comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 1 hour, 35 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/UnitedLatesNews/status/1665692671896158208?t=WeNbg_l4UDkHKXPqGPx3nw&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is this account trustworthy?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesn't look like it
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 9 hours, 19 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/UnitedLatesNews/status/1665692671896158208?t=WeNbg_l4UDkHKXPqGPx3nw&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't know if this is reliable but this is what I think though. We need him to be performing at a high level first but we are going to try and see if he can perform. "Packaging" of the situation is doable if he's actually playing at a level that he'll make Antony a role player.
Let's leave the agendas involved.
comment by Redastomatoes- Feels very Moyesian...cleverson forever!If he is good enough he is ready! (U12026)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 9 hours, 19 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/UnitedLatesNews/status/1665692671896158208?t=WeNbg_l4UDkHKXPqGPx3nw&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't know if this is reliable but this is what I think though. We need him to be performing at a high level first but we are going to try and see if he can perform. "Packaging" of the situation is doable if he's actually playing at a level that he'll make Antony a role player.
Let's leave the agendas involved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We need him to fack off somewhere else is what we need from him
comment by Redastomatoes- Feels very Moyesian...cleverson forever!If he is good enough he is ready! (U12026)
posted 52 minutes ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 9 hours, 19 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/UnitedLatesNews/status/1665692671896158208?t=WeNbg_l4UDkHKXPqGPx3nw&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't know if this is reliable but this is what I think though. We need him to be performing at a high level first but we are going to try and see if he can perform. "Packaging" of the situation is doable if he's actually playing at a level that he'll make Antony a role player.
Let's leave the agendas involved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you mean by agendas? I don't think anyone has any agendas. Some people aren't morally comfortable with him representing the club again. Some people are. That is it really.
Using words like agenda makes it sound as though some supporters have it in for Greenwood and are using this incident to attack him. Which simply isn't the case. We were all united in how excited we were to have such a talented youngster at the club and looking forwards to seeing him develop.
Martin Samuel has written a piece in The Times saying that it is suspected that the owners are stalling on making a decision on Greenwood, as they are hoping that the new owners will have to deal with it. Or that Juve or another club will sign him. Looks like it could drag on a while longer.
People most certainly have had agendas.
There have been 2 sides to this case.
Those that made their mind up on day 1 and won't change that opinion unless they are given an explanation they deem satisfactory, and then there are those that considered there could be more to the story than we knew, and trusted in the legal process and clubs assessment of the situation.
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 5 minutes ago
People most certainly have had agendas.
There have been 2 sides to this case.
Those that made their mind up on day 1 and won't change that opinion unless they are given an explanation they deem satisfactory, and then there are those that considered there could be more to the story than we knew, and trusted in the legal process and clubs assessment of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting. Which side are you on?
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 5 minutes ago
People most certainly have had agendas.
There have been 2 sides to this case.
Those that made their mind up on day 1 and won't change that opinion unless they are given an explanation they deem satisfactory, and then there are those that considered there could be more to the story than we knew, and trusted in the legal process and clubs assessment of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting. Which side are you on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The right one
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 5 minutes ago
People most certainly have had agendas.
There have been 2 sides to this case.
Those that made their mind up on day 1 and won't change that opinion unless they are given an explanation they deem satisfactory, and then there are those that considered there could be more to the story than we knew, and trusted in the legal process and clubs assessment of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting. Which side are you on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And you?
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 5 minutes ago
People most certainly have had agendas.
There have been 2 sides to this case.
Those that made their mind up on day 1 and won't change that opinion unless they are given an explanation they deem satisfactory, and then there are those that considered there could be more to the story than we knew, and trusted in the legal process and clubs assessment of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting. Which side are you on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The right one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 18 minutes ago
People most certainly have had agendas.
There have been 2 sides to this case.
Those that made their mind up on day 1 and won't change that opinion unless they are given an explanation they deem satisfactory, and then there are those that considered there could be more to the story than we knew, and trusted in the legal process and clubs assessment of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look at the recent comment from Baz Tard.
Has he judged and condemned MG, or is he willing to consider there might be more to this than we currently know?
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 19 minutes ago
People most certainly have had agendas.
There have been 2 sides to this case.
Those that made their mind up on day 1 and won't change that opinion unless they are given an explanation they deem satisfactory, and then there are those that considered there could be more to the story than we knew, and trusted in the legal process and clubs assessment of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You missed the 3rd group, of which you belong.
Those that are so threatened by women that they will believe that any abuse case must have at least some blame attributed to the woman.
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin (U2958)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 19 minutes ago
People most certainly have had agendas.
There have been 2 sides to this case.
Those that made their mind up on day 1 and won't change that opinion unless they are given an explanation they deem satisfactory, and then there are those that considered there could be more to the story than we knew, and trusted in the legal process and clubs assessment of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You missed the 3rd group, of which you belong.
