I think he's a loan option which is better than Zaniolo on an obligation to buy. I think this is a wise move if we're at a crossroads manager wise.
Especially with Zaniolo being an obigation with his ACL injury record.
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 5 minutes ago
I think he's a loan option which is better than Zaniolo on an obligation to buy. I think this is a wise move if we're at a crossroads manager wise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t get a game for Holland ahead of Bergwijn
He’s flying for a medical now. Looks like we’ve hijacked it
comment by The Beast 🐒 (U2836)
posted 16 seconds ago
He’s flying for a medical now. Looks like we’ve hijacked it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reeks of a deal that the club can appease some fans with activity. With no need to make it permanent if it doesn’t work out. 2 goals in 10 games this season. 16 in 34 last season. Behind Bergwijn for Holland. Nothing too inspiring and not the position we need.
Happy to be proven wrong.
comment by BelfastSpur (U15068)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 5 minutes ago
I think he's a loan option which is better than Zaniolo on an obligation to buy. I think this is a wise move if we're at a crossroads manager wise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t get a game for Holland ahead of Bergwijn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus can't get a game for Brazil ahead of Richy which also doesn't make sense. I've seen Danjuma play a few times. He gave United a torrid time last year. Had an amazing couple of games. I'm not sure why he's available for loan. Something must have happened - either the manager doesn't fancy him or he's got an attitude issue but there's no doubting his abilities. Watch his highlights vs Man U.
He'd be perfect cover for Son who could probably do with a rest to be honest.
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by BelfastSpur (U15068)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 5 minutes ago
I think he's a loan option which is better than Zaniolo on an obligation to buy. I think this is a wise move if we're at a crossroads manager wise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t get a game for Holland ahead of Bergwijn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus can't get a game for Brazil ahead of Richy which also doesn't make sense. I've seen Danjuma play a few times. He gave United a torrid time last year. Had an amazing couple of games. I'm not sure why he's available for loan. Something must have happened - either the manager doesn't fancy him or he's got an attitude issue but there's no doubting his abilities. Watch his highlights vs Man U.
He'd be perfect cover for Son who could probably do with a rest to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look at Jesus record for Brazil compared to Richarlison and it’s easy to see why he is second choice.
Danjuma didn’t play well for Bournemouth in the PL. granted he done a bit better in the championship. I just am not sold. When I last watched Villarreal the commentators were lauding him as the next big thing. I just simply didn’t see it.
He’s crap, If he was any good he wouldn’t be loaned out.
Club would be better off by trying to keep Harry Kane happy and convince his that they plan to quickly build a championship level team. Without Kane they are an ineffective squad, and time must be running out on his career ambitions!
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 9 minutes ago
He’s crap, If he was any good he wouldn’t be loaned out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What, like Kulusevki??
comment by Ghost of Seebs (U22859)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 9 minutes ago
He’s crap, If he was any good he wouldn’t be loaned out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What, like Kulusevki??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kulusevski was clearly thought out by the hierarchy.
Danjuma seems like an opportunistic signing purely of the back of his availability becoming apparent due to the Everton deal.
Danjuma, “ I will do absolutely everything I can to keep Everton in this league”.
Awkward.
WTAF
What kind of ambition is this?
Feck off
And anyone saying we have a plan. Or a project…
Well yano.. all the evidence says otherwise. Club signing to appease fans.
comment by BelfastSpur (U15068)
posted 20 seconds ago
And anyone saying we have a plan. Or a project…
Well yano.. all the evidence says otherwise. Club signing to appease fans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"appease fans?"
Have we signed Messi or something?
We nicked him off Everton FFS not Liverpool or Chelsea!
OP
WTF is he? I have never heard of any player Spurs have tried to sign since about 1990.
It's worth reminding everyone that Zaniolo was also a potential loan with two ACL injuries and an obligation to buy. Danjuma is an option to buy. We cannot keep loading the squad with risky players making them harder to shift. We have too many coasters. Zaniolo represents a major risk both financially and on the pitch because he's very much a Conte choice and Conte himself isn't committing beyond the end of the season. It's no wonder this is club policy. For once, they've made the right decision for the best interests of the future of the club.
If we're going in a different direction in the summer, we need to make sure that any new manager is not saddled with the dregs of the old regime. It will hinder his ability to recruit.
comment by Hezzman (U21558)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by BelfastSpur (U15068)
posted 20 seconds ago
And anyone saying we have a plan. Or a project…
Well yano.. all the evidence says otherwise. Club signing to appease fans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"appease fans?"
Have we signed Messi or something?
