felt so bad for him, he looked absolutely destroyed when he came off. can't imagine what that would feel like.
hope he gets a move for his own sake
Bit harsh on Palace and wolves mate. They don’t deserve that
Reacting while in attendance at an actual game remains the best and most effective way for fans to voice their opinion. Those reactions when positive can do wonders for an individual players performance, and I doubt anyone would be against that.
So the players have to take the negative reactions also. If the player can’t handle that, then they don’t have the mentality to be a top player, and mentality is what makes a top player.
So I don’t agree. Positive reactions and negative reactions should be equally encouraged. It isn’t the Crowds (supporters) job to wrap players in cotton wool and never be critical. Especially so at games.
At games - that’s really the only true voice that any fan has.
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
Reacting while in attendance at an actual game remains the best and most effective way for fans to voice their opinion. Those reactions when positive can do wonders for an individual players performance, and I doubt anyone would be against that.
So the players have to take the negative reactions also. If the player can’t handle that, then they don’t have the mentality to be a top player, and mentality is what makes a top player.
So I don’t agree. Positive reactions and negative reactions should be equally encouraged. It isn’t the Crowds (supporters) job to wrap players in cotton wool and never be critical. Especially so at games.
At games - that’s really the only true voice that any fan has.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
booing a team is one thing, singling out an individual and having thousands boo you every time you touch the ball is another.
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
Reacting while in attendance at an actual game remains the best and most effective way for fans to voice their opinion. Those reactions when positive can do wonders for an individual players performance, and I doubt anyone would be against that.
So the players have to take the negative reactions also. If the player can’t handle that, then they don’t have the mentality to be a top player, and mentality is what makes a top player.
So I don’t agree. Positive reactions and negative reactions should be equally encouraged. It isn’t the Crowds (supporters) job to wrap players in cotton wool and never be critical. Especially so at games.
At games - that’s really the only true voice that any fan has.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
booing a team is one thing, singling out an individual and having thousands boo you every time you touch the ball is another.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed Chris
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
Reacting while in attendance at an actual game remains the best and most effective way for fans to voice their opinion. Those reactions when positive can do wonders for an individual players performance, and I doubt anyone would be against that.
So the players have to take the negative reactions also. If the player can’t handle that, then they don’t have the mentality to be a top player, and mentality is what makes a top player.
So I don’t agree. Positive reactions and negative reactions should be equally encouraged. It isn’t the Crowds (supporters) job to wrap players in cotton wool and never be critical. Especially so at games.
At games - that’s really the only true voice that any fan has.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
booing a team is one thing, singling out an individual and having thousands boo you every time you touch the ball is another.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it is, but that booing happens for a reason. Fans don’t arbitrarily pick on individual players.
If the player can’t handle that, then they aren’t cut out for football at the very highest level.
The problem doesn’t lie with the crowd. The problem lies with the player. It’s up to that individual player to prove the fans wrong.
Like I say, it all essentially boils down to mentality.
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
Reacting while in attendance at an actual game remains the best and most effective way for fans to voice their opinion. Those reactions when positive can do wonders for an individual players performance, and I doubt anyone would be against that.
So the players have to take the negative reactions also. If the player can’t handle that, then they don’t have the mentality to be a top player, and mentality is what makes a top player.
So I don’t agree. Positive reactions and negative reactions should be equally encouraged. It isn’t the Crowds (supporters) job to wrap players in cotton wool and never be critical. Especially so at games.
At games - that’s really the only true voice that any fan has.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
booing a team is one thing, singling out an individual and having thousands boo you every time you touch the ball is another.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it is, but that booing happens for a reason. Fans don’t arbitrarily pick on individual players.
If the player can’t handle that, then they aren’t cut out for football at the very highest level.
The problem doesn’t lie with the crowd. The problem lies with the player. It’s up to that individual player to prove the fans wrong.
Like I say, it all essentially boils down to mentality.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
nah that's so cold of you. being booed by thousands of your own fans as soon as you step on the pitch must be absolutely soul destroying, regardless of your 'mentality'.