Those that are so threatened by women that they will believe that any abuse case must have at least some blame attributed to the woman.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Iv never blamed her for anything.
Clearly you are in the overly sensitive, easily offended mind made up camp.
I look at this like I'd look at someone hanging around my daughter.
Regardless of the legal decision (OJ was found 'not guilty' would I want Mason around my daughter? No, of couse not. As such, I wouldn't want them representing my football club either.
It's those that have suggested the 'victim' would drop everything for a few quid that are disrespecting the 'victim' not me.
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 5 minutes ago
People most certainly have had agendas.
There have been 2 sides to this case.
Those that made their mind up on day 1 and won't change that opinion unless they are given an explanation they deem satisfactory, and then there are those that considered there could be more to the story than we knew, and trusted in the legal process and clubs assessment of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting. Which side are you on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The right one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You mean you believe that you are taking the High Road whilst most others on here and taking the Low Road?
We are back to High Horses and Moral Codes again.
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 55 seconds ago
I look at this like I'd look at someone hanging around my daughter.
Regardless of the legal decision (OJ was found 'not guilty'would I want Mason around my daughter? No, of couse not. As such, I wouldn't want them representing my football club either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No matter the truth?
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
I look at this like I'd look at someone hanging around my daughter.
Regardless of the legal decision (OJ was found 'not guilty'would I want Mason around my daughter? No, of couse not. As such, I wouldn't want them representing my football club either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re either extremely lax about who you let your daughter hang around with or you’re way over the top with how much you care about who should play for your football team.
What a bizarre way of looking at things.
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
I look at this like I'd look at someone hanging around my daughter.
Regardless of the legal decision (OJ was found 'not guilty'would I want Mason around my daughter? No, of couse not. As such, I wouldn't want them representing my football club either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A pretty fair assessment really.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
I look at this like I'd look at someone hanging around my daughter.
Regardless of the legal decision (OJ was found 'not guilty'would I want Mason around my daughter? No, of couse not. As such, I wouldn't want them representing my football club either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re either extremely lax about who you let your daughter hang around with or you’re way over the top with how much you care about who should play for your football team.
What a bizarre way of looking at things.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is that being lax about who he lets his daughter hang around with? Surely if he let her hang around with people like Greenwood, that would be lax?
There has been no legal decision regarding Greenwood. All chargers were dropped and it never went to Court.
Which is much of the problem for many.
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
I look at this like I'd look at someone hanging around my daughter.
Regardless of the legal decision (OJ was found 'not guilty'would I want Mason around my daughter? No, of couse not. As such, I wouldn't want them representing my football club either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A pretty fair assessment really.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wanted Flanagan booted as soon as he smacked his missus about.
It's only even approaching a debate because Greenwood is good I reckon.
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
I look at this like I'd look at someone hanging around my daughter.
Regardless of the legal decision (OJ was found 'not guilty'would I want Mason around my daughter? No, of couse not. As such, I wouldn't want them representing my football club either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A pretty fair assessment really.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine that guy, sitting their alone at Xmas.whilst his wife and daughter are around the son in laws, having considered all the facts, whilst the guy sits there, insisting he is right, no matter the facts. Mumbling about OJ. 😄
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
I look at this like I'd look at someone hanging around my daughter.
Regardless of the legal decision (OJ was found 'not guilty'would I want Mason around my daughter? No, of couse not. As such, I wouldn't want them representing my football club either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re either extremely lax about who you let your daughter hang around with or you’re way over the top with how much you care about who should play for your football team.
What a bizarre way of looking at things.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is that being lax about who he lets his daughter hang around with? Surely if he let her hang around with people like Greenwood, that would be lax?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
'People LIKE Greenwood' ?
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
I look at this like I'd look at someone hanging around my daughter.
Regardless of the legal decision (OJ was found 'not guilty'would I want Mason around my daughter? No, of couse not. As such, I wouldn't want them representing my football club either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re either extremely lax about who you let your daughter hang around with or you’re way over the top with how much you care about who should play for your football team.
What a bizarre way of looking at things.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is that being lax about who he lets his daughter hang around with? Surely if he let her hang around with people like Greenwood, that would be lax?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well yes, it works for the consideration about Greenwood.
But in general? Not at all.
I care way more about who my children spend their lives with than who plays for Man Utd.
Sign in if you want to comment
Greenwood
Page 4 of 10
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 5/6/23
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 1 hour, 35 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/UnitedLatesNews/status/1665692671896158208?t=WeNbg_l4UDkHKXPqGPx3nw&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is this account trustworthy?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Doesn't look like it
posted on 6/6/23
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 9 hours, 19 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/UnitedLatesNews/status/1665692671896158208?t=WeNbg_l4UDkHKXPqGPx3nw&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't know if this is reliable but this is what I think though. We need him to be performing at a high level first but we are going to try and see if he can perform. "Packaging" of the situation is doable if he's actually playing at a level that he'll make Antony a role player.
