Fair play, i realised i had nothing more following this post. The best I had was Aberzombie and Fitch, more a fashion label than cricketer. oh well, look forward to convincing you bradman was twice thebatsman of sachin
I wont convince you though will I? Silly bravado on my part, its all subjective. But...... Bradman was so so far ahead of his comtemporaries, I dont think antone of his time got within 30 runs of his career average.
Sachin meanwhile, absolute genius, wish he was english, can do it in all conditions in all circumstances etc, however is his record THAT much better than that of Rahul Dravid? I actually feel a bit sorry for RD, maybe doesnt get the recognition he deserves. I think if it were not for Sachin you would be defending RD against Ponting and Lara for best batsaman. Maybe he has benefitted from being out of the spotlight (if possible for an indian cricketer!)?
You asked for it
Page 1 of 1
posted on 7/10/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/10/11
Fair play, i realised i had nothing more following this post. The best I had was Aberzombie and Fitch, more a fashion label than cricketer. oh well, look forward to convincing you bradman was twice thebatsman of sachin
posted on 8/10/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 8/10/11
I wont convince you though will I? Silly bravado on my part, its all subjective. But...... Bradman was so so far ahead of his comtemporaries, I dont think antone of his time got within 30 runs of his career average.
Sachin meanwhile, absolute genius, wish he was english, can do it in all conditions in all circumstances etc, however is his record THAT much better than that of Rahul Dravid? I actually feel a bit sorry for RD, maybe doesnt get the recognition he deserves. I think if it were not for Sachin you would be defending RD against Ponting and Lara for best batsaman. Maybe he has benefitted from being out of the spotlight (if possible for an indian cricketer!)?
Page 1 of 1