comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 13 hours, 38 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 2 minutes ago
I can’t think of anyone more despicable from British football that springs to mind, after all his family and
Brother stuff.
Must be a complete oddball. Never really see Keane or neville comment on it but I wonder if they thought he was a bit mental? I’ve never heard anything from ex players about him being like that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lee Hughes? Probably Greenwood too if found guilty of what he's accused. Mendy for sure
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This reads as lets give Greenwood the chance to be proven first, Mendy is guilty though. Then the comments after it accuse the City fan of bias.
Mendy’s obviously guilty because he’s not a United player
She is the one at fault here. She probably just made up that he was beating her so that it seemed like he was a bad person so his other 8 partners would break up with him and she could have him all to herself.
I see some have learned very little from depp v heard
comment by Blue_mooning (U12093)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 13 hours, 38 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 2 minutes ago
I can’t think of anyone more despicable from British football that springs to mind, after all his family and
Brother stuff.
Must be a complete oddball. Never really see Keane or neville comment on it but I wonder if they thought he was a bit mental? I’ve never heard anything from ex players about him being like that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lee Hughes? Probably Greenwood too if found guilty of what he's accused. Mendy for sure
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This reads as lets give Greenwood the chance to be proven first, Mendy is guilty though. Then the comments after it accuse the City fan of bias.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, I have no doubt that Greenwood is a wrong un and that he has probably done worse than what Giggs has done/is accused of. Mendy's charges are certainly worse than what Giggs is accused of. I was talking about the severity of what they are accused of rather than whether they are guilty. And you also have to remember that Mason hasn't been charged of anything yet, so that is why I said probably about him.
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 11 minutes ago
I see some have learned very little from depp v heard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think that anyone has presumed that Giggs is guilty here. But we know what he has done in the past and that is enough to conclude that he isn't a particularly nice person.
none of this is a shock, a man who betrays his brother has no morals.
Remember in the system of justice, the woman is always lying until proven otherwise. It is the duty of the people to keep giving her abuse until a decision has been made. Do not just assume that she will be found to be telling the truth.
It is just how our justice system works and should be respected.
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 11 minutes ago
I see some have learned very little from depp v heard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think that anyone has presumed that Giggs is guilty here. But we know what he has done in the past and that is enough to conclude that he isn't a particularly nice person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depp v Heard was a defamation case where the plaintiff (Depp) was seeking damages (think it was something like $100).
The Giggs case is being considered under the Serious Crime Act (coercive behaviour) and the Criminal Justice Act (assault) which is completely different to US defamation laws/requirements. Its' like trying to compare rugby to football as both are field sports.
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 11 minutes ago
I see some have learned very little from depp v heard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think that anyone has presumed that Giggs is guilty here. But we know what he has done in the past and that is enough to conclude that he isn't a particularly nice person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depp v Heard was a defamation case where the plaintiff (Depp) was seeking damages (think it was something like $100).
The Giggs case is being considered under the Serious Crime Act (coercive behaviour) and the Criminal Justice Act (assault) which is completely different to US defamation laws/requirements. Its' like trying to compare rugby to football as both are field sports.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparing rugby and serious criminal charges is absolutely ridiculous. One you have to have loads of money to get into, the other you have to have loads of money to get out of.
He will prob be thought of in a similar way to george best. he will be remembered for his stuff on the field rather than being a poor human off it
didnt betray his brother atleast
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 hours, 18 minutes ago
I see some have learned very little from depp v heard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably not the best example to use given the unsealed documents that came out last week showed Depp to be quite awful himself.
I actually have no idea how Heard lost the trial after reading those.
comment by HarlequinHebdo (U16981)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
Giggs is going down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On his sister in law
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 hours, 18 minutes ago
I see some have learned very little from depp v heard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably not the best example to use given the unsealed documents that came out last week showed Depp to be quite awful himself.
I actually have no idea how Heard lost the trial after reading those.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have seen bits, but not really paid much attention. What in particular are the worst bits.
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 2 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 hours, 18 minutes ago
I see some have learned very little from depp v heard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably not the best example to use given the unsealed documents that came out last week showed Depp to be quite awful himself.
I actually have no idea how Heard lost the trial after reading those.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was very clear why she lost. Because she painted herself as victim when she was not.