Let's leave the agendas involved.
posted on 6/6/23
comment by Redastomatoes- Feels very Moyesian...cleverson forever!If he is good enough he is ready! (U12026)
posted 44 minutes ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 9 hours, 19 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/UnitedLatesNews/status/1665692671896158208?t=WeNbg_l4UDkHKXPqGPx3nw&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't know if this is reliable but this is what I think though. We need him to be performing at a high level first but we are going to try and see if he can perform. "Packaging" of the situation is doable if he's actually playing at a level that he'll make Antony a role player.
Let's leave the agendas involved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We need him to fack off somewhere else is what we need from him
posted on 6/6/23
comment by Redastomatoes- Feels very Moyesian...cleverson forever!If he is good enough he is ready! (U12026)
posted 52 minutes ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 9 hours, 19 minutes ago
https://twitter.com/UnitedLatesNews/status/1665692671896158208?t=WeNbg_l4UDkHKXPqGPx3nw&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't know if this is reliable but this is what I think though. We need him to be performing at a high level first but we are going to try and see if he can perform. "Packaging" of the situation is doable if he's actually playing at a level that he'll make Antony a role player.
Let's leave the agendas involved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you mean by agendas? I don't think anyone has any agendas. Some people aren't morally comfortable with him representing the club again. Some people are. That is it really.
Using words like agenda makes it sound as though some supporters have it in for Greenwood and are using this incident to attack him. Which simply isn't the case. We were all united in how excited we were to have such a talented youngster at the club and looking forwards to seeing him develop.
posted on 6/6/23
Martin Samuel has written a piece in The Times saying that it is suspected that the owners are stalling on making a decision on Greenwood, as they are hoping that the new owners will have to deal with it. Or that Juve or another club will sign him. Looks like it could drag on a while longer.
posted on 6/6/23
People most certainly have had agendas.
There have been 2 sides to this case.
Those that made their mind up on day 1 and won't change that opinion unless they are given an explanation they deem satisfactory, and then there are those that considered there could be more to the story than we knew, and trusted in the legal process and clubs assessment of the situation.
posted on 6/6/23
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 5 minutes ago
People most certainly have had agendas.
There have been 2 sides to this case.
Those that made their mind up on day 1 and won't change that opinion unless they are given an explanation they deem satisfactory, and then there are those that considered there could be more to the story than we knew, and trusted in the legal process and clubs assessment of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting. Which side are you on?
posted on 6/6/23
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 5 minutes ago
People most certainly have had agendas.
There have been 2 sides to this case.
Those that made their mind up on day 1 and won't change that opinion unless they are given an explanation they deem satisfactory, and then there are those that considered there could be more to the story than we knew, and trusted in the legal process and clubs assessment of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting. Which side are you on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The right one
posted on 6/6/23
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 5 minutes ago
People most certainly have had agendas.
There have been 2 sides to this case.
Those that made their mind up on day 1 and won't change that opinion unless they are given an explanation they deem satisfactory, and then there are those that considered there could be more to the story than we knew, and trusted in the legal process and clubs assessment of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting. Which side are you on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And you?
posted on 6/6/23
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 5 minutes ago
People most certainly have had agendas.
There have been 2 sides to this case.
Those that made their mind up on day 1 and won't change that opinion unless they are given an explanation they deem satisfactory, and then there are those that considered there could be more to the story than we knew, and trusted in the legal process and clubs assessment of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting. Which side are you on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The right one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 6/6/23
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 18 minutes ago
People most certainly have had agendas.
There have been 2 sides to this case.
Those that made their mind up on day 1 and won't change that opinion unless they are given an explanation they deem satisfactory, and then there are those that considered there could be more to the story than we knew, and trusted in the legal process and clubs assessment of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Look at the recent comment from Baz Tard.
Has he judged and condemned MG, or is he willing to consider there might be more to this than we currently know?
posted on 6/6/23
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 19 minutes ago
People most certainly have had agendas.
There have been 2 sides to this case.
Those that made their mind up on day 1 and won't change that opinion unless they are given an explanation they deem satisfactory, and then there are those that considered there could be more to the story than we knew, and trusted in the legal process and clubs assessment of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You missed the 3rd group, of which you belong.
Those that are so threatened by women that they will believe that any abuse case must have at least some blame attributed to the woman.
posted on 6/6/23
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin (U2958)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 19 minutes ago
People most certainly have had agendas.
There have been 2 sides to this case.
Those that made their mind up on day 1 and won't change that opinion unless they are given an explanation they deem satisfactory, and then there are those that considered there could be more to the story than we knew, and trusted in the legal process and clubs assessment of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You missed the 3rd group, of which you belong.
