defo got away with one yesterday but these incidents always stick in my mind:
Goal given:
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/05/01/article-1382147-0BDA805000000578-737_634x422.jpg
No card:
https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2013/09/28/18/torres_vertonghen.jpg?quality=75&width=640&auto=webp
Not over the line at Old Trafford:
https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2017/02/16/15/pedromendesgaol05a.jpg?width=1200
We didn’t really get the rub of the green. They added on 6 minutes for a load of subs , a drinks break, goals, and five mins beef after the first goal. Should have been minimum 13 mins. Closer to 15. So actually we got facked over and could have gone on to win
Fack chelsea
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
defo got away with one yesterday but these incidents always stick in my mind:
Goal given:
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/05/01/article-1382147-0BDA805000000578-737_634x422.jpg
No card:
https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2013/09/28/18/torres_vertonghen.jpg?quality=75&width=640&auto=webp
Not over the line at Old Trafford:
https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2017/02/16/15/pedromendesgaol05a.jpg?width=1200
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Torres got sent off for that middle one
comment by Chronic - THFC North London's finest (U3423)
posted 5 minutes ago
We didn’t really get the rub of the green. They added on 6 minutes for a load of subs , a drinks break, goals, and five mins beef after the first goal. Should have been minimum 13 mins. Closer to 15. So actually we got facked over and could have gone on to win
Fack chelsea
----------------------------------------------------------------------
👍
Tuchel should have been sent off too for running out of his area, second yellow
comment by Chronic - THFC North London's finest (U3423)
posted 18 minutes ago
We didn’t really get the rub of the green. They added on 6 minutes for a load of subs , a drinks break, goals, and five mins beef after the first goal. Should have been minimum 13 mins. Closer to 15. So actually we got facked over and could have gone on to win
Fack chelsea
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you can take a hypothetical injustice i.e. less extra time with which to win, and put it next to actual injustices.
But yes I wholeheartedly agree, fack Chelsea.
Absolutely loved the fact it was Chelsea, it was an underserved point, the hair pull and Tuchel was a complete nob running down the touch line when they made it 2-1
Didn’t realise he had that in him but our equaliser gave me so much satisfaction cos of it
I’ve not watched it back yet so still not sure what actually happened after the game and who’s fault that was but going on his behaviour before it looked like Tuchel was the instigator
Fack Chelsea
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
defo got away with one yesterday but these incidents always stick in my mind:
Goal given:
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/05/01/article-1382147-0BDA805000000578-737_634x422.jpg
No card:
https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2013/09/28/18/torres_vertonghen.jpg?quality=75&width=640&auto=webp
Not over the line at Old Trafford:
https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2017/02/16/15/pedromendesgaol05a.jpg?width=1200
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Torres got sent off for that middle one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty certain he didn't and got no retrospective ban.
comment by Big Deki Energy (U3338)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
defo got away with one yesterday but these incidents always stick in my mind:
Goal given:
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/05/01/article-1382147-0BDA805000000578-737_634x422.jpg
No card:
https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2013/09/28/18/torres_vertonghen.jpg?quality=75&width=640&auto=webp
Not over the line at Old Trafford:
https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2017/02/16/15/pedromendesgaol05a.jpg?width=1200
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Torres got sent off for that middle one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty certain he didn't and got no retrospective ban.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Torres was sent off in that game, but not for the first half face gouging incident!
There's getting the rub of the green, which spurs got in a few games in the run in last year, and getting lots of key things fall your way in a game the opponent bossed.
I hate arsenal so was glad spurs got lucky in a few key games in the run in, and Chelsea should've had 3-4 goals easily so got themselves to blame, but been ages since I saw some key decisions handled so strangely by the ref.
Least Billy can st fu about Liverpool and VAR now once and for all 😂
Yeh in that game when the ball never crossed the line, Chelsea's other goal was clearly offside also, so we would have won 1-0 instead of a 2-1 defeat.
There was another Chelsea goal that never crossed the line in a cup semi at Wembley also
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 32 minutes ago
There's getting the rub of the green, which spurs got in a few games in the run in last year, and getting lots of key things fall your way in a game the opponent bossed.
I hate arsenal so was glad spurs got lucky in a few key games in the run in, and Chelsea should've had 3-4 goals easily so got themselves to blame, but been ages since I saw some key decisions handled so strangely by the ref.