We nicked him off Everton FFS not Liverpool or Chelsea!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yup. So it can’t be said we didn’t add personnel. Fans might not be jumping with excitement. But it takes the argument of no signings out of the equation.
comment by BelfastSpur (U15068)
posted 3 minutes ago
And anyone saying we have a plan. Or a project…
Well yano.. all the evidence says otherwise. Club signing to appease fans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's more likely to shut Conte up. Probably tired of him crying about not getting new signings so just bring someone, anyone, in to appease him
He's a decent player. I'm not sure what the fuss is all about. Everyone's pointing to his time at Bournemouth but last year he was great for Villareal. Players improve. If you were offered the Arsenal Serge Gnabry, you'd tell them to do one but you'd take the Bayern version in a heartbeat.
I think it makes sense. Danjuma covers Son, Richy covers Kane and Gil covers Kulu.
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 1 minute ago
It's worth reminding everyone that Zaniolo was also a potential loan with two ACL injuries and an obligation to buy. Danjuma is an option to buy. We cannot keep loading the squad with risky players making them harder to shift. We have too many coasters. Zaniolo represents a major risk both financially and on the pitch because he's very much a Conte choice and Conte himself isn't committing beyond the end of the season. It's no wonder this is club policy. For once, they've made the right decision for the best interests of the future of the club.
If we're going in a different direction in the summer, we need to make sure that any new manager is not saddled with the dregs of the old regime. It will hinder his ability to recruit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah and Trossard before him. They all scream of buying for buying shake.
No coherent plan or strategy with the manager having an input it seems.
I don’t even think we need a LWF we have Son and Perisic who can play there. Plus we have a 60m signing in Richarlison that has yet to feature much, who can also at a push play there.
Sign what we need for crying out loud. CB, RB and CM in that order. Deal with the GK in the summer if needs be.
comment by Meet her at the love parade (U6468)
posted 57 seconds ago
We a CB
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And GK
Sign in if you want to comment
Arnaut Danjuma
Page 1 of 11
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 24/1/23
Not what we need imo.
posted on 24/1/23
I think he's a loan option which is better than Zaniolo on an obligation to buy. I think this is a wise move if we're at a crossroads manager wise.
posted on 24/1/23
Especially with Zaniolo being an obigation with his ACL injury record.
posted on 24/1/23
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 5 minutes ago
I think he's a loan option which is better than Zaniolo on an obligation to buy. I think this is a wise move if we're at a crossroads manager wise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t get a game for Holland ahead of Bergwijn
posted on 24/1/23
He’s flying for a medical now. Looks like we’ve hijacked it
posted on 24/1/23
comment by The Beast 🐒 (U2836)
posted 16 seconds ago
He’s flying for a medical now. Looks like we’ve hijacked it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reeks of a deal that the club can appease some fans with activity. With no need to make it permanent if it doesn’t work out. 2 goals in 10 games this season. 16 in 34 last season. Behind Bergwijn for Holland. Nothing too inspiring and not the position we need.
Happy to be proven wrong.
posted on 24/1/23
comment by BelfastSpur (U15068)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 5 minutes ago
I think he's a loan option which is better than Zaniolo on an obligation to buy. I think this is a wise move if we're at a crossroads manager wise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t get a game for Holland ahead of Bergwijn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus can't get a game for Brazil ahead of Richy which also doesn't make sense. I've seen Danjuma play a few times. He gave United a torrid time last year. Had an amazing couple of games. I'm not sure why he's available for loan. Something must have happened - either the manager doesn't fancy him or he's got an attitude issue but there's no doubting his abilities. Watch his highlights vs Man U.
He'd be perfect cover for Son who could probably do with a rest to be honest.
posted on 24/1/23
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by BelfastSpur (U15068)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 5 minutes ago
I think he's a loan option which is better than Zaniolo on an obligation to buy. I think this is a wise move if we're at a crossroads manager wise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t get a game for Holland ahead of Bergwijn
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesus can't get a game for Brazil ahead of Richy which also doesn't make sense. I've seen Danjuma play a few times. He gave United a torrid time last year. Had an amazing couple of games. I'm not sure why he's available for loan. Something must have happened - either the manager doesn't fancy him or he's got an attitude issue but there's no doubting his abilities. Watch his highlights vs Man U.
He'd be perfect cover for Son who could probably do with a rest to be honest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look at Jesus record for Brazil compared to Richarlison and it’s easy to see why he is second choice.
