Back to the OP, it would've been the closest thing to Fergie's Fledglings that we've had.
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by RED666👺 The Influencer (U6562)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by RED666👺 The Influencer (U6562)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Zacab (U18502)
posted 1 minute ago
Push Rashford forward and play Bruno with Garnacho and Greenwood, I would have loved to see that lineup. I really hope Greenwood plays for us again. If we need to spend 85mil for a player like Antony, no idea how much it would cost to replace Greenwood.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I really hope he doesn't. But it's a shame.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you saying he’s guilty!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well obviously you believe everything you’ve seen and heard if you’re saying that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rdd666??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who’s Rdd666? And what is the point you’re trying to make?
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
Being convicted by a court of law based on a high burden on the prosecution to prove beyond doubt that he has committed a crime as the law specifically defines is one thing. Being fit to represent our club and expect our support and adulation is another. If anyone listens to those recordings and is okay with him playing for United if the courts don't convict, they have clearly been consuming too much content targeted at the incel community. In fact, wistful 'what if' posts like the OP are pretty distasteful, framing what has taken place as our loss. We fans are not the victims in this scenario.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Being convicted by a court of law based on a high burden on the prosecution to prove beyond doubt that he has committed a crime as the law specifically defines is one thing. Being fit to represent our club and expect our support and adulation is another. If anyone listens to those recordings and is okay with him playing for United if the courts don't convict, they have clearly been consuming too much content targeted at the incel community. In fact, wistful 'what if' posts like the OP are pretty distasteful, framing what has taken place as our loss. We fans are not the victims in this scenario.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm willing to hear what if any explanation he offers and the outcome of the case before I decide if I'd like him to play for us again or not.
Surely this should be the case for everyone.
comment by Christ We Won (TENƎꓕ) (U17162)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 15 minutes ago
Technically, Greenwood isn't guilty of anything, yet.
What happens to him if he is innocent? Will be interested to see how City handle the Mendy situation if he is cleared of the remaining charges.
I suspect Greenwood and Mendy will be let go of their clubs in any case.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A disgrace if Mendy is cleared from final charges and let go by City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really, a player whose been out of football for over 12 months isn't expected to be the same player afterwards, especially at elite level
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What about those coming back from bad injury? Shaw for example.
comment by Freds a Red (U22942)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Being convicted by a court of law based on a high burden on the prosecution to prove beyond doubt that he has committed a crime as the law specifically defines is one thing. Being fit to represent our club and expect our support and adulation is another. If anyone listens to those recordings and is okay with him playing for United if the courts don't convict, they have clearly been consuming too much content targeted at the incel community. In fact, wistful 'what if' posts like the OP are pretty distasteful, framing what has taken place as our loss. We fans are not the victims in this scenario.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm willing to hear what if any explanation he offers and the outcome of the case before I decide if I'd like him to play for us again or not.
Surely this should be the case for everyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. Unless it is shown the voice is not his, then for me that's enough to say he should not play for us.
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Freds a Red (U22942)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Being convicted by a court of law based on a high burden on the prosecution to prove beyond doubt that he has committed a crime as the law specifically defines is one thing. Being fit to represent our club and expect our support and adulation is another. If anyone listens to those recordings and is okay with him playing for United if the courts don't convict, they have clearly been consuming too much content targeted at the incel community. In fact, wistful 'what if' posts like the OP are pretty distasteful, framing what has taken place as our loss. We fans are not the victims in this scenario.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm willing to hear what if any explanation he offers and the outcome of the case before I decide if I'd like him to play for us again or not.
Surely this should be the case for everyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. Unless it is shown the voice is not his, then for me that's enough to say he should not play for us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. So until we know if that is the case (highly unlikely I know) surely we should reserve judgement?
comment by Freds a Red (U22942)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Freds a Red (U22942)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Being convicted by a court of law based on a high burden on the prosecution to prove beyond doubt that he has committed a crime as the law specifically defines is one thing. Being fit to represent our club and expect our support and adulation is another. If anyone listens to those recordings and is okay with him playing for United if the courts don't convict, they have clearly been consuming too much content targeted at the incel community. In fact, wistful 'what if' posts like the OP are pretty distasteful, framing what has taken place as our loss. We fans are not the victims in this scenario.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm willing to hear what if any explanation he offers and the outcome of the case before I decide if I'd like him to play for us again or not.
Surely this should be the case for everyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. Unless it is shown the voice is not his, then for me that's enough to say he should not play for us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. So until we know if that is the case (highly unlikely I know) surely we should reserve judgement?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As he's never denied it's his voice I think we can take it that it is. If wrong no harm done, he's not been fired and presumably picking up his ten grand a week.
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Freds a Red (U22942)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Freds a Red (U22942)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Being convicted by a court of law based on a high burden on the prosecution to prove beyond doubt that he has committed a crime as the law specifically defines is one thing. Being fit to represent our club and expect our support and adulation is another. If anyone listens to those recordings and is okay with him playing for United if the courts don't convict, they have clearly been consuming too much content targeted at the incel community. In fact, wistful 'what if' posts like the OP are pretty distasteful, framing what has taken place as our loss. We fans are not the victims in this scenario.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm willing to hear what if any explanation he offers and the outcome of the case before I decide if I'd like him to play for us again or not.
