I think they should cancelol suspensions for straight reds and I know it has been talked about dalot but wiping yellows after a certain period of time or everyone would just end up suspended.
Since when has it been a 2 game ban for 5 yellows?
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 53 seconds ago
Since when has it been a 2 game ban for 5 yellows?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Read it again
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
Since when has it been a 2 game ban for 5 yellows?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It isn't he's allowed play tonight but not on Sunday. It was the opposite for Cancelo despite both picking up their cards in the league.
It makes sense because it benefits Manchester City and not Manchester United.
I've been saying it for years now: any slight advantage the FA/referees/VAR can give to Pep and City, they do it right away.
They're the luckiest team I've seen under Guardiola.... bailed out time and time again by the powers that be.
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 15 seconds ago
It makes sense because it benefits Manchester City and not Manchester United.
I've been saying it for years now: any slight advantage the FA/referees/VAR can give to Pep and City, they do it right away.
They're the luckiest team I've seen under Guardiola.... bailed out time and time again by the powers that be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop with the nonsense. It was clearly a rule that was in before this week.
My point is that it's ridiculous rule.
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 15 seconds ago
It makes sense because it benefits Manchester City and not Manchester United.
I've been saying it for years now: any slight advantage the FA/referees/VAR can give to Pep and City, they do it right away.
They're the luckiest team I've seen under Guardiola.... bailed out time and time again by the powers that be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop with the nonsense. It was clearly a rule that was in before this week.
My point is that it's ridiculous rule.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
THere is no nonsense Process.
City won the title in '21 instead of us because of the referees.
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 2 minutes ago
It makes sense because it benefits Manchester City and not Manchester United.
I've been saying it for years now: any slight advantage the FA/referees/VAR can give to Pep and City, they do it right away.
They're the luckiest team I've seen under Guardiola.... bailed out time and time again by the powers that be.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This sounds like a typical spurs fan comment 😂
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 15 seconds ago
It makes sense because it benefits Manchester City and not Manchester United.
I've been saying it for years now: any slight advantage the FA/referees/VAR can give to Pep and City, they do it right away.
They're the luckiest team I've seen under Guardiola.... bailed out time and time again by the powers that be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop with the nonsense. It was clearly a rule that was in before this week.
My point is that it's ridiculous rule.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
THere is no nonsense Process.
City won the title in '21 instead of us because of the referees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed, I mean they gifted City all of those 12 extra points plus goal difference.
comment by Stewart Greacen (U1734)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 53 seconds ago
Since when has it been a 2 game ban for 5 yellows?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Read it again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I misread it
Must be because Dalot’s was on Sunday
Stupid rule. The FA would have specifically chosen to make it that way rather than it being like that by default surely?
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 seconds ago
Must be because Dalot’s was on Sunday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardly. Seems like the ruling is that red cards carry over to the league cup but 5 yellows don't.
Maybe I can see the logic where it would stop players deliberately getting their 5th yellow card before a league cup game but it's still all a bit silly.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
Must be because Dalot’s was on Sunday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
surely, when it comes to the rules, every day is like sunday?
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 15 seconds ago
It makes sense because it benefits Manchester City and not Manchester United.
I've been saying it for years now: any slight advantage the FA/referees/VAR can give to Pep and City, they do it right away.
They're the luckiest team I've seen under Guardiola.... bailed out time and time again by the powers that be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop with the nonsense. It was clearly a rule that was in before this week.
My point is that it's ridiculous rule.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
THere is no nonsense Process.
City won the title in '21 instead of us because of the referees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed, I mean they gifted City all of those 12 extra points plus goal difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City in that season were given about 8 points due to VAR and offside goals. One of their goals against Villa was ruled offside AFTER the game had finished, and the EPL then changed the rules to ensure any goals scored in the same manner would be disallowed except City's stood and they won. They also got battered in that game and played off the Etihad pitch by Villa.
If you take those 8 points off of City into the final few weeks, we'd have won it with momentum and them bottling it.
The rule makes sense
If yellow card suspensions applied to EFL cup games, players would try to deliberately get themselves booked so that they don't miss any PL game
Poor united gonna have to rely on their £50m backup right back
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
Must be because Dalot’s was on Sunday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
surely, when it comes to the rules, every day is like sunday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Every day is silent and grey?
Analog
So what about players who didn’t deliberately get a yellow like Dalot? The suspension is there for players who get too many bookings, whether they purposely do it to miss non PL games is irrelevant.
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 45 minutes ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 15 seconds ago
It makes sense because it benefits Manchester City and not Manchester United.
I've been saying it for years now: any slight advantage the FA/referees/VAR can give to Pep and City, they do it right away.
They're the luckiest team I've seen under Guardiola.... bailed out time and time again by the powers that be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop with the nonsense. It was clearly a rule that was in before this week.
My point is that it's ridiculous rule.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
THere is no nonsense Process.
