comment by SimonB (U22811)
posted 3 hours, 4 minutes ago
Always a big mystery ( and irritation ) to me as to why Spurs are the only PL club where everyone is leaving or needs to be held onto.

Just about every segment on Sky Sports involves some non entity telling us Kane needs to go, or they need to hold onto Conte. Then the , well if they lose Son they are in trouble.

Then you come on places like here, and all we see are comments from people who know even less than the idiots on Sky, sprouting on about Kane leaving, or Kane needs to win this or that or he will walk.

Apart from the obvious Media narrative, coupled with the fans who continually fall for that narrative, everyone needs to understand how contractual law works.

Kane is under contract until 2024. Levy has the power and, put simply, Kane, or Son can't just walk away just because they want to. Levy needs to agree to it.

I am fairly sure Sky have a very expensive legal team, but chose to ignore the basic principles of law and continually go with the "let's keep theorising, but in a way that sounds like it will happen"

I mean, does it not occur to people that it is a bit strange that nobody is looking to move from any other team, according the the daily tittle tattle given out by the media ?

The like of Merson must be laughing his head off at this constant Spurs / Kane / Conte narrative. Some of which he personally has stoked up for obvious reasons.



----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a mystery to you as it's not true. All clubs apart from those with high wages and who compete for trophies have this. Liverpool were the same before competing for and winning several trophies(Coutinho, Suarez, Torres etc.)

There's always only two or three in the league when this is not the case. When you have a top player and he's not winning trophies then there will be at the very least speculation. This is not limited to Spurs.

comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
I think the ship has sailed on Kane leaving Spurs. I don't see him going to Spain and he would only leave Spurs for City where he's guaranteed trophies. Only other clubs that could afford him are United, Chelsea and Newcastle and he'll not move to any of those clubs who have around about the same chances as Spurs for lifting trophies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably agree there BUT adding Kanr to any of those clubs would certainly move them forward don't you think? throw in a few more signings that they could make and perhaps it changes their chances of winning something?

All guesswork to be fair and Harry might prefer to stay at Spurs anyway

comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm sorry! (U4388)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
I think the ship has sailed on Kane leaving Spurs. I don't see him going to Spain and he would only leave Spurs for City where he's guaranteed trophies. Only other clubs that could afford him are United, Chelsea and Newcastle and he'll not move to any of those clubs who have around about the same chances as Spurs for lifting trophies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably agree there BUT adding Kanr to any of those clubs would certainly move them forward don't you think? throw in a few more signings that they could make and perhaps it changes their chances of winning something?

All guesswork to be fair and Harry might prefer to stay at Spurs anyway
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Likewise Spurs signing a defence this summer would move Spurs closer. If Qatari investment comes in then the sky is the limit.

Outside of City it’s all just sideways moves in England

comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Bronze medal khunt 2022 - Buy..Bellingham and another mid 20s Thiago type...lets just call him "frank" (U18109)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm sorry! (U4388)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
I think the ship has sailed on Kane leaving Spurs. I don't see him going to Spain and he would only leave Spurs for City where he's guaranteed trophies. Only other clubs that could afford him are United, Chelsea and Newcastle and he'll not move to any of those clubs who have around about the same chances as Spurs for lifting trophies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably agree there BUT adding Kanr to any of those clubs would certainly move them forward don't you think? throw in a few more signings that they could make and perhaps it changes their chances of winning something?

All guesswork to be fair and Harry might prefer to stay at Spurs anyway
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Likewise Spurs signing a defence this summer would move Spurs closer. If Qatari investment comes in then the sky is the limit.

Outside of City it’s all just sideways moves in England
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No doubt but I was only really surmising on any possible Kane move, personally can't even see him moving but if he were to...........

Chelsea are eyeing poch for manager, could he go to them 🤔

Wouldn’t be mad if Kane went to Madrid, any other PL team and he can fack off

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

When Kane ends this season with no honours again, he will be level with Murray Wallace on Millwall Young Player of the Year awards.

I think it will be difficult for him to walk away with that milestone in mind.

Shee Shenyour

I can't see him leaving the PL, he has Shearer's prem goals record in his sights now.

You know for all our guesswork and assumption only really Kane and Spurs know what will happen, its fun to chat about it but it will be entirely down to them, just sometimes it must pash the fans off a tad not fully knowing whats going on?

It may all come down to the money.
100 Mil EU is Real's starting bid......
that will mean Levy has something like 200 Mil Eu in mind. If ENIC can get say 150 Mil EU for a 29 year old, they may well be tempted.
We all know ENIC, don't we.
And then, Harry has a say too. Maybe he'd like to win something worthwhile before he retires.
And the Real salary might be tempting too.
But as of this moment....its all rumor from the BBC.

comment by der kloppites Hi, wie geht es dir * (U13373)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
comment by SimonB (U22811)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
Always a big mystery ( and irritation ) to me as to why Spurs are the only PL club where everyone is leaving or needs to be held onto.

Just about every segment on Sky Sports involves some non entity telling us Kane needs to go, or they need to hold onto Conte. Then the , well if they lose Son they are in trouble.

