comment by AFCISMYTEAM (U14931)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by 77, 78, 81, 84, 05 and 19. European Royalty 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 (U22930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by King of the Gil (U7905)
posted 3 minutes ago
Boelhy seems a richer version of Everton's owner. Come in and spent huge amounts on largely average/unproven players. Has made idiotic managerial decisions.
Chelsea are essentially spending their future transfer budgets this season. If these players don't work out they're pretty screwed for a while.
-------
Enzo F is hardly unproven. World Cup winner and ran the Midfield for Argentina. Would love to have him at Liverpool. Caicedo looks to be going there as well. Badeshile is one of the highest rated young defenders around and Murdyk looks a quality signing. As I've previously said, I would love to have him as Liverpool's owners
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a bit early ti be saying that, they're 10th in the league on his watch and looking chit..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Enzo looks quality, as does macallister who I reckon was very instrumental for Argentina. Think mudyk could be a great signing, very quick, good technique and can finish.
comment by TLLL (U4640)
posted 2 minutes ago
Don’t forget Willian Kash. The guy had his medical at Spurs and we somehow hijacked the deal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also you took Werner of us thankfully
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
Never heard of him. Any good?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As a comparison; I'd say he's faster than Garnacho, (with or without the ball). Same kind of style, i.e direct running at defenders. Like how he uses the space between the lines too - quick flick of the shoulders and he's gone and there's no catching him...and he knows exactly where the goal is. Skillful player man, I like him.
I’ve a feeling if the Chelsea owner gets frustrated with no output from his investment, Chelsea will be in trouble.
Todd Woodward is the funniest man in football after Nunez.
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 3 minutes ago
I’ve a feeling if the Chelsea owner gets frustrated with no output from his investment, Chelsea will be in trouble.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt that. He looks like he could be in for the long haul. You don't go spending that kind of money in the short term.
Boelhy’s signed more players than Chelsea have scored league goals.
I saw him at Celtic Park and watched him when we played them away, for me? He is a talent, very quick, direct and is controlled on the ball, obvs no one can say how he would be in the EPL or moving forward, price aside he could be a serious baller
You can't fail FFP is you're not in the CL. Hahahaha
Correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t one of the stipulations when Boelhy bought Chelsea that he had to invest so much into the club? If this is true could it be that he’s simply trying to get this clause out of the way?
Apparently so. Though I don’t see how it’s enforceable, what is sanctioned crook Abramovich gonna do?
I suspect they are gambling on getting through major investment whilst UEFA transition from FFP to their new sustainability rules, and there’s often some allowances for new ownerships investing provided the club is financially stable.
Seen him play for Ukraine a couple of times and he looked a talent. Good signing for Chelsea I think.
I've never seen mudryk play but I refuse to believe spending 100m on him is smart
comment by 77, 78, 81, 84, 05 and 19. European Royalty 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 (U22930)
posted 53 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 3 minutes ago
I’ve a feeling if the Chelsea owner gets frustrated with no output from his investment, Chelsea will be in trouble.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt that. He looks like he could be in for the long haul. You don't go spending that kind of money in the short term.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was a condition of his ownership of three club that he agrees to spend X amount on transfers over a 10 year period.
Looks like he's trying to do it in 1 season 😄
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 39 minutes ago
You can't fail FFP is you're not in the CL. Hahahaha
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Prem also has a similar rule
comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 18 minutes ago
Apparently so. Though I don’t see how it’s enforceable, what is sanctioned crook Abramovich gonna do?
I suspect they are gambling on getting through major investment whilst UEFA transition from FFP to their new sustainability rules, and there’s often some allowances for new ownerships investing provided the club is financially stable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Call in his £1.5bn loan maybe?
comment by Freds a Red (U22942)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 18 minutes ago
Apparently so. Though I don’t see how it’s enforceable, what is sanctioned crook Abramovich gonna do?
I suspect they are gambling on getting through major investment whilst UEFA transition from FFP to their new sustainability rules, and there’s often some allowances for new ownerships investing provided the club is financially stable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Call in his £1.5bn loan maybe?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Felix?
comment by Pun Guy (U21588)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by Freds a Red (U22942)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 18 minutes ago
Apparently so. Though I don’t see how it’s enforceable, what is sanctioned crook Abramovich gonna do?
I suspect they are gambling on getting through major investment whilst UEFA transition from FFP to their new sustainability rules, and there’s often some allowances for new ownerships investing provided the club is financially stable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Call in his £1.5bn loan maybe?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Felix?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The money Abramovich loaned Chelsea, which he wrote off on condition they spend X amount on transfers over the next 10 years.
