Comment deleted by Article Creator
Starting to wish you’d stuck with Arsenal?
Man Utd had more shots on target than Man Cuty this season over the 2 games and a similar XG over the 2 games. Honestly didn't feel threatened much all game against Man City. They just got a goal out of nothing really and did nothing else. Played a high line all game and got many times and got punished at the end unlike the first half when Fernandes missed and Rashford didn't score from 2 great chances.
Honestly it is amazing what Ten Hag has done. That Grealish goal was the first we conceded since Saka scored at OT in the league and that was Man City only shot on goal.
Comment deleted by Article Creator
Beaten by the better team. We had 5 chances and you only had the one. Had KDB scored the Bruno goal your tune would be very different. Bitter to the end as ever.
Was Haaland even on the pitch? 😂
That United second goal was a sickener. Let the FA worry about that ridiculous decision but we are a much better side than united by some distance and losing the game because of one bad call is annoying.
—
You lost the game because you were terrible and United had more players off the bench to change the game.
There's so much salt here
Sky-blue
I really can’t see why you’re blubbering over the Bruno goal!
By the rules of the game it was a goal, so dry your eyes son!
comment by RED666👺 The Influencer (U6562)
posted 11 minutes ago
Sky-blue
I really can’t see why you’re blubbering over the Bruno goal!
By the rules of the game it was a goal, so dry your eyes son!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By the rules it could go either way, tbf. The fact that the rule allows goals like that and the Mo Salah one last week to stand really highlights the rules are pretty shiiit.
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RED666👺 The Influencer (U6562)
posted 11 minutes ago
Sky-blue
I really can’t see why you’re blubbering over the Bruno goal!
By the rules of the game it was a goal, so dry your eyes son!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By the rules it could go either way, tbf. The fact that the rule allows goals like that and the Mo Salah one last week to stand really highlights the rules are pretty shiiit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No doubt about it, no matter how shiite the rules are you play to the rules and the refs whistle.
Personally think it’s a fair article and I’d be angry if that goal went against us.
Only thing I’d pick up on is the comment about OT and Anfield.
Referees will inevitably be influenced by any of the big crowds and big teams - the idea City are negatively impacted by this compared with United is far fetched.
Villa scored a perfectly good goal against City recently. Wasn't given despite VAR being used even though it was a goal all day long.
What happened there? Don't remember City allowing them a goal in the fairness of the game. 😂
Thought Akanjis post match interview was interesting, would be good to know what actual guidance was given to the players at the start of the season.
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
Thought Akanjis post match interview was interesting, would be good to know what actual guidance was given to the players at the start of the season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What he say?
Said that the guidance they’d been given was that it would be considered offside. He may well be wrong, but I’ve always thought they should publicise the guidance more.
Trent was deemed offside yday when he hadnt touched the ball. A shot had been deflected to him off a Brighton player. Its the inconsistencty that angers players, fans etc.
Simple really. If player doesnt touch it its not offside so players need to react.
comment by Rouge (U19907)
posted 1 minute ago
Trent was deemed offside yday when he hadnt touched the ball. A shot had been deflected to him off a Brighton player. Its the inconsistencty that angers players, fans etc.
Simple really. If player doesnt touch it its not offside so players need to react.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are saying a player should be able to shield a ball, block the keepers vision etc from an offside position and not be called offside? May as well scrap the offside rule altogether.
INTERFERING with the play is often called in an off-side situation, especially when it involves a goal scoring situation. Very bad "no call"! The two Man. U. players were practically holding hands as they headed towards the Man. City goalkeeper! In addition, the Flag was clearly up!