Surely this should be the case for everyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. Unless it is shown the voice is not his, then for me that's enough to say he should not play for us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. So until we know if that is the case (highly unlikely I know) surely we should reserve judgement?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As he's never denied it's his voice I think we can take it that it is. If wrong no harm done, he's not been fired and presumably picking up his ten grand a week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Im just saying we don't know what's going to come out so reserve judgment. No points for going early.
If Greenwood is proved innocent and that's a big (I think he's not unlike Mendy) then there's no reason why he shouldn't play for us. We have players like Giggs who have done far far worse and are still revered.
comment by ChampionsOfMediocrity (U22902)
posted 7 hours, 14 minutes ago
If Greenwood is proved innocent and that's a big (I think he's not unlike Mendy) then there's no reason why he shouldn't play for us. We have players like Giggs who have done far far worse and are still revered.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not by me he's not
comment by ChampionsOfMediocrity (U22902)
posted 7 hours, 11 minutes ago
If Greenwood is proved innocent and that's a big (I think he's not unlike Mendy) then there's no reason why he shouldn't play for us. We have players like Giggs who have done far far worse and are still revered.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What does ‘proved innocent’ mean to you, because there’s no such legal finding in England.
Assuming a prosecution follows, the two potential determinative outcomes are that:
- the defendant is found guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, of one or more charges;
- the defendant is found not guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, of all charges.
Being found not guilty of a charge is not the same as being found innocent.
comment by ChampionsOfMediocrity (U22902)
posted 10 hours, 31 minutes ago
If Greenwood is proved innocent and that's a big (I think he's not unlike Mendy) then there's no reason why he shouldn't play for us. We have players like Giggs who have done far far worse and are still revered.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No reason? Of course there is. Millions of reasons. You've got to be pretty daft not to be able to figure it out. He's done at United. I'll be absolutely amazed if he ever plays for United again, irrespective of the verdict.
Sign in if you want to comment
Garnacho, Rashford, *Greenwood*
Page 2 of 2
posted on 14/1/23
Back to the OP, it would've been the closest thing to Fergie's Fledglings that we've had.
posted on 14/1/23
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by RED666👺 The Influencer (U6562)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by RED666👺 The Influencer (U6562)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Zacab (U18502)
posted 1 minute ago
Push Rashford forward and play Bruno with Garnacho and Greenwood, I would have loved to see that lineup. I really hope Greenwood plays for us again. If we need to spend 85mil for a player like Antony, no idea how much it would cost to replace Greenwood.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I really hope he doesn't. But it's a shame.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you saying he’s guilty!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of what?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well obviously you believe everything you’ve seen and heard if you’re saying that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Rdd666??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who’s Rdd666? And what is the point you’re trying to make?
posted on 14/1/23
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
Being convicted by a court of law based on a high burden on the prosecution to prove beyond doubt that he has committed a crime as the law specifically defines is one thing. Being fit to represent our club and expect our support and adulation is another. If anyone listens to those recordings and is okay with him playing for United if the courts don't convict, they have clearly been consuming too much content targeted at the incel community. In fact, wistful 'what if' posts like the OP are pretty distasteful, framing what has taken place as our loss. We fans are not the victims in this scenario.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you
posted on 14/1/23
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Being convicted by a court of law based on a high burden on the prosecution to prove beyond doubt that he has committed a crime as the law specifically defines is one thing. Being fit to represent our club and expect our support and adulation is another. If anyone listens to those recordings and is okay with him playing for United if the courts don't convict, they have clearly been consuming too much content targeted at the incel community. In fact, wistful 'what if' posts like the OP are pretty distasteful, framing what has taken place as our loss. We fans are not the victims in this scenario.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm willing to hear what if any explanation he offers and the outcome of the case before I decide if I'd like him to play for us again or not.
Surely this should be the case for everyone.
posted on 14/1/23
comment by Christ We Won (TENƎꓕ) (U17162)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by _Viva_Vida (U6044)
posted 15 minutes ago
Technically, Greenwood isn't guilty of anything, yet.
What happens to him if he is innocent? Will be interested to see how City handle the Mendy situation if he is cleared of the remaining charges.
I suspect Greenwood and Mendy will be let go of their clubs in any case.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A disgrace if Mendy is cleared from final charges and let go by City.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really, a player whose been out of football for over 12 months isn't expected to be the same player afterwards, especially at elite level
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What about those coming back from bad injury? Shaw for example.
posted on 14/1/23
comment by Freds a Red (U22942)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Being convicted by a court of law based on a high burden on the prosecution to prove beyond doubt that he has committed a crime as the law specifically defines is one thing. Being fit to represent our club and expect our support and adulation is another. If anyone listens to those recordings and is okay with him playing for United if the courts don't convict, they have clearly been consuming too much content targeted at the incel community. In fact, wistful 'what if' posts like the OP are pretty distasteful, framing what has taken place as our loss. We fans are not the victims in this scenario.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm willing to hear what if any explanation he offers and the outcome of the case before I decide if I'd like him to play for us again or not.