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 5 hours, 28 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 11 minutes ago
I see some have learned very little from depp v heard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think that anyone has presumed that Giggs is guilty here. But we know what he has done in the past and that is enough to conclude that he isn't a particularly nice person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably accurate. Dont think he's going for mother Theresa of the year tho.
Mother Teresa was a monster.
I think both cases (including the 2018 UK Supreme Court Judgement) found it was a toxic relationship with both parties demonstrating varying levels of abuse towards each other.
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 26 seconds ago
I think both cases (including the 2018 UK Supreme Court Judgement) found it was a toxic relationship with both parties demonstrating varying levels of abuse towards each other.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depp/Heard.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 27 minutes ago
Mother Teresa was a monster.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She could have learnt a lot from Mendy.
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 52 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 hours, 18 minutes ago
I see some have learned very little from depp v heard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably not the best example to use given the unsealed documents that came out last week showed Depp to be quite awful himself.
I actually have no idea how Heard lost the trial after reading those.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have seen bits, but not really paid much attention. What in particular are the worst bits.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good thread on it with the documents:
https://twitter.com/cocainecross/status/1553506807766663169?t=ZsqcGCXALg-7zI6_KL_bXQ&s=19
Highlights:
- Depp wanted to use naked photos of Heard in the trial to embarrass her
- text messages where he admits kicking her
- doctored photos
- doctored audio
- his lawyer threatened a witness into a pre-written agreement that the witness saw no injuries on Heard
- he admitted that Heard caused him no injuries
- he had evidence Heard turned down $16m from their marriage despite lawyers telling her it was legally hers
There is a video kicking about of Amber Heards sister being interviewed and it's well worth a watch.
Whole family is clearly bonkers
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 27 minutes ago
Mother Teresa was a monster.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She could have learnt a lot from Mendy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She was known as Mama Giggsy in Calcutta.
Sign in if you want to comment
Giggsy
Page 6 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 10/8/22
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 13 hours, 38 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 2 minutes ago
I can’t think of anyone more despicable from British football that springs to mind, after all his family and
Brother stuff.
Must be a complete oddball. Never really see Keane or neville comment on it but I wonder if they thought he was a bit mental? I’ve never heard anything from ex players about him being like that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lee Hughes? Probably Greenwood too if found guilty of what he's accused. Mendy for sure
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This reads as lets give Greenwood the chance to be proven first, Mendy is guilty though. Then the comments after it accuse the City fan of bias.
posted on 10/8/22
Mendy’s obviously guilty because he’s not a United player
posted on 10/8/22
She is the one at fault here. She probably just made up that he was beating her so that it seemed like he was a bad person so his other 8 partners would break up with him and she could have him all to herself.
posted on 10/8/22
I see some have learned very little from depp v heard
posted on 10/8/22
comment by Blue_mooning (U12093)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 13 hours, 38 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 2 minutes ago
I can’t think of anyone more despicable from British football that springs to mind, after all his family and
Brother stuff.
Must be a complete oddball. Never really see Keane or neville comment on it but I wonder if they thought he was a bit mental? I’ve never heard anything from ex players about him being like that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lee Hughes? Probably Greenwood too if found guilty of what he's accused. Mendy for sure
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This reads as lets give Greenwood the chance to be proven first, Mendy is guilty though. Then the comments after it accuse the City fan of bias.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, I have no doubt that Greenwood is a wrong un and that he has probably done worse than what Giggs has done/is accused of. Mendy's charges are certainly worse than what Giggs is accused of. I was talking about the severity of what they are accused of rather than whether they are guilty. And you also have to remember that Mason hasn't been charged of anything yet, so that is why I said probably about him.
posted on 10/8/22
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 11 minutes ago
I see some have learned very little from depp v heard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think that anyone has presumed that Giggs is guilty here. But we know what he has done in the past and that is enough to conclude that he isn't a particularly nice person.
posted on 10/8/22
none of this is a shock, a man who betrays his brother has no morals.
posted on 10/8/22
Remember in the system of justice, the woman is always lying until proven otherwise. It is the duty of the people to keep giving her abuse until a decision has been made. Do not just assume that she will be found to be telling the truth.
It is just how our justice system works and should be respected.
posted on 10/8/22
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 11 minutes ago
I see some have learned very little from depp v heard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think that anyone has presumed that Giggs is guilty here. But we know what he has done in the past and that is enough to conclude that he isn't a particularly nice person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depp v Heard was a defamation case where the plaintiff (Depp) was seeking damages (think it was something like $100).