Sanchez's problem isn't his attitude, nobody who had a clue would question how hard he's trying out on the pitch. the problem is his ability, which is only hampered by his confidence being knocked. he looked like a broken man when he came off today, most players would do.
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
Reacting while in attendance at an actual game remains the best and most effective way for fans to voice their opinion. Those reactions when positive can do wonders for an individual players performance, and I doubt anyone would be against that.
So the players have to take the negative reactions also. If the player can’t handle that, then they don’t have the mentality to be a top player, and mentality is what makes a top player.
So I don’t agree. Positive reactions and negative reactions should be equally encouraged. It isn’t the Crowds (supporters) job to wrap players in cotton wool and never be critical. Especially so at games.
At games - that’s really the only true voice that any fan has.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
booing a team is one thing, singling out an individual and having thousands boo you every time you touch the ball is another.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it is, but that booing happens for a reason. Fans don’t arbitrarily pick on individual players.
If the player can’t handle that, then they aren’t cut out for football at the very highest level.
The problem doesn’t lie with the crowd. The problem lies with the player. It’s up to that individual player to prove the fans wrong.
Like I say, it all essentially boils down to mentality.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should boo when Dier, Porro, Kulu, etc. then whenever they touch the ball then. No reason why it should just be Sanchez, and I feel awful for him. Football fans can be so mindless at times, completely detached from reality.
Sanchez is objectively awful. I feel that part of the booing (and cheering when he was taken off) lay more with the decision to bring him on. Booing the fact that he's our option, still. Booing that Conte-lite couldn't see we'd benefit far more from switching formation when Lenglet went off by bringing on another man in midfield. That feeling was then cemented by Sanchez being woeful.
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 10 seconds ago
Sanchez is objectively awful. I feel that part of the booing (and cheering when he was taken off) lay more with the decision to bring him on. Booing the fact that he's our option, still. Booing that Conte-lite couldn't see we'd benefit far more from switching formation when Lenglet went off by bringing on another man in midfield. That feeling was then cemented by Sanchez being woeful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I find it hard to see it like that when he was getting booed on the ball too. it felt very personal
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
Reacting while in attendance at an actual game remains the best and most effective way for fans to voice their opinion. Those reactions when positive can do wonders for an individual players performance, and I doubt anyone would be against that.
So the players have to take the negative reactions also. If the player can’t handle that, then they don’t have the mentality to be a top player, and mentality is what makes a top player.
So I don’t agree. Positive reactions and negative reactions should be equally encouraged. It isn’t the Crowds (supporters) job to wrap players in cotton wool and never be critical. Especially so at games.
At games - that’s really the only true voice that any fan has.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
booing a team is one thing, singling out an individual and having thousands boo you every time you touch the ball is another.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it is, but that booing happens for a reason. Fans don’t arbitrarily pick on individual players.
If the player can’t handle that, then they aren’t cut out for football at the very highest level.
The problem doesn’t lie with the crowd. The problem lies with the player. It’s up to that individual player to prove the fans wrong.
Like I say, it all essentially boils down to mentality.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
nah that's so cold of you. being booed by thousands of your own fans as soon as you step on the pitch must be absolutely soul destroying, regardless of your 'mentality'.
Sanchez's problem isn't his attitude, nobody who had a clue would question how hard he's trying out on the pitch. the problem is his ability, which is only hampered by his confidence being knocked. he looked like a broken man when he came off today, most players would do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If the problem is his ability, then the problem lies with management who keep on playing him. If he isn’t good enough, then he isn’t good enough. So why shouldn’t fans boo a player who isn’t good enough? Why should they care about the players mentality, when he isn’t good enough to play at the level the team is at? Get rid? Deadwood? These are common themes on fans forums and common comments made by Match going fans.
If the problem with him lies in his actual ability rather than his own personal mentality, then absolutely he should be booed - and more to the point, shouldn’t even be selected to play in the first instance.
If you’ve got no one better, then where, really, does the problem lie?
with the player?
With the fans?
With the management?
With the owners?
like I said, that's so cold of you. the obvious answer to the question of why shouldn't fans boo a player who isn't good enough is because they're human beings and it would be heart breaking to go through.