Surely this should be the case for everyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. Unless it is shown the voice is not his, then for me that's enough to say he should not play for us.
posted on 14/1/23
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Freds a Red (U22942)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Being convicted by a court of law based on a high burden on the prosecution to prove beyond doubt that he has committed a crime as the law specifically defines is one thing. Being fit to represent our club and expect our support and adulation is another. If anyone listens to those recordings and is okay with him playing for United if the courts don't convict, they have clearly been consuming too much content targeted at the incel community. In fact, wistful 'what if' posts like the OP are pretty distasteful, framing what has taken place as our loss. We fans are not the victims in this scenario.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm willing to hear what if any explanation he offers and the outcome of the case before I decide if I'd like him to play for us again or not.
Surely this should be the case for everyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. Unless it is shown the voice is not his, then for me that's enough to say he should not play for us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. So until we know if that is the case (highly unlikely I know) surely we should reserve judgement?
posted on 14/1/23
comment by Freds a Red (U22942)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Freds a Red (U22942)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Being convicted by a court of law based on a high burden on the prosecution to prove beyond doubt that he has committed a crime as the law specifically defines is one thing. Being fit to represent our club and expect our support and adulation is another. If anyone listens to those recordings and is okay with him playing for United if the courts don't convict, they have clearly been consuming too much content targeted at the incel community. In fact, wistful 'what if' posts like the OP are pretty distasteful, framing what has taken place as our loss. We fans are not the victims in this scenario.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm willing to hear what if any explanation he offers and the outcome of the case before I decide if I'd like him to play for us again or not.
Surely this should be the case for everyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. Unless it is shown the voice is not his, then for me that's enough to say he should not play for us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. So until we know if that is the case (highly unlikely I know) surely we should reserve judgement?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As he's never denied it's his voice I think we can take it that it is. If wrong no harm done, he's not been fired and presumably picking up his ten grand a week.
posted on 14/1/23
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by Freds a Red (U22942)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Freds a Red (U22942)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 1 hour, 24 minutes ago
Being convicted by a court of law based on a high burden on the prosecution to prove beyond doubt that he has committed a crime as the law specifically defines is one thing. Being fit to represent our club and expect our support and adulation is another. If anyone listens to those recordings and is okay with him playing for United if the courts don't convict, they have clearly been consuming too much content targeted at the incel community. In fact, wistful 'what if' posts like the OP are pretty distasteful, framing what has taken place as our loss. We fans are not the victims in this scenario.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm willing to hear what if any explanation he offers and the outcome of the case before I decide if I'd like him to play for us again or not.
Surely this should be the case for everyone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really. Unless it is shown the voice is not his, then for me that's enough to say he should not play for us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly. So until we know if that is the case (highly unlikely I know) surely we should reserve judgement?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As he's never denied it's his voice I think we can take it that it is. If wrong no harm done, he's not been fired and presumably picking up his ten grand a week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Im just saying we don't know what's going to come out so reserve judgment. No points for going early.
posted on 15/1/23
If Greenwood is proved innocent and that's a big (I think he's not unlike Mendy) then there's no reason why he shouldn't play for us. We have players like Giggs who have done far far worse and are still revered.
posted on 15/1/23
He’s finished at United.
posted on 15/1/23
comment by ChampionsOfMediocrity (U22902)
posted 7 hours, 14 minutes ago
If Greenwood is proved innocent and that's a big (I think he's not unlike Mendy) then there's no reason why he shouldn't play for us. We have players like Giggs who have done far far worse and are still revered.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not by me he's not
posted on 15/1/23
comment by ChampionsOfMediocrity (U22902)
posted 7 hours, 11 minutes ago
If Greenwood is proved innocent and that's a big (I think he's not unlike Mendy) then there's no reason why he shouldn't play for us. We have players like Giggs who have done far far worse and are still revered.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What does ‘proved innocent’ mean to you, because there’s no such legal finding in England.
Assuming a prosecution follows, the two potential determinative outcomes are that:
- the defendant is found guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, of one or more charges;
- the defendant is found not guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, of all charges.
Being found not guilty of a charge is not the same as being found innocent.
posted on 15/1/23
comment by ChampionsOfMediocrity (U22902)
posted 10 hours, 31 minutes ago
If Greenwood is proved innocent and that's a big (I think he's not unlike Mendy) then there's no reason why he shouldn't play for us. We have players like Giggs who have done far far worse and are still revered.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No reason? Of course there is. Millions of reasons. You've got to be pretty daft not to be able to figure it out. He's done at United. I'll be absolutely amazed if he ever plays for United again, irrespective of the verdict.
Page 2 of 2