Chelsea's wage bill must be astronomical. Simply not sustainable, especially as they get less than 40,000 through the turnstiles. I think they could be the first Prem club to go bankrupt. And they must be breaking every FFP rule in the book.
comment by Pun Guy (U21588)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by Freds a Red (U22942)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 18 minutes ago
Apparently so. Though I don’t see how it’s enforceable, what is sanctioned crook Abramovich gonna do?
I suspect they are gambling on getting through major investment whilst UEFA transition from FFP to their new sustainability rules, and there’s often some allowances for new ownerships investing provided the club is financially stable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Call in his £1.5bn loan maybe?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Felix?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by (K̇ash) - FSG OUT (Get a move on!) - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 4 hours, 26 minutes ago
Chelsea have always hijacked players. Players like Hazard, Mikkel, Salah, Robben, Duff etc. Now they have taken Felix and Murdryk from other teams. Its how they operate. What's not working is the management side. If Tuchel was still in charge they would have been closer or maybe even in the top 4.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're saving money using other clubs' scouting?
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm sorry! (U4388)
posted 3 hours, 39 minutes ago
I saw him at Celtic Park and watched him when we played them away, for me? He is a talent, very quick, direct and is controlled on the ball, obvs no one can say how he would be in the EPL or moving forward, price aside he could be a serious baller
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He is very good. A cut above. Whether that is £50m or £100m I don't know but should do the biz in the EPL and at 22, well, worth a gamble IMHO.
comment by (K̇ash) - FSG OUT (Get a move on!) - Free Pal... (U1108)
posted 20 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 48 seconds ago
100 mill for a 22 year old with 12 career goals and 8 caps. This is bizarre.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bottomless money being spent
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Bottomless money"
Sign in if you want to comment
Mudryk to... Chelsea
Page 2 of 2
posted on 14/1/23
comment by AFCISMYTEAM (U14931)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by 77, 78, 81, 84, 05 and 19. European Royalty 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 (U22930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by King of the Gil (U7905)
posted 3 minutes ago
Boelhy seems a richer version of Everton's owner. Come in and spent huge amounts on largely average/unproven players. Has made idiotic managerial decisions.
Chelsea are essentially spending their future transfer budgets this season. If these players don't work out they're pretty screwed for a while.
-------
Enzo F is hardly unproven. World Cup winner and ran the Midfield for Argentina. Would love to have him at Liverpool. Caicedo looks to be going there as well. Badeshile is one of the highest rated young defenders around and Murdyk looks a quality signing. As I've previously said, I would love to have him as Liverpool's owners
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a bit early ti be saying that, they're 10th in the league on his watch and looking chit..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Enzo looks quality, as does macallister who I reckon was very instrumental for Argentina. Think mudyk could be a great signing, very quick, good technique and can finish.
posted on 14/1/23
comment by TLLL (U4640)
posted 2 minutes ago
Don’t forget Willian Kash. The guy had his medical at Spurs and we somehow hijacked the deal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also you took Werner of us thankfully
posted on 14/1/23
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 1 hour, 16 minutes ago
Never heard of him. Any good?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As a comparison; I'd say he's faster than Garnacho, (with or without the ball). Same kind of style, i.e direct running at defenders. Like how he uses the space between the lines too - quick flick of the shoulders and he's gone and there's no catching him...and he knows exactly where the goal is. Skillful player man, I like him.
posted on 14/1/23
I’ve a feeling if the Chelsea owner gets frustrated with no output from his investment, Chelsea will be in trouble.
posted on 14/1/23
Todd Woodward is the funniest man in football after Nunez.
posted on 14/1/23
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 3 minutes ago
I’ve a feeling if the Chelsea owner gets frustrated with no output from his investment, Chelsea will be in trouble.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt that. He looks like he could be in for the long haul. You don't go spending that kind of money in the short term.
posted on 14/1/23
Boelhy’s signed more players than Chelsea have scored league goals.
posted on 14/1/23
I saw him at Celtic Park and watched him when we played them away, for me? He is a talent, very quick, direct and is controlled on the ball, obvs no one can say how he would be in the EPL or moving forward, price aside he could be a serious baller
posted on 14/1/23
You can't fail FFP is you're not in the CL. Hahahaha
posted on 14/1/23
Correct me if I’m wrong but wasn’t one of the stipulations when Boelhy bought Chelsea that he had to invest so much into the club? If this is true could it be that he’s simply trying to get this clause out of the way?
posted on 14/1/23
Apparently so. Though I don’t see how it’s enforceable, what is sanctioned crook Abramovich gonna do?
