They don’t care about the football team mate. They would not allow the incompetence that Daniel levy brings to it if they did.
Best we can hope for is they somehow stumble upon a manager that wants to play attacking football.
I’m pretty sure Enic would do away with the football team if they could and focus on nfl and concerts.
comment by Citizen Smeg. Is Levy a Gooner? This is not To... (U6574)
posted 1 minute ago
They don’t care about the football team mate. They would not allow the incompetence that Daniel levy brings to it if they did.
Best we can hope for is they somehow stumble upon a manager that wants to play attacking football.
I’m pretty sure Enic would do away with the football team if they could and focus on nfl and concerts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scary thing is that is a believable scenario.
No matter how daft and absurd it sounds.
Some people would probably shrug their shoulders and accept it as there is not much they can do.
If PL wasn't so lucrative I could see that happen especially if we got a NFL team to be based at the stadium.
Funny how we all see things differently.
I like the fact that we don't have our name or sponsors logo emblazoned across the seats as I think the stadium looks far classier without it.
Have you seen what West Ham have done with the Athletics stadium in a desperate attempt to make it feel like home.
Keeping it how it is suits me but I guess if we ever do sell the naming rites it could all change.
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 5 minutes ago
Funny how we all see things differently.
I like the fact that we don't have our name or sponsors logo emblazoned across the seats as I think the stadium looks far classier without it.
Have you seen what West Ham have done with the Athletics stadium in a desperate attempt to make it feel like home.
Keeping it how it is suits me but I guess if we ever do sell the naming rites it could all change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Each to their own I guess.
But SPURS or THFC is not an eyesore nor tacky in my opinion.
It's not uncommon for football stadium seats to just adhere to the colour of the team without having a logo on. There's a whacking great cockerel on the stadium roof. It's clear who we are. There's a thousand LED screens adorned with our branding that are then interchangeable depending on what sport is being hosted. It's a smart move to do it this way as if it's a multi-use stadium it has to be adaptable.
Honestly, Levy can't win here. He tries to build something to allow us to ultimately spend more and in order to maximise that transfer budget, he comes up with a stadium that's adaptable. You criticise him for not having the logo on the seats yet you moan when there isn't a transfer budget to spend on players. The generic nature of those seats makes our stadium more attractive for hosting and therefore brings in more funds.
It seems to me that this is just another lazy attempt to bash Levy and it's weak, really weak.
Oh, and speaking as an Art Director, I think it looks so much better with blank seats anyway. Putting the logo on every seat is very cheap looking.
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 2 minutes ago
It's not uncommon for football stadium seats to just adhere to the colour of the team without having a logo on. There's a whacking great cockerel on the stadium roof. It's clear who we are. There's a thousand LED screens adorned with our branding that are then interchangeable depending on what sport is being hosted. It's a smart move to do it this way as if it's a multi-use stadium it has to be adaptable.
Honestly, Levy can't win here. He tries to build something to allow us to ultimately spend more and in order to maximise that transfer budget, he comes up with a stadium that's adaptable. You criticise him for not having the logo on the seats yet you moan when there isn't a transfer budget to spend on players. The generic nature of those seats makes our stadium more attractive for hosting and therefore brings in more funds.
It seems to me that this is just another lazy attempt to bash Levy and it's weak, really weak.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry Daniel lol
comment by Hezzman (U21558)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 2 minutes ago
It's not uncommon for football stadium seats to just adhere to the colour of the team without having a logo on. There's a whacking great cockerel on the stadium roof. It's clear who we are. There's a thousand LED screens adorned with our branding that are then interchangeable depending on what sport is being hosted. It's a smart move to do it this way as if it's a multi-use stadium it has to be adaptable.
Honestly, Levy can't win here. He tries to build something to allow us to ultimately spend more and in order to maximise that transfer budget, he comes up with a stadium that's adaptable. You criticise him for not having the logo on the seats yet you moan when there isn't a transfer budget to spend on players. The generic nature of those seats makes our stadium more attractive for hosting and therefore brings in more funds.
It seems to me that this is just another lazy attempt to bash Levy and it's weak, really weak.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry Daniel lol
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let me explain a story about my GCSE results to inspire you
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Ace (U22861)
posted 13 minutes ago
I don’t see that this is an issue really, but I do hope said stadium is absolutely toxic at the weekend with Levy Out banners everywhere and sack the board being sung from the rafters. Levy deserves to be harangued, harassed and humiliated - and if that miserable piece of filth Lewis should ever decide to show his face there again he ought to be pelted with rotten eggs and rancid fruit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s going to be toxic on Saturday , especially if we concede early
The fans will turn big time
I see nothing but Brighton carving us open time and time again ….if we can’t even muster a bit of possession against a shat Everton team down to 10 men what we gonna do against an inform Brighton who play fast attacking football
I find it bemusing there have been no takers for naming rights to the best stadium in the country.
Brighton should really beat you so i guess that's a spurs win then.
I wonder how much Blofeld is demanding for naming rights
comment by HB Fashion Sakala is offside again (U21935)
posted 1 day ago
I find it bemusing there have been no takers for naming rights to the best stadium in the country.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Todd Kline is enjoying himself
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Anonymous Stadium
Page 1 of 1
posted on 4/4/23
They don’t care about the football team mate. They would not allow the incompetence that Daniel levy brings to it if they did.
Best we can hope for is they somehow stumble upon a manager that wants to play attacking football.