I have no problems with fans booing the team as a whole as a means to voice their frustrations. picking out individuals and booing them when they came on and when they get the ball is just cuuuunty.
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 10 seconds ago
Sanchez is objectively awful. I feel that part of the booing (and cheering when he was taken off) lay more with the decision to bring him on. Booing the fact that he's our option, still. Booing that Conte-lite couldn't see we'd benefit far more from switching formation when Lenglet went off by bringing on another man in midfield. That feeling was then cemented by Sanchez being woeful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I find it hard to see it like that when he was getting booed on the ball too. it felt very personal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. Getting booed everyone he touches the ball ffs like he’s Sol Campball he’s just a bit chite like half the squad, but they single out him.
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
I have no problems with fans booing the team as a whole as a means to voice their frustrations. picking out individuals and booing them when they came on and when they get the ball is just cuuuunty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Definitely agree with this, not a nice thing to see.
Awwww diddums Davinson
Look, these players get paid a fortune for a reason. They have to put up with stuff like this, that’s why they get the big bucks. If they can’t handle it then don’t take your 5 million a year, more than the average person will ever see in their entire life.
As someone just said, if you don’t have the mental strength to be a top player then don’t steal a living at a big club, as this is the kind of thing that will happen
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 10 seconds ago
Sanchez is objectively awful. I feel that part of the booing (and cheering when he was taken off) lay more with the decision to bring him on. Booing the fact that he's our option, still. Booing that Conte-lite couldn't see we'd benefit far more from switching formation when Lenglet went off by bringing on another man in midfield. That feeling was then cemented by Sanchez being woeful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I find it hard to see it like that when he was getting booed on the ball too. it felt very personal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Booing any of our players is awful. But let’s be honest, he is a horrendous player. So far out of his depth at this level. That defending for Bournemouth’s second goal was tragic
He should have been sold two years ago
Just to caveat, I don’t like individual booing or cheering when an individual comes off.
Booing the team is fine. But singling out players like that is awful. We have some of the worst fans for that
comment by Sir Tottenham of Hotspur (U17379)
posted 3 minutes ago
Awwww diddums Davinson
Look, these players get paid a fortune for a reason. They have to put up with stuff like this, that’s why they get the big bucks. If they can’t handle it then don’t take your 5 million a year, more than the average person will ever see in their entire life.
As someone just said, if you don’t have the mental strength to be a top player then don’t steal a living at a big club, as this is the kind of thing that will happen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing to do with the millions he gets. An awful take completely devoid of compassion and foresight. He’s allowed to get emotional when his own fan fanbase make it very personal with him, many other players should be getting booed by those standards.
Muggy Spurs fans reaping what they sow.
Sanchez has sacrificed more, tried harder and given more to spurs than all of us have done in our lifetime combined.
He isn’t a player with a bad attitude or who speaks bad about the club, he is a great professional who has tried his hardest for the club.
What he also is, is a good defender at covering a high line and defending space - but poor on the ball and when asked to defend deeper. Even peak Baresi would look rusty having played roughly less than 90 mins in the league since the WC break.
Everything that went wrong with him today was completely the fault of the management, tactics and rotation.
The fans to boo/cheer a player like this is disgraceful - he isn’t the causation of all our problems, so he shouldn’t be the funnel of ‘fans’ hatred.
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 15 minutes ago
Just to caveat, I don’t like individual booing or cheering when an individual comes off.
Booing the team is fine. But singling out players like that is awful. We have some of the worst fans for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is boo urns ok?
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 8 minutes ago
Muggy Spurs fans reaping what they sow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Meaning what exactly
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 11 minutes ago
Muggy Spurs fans reaping what they sow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You love Harry Kane. Admit it
Sign in if you want to comment
Davinson Sanchez
Page 1 of 2
posted on 15/4/23
felt so bad for him, he looked absolutely destroyed when he came off. can't imagine what that would feel like.
hope he gets a move for his own sake
posted on 15/4/23
Bit harsh on Palace and wolves mate. They don’t deserve that
posted on 15/4/23
Reacting while in attendance at an actual game remains the best and most effective way for fans to voice their opinion. Those reactions when positive can do wonders for an individual players performance, and I doubt anyone would be against that.
