There must be countless examples on here of Jonty mocking many people for daring to contradict without irrefutable evidence to back it up.

The double standards and hypocrisy of a man that pretends to value integrity is limitless.

comment by Jonty (U4614)
posted 2 hours ago
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Jonty (U4614)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 14 seconds ago
"The 23-year-old joins for an undisclosed fee and has penned a five-year deal at Elland Road, running until the summer of 2027."

So he had a five year contract but we don't own him....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a loan at this point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not.

I've literally quoted the club website where it says he has signed a five year contract after being signed by the club.

Originally they were going to let him go out on loan but we have bought him as per all reports of his signing

So provide your proof now or admit you are wrong
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you think I would say it?

Do you think I just made it up to say it and get slaughtered?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you made a mistake and assumed that it was a loan deal because that what was originally reported as being an option when we first looked to sign him.

I think assumption led you to believe that deal was what was signed without double checking first and now you are too proud to admit you are wrong.

So you double down without proof, in a way, that as faith points out, you would mock other people for.

From everything I've read since the summer, we signed
Tyler permanently on a 5-year deal. As someone else
said earlier, he's been great. Probably our best player.

Not sure where the loan reports came from? Unless
Jonty's got some insider news?

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/tyler-adams/profil/spieler/332705

comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 5 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by Jonty (U4614)
posted 2 hours ago
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Jonty (U4614)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 14 seconds ago
"The 23-year-old joins for an undisclosed fee and has penned a five-year deal at Elland Road, running until the summer of 2027."

So he had a five year contract but we don't own him....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a loan at this point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not.

I've literally quoted the club website where it says he has signed a five year contract after being signed by the club.

Originally they were going to let him go out on loan but we have bought him as per all reports of his signing

So provide your proof now or admit you are wrong
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you think I would say it?

Do you think I just made it up to say it and get slaughtered?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you made a mistake and assumed that it was a loan deal because that what was originally reported as being an option when we first looked to sign him.

I think assumption led you to believe that deal was what was signed without double checking first and now you are too proud to admit you are wrong.

So you double down without proof, in a way, that as faith points out, you would mock other people for.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't made any assumption.

I was told just before the Chelsea game.

All sorts of people get all sorts of info here or there, these don't come with certificates of authenticity.

If you choose not to believe it, that's up to you, I can only share what I heard, some people take a value from that, others choose not to, it makes no odds to me really.

comment by Jonty (U4614)
posted 4 hours, 4 minutes ago
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 5 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by Jonty (U4614)
posted 2 hours ago
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Jonty (U4614)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 14 seconds ago
"The 23-year-old joins for an undisclosed fee and has penned a five-year deal at Elland Road, running until the summer of 2027."

So he had a five year contract but we don't own him....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a loan at this point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not.

I've literally quoted the club website where it says he has signed a five year contract after being signed by the club.

Originally they were going to let him go out on loan but we have bought him as per all reports of his signing

So provide your proof now or admit you are wrong
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you think I would say it?

Do you think I just made it up to say it and get slaughtered?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you made a mistake and assumed that it was a loan deal because that what was originally reported as being an option when we first looked to sign him.

I think assumption led you to believe that deal was what was signed without double checking first and now you are too proud to admit you are wrong.

So you double down without proof, in a way, that as faith points out, you would mock other people for.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't made any assumption.

I was told just before the Chelsea game.

All sorts of people get all sorts of info here or there, these don't come with certificates of authenticity.

If you choose not to believe it, that's up to you, I can only share what I heard, some people take a value from that, others choose not to, it makes no odds to me really.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And do you believe everything you are told Jonty?

I think you need to question why the club announced on 6th July that he had "joined for an undisclosed fee and has penned a five-year deal at Elland Road, running until the summer of 2027".
If you look at Leipzig's web site it says "Another transfer has been completed. Tyler Adams has left RB Leipzig after three and a half years to sign for Premier League club Leeds United with immediate effect".