Least Billy can st fu about Liverpool and VAR now once and for all 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh stop following the 606 Spurs hating idiots. I'd say Romero should have been a foul and whatever card, but apart from that I honestly don't think the ref got alot wrong, and if he did then they were hardly shockers.
Chelsea should be concentrating on Jorginho giving the ball in his own box and the poor marking for the goal from the corner. Much easier to blame the ref rather than themselves.
The have literally cheated to become the club they are now, so seeing fans and 606 haters cry isa drop in the ocean.
Spurs have had plenty in their favour over the years.
Perhaps the real difference is that at 2-1 down away at Chelsea, your team now has the self belief and ability to actually create situations where you can benefit from good fortune.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Spurs have had plenty in their favour over the years.
Perhaps the real difference is that at 2-1 down away at Chelsea, your team now has the self belief and ability to actually create situations where you can benefit from good fortune.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Compared to Varpool & Penited we have had next to nothing in our favour over the years, one missed hair pull won't change that.
Anyway, to all those bleating about Romero should have been sent off, did they not see Cucarella deliberately stand on Romero's knee, when he could have easily avoided it, or does that not fit into the narrative.
Fact is, had Cucarella been sent off for a deliberate stamp like he should have been, the hair pull would never have happened.
Anyway, with such a stupid haircut he deserves to have it pulled.
comment by ●Billy The Spur● 20*21*22* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Spurs have had plenty in their favour over the years.
Perhaps the real difference is that at 2-1 down away at Chelsea, your team now has the self belief and ability to actually create situations where you can benefit from good fortune.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Compared to Varpool & Penited we have had next to nothing in our favour over the years, one missed hair pull won't change that.
Anyway, to all those bleating about Romero should have been sent off, did they not see Cucarella deliberately stand on Romero's knee, when he could have easily avoided it, or does that not fit into the narrative.
Fact is, had Cucarella been sent off for a deliberate stamp like he should have been, the hair pull would never have happened.
Anyway, with such a stupid haircut he deserves to have it pulled.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s interesting you chose to use the word ‘bleating’ when referring to others.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 31 minutes ago
Spurs have had plenty in their favour over the years.
Perhaps the real difference is that at 2-1 down away at Chelsea, your team now has the self belief and ability to actually create situations where you can benefit from good fortune.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair point
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 15 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by Big Deki Energy (U3338)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
defo got away with one yesterday but these incidents always stick in my mind:
Goal given:
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/05/01/article-1382147-0BDA805000000578-737_634x422.jpg
No card:
https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2013/09/28/18/torres_vertonghen.jpg?quality=75&width=640&auto=webp
Not over the line at Old Trafford:
https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2017/02/16/15/pedromendesgaol05a.jpg?width=1200
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Torres got sent off for that middle one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty certain he didn't and got no retrospective ban.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Torres was sent off in that game, but not for the first half face gouging incident!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was he? I’ve got a feeling he went on to score the winner?
comment by ●Billy The Spur● 20*21*22* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 14 hours, 54 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Spurs have had plenty in their favour over the years.
Perhaps the real difference is that at 2-1 down away at Chelsea, your team now has the self belief and ability to actually create situations where you can benefit from good fortune.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Compared to Varpool & Penited we have had next to nothing in our favour over the years, one missed hair pull won't change that.
Anyway, to all those bleating about Romero should have been sent off, did they not see Cucarella deliberately stand on Romero's knee, when he could have easily avoided it, or does that not fit into the narrative.
Fact is, had Cucarella been sent off for a deliberate stamp like he should have been, the hair pull would never have happened.
Anyway, with such a stupid haircut he deserves to have it pulled.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not to mention all his let's try and pushing and shoving Romero all over the place at corners, whilst not even looking in the direction of the ball. I mean come on deliberate and blatant blocking off is not in the rules of football, he is a foot shorter and about 2 stone lighter and picks on one of hardest CB's in the modern game. I mean, if you were 5 foot nothing, would you try and go up against Romero ?
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Refreshing change!!