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
At least next game is on Thursday
Page 1 of 1
posted on 14/1/23
Comment deleted by Article Creator
posted on 14/1/23
Starting to wish you’d stuck with Arsenal?
posted on 14/1/23
Man Utd had more shots on target than Man Cuty this season over the 2 games and a similar XG over the 2 games. Honestly didn't feel threatened much all game against Man City. They just got a goal out of nothing really and did nothing else. Played a high line all game and got many times and got punished at the end unlike the first half when Fernandes missed and Rashford didn't score from 2 great chances.
posted on 14/1/23
Honestly it is amazing what Ten Hag has done. That Grealish goal was the first we conceded since Saka scored at OT in the league and that was Man City only shot on goal.
posted on 14/1/23
Comment deleted by Article Creator
posted on 14/1/23
Edit and delete
posted on 14/1/23
Beaten by the better team. We had 5 chances and you only had the one. Had KDB scored the Bruno goal your tune would be very different. Bitter to the end as ever.
Was Haaland even on the pitch? 😂
posted on 14/1/23
That United second goal was a sickener. Let the FA worry about that ridiculous decision but we are a much better side than united by some distance and losing the game because of one bad call is annoying.
—
You lost the game because you were terrible and United had more players off the bench to change the game.
posted on 14/1/23
There's so much salt here
posted on 15/1/23
Sky-blue
I really can’t see why you’re blubbering over the Bruno goal!
By the rules of the game it was a goal, so dry your eyes son!
posted on 15/1/23
comment by RED666👺 The Influencer (U6562)
posted 11 minutes ago
Sky-blue
I really can’t see why you’re blubbering over the Bruno goal!
By the rules of the game it was a goal, so dry your eyes son!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By the rules it could go either way, tbf. The fact that the rule allows goals like that and the Mo Salah one last week to stand really highlights the rules are pretty shiiit.
posted on 15/1/23
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RED666👺 The Influencer (U6562)
posted 11 minutes ago
Sky-blue
I really can’t see why you’re blubbering over the Bruno goal!
By the rules of the game it was a goal, so dry your eyes son!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
By the rules it could go either way, tbf. The fact that the rule allows goals like that and the Mo Salah one last week to stand really highlights the rules are pretty shiiit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No doubt about it, no matter how shiite the rules are you play to the rules and the refs whistle.
posted on 15/1/23
Personally think it’s a fair article and I’d be angry if that goal went against us.
Only thing I’d pick up on is the comment about OT and Anfield.
Referees will inevitably be influenced by any of the big crowds and big teams - the idea City are negatively impacted by this compared with United is far fetched.
posted on 15/1/23
Villa scored a perfectly good goal against City recently. Wasn't given despite VAR being used even though it was a goal all day long.
What happened there? Don't remember City allowing them a goal in the fairness of the game. 😂
posted on 15/1/23
Thought Akanjis post match interview was interesting, would be good to know what actual guidance was given to the players at the start of the season.
posted on 15/1/23
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
Thought Akanjis post match interview was interesting, would be good to know what actual guidance was given to the players at the start of the season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What he say?
posted on 15/1/23
Said that the guidance they’d been given was that it would be considered offside. He may well be wrong, but I’ve always thought they should publicise the guidance more.
posted on 15/1/23
Trent was deemed offside yday when he hadnt touched the ball. A shot had been deflected to him off a Brighton player. Its the inconsistencty that angers players, fans etc.
Simple really. If player doesnt touch it its not offside so players need to react.
posted on 15/1/23
comment by Rouge (U19907)
posted 1 minute ago
Trent was deemed offside yday when he hadnt touched the ball. A shot had been deflected to him off a Brighton player. Its the inconsistencty that angers players, fans etc.
Simple really. If player doesnt touch it its not offside so players need to react.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are saying a player should be able to shield a ball, block the keepers vision etc from an offside position and not be called offside? May as well scrap the offside rule altogether.
posted on 15/1/23
INTERFERING with the play is often called in an off-side situation, especially when it involves a goal scoring situation. Very bad "no call"! The two Man. U. players were practically holding hands as they headed towards the Man. City goalkeeper! In addition, the Flag was clearly up!
Page 1 of 1