So the players have to take the negative reactions also. If the player can’t handle that, then they don’t have the mentality to be a top player, and mentality is what makes a top player.
So I don’t agree. Positive reactions and negative reactions should be equally encouraged. It isn’t the Crowds (supporters) job to wrap players in cotton wool and never be critical. Especially so at games.
At games - that’s really the only true voice that any fan has.
posted on 15/4/23
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
Reacting while in attendance at an actual game remains the best and most effective way for fans to voice their opinion. Those reactions when positive can do wonders for an individual players performance, and I doubt anyone would be against that.
So the players have to take the negative reactions also. If the player can’t handle that, then they don’t have the mentality to be a top player, and mentality is what makes a top player.
So I don’t agree. Positive reactions and negative reactions should be equally encouraged. It isn’t the Crowds (supporters) job to wrap players in cotton wool and never be critical. Especially so at games.
At games - that’s really the only true voice that any fan has.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
booing a team is one thing, singling out an individual and having thousands boo you every time you touch the ball is another.
posted on 15/4/23
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
Reacting while in attendance at an actual game remains the best and most effective way for fans to voice their opinion. Those reactions when positive can do wonders for an individual players performance, and I doubt anyone would be against that.
So the players have to take the negative reactions also. If the player can’t handle that, then they don’t have the mentality to be a top player, and mentality is what makes a top player.
So I don’t agree. Positive reactions and negative reactions should be equally encouraged. It isn’t the Crowds (supporters) job to wrap players in cotton wool and never be critical. Especially so at games.
At games - that’s really the only true voice that any fan has.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
booing a team is one thing, singling out an individual and having thousands boo you every time you touch the ball is another.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed Chris
posted on 15/4/23
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
Reacting while in attendance at an actual game remains the best and most effective way for fans to voice their opinion. Those reactions when positive can do wonders for an individual players performance, and I doubt anyone would be against that.
So the players have to take the negative reactions also. If the player can’t handle that, then they don’t have the mentality to be a top player, and mentality is what makes a top player.
So I don’t agree. Positive reactions and negative reactions should be equally encouraged. It isn’t the Crowds (supporters) job to wrap players in cotton wool and never be critical. Especially so at games.
At games - that’s really the only true voice that any fan has.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
booing a team is one thing, singling out an individual and having thousands boo you every time you touch the ball is another.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it is, but that booing happens for a reason. Fans don’t arbitrarily pick on individual players.
If the player can’t handle that, then they aren’t cut out for football at the very highest level.
The problem doesn’t lie with the crowd. The problem lies with the player. It’s up to that individual player to prove the fans wrong.
Like I say, it all essentially boils down to mentality.
posted on 15/4/23
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
Reacting while in attendance at an actual game remains the best and most effective way for fans to voice their opinion. Those reactions when positive can do wonders for an individual players performance, and I doubt anyone would be against that.
So the players have to take the negative reactions also. If the player can’t handle that, then they don’t have the mentality to be a top player, and mentality is what makes a top player.
So I don’t agree. Positive reactions and negative reactions should be equally encouraged. It isn’t the Crowds (supporters) job to wrap players in cotton wool and never be critical. Especially so at games.
At games - that’s really the only true voice that any fan has.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
booing a team is one thing, singling out an individual and having thousands boo you every time you touch the ball is another.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it is, but that booing happens for a reason. Fans don’t arbitrarily pick on individual players.
If the player can’t handle that, then they aren’t cut out for football at the very highest level.
The problem doesn’t lie with the crowd. The problem lies with the player. It’s up to that individual player to prove the fans wrong.
Like I say, it all essentially boils down to mentality.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
nah that's so cold of you. being booed by thousands of your own fans as soon as you step on the pitch must be absolutely soul destroying, regardless of your 'mentality'.