Danjuma didn’t play well for Bournemouth in the PL. granted he done a bit better in the championship. I just am not sold. When I last watched Villarreal the commentators were lauding him as the next big thing. I just simply didn’t see it.
posted on 24/1/23
He’s crap, If he was any good he wouldn’t be loaned out.
posted on 24/1/23
Club would be better off by trying to keep Harry Kane happy and convince his that they plan to quickly build a championship level team. Without Kane they are an ineffective squad, and time must be running out on his career ambitions!
posted on 24/1/23
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 9 minutes ago
He’s crap, If he was any good he wouldn’t be loaned out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What, like Kulusevki??
posted on 24/1/23
comment by Ghost of Seebs (U22859)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 9 minutes ago
He’s crap, If he was any good he wouldn’t be loaned out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What, like Kulusevki??
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kulusevski was clearly thought out by the hierarchy.
Danjuma seems like an opportunistic signing purely of the back of his availability becoming apparent due to the Everton deal.
posted on 24/1/23
Danjuma, “ I will do absolutely everything I can to keep Everton in this league”.
Awkward.
posted on 24/1/23
WTAF
What kind of ambition is this?
Feck off
posted on 24/1/23
And anyone saying we have a plan. Or a project…
Well yano.. all the evidence says otherwise. Club signing to appease fans.
posted on 24/1/23
comment by BelfastSpur (U15068)
posted 20 seconds ago
And anyone saying we have a plan. Or a project…
Well yano.. all the evidence says otherwise. Club signing to appease fans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"appease fans?"
Have we signed Messi or something?
We nicked him off Everton FFS not Liverpool or Chelsea!
posted on 24/1/23
OP
WTF is he? I have never heard of any player Spurs have tried to sign since about 1990.
posted on 24/1/23
It's worth reminding everyone that Zaniolo was also a potential loan with two ACL injuries and an obligation to buy. Danjuma is an option to buy. We cannot keep loading the squad with risky players making them harder to shift. We have too many coasters. Zaniolo represents a major risk both financially and on the pitch because he's very much a Conte choice and Conte himself isn't committing beyond the end of the season. It's no wonder this is club policy. For once, they've made the right decision for the best interests of the future of the club.
If we're going in a different direction in the summer, we need to make sure that any new manager is not saddled with the dregs of the old regime. It will hinder his ability to recruit.
posted on 24/1/23
comment by Hezzman (U21558)
posted 35 seconds ago
comment by BelfastSpur (U15068)
posted 20 seconds ago
And anyone saying we have a plan. Or a project…
Well yano.. all the evidence says otherwise. Club signing to appease fans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"appease fans?"
Have we signed Messi or something?
We nicked him off Everton FFS not Liverpool or Chelsea!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yup. So it can’t be said we didn’t add personnel. Fans might not be jumping with excitement. But it takes the argument of no signings out of the equation.
posted on 24/1/23
comment by BelfastSpur (U15068)
posted 3 minutes ago
And anyone saying we have a plan. Or a project…
Well yano.. all the evidence says otherwise. Club signing to appease fans.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's more likely to shut Conte up. Probably tired of him crying about not getting new signings so just bring someone, anyone, in to appease him
posted on 24/1/23
He's a decent player. I'm not sure what the fuss is all about. Everyone's pointing to his time at Bournemouth but last year he was great for Villareal. Players improve. If you were offered the Arsenal Serge Gnabry, you'd tell them to do one but you'd take the Bayern version in a heartbeat.
I think it makes sense. Danjuma covers Son, Richy covers Kane and Gil covers Kulu.
posted on 24/1/23
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 1 minute ago
It's worth reminding everyone that Zaniolo was also a potential loan with two ACL injuries and an obligation to buy. Danjuma is an option to buy. We cannot keep loading the squad with risky players making them harder to shift. We have too many coasters. Zaniolo represents a major risk both financially and on the pitch because he's very much a Conte choice and Conte himself isn't committing beyond the end of the season. It's no wonder this is club policy. For once, they've made the right decision for the best interests of the future of the club.
If we're going in a different direction in the summer, we need to make sure that any new manager is not saddled with the dregs of the old regime. It will hinder his ability to recruit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah and Trossard before him. They all scream of buying for buying shake.
No coherent plan or strategy with the manager having an input it seems.
I don’t even think we need a LWF we have Son and Perisic who can play there. Plus we have a 60m signing in Richarlison that has yet to feature much, who can also at a push play there.
Sign what we need for crying out loud. CB, RB and CM in that order. Deal with the GK in the summer if needs be.
posted on 24/1/23
We a CB
posted on 24/1/23
comment by Meet her at the love parade (U6468)
posted 57 seconds ago
We a CB
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And GK
posted on 24/1/23
Random
Page 1 of 11
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10