I suspect they are gambling on getting through major investment whilst UEFA transition from FFP to their new sustainability rules, and there’s often some allowances for new ownerships investing provided the club is financially stable.
posted on 14/1/23
Seen him play for Ukraine a couple of times and he looked a talent. Good signing for Chelsea I think.
posted on 14/1/23
I've never seen mudryk play but I refuse to believe spending 100m on him is smart
posted on 14/1/23
comment by 77, 78, 81, 84, 05 and 19. European Royalty 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 (U22930)
posted 53 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 3 minutes ago
I’ve a feeling if the Chelsea owner gets frustrated with no output from his investment, Chelsea will be in trouble.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I doubt that. He looks like he could be in for the long haul. You don't go spending that kind of money in the short term.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was a condition of his ownership of three club that he agrees to spend X amount on transfers over a 10 year period.
Looks like he's trying to do it in 1 season 😄
posted on 14/1/23
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 39 minutes ago
You can't fail FFP is you're not in the CL. Hahahaha
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Prem also has a similar rule
posted on 14/1/23
comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 18 minutes ago
Apparently so. Though I don’t see how it’s enforceable, what is sanctioned crook Abramovich gonna do?
I suspect they are gambling on getting through major investment whilst UEFA transition from FFP to their new sustainability rules, and there’s often some allowances for new ownerships investing provided the club is financially stable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Call in his £1.5bn loan maybe?
posted on 14/1/23
comment by Freds a Red (U22942)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 18 minutes ago
Apparently so. Though I don’t see how it’s enforceable, what is sanctioned crook Abramovich gonna do?
I suspect they are gambling on getting through major investment whilst UEFA transition from FFP to their new sustainability rules, and there’s often some allowances for new ownerships investing provided the club is financially stable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Call in his £1.5bn loan maybe?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Felix?
posted on 14/1/23
comment by Pun Guy (U21588)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by Freds a Red (U22942)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 18 minutes ago
Apparently so. Though I don’t see how it’s enforceable, what is sanctioned crook Abramovich gonna do?
I suspect they are gambling on getting through major investment whilst UEFA transition from FFP to their new sustainability rules, and there’s often some allowances for new ownerships investing provided the club is financially stable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Call in his £1.5bn loan maybe?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Felix?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The money Abramovich loaned Chelsea, which he wrote off on condition they spend X amount on transfers over the next 10 years.
posted on 14/1/23
Chelsea's wage bill must be astronomical. Simply not sustainable, especially as they get less than 40,000 through the turnstiles. I think they could be the first Prem club to go bankrupt. And they must be breaking every FFP rule in the book.
posted on 14/1/23
comment by Pun Guy (U21588)
posted 59 minutes ago
comment by Freds a Red (U22942)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 18 minutes ago
Apparently so. Though I don’t see how it’s enforceable, what is sanctioned crook Abramovich gonna do?
I suspect they are gambling on getting through major investment whilst UEFA transition from FFP to their new sustainability rules, and there’s often some allowances for new ownerships investing provided the club is financially stable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Call in his £1.5bn loan maybe?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Felix?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 14/1/23
comment by (K̇ash) - FSG OUT (Get a move on!) - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 4 hours, 26 minutes ago
Chelsea have always hijacked players. Players like Hazard, Mikkel, Salah, Robben, Duff etc. Now they have taken Felix and Murdryk from other teams. Its how they operate. What's not working is the management side. If Tuchel was still in charge they would have been closer or maybe even in the top 4.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They're saving money using other clubs' scouting?
posted on 14/1/23
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm sorry! (U4388)
posted 3 hours, 39 minutes ago
I saw him at Celtic Park and watched him when we played them away, for me? He is a talent, very quick, direct and is controlled on the ball, obvs no one can say how he would be in the EPL or moving forward, price aside he could be a serious baller
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He is very good. A cut above. Whether that is £50m or £100m I don't know but should do the biz in the EPL and at 22, well, worth a gamble IMHO.
posted on 15/1/23
comment by (K̇ash) - FSG OUT (Get a move on!) - Free Pal... (U1108)
posted 20 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 48 seconds ago
100 mill for a 22 year old with 12 career goals and 8 caps. This is bizarre.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bottomless money being spent
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Bottomless money"
Page 2 of 2