they can get.
Spurs are used to teams like United in yesteryear taking our best players. The things is, Levy (for all his shortcomings) has built spurs up organically to compete with the best in the world.
The fact we have Conte as Manager and the PL deadliest EVER duo in Kane and Son is testament to that. Now away and chase a bus
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PL’s deadliest duo who have never won a trophyfack off
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Errrr, we literally won a trophy today you plastic caaaant
I know i know, you’re probably a real Chelsea fan who followed them pre Roman
posted on 24/7/22
According to Spurs fans it is an "elite" trophy 🤣
posted on 24/7/22
comment by Kingdom of Davids (U21957)
posted 6 hours, 50 minutes ago
According to Spurs fans it is an "elite" trophy 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You lost to Rangers mid week - 42 years since your tin pot outfit won anything, you would have paraded this like the World Cup
posted on 24/7/22
Well done Spurs...no really...well done
You must be hugely proud...& don't let the nasty posters who say it's a tin pot nothing get you down...it's yours you won it
DVD & bus parade time
posted on 24/7/22
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 12 minutes ago
Well done Spurs...no really...well done
You must be hugely proud...& don't let the nasty posters who say it's a tin pot nothing get you down...it's yours you won it
DVD & bus parade time
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks Rusty sheriffs badge
A commemorative coin would be nice also
Page 2 of 3