Then you come on places like here, and all we see are comments from people who know even less than the idiots on Sky, sprouting on about Kane leaving, or Kane needs to win this or that or he will walk.

Apart from the obvious Media narrative, coupled with the fans who continually fall for that narrative, everyone needs to understand how contractual law works.

Kane is under contract until 2024. Levy has the power and, put simply, Kane, or Son can't just walk away just because they want to. Levy needs to agree to it.

I am fairly sure Sky have a very expensive legal team, but chose to ignore the basic principles of law and continually go with the "let's keep theorising, but in a way that sounds like it will happen"

I mean, does it not occur to people that it is a bit strange that nobody is looking to move from any other team, according the the daily tittle tattle given out by the media ?

The like of Merson must be laughing his head off at this constant Spurs / Kane / Conte narrative. Some of which he personally has stoked up for obvious reasons.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

So your saying there is an agenda against spurs , can’t see it tbf
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There is a narrative against Spurs but we do invite it, largely through lack of trophies and being Spursy over the years. If we got over the line and won something meaningful the narrative would change, but until then its Spurs also-rans, whose best players need to move to win stuff, whose owners aren't ambitious, who bottle the big moments.

comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 2 minutes ago
It may all come down to the money.
100 Mil EU is Real's starting bid......
that will mean Levy has something like 200 Mil Eu in mind. If ENIC can get say 150 Mil EU for a 29 year old, they may well be tempted.
We all know ENIC, don't we.
And then, Harry has a say too. Maybe he'd like to win something worthwhile before he retires.
And the Real salary might be tempting too.
But as of this moment....its all rumor from the BBC.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Kane is worth so much more than the transfer fee. He is the England Captain, an icon, will be the Country's highest scorer in history, one of our own. The prestige this brings the club is immense, boosting our status and also commercially hugely beneficial.

We will not sell. Levy would not dare and you can see from the efforts around European clubs this summer, there aint that many decent strikers out there.

No chance Kane leaves now, Ace has hit the nail on the head he wants to hit that scoring record. Not sure trophies are as high on his agenda as personal achievements and loyalty.

The more I think about it, the more I think this will be Kane's last season with Spurs. I can't see him signing a new contract, he wants to win things and will realize he won't do that under ENIC. Levy will have no option but to sell or risk losing him for free.

I can see the likes of Penited & Chelsea being in for him, they may be sideways steps at the moment but they will back their manager and build a competitive squad.

We will be worse off if Kane does leave, I can't see Levy replacing his output adequately.

comment by Ace (U22861)
posted 2 hours, 46 minutes ago
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 24 minutes ago
Imagine him trying to speak Spanish!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Coming from a Brummie ffs, you lot can barely speak English.

“Alroit skip dats busting dat is, tara fora bit!”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brummies don't speak like that. People from the Black Country however...... It's a common regional stereotype mistake. Like saying all southerners are cockneys.

I just can't see it tbh. RM have been deliberately focusing on bringing through the next generation of players in their signings it seems. Vinicius, Rodrygo, Militao, Camavinga, Tchouameni and even that 'wonderkid' Endrick. I know they're picked up Alaba and Rudiger on frees who are older. Even Hazard was only 28 when Chelsea took them to the cleaners.

Paying a huge fee for Kane would seem a departure from their current strategy imo. Especially if the rumoured interest in Bellingham is true.

I think there was a window for Kane to move but I don't think he will now. One club man would be my guess and the EPL scoring record secured.

StrikeMug - the thickest person you know - Bronze medal khunt in a 2 horse race - Buy..Bellingham and another mid 20s Thiago type...lets just call him a "khunt" (

That's fantastic that is Ace! Wow, you're my hero mate. I wish I was more like you and less of a complete khunt.

Absolutely no one is paying 100 mil for 29 yr old Kane, with one year left on his deal, thatk;s not a good deal for anyone involved.

comment by AFCISMYTEAM (U14931)
posted 3 minutes ago
Absolutely no one is paying 100 mil for 29 yr old Kane, with one year left on his deal, thatk;s not a good deal for anyone involved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Real paid Chelsea £150m for Hazard when he was 29. Not sure the length of his contract at the time.

Kane could play for Madrid for the next 5 years and secure them titles, Benzema isn’t getting any younger and they need a world class striker to replace him, could see it happening.

comment by LukaBrasi COYS (U22178)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by AFCISMYTEAM (U14931)
posted 3 minutes ago
Absolutely no one is paying 100 mil for 29 yr old Kane, with one year left on his deal, thatk;s not a good deal for anyone involved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Real paid Chelsea £150m for Hazard when he was 29. Not sure the length of his contract at the time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm sure he had more than a year left and also,look how that worked out, they won't be making that mistake again.

100% if Spurs don’t get CL this season he’s off in the summer. The lack of contract news is telling. Such a shame our owners are part of the problem as to why Harry has never truly had a team capable of major success consistently. Their own fault for never truly building around a once in a generation talent like this that cost us nothing

Yep not just Kane's future they are playing with but Conte's as well