I have always assumed or thought there was one already

Well deserved of course.

Spurs have ordered one of Richie lifting the Tiger Cup

He took them into the Champions League in 20 consecutive years. Next season will be their first campaign in the competition without Wenger in charge since the 1991-92 European Cup.

I that true?

comment by FFS Mike. (U1170)
posted 27 minutes ago
I have always assumed or thought there was one already

Well deserved of course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think we should have gone for a just a bust like Herbert Chapman. For some reason I find it that extra bit classier than the statues.

The trophy in the statue looks bad

comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted 24 seconds ago
The trophy in the statue looks bad
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should have been gold.

No statue for Henry Norris?

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 33 minutes ago
He took them into the Champions League in 20 consecutive years. Next season will be their first campaign in the competition without Wenger in charge since the 1991-92 European Cup.

I that true?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but they have been in European finals without Wenger during that time. I seem to remember them being totally humiliated by ex-Spurs midfielder Nayim from the halfway line. A beautiful moment.

It seems odd to have so many Highbury legends at The Emirates. None of them achieved anything of note really at that stadium so it does seem a little strange.

Arsenal had a good four or five years there.

comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 33 minutes ago
He took them into the Champions League in 20 consecutive years. Next season will be their first campaign in the competition without Wenger in charge since the 1991-92 European Cup.

I that true?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but they have been in European finals without Wenger during that time. I seem to remember them being totally humiliated by ex-Spurs midfielder Nayim from the halfway line. A beautiful moment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Halfway line Nowhere near the halfway line, strange how that lie seems to have stood so long.

comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 45 seconds ago
Arsenal had a good four or five years there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They really didn't. 1998-2004 were their peak years and by 2006, despite getting to the CL final, they were starting to fade. Bergkamp retired, Henry left and they were gradually replaced with smaller, technical players that just couldn't cut it in the Premier League in the same way. Fabregas and Wilshere aside, the quality dipped and they faded. To claim they 4-5 good years is absurd. Even the most die hard Arsenal fan couldn't dispute that.

comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 45 seconds ago
Arsenal had a good four or five years there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They really didn't. 1998-2004 were their peak years and by 2006, despite getting to the CL final, they were starting to fade. Bergkamp retired, Henry left and they were gradually replaced with smaller, technical players that just couldn't cut it in the Premier League in the same way. Fabregas and Wilshere aside, the quality dipped and they faded. To claim they 4-5 good years is absurd. Even the most die hard Arsenal fan couldn't dispute that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What?

comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 45 seconds ago
Arsenal had a good four or five years there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They really didn't. 1998-2004 were their peak years and by 2006, despite getting to the CL final, they were starting to fade. Bergkamp retired, Henry left and they were gradually replaced with smaller, technical players that just couldn't cut it in the Premier League in the same way. Fabregas and Wilshere aside, the quality dipped and they faded. To claim they 4-5 good years is absurd. Even the most die hard Arsenal fan couldn't dispute that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry old boy, you having troubling grasping plan English?

comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 45 seconds ago
Arsenal had a good four or five years there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They really didn't. 1998-2004 were their peak years and by 2006, despite getting to the CL final, they were starting to fade. Bergkamp retired, Henry left and they were gradually replaced with smaller, technical players that just couldn't cut it in the Premier League in the same way. Fabregas and Wilshere aside, the quality dipped and they faded. To claim they 4-5 good years is absurd. Even the most die hard Arsenal fan couldn't dispute that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry old boy, you having troubling grasping plan English?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

We'll I said they had four or five good years and I'm really not sure what you're saying. Are you saying they didn't?

comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 45 seconds ago
Arsenal had a good four or five years there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They really didn't. 1998-2004 were their peak years and by 2006, despite getting to the CL final, they were starting to fade. Bergkamp retired, Henry left and they were gradually replaced with smaller, technical players that just couldn't cut it in the Premier League in the same way. Fabregas and Wilshere aside, the quality dipped and they faded. To claim they 4-5 good years is absurd. Even the most die hard Arsenal fan couldn't dispute that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry old boy, you having troubling grasping plan English?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

We'll I said they had four or five good years and I'm really not sure what you're saying. Are you saying they didn't?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, they didn't. They moved into the new stadium in 2006, which is when they started to decline. During the 4-5 years you've referenced, they didn't win a single thing. For a club with the history of Arsenal, finishing 4th every season does not constitute "a good year".

I was hoping it was going to be a statue of this

https://i.imgur.com/dyyFGX8.jpg

comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by fridgeboy (U1053)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - At the end of a storm (U6374)
posted 45 seconds ago
Arsenal had a good four or five years there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They really didn't. 1998-2004 were their peak years and by 2006, despite getting to the CL final, they were starting to fade. Bergkamp retired, Henry left and they were gradually replaced with smaller, technical players that just couldn't cut it in the Premier League in the same way. Fabregas and Wilshere aside, the quality dipped and they faded. To claim they 4-5 good years is absurd. Even the most die hard Arsenal fan couldn't dispute that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry old boy, you having troubling grasping plan English?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

We'll I said they had four or five good years and I'm really not sure what you're saying. Are you saying they didn't?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, they didn't. They moved into the new stadium in 2006, which is when they started to decline. During the 4-5 years you've referenced, they didn't win a single thing. For a club with the history of Arsenal, finishing 4th every season does not constitute "a good year".
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Are you drunk? They definitely did have a few good years under Wenger, it's not even up for debate. I didn't reference any years in particular but it's pretty obvious, imo, that I'm talking about when they were winning leagues.

Well deserved.

He’s iconic manger for Arsenal tbf

Richly deserved.

Could've sworn the title said Wagner for a minute

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 19 hours, 40 minutes ago
No statue for Henry Norris?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How do you depict a bribe being handed out in statue form?