Why is 100m ‘monstrous’ for one of the best strikers in the world?

Honestly the journalism in this country is on its knees. This seems to have been written by a child. Not a single quote.

Jog on I say

comment by Mack (U6574)
posted 41 seconds ago
Why is 100m ‘monstrous’ for one of the best strikers in the world?

Honestly the journalism in this country is on its knees. This seems to have been written by a child. Not a single quote.

Jog on I say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
read the link!

Levy wont accept £69m. Even if its the last contract year.
Also If Postecoglu is staying for the long term he will need 2 or 3 transfer windows to build a team that his totally his.
There are at least 3 or 4 players that he will decide are crap and just wont pick them giving youth players or new players a chance.
During a rebuild there is always a risk that results will get worse before they get better

comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Mack (U6574)
posted 41 seconds ago
Why is 100m ‘monstrous’ for one of the best strikers in the world?

Honestly the journalism in this country is on its knees. This seems to have been written by a child. Not a single quote.

Jog on I say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
read the link!
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Just did. What did I say wrong about it?

I want to hear SteveF's thoughts on this.

Absolutely garbage, morespurs could do this better

Is this another of that poster with all the accounts? I feel disgusted with myself that I’ve commented on it if so.

"Real Madrid will not make any ‘movement’ for Chelsea’s Kai Havertz and are instead pursuing the €80million signing of Tottenham striker Harry Kane, according to a report."

According to a report A report that they then do not even go on to reference.

I banged Kate Upton last night, according to a report. So that makes it true, right Lucky me.

comment by Dave&Danny COYH (U4428)
posted 9 minutes ago
Absolutely garbage, morespurs could do this better
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't go overboard!

So the Headline says Kane says ok to 69m exit , he’s not once quoted and I’m pretty certain if he had said okay to Madrid to this journalist I’ve never heard of it would be on SSN, absolute bollix journalism and very misleading.

Can someone please put a list together of what accounts belong to that poster. I do not want to accidentally engage them in any conversation whatsoever

Chill out

Ted really lost his marbles on this article. Not that he had many in the first place.

comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 45 minutes ago
So the Headline says Kane says ok to 69m exit , he’s not once quoted and I’m pretty certain if he had said okay to Madrid to this journalist I’ve never heard of it would be on SSN, absolute bollix journalism and very misleading.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ted is one of those that falls for all the Tabloid bollix, Edward.

A couple of days ago Ted said no manager would be joining Spurs, and that Pochettino will be a serial winner at Chelsea. He really is a fool. Take no notice of what he posts. It`s all total in his head made up nonsense.

People pick and choose what they want to believe from the papers, papers that often call it spot on.

For example, we'll sign Mac Allister, not one direct quote from the club or player, but it'll happen.

comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
"Real Madrid will not make any ‘movement’ for Chelsea’s Kai Havertz and are instead pursuing the €80million signing of Tottenham striker Harry Kane, according to a report."

According to a reportA report that they then do not even go on to reference.

I banged Kate Upton last night, according to a report. So that makes it true, rightLucky me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Go on………

So Kane has gone to Madrid. Doesn't matter because your new manager will bring some replacement from the best team in Scotland.
Things looking up for Madrid's feeder club.

comment by Genius of Nielsen (U9059)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 11 minutes ago
"Real Madrid will not make any ‘movement’ for Chelsea’s Kai Havertz and are instead pursuing the €80million signing of Tottenham striker Harry Kane, according to a report."

According to a reportA report that they then do not even go on to reference.

I banged Kate Upton last night, according to a report. So that makes it true, rightLucky me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Go on………
----------------------------------------------------------------------
She a squirter?

Mind you though,...beware Harry... the Real fans are very fickle.
....
He'll feel right at home.

69s a lovely number atleast.

Would you’d rather sell Kane to Utd for £100m or Real for £70m?

comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 11 hours, 11 minutes ago
Ted really lost his marbles on this article. Not that he had many in the first place.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Says the clown who said Pochettino would only manage Crystal Palace!

Unbelievers and other idiots (i.e., Sandy) can now read the next report on Harry Kane......

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/harry-kane-tottenham-realmadrid-transfer-30171952

Whats the betting this happens...
I'll give odds of 2-1 for those who want to bet it doesn't happen!

One item against Kane moving to Real is that they've reportedly just shell out 100 Mil for Bellingham.
How much money do they have left?
But Bellingham AND Kane .......