Those that are so threatened by women that they will believe that any abuse case must have at least some blame attributed to the woman.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Iv never blamed her for anything.
Clearly you are in the overly sensitive, easily offended mind made up camp.
posted on 6/6/23
I look at this like I'd look at someone hanging around my daughter.
Regardless of the legal decision (OJ was found 'not guilty' would I want Mason around my daughter? No, of couse not. As such, I wouldn't want them representing my football club either.
posted on 6/6/23
It's those that have suggested the 'victim' would drop everything for a few quid that are disrespecting the 'victim' not me.
posted on 6/6/23
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by WeekendOffender (U22920)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Dave the Save (U22987)
posted 5 minutes ago
People most certainly have had agendas.
There have been 2 sides to this case.
Those that made their mind up on day 1 and won't change that opinion unless they are given an explanation they deem satisfactory, and then there are those that considered there could be more to the story than we knew, and trusted in the legal process and clubs assessment of the situation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting. Which side are you on?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The right one
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You mean you believe that you are taking the High Road whilst most others on here and taking the Low Road?
We are back to High Horses and Moral Codes again.
posted on 6/6/23
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 55 seconds ago
I look at this like I'd look at someone hanging around my daughter.
Regardless of the legal decision (OJ was found 'not guilty'would I want Mason around my daughter? No, of couse not. As such, I wouldn't want them representing my football club either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No matter the truth?
posted on 6/6/23
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
I look at this like I'd look at someone hanging around my daughter.
Regardless of the legal decision (OJ was found 'not guilty'would I want Mason around my daughter? No, of couse not. As such, I wouldn't want them representing my football club either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re either extremely lax about who you let your daughter hang around with or you’re way over the top with how much you care about who should play for your football team.
What a bizarre way of looking at things.
posted on 6/6/23
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
I look at this like I'd look at someone hanging around my daughter.
Regardless of the legal decision (OJ was found 'not guilty'would I want Mason around my daughter? No, of couse not. As such, I wouldn't want them representing my football club either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A pretty fair assessment really.
posted on 6/6/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
I look at this like I'd look at someone hanging around my daughter.
Regardless of the legal decision (OJ was found 'not guilty'would I want Mason around my daughter? No, of couse not. As such, I wouldn't want them representing my football club either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re either extremely lax about who you let your daughter hang around with or you’re way over the top with how much you care about who should play for your football team.
What a bizarre way of looking at things.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is that being lax about who he lets his daughter hang around with? Surely if he let her hang around with people like Greenwood, that would be lax?
posted on 6/6/23
There has been no legal decision regarding Greenwood. All chargers were dropped and it never went to Court.
Which is much of the problem for many.
posted on 6/6/23
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
I look at this like I'd look at someone hanging around my daughter.
Regardless of the legal decision (OJ was found 'not guilty'would I want Mason around my daughter? No, of couse not. As such, I wouldn't want them representing my football club either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A pretty fair assessment really.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wanted Flanagan booted as soon as he smacked his missus about.
It's only even approaching a debate because Greenwood is good I reckon.
posted on 6/6/23
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
I look at this like I'd look at someone hanging around my daughter.
Regardless of the legal decision (OJ was found 'not guilty'would I want Mason around my daughter? No, of couse not. As such, I wouldn't want them representing my football club either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A pretty fair assessment really.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine that guy, sitting their alone at Xmas.whilst his wife and daughter are around the son in laws, having considered all the facts, whilst the guy sits there, insisting he is right, no matter the facts. Mumbling about OJ. 😄
posted on 6/6/23
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
I look at this like I'd look at someone hanging around my daughter.
Regardless of the legal decision (OJ was found 'not guilty'would I want Mason around my daughter? No, of couse not. As such, I wouldn't want them representing my football club either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re either extremely lax about who you let your daughter hang around with or you’re way over the top with how much you care about who should play for your football team.
What a bizarre way of looking at things.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is that being lax about who he lets his daughter hang around with? Surely if he let her hang around with people like Greenwood, that would be lax?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
'People LIKE Greenwood' ?
posted on 6/6/23
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 2 minutes ago
I look at this like I'd look at someone hanging around my daughter.
Regardless of the legal decision (OJ was found 'not guilty'would I want Mason around my daughter? No, of couse not. As such, I wouldn't want them representing my football club either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re either extremely lax about who you let your daughter hang around with or you’re way over the top with how much you care about who should play for your football team.
What a bizarre way of looking at things.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is that being lax about who he lets his daughter hang around with? Surely if he let her hang around with people like Greenwood, that would be lax?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well yes, it works for the consideration about Greenwood.
But in general? Not at all.
I care way more about who my children spend their lives with than who plays for Man Utd.
Page 4 of 10
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10