Page 1 of 1
posted on 15/8/22
defo got away with one yesterday but these incidents always stick in my mind:
Goal given:
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/05/01/article-1382147-0BDA805000000578-737_634x422.jpg
No card:
https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2013/09/28/18/torres_vertonghen.jpg?quality=75&width=640&auto=webp
Not over the line at Old Trafford:
https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2017/02/16/15/pedromendesgaol05a.jpg?width=1200
posted on 15/8/22
We didn’t really get the rub of the green. They added on 6 minutes for a load of subs , a drinks break, goals, and five mins beef after the first goal. Should have been minimum 13 mins. Closer to 15. So actually we got facked over and could have gone on to win
Fack chelsea
posted on 15/8/22
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
defo got away with one yesterday but these incidents always stick in my mind:
Goal given:
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/05/01/article-1382147-0BDA805000000578-737_634x422.jpg
No card:
https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2013/09/28/18/torres_vertonghen.jpg?quality=75&width=640&auto=webp
Not over the line at Old Trafford:
https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2017/02/16/15/pedromendesgaol05a.jpg?width=1200
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Torres got sent off for that middle one
posted on 15/8/22
comment by Chronic - THFC North London's finest (U3423)
posted 5 minutes ago
We didn’t really get the rub of the green. They added on 6 minutes for a load of subs , a drinks break, goals, and five mins beef after the first goal. Should have been minimum 13 mins. Closer to 15. So actually we got facked over and could have gone on to win
Fack chelsea
----------------------------------------------------------------------
👍
posted on 15/8/22
Tuchel should have been sent off too for running out of his area, second yellow
posted on 15/8/22
comment by Chronic - THFC North London's finest (U3423)
posted 18 minutes ago
We didn’t really get the rub of the green. They added on 6 minutes for a load of subs , a drinks break, goals, and five mins beef after the first goal. Should have been minimum 13 mins. Closer to 15. So actually we got facked over and could have gone on to win
Fack chelsea
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think you can take a hypothetical injustice i.e. less extra time with which to win, and put it next to actual injustices.
But yes I wholeheartedly agree, fack Chelsea.
posted on 15/8/22
Absolutely loved the fact it was Chelsea, it was an underserved point, the hair pull and Tuchel was a complete nob running down the touch line when they made it 2-1
Didn’t realise he had that in him but our equaliser gave me so much satisfaction cos of it
I’ve not watched it back yet so still not sure what actually happened after the game and who’s fault that was but going on his behaviour before it looked like Tuchel was the instigator
Fack Chelsea
posted on 15/8/22
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
defo got away with one yesterday but these incidents always stick in my mind:
Goal given:
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/05/01/article-1382147-0BDA805000000578-737_634x422.jpg
No card:
https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2013/09/28/18/torres_vertonghen.jpg?quality=75&width=640&auto=webp
Not over the line at Old Trafford:
https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2017/02/16/15/pedromendesgaol05a.jpg?width=1200
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Torres got sent off for that middle one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty certain he didn't and got no retrospective ban.
posted on 15/8/22
comment by Big Deki Energy (U3338)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
defo got away with one yesterday but these incidents always stick in my mind:
Goal given:
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/05/01/article-1382147-0BDA805000000578-737_634x422.jpg
No card:
https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2013/09/28/18/torres_vertonghen.jpg?quality=75&width=640&auto=webp
Not over the line at Old Trafford:
https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2017/02/16/15/pedromendesgaol05a.jpg?width=1200
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Torres got sent off for that middle one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty certain he didn't and got no retrospective ban.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Torres was sent off in that game, but not for the first half face gouging incident!
posted on 15/8/22
There's getting the rub of the green, which spurs got in a few games in the run in last year, and getting lots of key things fall your way in a game the opponent bossed.
I hate arsenal so was glad spurs got lucky in a few key games in the run in, and Chelsea should've had 3-4 goals easily so got themselves to blame, but been ages since I saw some key decisions handled so strangely by the ref.
Least Billy can st fu about Liverpool and VAR now once and for all 😂
posted on 15/8/22
Yeh in that game when the ball never crossed the line, Chelsea's other goal was clearly offside also, so we would have won 1-0 instead of a 2-1 defeat.
There was another Chelsea goal that never crossed the line in a cup semi at Wembley also
posted on 15/8/22
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 32 minutes ago
There's getting the rub of the green, which spurs got in a few games in the run in last year, and getting lots of key things fall your way in a game the opponent bossed.
I hate arsenal so was glad spurs got lucky in a few key games in the run in, and Chelsea should've had 3-4 goals easily so got themselves to blame, but been ages since I saw some key decisions handled so strangely by the ref.