I’m pretty sure Enic would do away with the football team if they could and focus on nfl and concerts.
posted on 4/4/23
comment by Citizen Smeg. Is Levy a Gooner? This is not To... (U6574)
posted 1 minute ago
They don’t care about the football team mate. They would not allow the incompetence that Daniel levy brings to it if they did.
Best we can hope for is they somehow stumble upon a manager that wants to play attacking football.
I’m pretty sure Enic would do away with the football team if they could and focus on nfl and concerts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scary thing is that is a believable scenario.
No matter how daft and absurd it sounds.
Some people would probably shrug their shoulders and accept it as there is not much they can do.
If PL wasn't so lucrative I could see that happen especially if we got a NFL team to be based at the stadium.
posted on 4/4/23
Funny how we all see things differently.
I like the fact that we don't have our name or sponsors logo emblazoned across the seats as I think the stadium looks far classier without it.
Have you seen what West Ham have done with the Athletics stadium in a desperate attempt to make it feel like home.
Keeping it how it is suits me but I guess if we ever do sell the naming rites it could all change.
posted on 4/4/23
comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 5 minutes ago
Funny how we all see things differently.
I like the fact that we don't have our name or sponsors logo emblazoned across the seats as I think the stadium looks far classier without it.
Have you seen what West Ham have done with the Athletics stadium in a desperate attempt to make it feel like home.
Keeping it how it is suits me but I guess if we ever do sell the naming rites it could all change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Each to their own I guess.
But SPURS or THFC is not an eyesore nor tacky in my opinion.
posted on 4/4/23
It's not uncommon for football stadium seats to just adhere to the colour of the team without having a logo on. There's a whacking great cockerel on the stadium roof. It's clear who we are. There's a thousand LED screens adorned with our branding that are then interchangeable depending on what sport is being hosted. It's a smart move to do it this way as if it's a multi-use stadium it has to be adaptable.
Honestly, Levy can't win here. He tries to build something to allow us to ultimately spend more and in order to maximise that transfer budget, he comes up with a stadium that's adaptable. You criticise him for not having the logo on the seats yet you moan when there isn't a transfer budget to spend on players. The generic nature of those seats makes our stadium more attractive for hosting and therefore brings in more funds.
It seems to me that this is just another lazy attempt to bash Levy and it's weak, really weak.
posted on 4/4/23
Oh, and speaking as an Art Director, I think it looks so much better with blank seats anyway. Putting the logo on every seat is very cheap looking.
posted on 4/4/23
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 2 minutes ago
It's not uncommon for football stadium seats to just adhere to the colour of the team without having a logo on. There's a whacking great cockerel on the stadium roof. It's clear who we are. There's a thousand LED screens adorned with our branding that are then interchangeable depending on what sport is being hosted. It's a smart move to do it this way as if it's a multi-use stadium it has to be adaptable.
Honestly, Levy can't win here. He tries to build something to allow us to ultimately spend more and in order to maximise that transfer budget, he comes up with a stadium that's adaptable. You criticise him for not having the logo on the seats yet you moan when there isn't a transfer budget to spend on players. The generic nature of those seats makes our stadium more attractive for hosting and therefore brings in more funds.
It seems to me that this is just another lazy attempt to bash Levy and it's weak, really weak.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry Daniel lol
posted on 4/4/23
comment by Hezzman (U21558)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 2 minutes ago
It's not uncommon for football stadium seats to just adhere to the colour of the team without having a logo on. There's a whacking great cockerel on the stadium roof. It's clear who we are. There's a thousand LED screens adorned with our branding that are then interchangeable depending on what sport is being hosted. It's a smart move to do it this way as if it's a multi-use stadium it has to be adaptable.
Honestly, Levy can't win here. He tries to build something to allow us to ultimately spend more and in order to maximise that transfer budget, he comes up with a stadium that's adaptable. You criticise him for not having the logo on the seats yet you moan when there isn't a transfer budget to spend on players. The generic nature of those seats makes our stadium more attractive for hosting and therefore brings in more funds.
It seems to me that this is just another lazy attempt to bash Levy and it's weak, really weak.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry Daniel lol
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let me explain a story about my GCSE results to inspire you
posted on 4/4/23
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 4/4/23
comment by Ace (U22861)
posted 13 minutes ago
I don’t see that this is an issue really, but I do hope said stadium is absolutely toxic at the weekend with Levy Out banners everywhere and sack the board being sung from the rafters. Levy deserves to be harangued, harassed and humiliated - and if that miserable piece of filth Lewis should ever decide to show his face there again he ought to be pelted with rotten eggs and rancid fruit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s going to be toxic on Saturday , especially if we concede early
The fans will turn big time
I see nothing but Brighton carving us open time and time again ….if we can’t even muster a bit of possession against a shat Everton team down to 10 men what we gonna do against an inform Brighton who play fast attacking football
posted on 4/4/23
I find it bemusing there have been no takers for naming rights to the best stadium in the country.
posted on 4/4/23
Brighton should really beat you so i guess that's a spurs win then.
posted on 4/4/23
I wonder how much Blofeld is demanding for naming rights
posted on 5/4/23
comment by HB Fashion Sakala is offside again (U21935)
posted 1 day ago
I find it bemusing there have been no takers for naming rights to the best stadium in the country.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Todd Kline is enjoying himself
Page 1 of 1