Though Wiki is not the most reliable of sources, they list 12 Leipzig players, including compatriot Caden Clark, Adams name is not mentioned.

Your assertion does seem very far fetched.

In other news, Adams is being monitored by Man Utd. Could do us a huge favour if we go down and have to jetison players.

comment by Elsbels - El Jugador (U21658)
posted 7 hours, 33 minutes ago
comment by Jonty (U4614)
posted 4 hours, 4 minutes ago
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 5 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by Jonty (U4614)
posted 2 hours ago
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Jonty (U4614)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 14 seconds ago
"The 23-year-old joins for an undisclosed fee and has penned a five-year deal at Elland Road, running until the summer of 2027."

So he had a five year contract but we don't own him....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a loan at this point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not.

I've literally quoted the club website where it says he has signed a five year contract after being signed by the club.

Originally they were going to let him go out on loan but we have bought him as per all reports of his signing

So provide your proof now or admit you are wrong
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you think I would say it?

Do you think I just made it up to say it and get slaughtered?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you made a mistake and assumed that it was a loan deal because that what was originally reported as being an option when we first looked to sign him.

I think assumption led you to believe that deal was what was signed without double checking first and now you are too proud to admit you are wrong.

So you double down without proof, in a way, that as faith points out, you would mock other people for.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't made any assumption.

I was told just before the Chelsea game.

All sorts of people get all sorts of info here or there, these don't come with certificates of authenticity.

If you choose not to believe it, that's up to you, I can only share what I heard, some people take a value from that, others choose not to, it makes no odds to me really.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And do you believe everything you are told Jonty?

I think you need to question why the club announced on 6th July that he had "joined for an undisclosed fee and has penned a five-year deal at Elland Road, running until the summer of 2027".
If you look at Leipzig's web site it says "Another transfer has been completed. Tyler Adams has left RB Leipzig after three and a half years to sign for Premier League club Leeds United with immediate effect".

Though Wiki is not the most reliable of sources, they list 12 Leipzig players, including compatriot Caden Clark, Adams name is not mentioned.

Your assertion does seem very far fetched.

In other news, Adams is being monitored by Man Utd. Could do us a huge favour if we go down and have to jetison players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not my assertion, it's the agent's.

Is it as far fetched as saying we don't owe anything for JKA?

Is it as far fetched as saying Bielsa signed 2 year deal for us when in fact he only ever signs one year deals?

Is it as far fetched as calling Bamford an experienced international, or Firpo world class?

The club "spins" all over the place.

I believe my source, no problem if you don't.

There’s spin and there’s accounting fraud. Leipzig and Leeds aren’t just going to lie about a transfer being permanent when it’s a loan.

comment by Jonty (U4614)
posted 14 hours, 14 minutes ago
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 5 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by Jonty (U4614)
posted 2 hours ago
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 27 minutes ago
comment by Jonty (U4614)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Mattyp (U8926)
posted 14 seconds ago
"The 23-year-old joins for an undisclosed fee and has penned a five-year deal at Elland Road, running until the summer of 2027."

So he had a five year contract but we don't own him....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s a loan at this point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not.

I've literally quoted the club website where it says he has signed a five year contract after being signed by the club.

Originally they were going to let him go out on loan but we have bought him as per all reports of his signing

So provide your proof now or admit you are wrong
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you think I would say it?

Do you think I just made it up to say it and get slaughtered?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you made a mistake and assumed that it was a loan deal because that what was originally reported as being an option when we first looked to sign him.

I think assumption led you to believe that deal was what was signed without double checking first and now you are too proud to admit you are wrong.

So you double down without proof, in a way, that as faith points out, you would mock other people for.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't made any assumption.

I was told just before the Chelsea game.

All sorts of people get all sorts of info here or there, these don't come with certificates of authenticity.

If you choose not to believe it, that's up to you, I can only share what I heard, some people take a value from that, others choose not to, it makes no odds to me really.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've literally stating that you have assumed what some agent has told you is correct.