Sanchez's problem isn't his attitude, nobody who had a clue would question how hard he's trying out on the pitch. the problem is his ability, which is only hampered by his confidence being knocked. he looked like a broken man when he came off today, most players would do.
posted on 15/4/23
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
Reacting while in attendance at an actual game remains the best and most effective way for fans to voice their opinion. Those reactions when positive can do wonders for an individual players performance, and I doubt anyone would be against that.
So the players have to take the negative reactions also. If the player can’t handle that, then they don’t have the mentality to be a top player, and mentality is what makes a top player.
So I don’t agree. Positive reactions and negative reactions should be equally encouraged. It isn’t the Crowds (supporters) job to wrap players in cotton wool and never be critical. Especially so at games.
At games - that’s really the only true voice that any fan has.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
booing a team is one thing, singling out an individual and having thousands boo you every time you touch the ball is another.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it is, but that booing happens for a reason. Fans don’t arbitrarily pick on individual players.
If the player can’t handle that, then they aren’t cut out for football at the very highest level.
The problem doesn’t lie with the crowd. The problem lies with the player. It’s up to that individual player to prove the fans wrong.
Like I say, it all essentially boils down to mentality.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They should boo when Dier, Porro, Kulu, etc. then whenever they touch the ball then. No reason why it should just be Sanchez, and I feel awful for him. Football fans can be so mindless at times, completely detached from reality.
posted on 15/4/23
Sanchez is objectively awful. I feel that part of the booing (and cheering when he was taken off) lay more with the decision to bring him on. Booing the fact that he's our option, still. Booing that Conte-lite couldn't see we'd benefit far more from switching formation when Lenglet went off by bringing on another man in midfield. That feeling was then cemented by Sanchez being woeful.
posted on 15/4/23
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 10 seconds ago
Sanchez is objectively awful. I feel that part of the booing (and cheering when he was taken off) lay more with the decision to bring him on. Booing the fact that he's our option, still. Booing that Conte-lite couldn't see we'd benefit far more from switching formation when Lenglet went off by bringing on another man in midfield. That feeling was then cemented by Sanchez being woeful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I find it hard to see it like that when he was getting booed on the ball too. it felt very personal
posted on 15/4/23
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
Reacting while in attendance at an actual game remains the best and most effective way for fans to voice their opinion. Those reactions when positive can do wonders for an individual players performance, and I doubt anyone would be against that.
So the players have to take the negative reactions also. If the player can’t handle that, then they don’t have the mentality to be a top player, and mentality is what makes a top player.
So I don’t agree. Positive reactions and negative reactions should be equally encouraged. It isn’t the Crowds (supporters) job to wrap players in cotton wool and never be critical. Especially so at games.
At games - that’s really the only true voice that any fan has.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
booing a team is one thing, singling out an individual and having thousands boo you every time you touch the ball is another.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it is, but that booing happens for a reason. Fans don’t arbitrarily pick on individual players.
If the player can’t handle that, then they aren’t cut out for football at the very highest level.
The problem doesn’t lie with the crowd. The problem lies with the player. It’s up to that individual player to prove the fans wrong.
Like I say, it all essentially boils down to mentality.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
nah that's so cold of you. being booed by thousands of your own fans as soon as you step on the pitch must be absolutely soul destroying, regardless of your 'mentality'.
Sanchez's problem isn't his attitude, nobody who had a clue would question how hard he's trying out on the pitch. the problem is his ability, which is only hampered by his confidence being knocked. he looked like a broken man when he came off today, most players would do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If the problem is his ability, then the problem lies with management who keep on playing him. If he isn’t good enough, then he isn’t good enough. So why shouldn’t fans boo a player who isn’t good enough? Why should they care about the players mentality, when he isn’t good enough to play at the level the team is at? Get rid? Deadwood? These are common themes on fans forums and common comments made by Match going fans.
If the problem with him lies in his actual ability rather than his own personal mentality, then absolutely he should be booed - and more to the point, shouldn’t even be selected to play in the first instance.
If you’ve got no one better, then where, really, does the problem lie?
with the player?
With the fans?
With the management?
