comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 15 hours, 49 minutes ago
I’m presuming that you think City are guilty.
Am I wrong to presume that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have no idea if City are guilty of what they have been accused. No-one here does.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by Cinciwolf----Old Trafford record attendance...... (U11551)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 10 seconds ago
Probably true which is where I don't quite understand why PSG and City at times feel the need to pay over the asking rate.
-----------------------------------------
Why group City in with PSG?
£53m for Haaland and £19m for Alvarez was way over the top.
PSG who are in the 5th rated European league, with attendances that would place them between Newcastle and Villa if they were in the Prem, receive Championship levels of TV money and could only afford to pay £200m for Mbappe because they are totally dependant on sponsorship money which UEFA completely ignores.
City celebrated the 129th anniversary yesterday of changing their name from Ardwick FC to Manchester City F.C.
PSG celebrate the 50th anniversary of the formation in 2 years time, anyone who compares the 2 clubs is a clueless idiot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You seriously don't see a link in how both clubs go about business?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all, our prize and TV money was nearly £200m last season, we didn't need a huge handout from the owners.
Like I said, only clueless idiots could find a connection.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The story that preceded the link between City and PSG was Haalands transfer and how he reportedly turned down Bayern Munich's 250 million euro's package and a 35m/year gross salary
Obviously the City package is structured differently and I can understand why they offered more to secure the player but I dont think they needed to.
With Pep as the manager I still think Haaland would have joined for the same fees or maybe slightly less. Just a hunch.
PL's handling of City's financial doping
Page 3 of 3
posted on 18/4/23
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 15 hours, 49 minutes ago
I’m presuming that you think City are guilty.
Am I wrong to presume that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have no idea if City are guilty of what they have been accused. No-one here does.
posted on 18/4/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 18 hours, 55 minutes ago
comment by Cinciwolf----Old Trafford record attendance...... (U11551)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 10 seconds ago
Probably true which is where I don't quite understand why PSG and City at times feel the need to pay over the asking rate.
-----------------------------------------
Why group City in with PSG?
£53m for Haaland and £19m for Alvarez was way over the top.
PSG who are in the 5th rated European league, with attendances that would place them between Newcastle and Villa if they were in the Prem, receive Championship levels of TV money and could only afford to pay £200m for Mbappe because they are totally dependant on sponsorship money which UEFA completely ignores.
City celebrated the 129th anniversary yesterday of changing their name from Ardwick FC to Manchester City F.C.
PSG celebrate the 50th anniversary of the formation in 2 years time, anyone who compares the 2 clubs is a clueless idiot.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You seriously don't see a link in how both clubs go about business?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at all, our prize and TV money was nearly £200m last season, we didn't need a huge handout from the owners.
Like I said, only clueless idiots could find a connection.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The story that preceded the link between City and PSG was Haalands transfer and how he reportedly turned down Bayern Munich's 250 million euro's package and a 35m/year gross salary
Obviously the City package is structured differently and I can understand why they offered more to secure the player but I dont think they needed to.
With Pep as the manager I still think Haaland would have joined for the same fees or maybe slightly less. Just a hunch.
Page 3 of 3