The Giggs case is being considered under the Serious Crime Act (coercive behaviour) and the Criminal Justice Act (assault) which is completely different to US defamation laws/requirements. Its' like trying to compare rugby to football as both are field sports.
posted on 10/8/22
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 11 minutes ago
I see some have learned very little from depp v heard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think that anyone has presumed that Giggs is guilty here. But we know what he has done in the past and that is enough to conclude that he isn't a particularly nice person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depp v Heard was a defamation case where the plaintiff (Depp) was seeking damages (think it was something like $100).
The Giggs case is being considered under the Serious Crime Act (coercive behaviour) and the Criminal Justice Act (assault) which is completely different to US defamation laws/requirements. Its' like trying to compare rugby to football as both are field sports.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparing rugby and serious criminal charges is absolutely ridiculous. One you have to have loads of money to get into, the other you have to have loads of money to get out of.
posted on 10/8/22
He will prob be thought of in a similar way to george best. he will be remembered for his stuff on the field rather than being a poor human off it
posted on 10/8/22
didnt betray his brother atleast
posted on 10/8/22
Giggs is going down.
posted on 10/8/22
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 hours, 18 minutes ago
I see some have learned very little from depp v heard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably not the best example to use given the unsealed documents that came out last week showed Depp to be quite awful himself.
I actually have no idea how Heard lost the trial after reading those.
posted on 10/8/22
comment by HarlequinHebdo (U16981)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
Giggs is going down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On his sister in law
posted on 10/8/22
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 hours, 18 minutes ago
I see some have learned very little from depp v heard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably not the best example to use given the unsealed documents that came out last week showed Depp to be quite awful himself.
I actually have no idea how Heard lost the trial after reading those.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have seen bits, but not really paid much attention. What in particular are the worst bits.
posted on 10/8/22
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 2 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 hours, 18 minutes ago
I see some have learned very little from depp v heard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably not the best example to use given the unsealed documents that came out last week showed Depp to be quite awful himself.
I actually have no idea how Heard lost the trial after reading those.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was very clear why she lost. Because she painted herself as victim when she was not.
posted on 10/8/22
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 5 hours, 28 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 11 minutes ago
I see some have learned very little from depp v heard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think that anyone has presumed that Giggs is guilty here. But we know what he has done in the past and that is enough to conclude that he isn't a particularly nice person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably accurate. Dont think he's going for mother Theresa of the year tho.
posted on 10/8/22
Mother Teresa was a monster.
posted on 10/8/22
I think both cases (including the 2018 UK Supreme Court Judgement) found it was a toxic relationship with both parties demonstrating varying levels of abuse towards each other.
posted on 10/8/22
comment by What would Stuart Pearce do? Who do you think you are kidding Mr.... (U3126)
posted 26 seconds ago
I think both cases (including the 2018 UK Supreme Court Judgement) found it was a toxic relationship with both parties demonstrating varying levels of abuse towards each other.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Depp/Heard.
posted on 10/8/22
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 27 minutes ago
Mother Teresa was a monster.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She could have learnt a lot from Mendy.
posted on 10/8/22
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 1 hour, 52 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Rude Van Nist (U22799)
posted 3 hours, 18 minutes ago
I see some have learned very little from depp v heard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably not the best example to use given the unsealed documents that came out last week showed Depp to be quite awful himself.
I actually have no idea how Heard lost the trial after reading those.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have seen bits, but not really paid much attention. What in particular are the worst bits.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good thread on it with the documents:
https://twitter.com/cocainecross/status/1553506807766663169?t=ZsqcGCXALg-7zI6_KL_bXQ&s=19
Highlights:
- Depp wanted to use naked photos of Heard in the trial to embarrass her
- text messages where he admits kicking her
- doctored photos
- doctored audio
- his lawyer threatened a witness into a pre-written agreement that the witness saw no injuries on Heard
- he admitted that Heard caused him no injuries
- he had evidence Heard turned down $16m from their marriage despite lawyers telling her it was legally hers
posted on 10/8/22
There is a video kicking about of Amber Heards sister being interviewed and it's well worth a watch.
Whole family is clearly bonkers
posted on 10/8/22
comment by Elvis: King of Cult (U7425)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 27 minutes ago
Mother Teresa was a monster.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She could have learnt a lot from Mendy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She was known as Mama Giggsy in Calcutta.
Page 6 of 8
6 | 7 | 8