City won the title in '21 instead of us because of the referees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed, I mean they gifted City all of those 12 extra points plus goal difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City in that season were given about 8 points due to VAR and offside goals. One of their goals against Villa was ruled offside AFTER the game had finished, and the EPL then changed the rules to ensure any goals scored in the same manner would be disallowed except City's stood and they won. They also got battered in that game and played off the Etihad pitch by Villa.
If you take those 8 points off of City into the final few weeks, we'd have won it with momentum and them bottling it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 39 minutes ago
Analog
So what about players who didn’t deliberately get a yellow like Dalot? The suspension is there for players who get too many bookings, whether they purposely do it to miss non PL games is irrelevant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dalot was punished for accumulating too many yellow cards. To avoid a suspension, he should simply stop fouling so often
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 seconds ago
Must be because Dalot’s was on Sunday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardly. Seems like the ruling is that red cards carry over to the league cup but 5 yellows don't.
Maybe I can see the logic where it would stop players deliberately getting their 5th yellow card before a league cup game but it's still all a bit silly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
red card suspensions are for all dometic games ..... yellow card suspensions only apply to the competition they are handed out in ??
its done this way so that you cannot get a ban for multiple yellows over different competitions. I assume anyway?
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 45 minutes ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 15 seconds ago
It makes sense because it benefits Manchester City and not Manchester United.
I've been saying it for years now: any slight advantage the FA/referees/VAR can give to Pep and City, they do it right away.
They're the luckiest team I've seen under Guardiola.... bailed out time and time again by the powers that be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop with the nonsense. It was clearly a rule that was in before this week.
My point is that it's ridiculous rule.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
THere is no nonsense Process.
City won the title in '21 instead of us because of the referees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed, I mean they gifted City all of those 12 extra points plus goal difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City in that season were given about 8 points due to VAR and offside goals. One of their goals against Villa was ruled offside AFTER the game had finished, and the EPL then changed the rules to ensure any goals scored in the same manner would be disallowed except City's stood and they won. They also got battered in that game and played off the Etihad pitch by Villa.
If you take those 8 points off of City into the final few weeks, we'd have won it with momentum and them bottling it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
if you take the 8 points off them they would have lost the league with a 4 point lead
Sign in if you want to comment
Ridiculous suspension rules. Cancelo/Dalot
Page 1 of 2
posted on 10/11/22
I think they should cancelol suspensions for straight reds and I know it has been talked about dalot but wiping yellows after a certain period of time or everyone would just end up suspended.
posted on 10/11/22
Since when has it been a 2 game ban for 5 yellows?
posted on 10/11/22
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 53 seconds ago
Since when has it been a 2 game ban for 5 yellows?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Read it again
posted on 10/11/22
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 minute ago
Since when has it been a 2 game ban for 5 yellows?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It isn't he's allowed play tonight but not on Sunday. It was the opposite for Cancelo despite both picking up their cards in the league.
posted on 10/11/22
It makes sense because it benefits Manchester City and not Manchester United.
I've been saying it for years now: any slight advantage the FA/referees/VAR can give to Pep and City, they do it right away.
They're the luckiest team I've seen under Guardiola.... bailed out time and time again by the powers that be.
posted on 10/11/22
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 15 seconds ago
It makes sense because it benefits Manchester City and not Manchester United.
I've been saying it for years now: any slight advantage the FA/referees/VAR can give to Pep and City, they do it right away.
They're the luckiest team I've seen under Guardiola.... bailed out time and time again by the powers that be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop with the nonsense. It was clearly a rule that was in before this week.
My point is that it's ridiculous rule.
posted on 10/11/22
It’s a daft rule.
posted on 10/11/22
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 15 seconds ago
It makes sense because it benefits Manchester City and not Manchester United.
I've been saying it for years now: any slight advantage the FA/referees/VAR can give to Pep and City, they do it right away.
They're the luckiest team I've seen under Guardiola.... bailed out time and time again by the powers that be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop with the nonsense. It was clearly a rule that was in before this week.
My point is that it's ridiculous rule.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
THere is no nonsense Process.
City won the title in '21 instead of us because of the referees.
posted on 10/11/22
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 2 minutes ago
It makes sense because it benefits Manchester City and not Manchester United.
I've been saying it for years now: any slight advantage the FA/referees/VAR can give to Pep and City, they do it right away.
They're the luckiest team I've seen under Guardiola.... bailed out time and time again by the powers that be.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This sounds like a typical spurs fan comment 😂
posted on 10/11/22
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 15 seconds ago
It makes sense because it benefits Manchester City and not Manchester United.
I've been saying it for years now: any slight advantage the FA/referees/VAR can give to Pep and City, they do it right away.
They're the luckiest team I've seen under Guardiola.... bailed out time and time again by the powers that be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop with the nonsense. It was clearly a rule that was in before this week.
My point is that it's ridiculous rule.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
THere is no nonsense Process.