Least Billy can st fu about Liverpool and VAR now once and for all 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh stop following the 606 Spurs hating idiots. I'd say Romero should have been a foul and whatever card, but apart from that I honestly don't think the ref got alot wrong, and if he did then they were hardly shockers.
Chelsea should be concentrating on Jorginho giving the ball in his own box and the poor marking for the goal from the corner. Much easier to blame the ref rather than themselves.
The have literally cheated to become the club they are now, so seeing fans and 606 haters cry isa drop in the ocean.
posted on 15/8/22
Spurs have had plenty in their favour over the years.
Perhaps the real difference is that at 2-1 down away at Chelsea, your team now has the self belief and ability to actually create situations where you can benefit from good fortune.
posted on 15/8/22
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Spurs have had plenty in their favour over the years.
Perhaps the real difference is that at 2-1 down away at Chelsea, your team now has the self belief and ability to actually create situations where you can benefit from good fortune.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Compared to Varpool & Penited we have had next to nothing in our favour over the years, one missed hair pull won't change that.
Anyway, to all those bleating about Romero should have been sent off, did they not see Cucarella deliberately stand on Romero's knee, when he could have easily avoided it, or does that not fit into the narrative.
Fact is, had Cucarella been sent off for a deliberate stamp like he should have been, the hair pull would never have happened.
Anyway, with such a stupid haircut he deserves to have it pulled.
posted on 15/8/22
comment by ●Billy The Spur● 20*21*22* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Spurs have had plenty in their favour over the years.
Perhaps the real difference is that at 2-1 down away at Chelsea, your team now has the self belief and ability to actually create situations where you can benefit from good fortune.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Compared to Varpool & Penited we have had next to nothing in our favour over the years, one missed hair pull won't change that.
Anyway, to all those bleating about Romero should have been sent off, did they not see Cucarella deliberately stand on Romero's knee, when he could have easily avoided it, or does that not fit into the narrative.
Fact is, had Cucarella been sent off for a deliberate stamp like he should have been, the hair pull would never have happened.
Anyway, with such a stupid haircut he deserves to have it pulled.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s interesting you chose to use the word ‘bleating’ when referring to others.
posted on 15/8/22
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 31 minutes ago
Spurs have had plenty in their favour over the years.
Perhaps the real difference is that at 2-1 down away at Chelsea, your team now has the self belief and ability to actually create situations where you can benefit from good fortune.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fair point
posted on 16/8/22
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 15 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by Big Deki Energy (U3338)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 1 hour, 13 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 minute ago
defo got away with one yesterday but these incidents always stick in my mind:
Goal given:
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/05/01/article-1382147-0BDA805000000578-737_634x422.jpg
No card:
https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2013/09/28/18/torres_vertonghen.jpg?quality=75&width=640&auto=webp
Not over the line at Old Trafford:
https://static.standard.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2017/02/16/15/pedromendesgaol05a.jpg?width=1200
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Torres got sent off for that middle one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty certain he didn't and got no retrospective ban.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Torres was sent off in that game, but not for the first half face gouging incident!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was he? I’ve got a feeling he went on to score the winner?
posted on 16/8/22
comment by ●Billy The Spur● 20*21*22* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 14 hours, 54 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Spurs have had plenty in their favour over the years.
Perhaps the real difference is that at 2-1 down away at Chelsea, your team now has the self belief and ability to actually create situations where you can benefit from good fortune.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Compared to Varpool & Penited we have had next to nothing in our favour over the years, one missed hair pull won't change that.
Anyway, to all those bleating about Romero should have been sent off, did they not see Cucarella deliberately stand on Romero's knee, when he could have easily avoided it, or does that not fit into the narrative.
Fact is, had Cucarella been sent off for a deliberate stamp like he should have been, the hair pull would never have happened.
Anyway, with such a stupid haircut he deserves to have it pulled.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not to mention all his let's try and pushing and shoving Romero all over the place at corners, whilst not even looking in the direction of the ball. I mean come on deliberate and blatant blocking off is not in the rules of football, he is a foot shorter and about 2 stone lighter and picks on one of hardest CB's in the modern game. I mean, if you were 5 foot nothing, would you try and go up against Romero ?
Page 1 of 1