With the owners?
posted on 15/4/23
like I said, that's so cold of you. the obvious answer to the question of why shouldn't fans boo a player who isn't good enough is because they're human beings and it would be heart breaking to go through.
posted on 15/4/23
I have no problems with fans booing the team as a whole as a means to voice their frustrations. picking out individuals and booing them when they came on and when they get the ball is just cuuuunty.
posted on 15/4/23
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 10 seconds ago
Sanchez is objectively awful. I feel that part of the booing (and cheering when he was taken off) lay more with the decision to bring him on. Booing the fact that he's our option, still. Booing that Conte-lite couldn't see we'd benefit far more from switching formation when Lenglet went off by bringing on another man in midfield. That feeling was then cemented by Sanchez being woeful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I find it hard to see it like that when he was getting booed on the ball too. it felt very personal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agreed. Getting booed everyone he touches the ball ffs like he’s Sol Campball he’s just a bit chite like half the squad, but they single out him.
posted on 15/4/23
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
I have no problems with fans booing the team as a whole as a means to voice their frustrations. picking out individuals and booing them when they came on and when they get the ball is just cuuuunty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Definitely agree with this, not a nice thing to see.
posted on 15/4/23
Awwww diddums Davinson
Look, these players get paid a fortune for a reason. They have to put up with stuff like this, that’s why they get the big bucks. If they can’t handle it then don’t take your 5 million a year, more than the average person will ever see in their entire life.
As someone just said, if you don’t have the mental strength to be a top player then don’t steal a living at a big club, as this is the kind of thing that will happen
posted on 15/4/23
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 10 seconds ago
Sanchez is objectively awful. I feel that part of the booing (and cheering when he was taken off) lay more with the decision to bring him on. Booing the fact that he's our option, still. Booing that Conte-lite couldn't see we'd benefit far more from switching formation when Lenglet went off by bringing on another man in midfield. That feeling was then cemented by Sanchez being woeful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I find it hard to see it like that when he was getting booed on the ball too. it felt very personal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Booing any of our players is awful. But let’s be honest, he is a horrendous player. So far out of his depth at this level. That defending for Bournemouth’s second goal was tragic
posted on 15/4/23
He should have been sold two years ago
posted on 15/4/23
Just to caveat, I don’t like individual booing or cheering when an individual comes off.
Booing the team is fine. But singling out players like that is awful. We have some of the worst fans for that
posted on 15/4/23
comment by Sir Tottenham of Hotspur (U17379)
posted 3 minutes ago
Awwww diddums Davinson
Look, these players get paid a fortune for a reason. They have to put up with stuff like this, that’s why they get the big bucks. If they can’t handle it then don’t take your 5 million a year, more than the average person will ever see in their entire life.
As someone just said, if you don’t have the mental strength to be a top player then don’t steal a living at a big club, as this is the kind of thing that will happen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing to do with the millions he gets. An awful take completely devoid of compassion and foresight. He’s allowed to get emotional when his own fan fanbase make it very personal with him, many other players should be getting booed by those standards.
posted on 15/4/23
Muggy Spurs fans reaping what they sow.
posted on 15/4/23
Sanchez has sacrificed more, tried harder and given more to spurs than all of us have done in our lifetime combined.
He isn’t a player with a bad attitude or who speaks bad about the club, he is a great professional who has tried his hardest for the club.
What he also is, is a good defender at covering a high line and defending space - but poor on the ball and when asked to defend deeper. Even peak Baresi would look rusty having played roughly less than 90 mins in the league since the WC break.
Everything that went wrong with him today was completely the fault of the management, tactics and rotation.
The fans to boo/cheer a player like this is disgraceful - he isn’t the causation of all our problems, so he shouldn’t be the funnel of ‘fans’ hatred.
posted on 15/4/23
comment by palmers_spur (U8896)
posted 15 minutes ago
Just to caveat, I don’t like individual booing or cheering when an individual comes off.
Booing the team is fine. But singling out players like that is awful. We have some of the worst fans for that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is boo urns ok?
posted on 15/4/23
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 8 minutes ago
Muggy Spurs fans reaping what they sow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Meaning what exactly
posted on 15/4/23
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 11 minutes ago
Muggy Spurs fans reaping what they sow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You love Harry Kane. Admit it
Page 1 of 2