City won the title in '21 instead of us because of the referees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed, I mean they gifted City all of those 12 extra points plus goal difference.
posted on 10/11/22
comment by Stewart Greacen (U1734)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 53 seconds ago
Since when has it been a 2 game ban for 5 yellows?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Read it again
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I misread it
posted on 10/11/22
Must be because Dalot’s was on Sunday
posted on 10/11/22
Stupid rule. The FA would have specifically chosen to make it that way rather than it being like that by default surely?
posted on 10/11/22
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 seconds ago
Must be because Dalot’s was on Sunday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardly. Seems like the ruling is that red cards carry over to the league cup but 5 yellows don't.
Maybe I can see the logic where it would stop players deliberately getting their 5th yellow card before a league cup game but it's still all a bit silly.
posted on 10/11/22
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
Must be because Dalot’s was on Sunday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
surely, when it comes to the rules, every day is like sunday?
posted on 10/11/22
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 15 seconds ago
It makes sense because it benefits Manchester City and not Manchester United.
I've been saying it for years now: any slight advantage the FA/referees/VAR can give to Pep and City, they do it right away.
They're the luckiest team I've seen under Guardiola.... bailed out time and time again by the powers that be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop with the nonsense. It was clearly a rule that was in before this week.
My point is that it's ridiculous rule.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
THere is no nonsense Process.
City won the title in '21 instead of us because of the referees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed, I mean they gifted City all of those 12 extra points plus goal difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City in that season were given about 8 points due to VAR and offside goals. One of their goals against Villa was ruled offside AFTER the game had finished, and the EPL then changed the rules to ensure any goals scored in the same manner would be disallowed except City's stood and they won. They also got battered in that game and played off the Etihad pitch by Villa.
If you take those 8 points off of City into the final few weeks, we'd have won it with momentum and them bottling it.
posted on 10/11/22
The rule makes sense
If yellow card suspensions applied to EFL cup games, players would try to deliberately get themselves booked so that they don't miss any PL game
posted on 10/11/22
Poor united gonna have to rely on their £50m backup right back
posted on 10/11/22
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
Must be because Dalot’s was on Sunday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
surely, when it comes to the rules, every day is like sunday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Every day is silent and grey?
posted on 10/11/22
Analog
So what about players who didn’t deliberately get a yellow like Dalot? The suspension is there for players who get too many bookings, whether they purposely do it to miss non PL games is irrelevant.
posted on 10/11/22
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 45 minutes ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 15 seconds ago
It makes sense because it benefits Manchester City and not Manchester United.
I've been saying it for years now: any slight advantage the FA/referees/VAR can give to Pep and City, they do it right away.
They're the luckiest team I've seen under Guardiola.... bailed out time and time again by the powers that be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop with the nonsense. It was clearly a rule that was in before this week.
My point is that it's ridiculous rule.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
THere is no nonsense Process.
City won the title in '21 instead of us because of the referees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed, I mean they gifted City all of those 12 extra points plus goal difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City in that season were given about 8 points due to VAR and offside goals. One of their goals against Villa was ruled offside AFTER the game had finished, and the EPL then changed the rules to ensure any goals scored in the same manner would be disallowed except City's stood and they won. They also got battered in that game and played off the Etihad pitch by Villa.
If you take those 8 points off of City into the final few weeks, we'd have won it with momentum and them bottling it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂
posted on 10/11/22
posted on 10/11/22
comment by manutd1982 (U6633)
posted 39 minutes ago
Analog
So what about players who didn’t deliberately get a yellow like Dalot? The suspension is there for players who get too many bookings, whether they purposely do it to miss non PL games is irrelevant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dalot was punished for accumulating too many yellow cards. To avoid a suspension, he should simply stop fouling so often
posted on 10/11/22
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 hour, 21 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 seconds ago
Must be because Dalot’s was on Sunday
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardly. Seems like the ruling is that red cards carry over to the league cup but 5 yellows don't.
Maybe I can see the logic where it would stop players deliberately getting their 5th yellow card before a league cup game but it's still all a bit silly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
red card suspensions are for all dometic games ..... yellow card suspensions only apply to the competition they are handed out in ??
its done this way so that you cannot get a ban for multiple yellows over different competitions. I assume anyway?
posted on 10/11/22
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 45 minutes ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 15 seconds ago
It makes sense because it benefits Manchester City and not Manchester United.
I've been saying it for years now: any slight advantage the FA/referees/VAR can give to Pep and City, they do it right away.
They're the luckiest team I've seen under Guardiola.... bailed out time and time again by the powers that be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop with the nonsense. It was clearly a rule that was in before this week.
My point is that it's ridiculous rule.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
THere is no nonsense Process.
City won the title in '21 instead of us because of the referees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed, I mean they gifted City all of those 12 extra points plus goal difference.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City in that season were given about 8 points due to VAR and offside goals. One of their goals against Villa was ruled offside AFTER the game had finished, and the EPL then changed the rules to ensure any goals scored in the same manner would be disallowed except City's stood and they won. They also got battered in that game and played off the Etihad pitch by Villa.
If you take those 8 points off of City into the final few weeks, we'd have won it with momentum and them bottling it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
if you take the 8 points off them they would have lost the league with a 4 point lead
Page 1 of 2